User talk:Agnes Monkelbaan/Archive 6

Agnes Monkelbaan/Archive 3: 2017

Quality images

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont in de Langweerder Vaart 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 04:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Hortus Haren. Locatie Chinese tuin Het Verborgen Rijk van Ming 02.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren. Locatie Chinese tuin Het Verborgen Rijk van Ming 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It lookes a little bit dark. And IMO an information about the permission is missing. I think it's not FoP. --XRay 05:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews. Better now? Image is displayed on various websites. Take a look at: Jops Jacobs's works.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)  Support Thank you. Quality IMO OK. --XRay 17:38, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Back to the stone age, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 04:54, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 11:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Possible FP? PumpkinSky 23:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: Please remove the CAs at the branches. --XRay 05:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC)  Done. Ca’s removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments May be a bit too warm, but ok --Poco a poco 16:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:53, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the dark cloudy sky --Michielverbeek 05:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hondsrug, De Strubben-Kniphorstbosch 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 06:16, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloërveld, natuurgebied in Drenthe 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 06:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Bezoekerscentrum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Waterloop in het gebied 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:17, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 06:17, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Bron van de Voorsterbeek 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek vormgeving van de nieuwe havenmond in IJmuiden M526 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek afsluiting van zeegaten Deltawerken M995 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image for CAs at the branches. --XRay 05:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)  Done. Ca’s removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Thank you. Good quality. --XRay 10:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek afsluiting van zeegaten Deltawerken M995 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek afsluiting van zeegaten Deltawerken M995 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Waterloop in het gebied 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek afsluiting van zeegaten Deltawerken M995 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Bezoekerscentrum 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek afsluiting van zeegaten Deltawerken M995 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Bron van de Voorsterbeek 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Bezoekerscentrum 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really sorry, but there is imho too much noise, an issue with DoF, and a lack of sharpness for that kind of picture. --Sputniktilt 14:11, 5 August 2017 (UTC) This is a large photo, and I think the DoF is adequate. However, the crop on the right is jarring. I would suggest for you to crop out the entire unsharp stone in the nearest foreground, along with whatever is near the upper right-hand corner. I think the resulting photo might pass, though if it's reasonably possible to de-noise the shadows in the forest, you might want to do that. I don't consider it essential but others might. If you make the crop, either change the status to "Discuss" and/or ping me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:01, 6 August 2017 (UTC) Than you Ikan for your note, you're right and I support your point of view.--Sputniktilt 11:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC) ** Comment @Sputniktilt: , @Ikan Kekek: .Thank you for your comments. I have adapted the photo. Take a look please.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:27, 6 August 2017 (UTC) I think this is good enough for QI now. Sputniktilt, do you agree? -- Ikan Kekek 20:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC) Thank you for the modifications. yes, I agree with Ikan. --Sputniktilt 23:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Informatiebord 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Waterloop in het gebied 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oude regenwaterbak. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Bezoekerscentrum 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Bezoekerscentrum 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte centrale model M1193.M1217 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oude regenwaterbak. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heesterborder. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Waterloop in het gebied 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 05:52, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oud scheefgezakt houten tuinschuurtje. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Waterloop in het gebied 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oud scheefgezakt houten tuinschuurtje. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek afsluiting van zeegaten Deltawerken M995 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oude regenwaterbak. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 05:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Bezoekerscentrum 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 05:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterbeheersing. Locatie Noarderleech 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Bezoekerscentrum 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek afsluiting van zeegaten Deltawerken M995 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oude regenwaterbak. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Informatiebord 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:34, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek vormgeving van de nieuwe havenmond in IJmuiden M526 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oud scheefgezakt houten tuinschuurtje. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:12, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek vormgeving van de nieuwe havenmond in IJmuiden M526 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oud scheefgezakt houten tuinschuurtje. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drinkbak voor het vee. Locatie Noarderleech 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)  Comment Sorry for my interfering but the horizon seems tilted... --Basotxerri 06:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, you're right. I'm sure Agnes will fix it. --XRay 06:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heesterborder. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Minor CAs at the leafs. --XRay 06:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Bezoekerscentrum 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be improvable with more black and more white. --XRay 06:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

|User talk:Agnes Monkelbaan/Archive 6/Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek vormgeving van de nieuwe havenmond in IJmuiden M526 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 13:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterbeheersing. Locatie Noarderleech 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC) I believe the sky is a bit noisy which should be fixed, otherwise very good --Moroder 06:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek vormgeving van de nieuwe havenmond in IJmuiden M526 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drinkbak voor het vee. Locatie Noarderleech 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heesterborder. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Bezoekerscentrum 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterbeheersing. Locatie Noarderleech 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek afsluiting van zeegaten Deltawerken M995 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterbeheersing. Locatie Noarderleech 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalveren buitendijks. Locatie Noarderleech 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalveren buitendijks. Locatie Noarderleech 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drinkbak voor het vee. Locatie Noarderleech 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterbeheersing. Locatie Noarderleech 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek afsluiting van zeegaten Deltawerken M995 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloopbos. Onderzoek afsluiting van zeegaten Deltawerken M995 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image needs a perspective correction. --XRay 06:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)  Support Thank you. --XRay 06:18, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terra Gator 2104 Track Dumper (detail) Locatie Noarderleech 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough --Shansov.net 05:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terra Gator 2104 Track Dumper (detail) Locatie Noarderleech 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terra Gator 2104 Track Dumper (detail) Locatie Noarderleech 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:52, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tjerkgaast. Kerk van Tjerkgaast Gaestdyk 37 (Rijksmonument) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweer. Sweachmermolen Boarnsweachsterdyk 3 Bijgebouw (Rijksmonument) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me -- Sixflashphoto 06:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vanaf de dijk. Locatie Noarderleech 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tjerkgaast. Spannenburg (Het Wapen van Friesland) Strjitwei 5 (Rijksmonument) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 and I think sky is well done --Michielverbeek 17:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scharsterbrug. Skarrenmolen bij Hollandiastraat 7 (Rijksmonument) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweer. Voormalig rechthuis van Doniawerstal. Buorren 1. (Rijksmonument) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. If you add some more categories the picture will be found easier. --Ermell 07:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)  Done. Category added. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scharsterbrug. Skarrenmolen bij Hollandiastraat 7 (Rijksmonument) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vanaf de dijk. Locatie Noarderleech 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tjerkgaast. Kerk van Tjerkgaast Gaestdyk 37 (Rijksmonument) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:11, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tjerkgaast. Kerk van Tjerkgaast Gaestdyk 37 (Rijksmonument) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tjerkgaast. Spannenburg (Het Wapen van Friesland) Strjitwei 5 (Rijksmonument) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) naar Ochsenalp (1941 meter) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vanaf de dijk. Locatie Noarderleech 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scharsterbrug. Skarrenmolen bij Hollandiastraat 7 (Rijksmonument) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 08:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweer. Sweachmermolen Boarnsweachsterdyk 3 Bijgebouw (Rijksmonument) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) naar Ochsenalp (1941 meter) 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) naar Ochsenalp (1941 meter) 0012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) naar Ochsenalp (1941 meter) 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality, even the corners don't go soft -- Sixflashphoto 13:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 06:36, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Idskenhuizen. Monument van een restant van een vroegere kerk 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Well done composition and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:21, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vanaf de dijk. Locatie Noarderleech 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:52, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:19, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit unsharp in the foreground, but the overall picture is beautiful and certainly good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scharsterbrug. Skarrenmolen bij Hollandiastraat 7 (Rijksmonument) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice picture. -- Ikan Kekek 05:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scharsterbrug. Hoofd van Skarrenmolen bij Hollandiastraat 7 (Rijksmonument) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scharsterbrug. Skarrenmolen bij Hollandiastraat 7 (Rijksmonument) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) naar Ochsenalp (1941 meter) 0010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tjerkgaast. Kerk van Tjerkgaast Gaestdyk 37 (Rijksmonument) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Would be even better if you cleaned up all the small black dots (birds or bugs) in the sky. --W.carter 19:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)  Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 06:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweer. Hervormde kerk en toren, Oasingaleane 9 (Rijksmonument) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vanaf de dijk. Locatie Noarderleech 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweer. Hervormde kerk en toren, Oasingaleane 9 (Rijksmonument) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done. New version.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scharsterbrug. Skarrenmolen bij Hollandiastraat 7 (Rijksmonument) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) naar Ochsenalp (1941 meter) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:27, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Mystic and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) naar Ochsenalp (1941 meter) 0011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 05:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) naar Ochsenalp (1941 meter) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tjerkgaast. Kerk van Tjerkgaast Gaestdyk 37 (Rijksmonument) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. "Bach" in English is "brook" or "stream". -- Ikan Kekek 06:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)  Done. Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vanaf de dijk. Locatie Noarderleech 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:48, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen village 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) naar Ochsenalp (1941 meter) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) naar Ochsenalp (1941 meter) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 11:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not sure if the category Decoration is adecuate because it seems very, very, general. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Thank you for your comment. I could not find a better category.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) naar Ochsenalp (1941 meter) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 05:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen village 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 05:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent; Great Quality -- Sixflashphoto 04:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit noise, but IMO acceptable. --XRay 05:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Sixflashphoto 02:44, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tjerkgaast. Kerk van Tjerkgaast Gaestdyk 37 (Rijksmonument) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly leaning in, otherwise good. Could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 18:47, 24 October 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 25 October 2017 (UTC) For me, the image is already OK. However, if you look at the mortar joints, you'll see that the horizontals aren't horizontal. You could try to correct this in Lightroom with a slight horizontal correction. --Basotxerri 18:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC) Thank you for your explanation. I've tried it but it's an old building.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Gorgeous composition and very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen village 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen village 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks alright to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:02, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:02, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen village 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:25, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 06:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:37, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be a bit brighter but good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 14:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments New version.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be WB could be checked. --XRay 06:28, 11 November 2017 (UTC)  Done. WB. correction Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Aeou 06:15, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen village 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add some sign-related category. Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)  Done. Category added. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not a specialist but this is a Amanita pantherina, isn't it? Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC) Answer: I asked a specialist. That was not sure. Then I had to photograph the bottom. But I did not want to damage the mushroom.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC) In any case, don't eat it! --Basotxerri 07:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel naar Löser (1680 meter) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 07:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel naar Löser (1680 meter) 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Difficult weather conditions for making beautuful photos. However the photo is quiet sharp --Michielverbeek 06:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 07:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 07:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel naar Löser (1680 meter) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 07:34, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel naar Löser (1680 meter) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chur in Graubünden (Zwitserland) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:25, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 06:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chur in Graubünden (Zwitserland) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chur in Graubünden (Zwitserland) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 07:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel naar Löser (1680 meter) 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chur in Graubünden (Zwitserland) 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be better with only the both mushrooms at the right. --XRay 06:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC) Thank you for your comment. You are right.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chur in Graubünden (Zwitserland) 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel naar Löser (1680 meter) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:49, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chur in Graubünden (Zwitserland) 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals well done, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:42, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice; Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 06:02, 21 November 2017 (UTC)