User talk:Alfvanbeem

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alfvanbeem!

Categorize!Edit

Hello Alf, thanks for all of the great photos. However, might I ask that you add the requisite categories to your photos? It makes it easier to find them, so that they don't get lost in the maelstrom of information available here. I just edited a few of your photos to add categories, you can check my work if you have any questions or concerns. Best, Mr.choppers (talk) 07:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Got you! I don't use bots much; as I upload each and every picture manually I find it easier to categorize right away. And again, great photos and thanks for sharing. Mr.choppers (talk) 17:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

You might want to check out HotCat. // Liftarn (talk)

  • Hello Alf, may I ask you again to categorize your photos more carefully. In the last days, you uploaded beautiful photos of Volkswagen Transporter, generation T1 and T2. It would be nice if you put these cars in the proper category. It is quite a lot of work to recategorize all your photos. Thanks in advance. OnkelFordTaunus (talk) 16:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Auto Union 1000 break image Doubt about the date of the carEdit

I think this excellent picture is unlikely to be of a 1968 car. As far as I know the model was replaced in Europe several years earlier. Please, why do you think it is a 1968 car? If it is down to the kenteken, then maybe the car was used first in Germany and then imported to NL in 1968. I think they were still manufactured in 1968 in Argentina but (1) I do not know if that included the estate model and (2) you would need to be very rich and determined to import an out of date Auto Union model from Argentina to Europe back then?

OR (which is very likely) am I missing something obvious? Thank you if you will have any thoughts on this. Regards Charles01 (talk) 13:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

The DKW/Auto-Union estate was made in Argentina till 1969 → http://www.cocheargentino.com.ar/a/auto_union.htm , one in that condition will set you back about 30,000 dollars down under, this one has the suicide doors so its probably a 1958 F94, good way of finding out is by the engine size, if its a 1000 cc it may be from Argentina.
...and by the way Charles01, saw that you've got a Mk 1 Scirocco on your talk page, I owned one of those (brand new) in that same colour! cheers - Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 22:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 
It looks as though there were rear hinged doors on the Argentinian built Auto Union 1000 even where it has four doors. Structural rigidity must have been horrible.
Thanks for a full and thoughtful answer. According to the english language wiki entry the Duesseldorf (ie German) built version had a 981cc engine which would have counted as 1000 cc Auto Union branded car (and was up from 896cc on the previous DKW badged model). I wrote most of that entry, so maybe I do not add much by quoting myself! But I did copy most of it from the German language entry, and I see that in the info box at the top of the page I did add the name of a book as an independent authoritative source for the (new) engine size, so I promise I didn't simply make it up! The door hinges do indeed recall the previous model / DKW F93, but the positioning of the badge on the front grill (not above it) suggest it is a feature of the Auto Union 1000. And when you took the picture it presumably had Auto Union (not DKW) written on it somewhere. So it looks like a sort of hybrid between the old and new. Maybe in the workshop where they did the estate they had some previous year components to use up so they put the new model's front decor (and maybe fitted its engine) on what was in other respects last year's model so as to sell it as the newer model at a newer price. The company was very short of cash at this time. 1958 seems a likely build year, but as you can tell, I'm still pretty confused...
The Argentinian website looks as if its been put together with some care, so I guess the car might be a more recent (than 1958) model built there. The Argentine version does indeed seem to have retained the rear hinged doors even after the European version had switched to front hinged doors - even for the four door version. Though it would still have been ... very unusual that anyone should take the Argentinian version of an (in European terms) obsolete car and spend time and money to import it to the Netherlands. Ah well.
Beautiful car (the original Giugaro Scirocco), though I think from inside more suitable for short people than for tall people, so probably NL was not their best market. At least, when I moved to work in Amstelveen I went from feeling tall (in England) to feeling on the small side of normal (in Nederland)....
I have another picture that same colour on a Scirocco taken in Munich when the car was newly introduced. (The month the German postage stamps were advertising some Weltmeisterschaft - I guess football?) I always liked that picture, but the lighting was never easy under a tree, and when I look at it now, either my eyes have changed or the film has faded. The angle's still usefully interesting but otherwise it doesn't look so good these days. Sorry .... you didn't deserve such a lengthy reaction. Regards Charles01 (talk) 07:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Flickr disagrees. I found two other photos of the same car (here and here) which claim it as a "1962", and another one here which simply states that this car was built between 1957 and 1959. The mystery deepens. Mr.choppers (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
... and here, right in front of our noses →   and here →  Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 03:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Deira IMO 9394466 approaching Port of Rotterdam, Holland 21-Feb-2005.jpgEdit

How you photographed the ship in 2005 year if she was launched in 2006? Where is error?--Mike1979 Russia (talk) 04:20, 10 April 2012 (UTC)


Author categoryEdit

Hi Alfvanbeem,

If you are interested, I could create a category Category:Photographs by Alfvanbeem or Category:Photographs by Alf van Beem and have my bot add your uploads in there. It would take the bot some time to add them, but it wouldn't involve too much work. It could make it easier to navigate through your photographs, similar to Category:Images by S.J. de Waard.

BTW thanks for sharing your photographs with us. It's a substantial part of our Commons ships collection. --  Docu  at 14:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Reply: Hi Docu, I hope i am responding in the right way. Please do as you suggested. Thanks and regards, Alf

Thanks for your response. Do you prefer "Photographs by Alfvanbeem" or "Photographs by Alf van Beem" (or some other variant)? Subcategories at Category:User categories (flat list) use quite a few different variations. --  Docu  at 20:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Reply: Hi Docu, "Photographs by Alf van Beem" would be nice i think. Thanks, Alf

Ok. I did some of it today. I will try to finish tomorrow. --  Docu  at 19:13, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I guess this was just a mistake. But you better check so you haven't "taken credit" from someone else on other images :-) Cheers! /V-wolf (talk) 20:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Alfvanbeem
Similarly, I asked for a series of images to be corrected (see Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Fix_author_name). I assume this is correct. --  Docu  at 02:19, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Alf van Beem,

I was about to move about 400 ships from "Photographs by Alf van Beem" to "Ships photographed by Alf van Beem", but after about 100 I stopped as I noticed that you had moved some in the opposite direction. If it's a problem, I can undo the 100.

With my Best Wishes for 2013. --  Docu  at 17:07, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Photographer's Barnstar
For the large amount of high quality images of all kinds of vehicles. Thank you! High Contrast (talk) 17:18, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Avia S-199 and Avia S-92Edit

Thank you for adding the photos of these aircraft. I have added then to the related articles on wiki.Thank you again for these great photos. Articseahorse (talk) 05:16, 1 July 2012 (UTC)


BinnenschepenEdit

Vraagje. Tot op heden zie ik dat je meestal foto's van zeeschepen uploadt, maar mijn vraag is om bij het rondvaren door de haven ook eens wat meer aandacht te besteden aan de binnenvaart. Maar dan wel gelijk het verzoek om bij die schepen ook een foto te maken waarbij je duidelijk het Europanummer (ENI-nummer) kunt aflezen. Ik zoek me vaak mottig om dat achteraf bij binnenschepen weer terug te vinden. En als de naam er dan niet bijstaat is dat geen probleem, via dat nummer is die meestal wel te vinden op de site van De binnenvaart. Zo doe ik dat meestal, zie: Category:Companion (ship, 2009). (Vanaf de brug van Gorinchem genomen.) Ik zag overigens net dat je er al een zwik gedaan had. Prima. --Stunteltje (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you !Edit

 

40,000 contributions but I can't even count, let alone look at, all your brilliant images. Penyulap 12:17, 21 April 2013 (UTC)


Boudicca (ship, 1973)Edit

  • Hallo Alfvanbeem , wo wurde   aufgenommen? (Where was this photo captured?), viele Grüße, --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 16:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
    • At Dover, England.

Thank youEdit

Many thanks for the excellent car images that you upload to Wikimedia. However it would be a great assistance if you would provide more detail about the vehicle in your photograph, particularly the things that cannot be established from the photo like the precise model, year of manufacture, engine size etc. Yes, it is very true that an image of a rare car is much much nicer than no image at all but often it becomes important to be able to distinguish between cars and when many details are provided important distinctions can be made. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 07:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProjectEdit

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Commons' coverage of aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

As you have shown an interest in File:B-2460 Air China Cargo Boeing 747-4J6(BCF) - cn 24348 taxiing 14july2013 pic-001.JPG we thought you might like to take an interest in this new WikiProject.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! russavia (talk) 13:29, 3 August 2013 (UTC)


Menhir du PlessisEdit

Hello

I'm checking the images for Wiki loves monuments France,and I currently have an issue. The two photos of the Menhir du Plessis (File:Menhir du Plessis, pic1.JPG and File:Menhir du Plessis, pic2.JPG) don't have a location. Where did you take these two photos ?

Thanks, Trizek from FR 11:21, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

These are the coordinates: 46.45758,-1.444998 and 46.456798,-1.445631 Google has also a hit when you google Menhirs du Plessis! Regards, Alfvanbeem (talk) 11:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Subcategories of Category:Musée des BlindésEdit

Hello. Your edits (e.g., [1] and [2]) violate COM:CAT. Why have you performed such strange esits? Ain92 (talk) 06:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ain92, I am trying to create a lot of new categories related to this museum in the next couple of day's and to make it more clearly for this period i dragged al the categories temporarely to the main category. Whitin a day or to i will then move all the categories to there appropriate position again if that is allright with you.
Regards Alfvanbeem (talk) 08:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

  • Then I wish you success! Best regards, Ain92 (talk) 17:11, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Images of cansEdit

Hello, Alfvanbeem. Could you consider giving a license to the cans of the images you're uploading? I am not familiar with the subject, and I can't read Dutch so I cannot research it either. You can do it via the {{3-D in PD|<Template or reason here>}} template. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:41, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Magog, I do not understand the question. As i look back to these uploads i see i have given them a licence. Did you mean i should categorize them? Regards, Alf Alfvanbeem (talk) 16:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

You haven't provided a license to the cans. Your photographs qualify as derivative works; if the cans themselves are not out of copyright, then we must delete the photographs. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:25, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Magog, If i follow the tree on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Derivative_Works_Decision_Tree.svg, it is permanently installed in a public place (the museum Terug in de Tijd) and free of FOP. Than it should be ok or not? Regards, Alf

Panoramafreiheit refers to photographs of permanently fixed items, namely statues and buildings. Museums are not considered OK in most countries, including the Netherlands. So I don't believe so. However, if the cans are old enough, they may be in the public domain already. Also, we only have to worry about the part of the cans that has artwork on it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:09, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the info. The only thing i know about the museum is that the stuff they have expositioned is from 1900 - 1960's. So if you think some of them should be deleted, please go ahead. Regards, Alfvanbeem (talk) 17:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)


File:Marouise cigarettes pic1.JPGEdit

Bet it was "Marquise"... AnonMoos (talk) 21:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

File:ATST cigarettes.JPGEdit

Presumably Devanagari, not "ATST"... AnonMoos (talk) 22:11, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Moving categoriesEdit

This regards the creation of Category:Old Gold (cigarettes) to replace Category:Old Gold (cigarette).

Please use the {{move}} template to request a category move, or place non-controversial move requests (such as this one) at User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands. These will (somewhat) preserve the history of the category, instead of eliminating it entirely. Thank you. Mindmatrix 16:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Alfvanbeem,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

 


Hallo Alf,

Is dat blauwe erba sigarenblik uit mijn woonplaats ook te ruil / koop. Ik zoek valkenswaardse sigarenblikken en deze heb ik nog niet. Ik kan ook ruilen, want ik ca. 400 sigarenblikken te ruil. Ik hoor graag van u.

Groet

G. van Gerven

Hallo G. van Gerven,
Ik heb dit gefotografeerd op de Verzamelbeurs te Nieuwegein. Het blik was in der daad te koop, maar ik weet niet hoe contact te krijgen met de verkoper, alleen dat zijn naam Han is en hij een woning in Amsterdam heeft.
In Maart zal er weer een verzamelbeurs in Nieuwegijn zijn en dan zal ik hem eea kunnen vragen, of als ik hem op een andere verzamelbeurs tegen kom.
Is dat ok?
Groetjes,
Alf


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 13:12, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Gratitude for cigarette pack imagesEdit

Dear Alf, though I'm not a smoker, I've recently started appreciating the design of cigarette packaging. Thanks so much for your uploads of images of these, and for releasing them into the public domain. Sincerely, Leon... (talk) 15:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Photographer's Barnstar
For your wonderful, hi-res photos of cigarette packaging. Leon... (talk) 15:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Feinstes Boden-Wachs Union Auchsburg Schild-001.JPGEdit

Hi Alfvanbeem, could you eventually add an approximate date (year) about when the original sign was used/produced. --Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Enamel advert, Eveready, extra long life battery.JPGEdit

Hi, Alfvanbeem. It looks like the language at the bottom of this image is Bengali. However, you might want to check up with someone on this list (I'm no expert on Bengali!) Best regards, Clockery Fairfeld who, me? 17:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Dry electrolytic capacitorEdit

Hallo Alfvanbeem, Du hast vor kurzem einige Fotos von "dry electrolytic capacitors" hochgeladen. Danke dafür, konnte eines gleich in der Historie von Aluminium Elektrolytkondensatoren einbauen. Eine Frage: Kannst Du auf Deinen Fotos die aufgedruckte Patent-Nummer erkennen? Ich schreibe grade einen Artikel über die Geschichte der Elkos und dieses Patent könnte die Beschreibung beeinflussen. Danke im Voraus für Deine Hilfe. Grüsse --Elcap (talk) 07:08, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Problem with your pictures of 2 Chevrolet Task Force pick-upEdit

Hello!

I faced difficulties with categorizing 2 pickups (4 pictures) you put on Commons:

You gave the first one the name "Chevrolet 3100 Pick-Up (1959)". Are you 100% sure of this model year? It has indeed the 1958-59 only rear "Fleetside" bed, but also... 1955-57 fenders, a 1955-56 only hood and a 1957 only fender emblem  
If this one is definitely a 1959 model, it will go with the other 1958-59 Apache Task Force trucks. But shouldn't it then be given a better name, so people can understand it has some older parts on it? And if you're unsure, I think it would be better also to change the name to avoid showing a misleading model year.

Same problem with the blue pick-up: 1958-59 bed and 1959 only fender emblem, but 1955-57 fenders and 1955-56 only hood and front fascia. If it is a pre-1958 model with later bed and emblem, it cannot be named Apache and categorized with such trucks. But the name of the picture has then to be changed, so people won't be confused.
If it is 1958+ model with previous model cab, it's without a doubt an Apache, but the name deserve to be also changed, so one can understand why a pick-up with that kind of front fascia is among totally different looking trucks.

What do you think about all of this?

For the record, the 3 different front fascias of the Task Force series, and the one of "your" blue TF.

       
1955-56 1957 1958-59 "Yours" #2

Regards,
BarnCas (talk) 08:31, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Cars

Hi BarnCas, I do not have much knowledge of cars, i looked up the data on the website of the Dutch car registration of the tax office. There it simply says what year the car was officially registered. So i leave it up to you to do what you think is best :)

Regards Alfvanbeem (talk) 10:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to jump in with a "side-question", but your talk page is on my watch list and .... would you mind letting us know the web page ("url"?) for the Dutch tax office? And please.
In case helpful, here is the one for the British tax office (which was discovered - or at least notified to me by a fellow contributor from not Britain but Finland). http://www.taxdisc.direct.gov.uk
Many thanks if you can help on this. Success Charles01 (talk) 11:55, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
It is http://www.rdw.nl
You can enter the licencenumber (with or without dashes) in the yellow area.
Alfvanbeem (talk) 14:17, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Seriously useful and thank you much.
Do you happen to know why such a high proportion of the cars appear to have been first registered in the month of June? - especially US originating cars. Do NOT, please, take time thinking about this. I just thought you MIGHT have noticed the same issue yourself and found an explanation. Regards Charles01 (talk) 15:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
@ Alfvanbeem
I do not have much knowledge of cars [...] So i leave it up to you to do what you think is best :)
—Alfvanbeem
I feared such an answer  
Ok, I'll do something. I don't know what yet, but I'll do it. Most certainly ask to remove model year (59) and model name (Apache) from the names of the pictures, and explain the "chimera mix" of these cars in the description...
I think indeed it is important not to mislead people seeking for informations on how a car/truck/flower/whatever-you-want looks like.

@Charles01:
  • American model year change in July, like in many other countries. So maybe the car dealers give a substantial discount to get rid of as many "soon to be last model year" cars as possible in June? I also vaguely remember a tax story related to former model year, but I don't remember if it was for the USA nor if it is a recent practice or a 50 years old one...
  • Not asked, but you'll find a lot of links about registration plate numbers in numerous countries here. And also this tool (fr) for the new French plates. Finding the date of first registration is not the actual purpose of the French tool, but it does it in practice  
       But remember that in France:
    • the new plate system will give useful informations only for mid-2009+ vehicles, as the former system gave plate numbers depending on the location of the owner of the car. For 2009 on, a new vehicle gets a unique national and life-long plate number.
    • pre-2009 vehicles can get (and they will eventually all have) a new system plate number. It then just gives the date of their first registration... in the new system, regardless of their actual model year...
Regards,
BarnCas (talk) 03:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you both. I've not yet gone through the answers but it looks as though I'll have fun following up on those links. It is indeed a source of sadness for me that with Italian and (more recently) French cars you cannot simply look at the license plate and know where in the country it is registered. (Though maybe it's not important enough to trigger anything so profound as sadness...)
In terms of getting to the age of the car from the license plate, the Netherlands and Great Britain are both unusual - at least at this end of Europe - in that the same license plate (usually) stays with the car throughout the life of the car. So you really can know - or at least the information is there if you can access it - simply from looking at the license plate when the car was first registered. Ho hum and best wishes. Charles01 (talk) 06:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
@Charles01: I think the plate subject deserves to have its own existence in your UTP  
@Alfvanbeem: Once again, thank you for your response  
BarnCas (talk) 00:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

DYKEdit

This photo of yours will be on the English language Wikipedia main page for twelve hours beginning 14:00 Friday 3 october. I finally wrote an article on the Marcos GT, and this is a good accompanying shot, I feel. Cheers, mr.choppers (talk)-en- 07:41, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

--  Gazebo (talk) 06:22, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Dollfus-Mieg & Cie, DMC Mulhouse-Belfort-Paris.JPGEdit

You wrote in the description of the file "Photographed at Port of Amsterdam, The Netherlands", then it would be nice to have a category related to the port of Amsterdam, in order to have a localization-related category, don't you think?   Jeriby (talk) 09:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Issues with some of your Formula One car photosEdit

  • I'd like to thank you for your work in getting so many photographs; however, there is an issue with the subjects of some of them, and it's something you may not be aware of. Basically, what it looks like is that some of the Formula One photographs you've taken of cars at the Auto & Technic museum Sinsheim are of incorrectly described cars. The reason this is an issue is that they have been widely used across many Wikis, and unfortunately some editors don't seem to understand that the cars in the pictures are not what they claim to be.
  • Sauber C20: Please compare your photo to one of an actual C20. You'll see that the front wing is totally wrong on your car, and that the car is in fact far too narrow. Indeed, it is far too narrow to be any 2001 Formula One car, and it's something that is very obvious if you were to put the image side-by-side with practically any 2001 F1 car.
  • Williams FW23: Please compare your photo to one of an actual FW23. Again, you can clearly see that the front wing isn't remotely similar, the side pods are totally wrong, and everything else simply doesn't match, either to the FW23, or any 2001 F1 car. If Commons allowed you to do so, I'd go as far as requesting that you delete your FW23 images, since there are plenty of other Commons FW23 images that are of the real car.
  • I'd like to reinforce that this is in no way a criticism of you; after all, I've seen the plaques in the images, and those clearly do state the cars to be either the C20 or the FW23. I'm not entirely sure what those cars actually are (had a discussion about this many months ago with a friend, but have long since forgotten), but I'd appreciate your assistance in the matter of cleaning up after them. Also, it's a damn shame no one seems to have a properly licensed real Sauber C20 image to replace it - that's half the problem! Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 00:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

File:La Meuse beer can at the Musée Européen de la Bière pic2.JPGEdit

  File:La Meuse beer can at the Musée Européen de la Bière pic2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

🎂CAKE🎂 22:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:La Meuse beer can at the Musée Européen de la Bière.JPGEdit

  File:La Meuse beer can at the Musée Européen de la Bière.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

🎂CAKE🎂 22:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2001 Red Bull Sauber Petronas C20 pic2.JPGEdit

  File:2001 Red Bull Sauber Petronas C20 pic2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2001 BMW-Williams FW23.JPGEdit

  File:2001 BMW-Williams FW23.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:22, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2001 Red Bull Sauber Petronas C20 pic1.JPGEdit

  File:2001 Red Bull Sauber Petronas C20 pic1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:24, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2001 Red Bull Sauber Petronas C20 pic3.JPGEdit

  File:2001 Red Bull Sauber Petronas C20 pic3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:24, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

File:1992 BMW Williams pic1.JPGEdit

  File:1992 BMW Williams pic1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:BMW R26 with sidecar pic3.JPGEdit

  File:BMW R26 with sidecar pic3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Palauenc05 (talk) 12:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Alfvanbeem und Palauenc, das Foto „BMW R26 with sidecar pic3.JPG“ zeigt auf keinen Fall das im Dateinamen und in der Bildbeschreibung genannte Motorrad, sondern mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit eine russische Dnepr (Category:Dnepr Motorcycles), die verschiedenen BMW-Modellen nachempfunden ist. Die genaue Typbezeichnung kenne ich nicht. Schaut bitte einmal in den Wikipedia-Artikel Dnepr (Motorradmarke). Herzliche Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Fotografieren und Identifizieren historischer Autos und Motorräder -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:39, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Nachtrag: Ich habe noch einmal nachgeschaut. Das Motorrad ist noch keine Dnepr, sondern das Vorgängermodell Ural M72. Man erkennt es an dem Zylinderkopfdeckel. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Und es ist doch eine Dnepr, wie ich zuerst angenommen hatte. Die Ural M72 hatte noch keine Hinterradschwinge. Gruß -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Hier eine interessante Website „Russische Seitenventiler“, die ich vorhin gefunden habe. Wahrscheinlich hattest Du wegen des hinteren Rahmens und der Schwinge auf die BMW R 26 getippt. Eine R 26 (1956–1960) konnte oder kann es aber nicht sein, denn sie hat einen Einzylindermotor mit stehendem Zylinder. Die Bildbeschreibung und die Kategorie habe ich schon berichtigt; jetzt müsste aber noch der Dateiname geändert warden. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Library at the Teylers museum, photo-4, Cabinet of Boudewijn Buch.JPGEdit

Dag Alfvanbeem, betreft dit het Boudewijn Büch cabinet? Zo ja, zou ik de beschrijving aanpassen. Bedankt. Lotje (talk) 09:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Ship categoriesEdit

Thank you for uploading all the nice images of ships. Please note though that ENI and/or IMO number should always be the top categories which include a category with the ships's name. Please do not put the images directly into a category like "IMO 123456" but sort them first into a category like Category:21 (tugboat, 2002). For more information, see Category:Ships by name. De728631 (talk) 13:33, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I upload them with Commonist to IMO or ENI number because i do not always know if there is a subcategory. After uploading i always move them to the subcategories with CataLot if they exist. It sometimes takes me a couple of days! :) Regards! Alfvanbeem (talk) 14:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Alright, that sounds like a reasonable method. :) De728631 (talk) 19:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 105 p2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 302 p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 337 p1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 406 p3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 406 p4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JCP (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Excelsior - ENI 04607680, Zandvlietsluis, Port of Antwerp pic1.JPGEdit

Warum diese Shiff hat ENI-Nummer 04607680 wenn Category:Excelsior (ship, 1987) ist in ketegorie ENI 04606360? Zwiadowca 21 16:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Sehe [3] leider nur in Niederländisch. Selbe Schiff, zwei ENI-nummer. ENI 04607680 Später. --Stunteltje (talk) 18:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC) @Alfvanbeem Sorry dat ik even inval, stond in mijn volglijst. --Stunteltje (talk) 18:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Category:Hand soap barEdit

Hi Alfvanbeem, cou have created for a longer time the Category:Hand soap bar - What does it mean: Soap for washing hands or Soap for washing with hands e.g. clothes - this a different, but I found never the difference in english. --regards from Austria K@rl (talk) 07:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

De PijpEdit

Hallo, Ik ben Ceescamel van de Nederlandse Wikipedia. Ik zag dat je een aantal foto's hebt geplaatst van de Albert Cuypstraat. Ik schrijf de laatste tijd zo nu en dan een artikel over gemeentelijke monumenten. Helaas is er weinig fotomateriaal aanwezig. Mijn vraag aan jou is, ben je nog in de gelegenheid foto's te maken in die wijk. Ik ben namelijk zelf slecht in fotograferen, tenzij we Amsterdam met 5.9 op de schaal van Richter willen zien. Het gaat om de gebouwen genoemd in het artikel Lijst van gemeentelijke monumenten in Amsterdam-Zuid en dan met name de oude en nieuwe Pijp. Als ik die af heb, dan wil ik nog wel eens denken aan die anderen. Ik hoor graag van je, hier of op https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overleg_gebruiker:Ceescamel.Ceescamel (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Hoi, dank je voor het bericht. Ik heb geen haast. Het moet niet alleen mooi weer zijn, maar ook zondag. Anders is er hier geen doorkomen aan. Een object gaat problemen geven, een oude fabriekshal in de Gerard Doustraat. Daar staat nu een politiecabine voor (t.o. de synagogue, maar die hebben we al). Alvast bedankt, en veel plezier.Ceescamel (talk) 11:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Als je wil, mag je ook een aantal gebouwen aan de Sarphatistraat (tot aan de Hogesluis) meenemen.Ceescamel (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Mocht je gaan beginnen, alle gebouwen aan het begin van de Stadhouderskade zijn inmiddels beschreven en er waren nog geen foto's voorhanden van het Marriott en het Byzantium em de hoek Stadhouderskade met de Overtoom.Ceescamel (talk) 15:28, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Zodra het een beetje weer wordt, ga ik beginnen. :) Hopelijk dat de zon ook hoog genoeg komt zodat er geen scahduwen van andere gebouwen op komen. Ik hou het weer nauwlettend in de gaten. Hopelijk kan ik snel gaan beginnen! Groetjes Alfvanbeem (talk) 19:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Musée du Quai Branly.JPGEdit

  File:Musée du Quai Branly.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Manahene (talk) 14:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Van Nelle De Echte Zware karonnen reklame bord pic2.JPGEdit

Hallo, Alf. Hast du damals wirklich das Plakat entworfen, oder hast du nur das Bild eingescannt oder kopiert? Wir brauchen ja immer die Genehmigung des Original-Künstlers für solche Uploads. De728631 (talk) 19:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes, if any of those tins and cardboards was published before 1923, please consider using {{Licensed-PD |1={{PD-1923}}{{PD-EU-anonymous}} |2= <your CC license>}}. That should be more informative and may prevent unnecessary deletion discussions. De728631 (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Sympetrum sanguineum ?Edit

hello Alf,

Parc du Marquenterre, Trithemis annulata, Red Dragonfly, pic-013.JPG

Est-ce vraiment Trithemis annulata ? J'ai un doute.

Merci de votre visite au parc. A+

APictche (talk) 14:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


Bonjour APictche, Vraiment, je ne sais pas. J'ai choisir le insect qui resemble le plus. Salut, Alf

IMO templatesEdit

Could you please add the templates {{IMOcat}} and {{IMO}} to the relevant categories (IMOcat in "ships by name" categories and IMO in ships by IMO number categories, e.g. Category:Havila Fortune (ship, 2009) and Category:IMO 9390551, respectively)? By adding the IMO template, it is not necessary to define the sort key, and a search link appears on the category page. - Kind regards, 4ing (talk) 09:00, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:Navitas (ship, 1984)Edit

Hi Alf,

May I ask you to have a double check on the year built - according to what I found on the Net, the ENI 02321732 belongs to a 1994 built. Thanks for your time! --Jwh (talk) 21:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC) --Thanks for the headsup. I made a mistake! Only thing is, i dont know how to do a change filename request. Alfvanbeem (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for checking, Alf. I've put a "rename" template on the file. Have a nice evening! --Jwh (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for doing that and helping out! Regrads Alfvanbeem (talk) 07:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

RET tram 730 in case of 703Edit

Please change the name of the File:Rotterdam tram RET 703 pic1 Type ZGT-6 made by Düwag Düsseldorf.JPG in File:Rotterdam tram RET 730 pic1 Type ZGT-6 made by Düwag Düsseldorf.JPG 2003:5F:2A0C:F926:25C8:AD36:8E87:3A61 12:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done I moved the file for you. De728631 (talk) 14:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Invotis (ship, 1960) ENI 02310799 Port of Rotterdam.JPGEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Invotis (ship, 1960) ENI 02310799 Port of Rotterdam.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Emma Maersk (ship, 2006)Edit

Hi,

I see that you created Category:Emma Maersk (ship, 2006) last week but there was already Category:Emma Mærsk (ship, 2006). Isn't it the same ship? And if it is, can I transform the first into a {{category redirect}} ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Vigneron, I think you are right and if you would be so kind, please go ahead! Regards Alfvanbeem (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speelgoedmuseum DeventerEdit

Beste Alfvanbeem, heb je toevallig ook een foto van de buitenkant van het museum? Ik zag wel hele fraaie foto's van de collectie namelijk. Vriendelijke groet, Graaf Statler (talk) 23:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

SarphatiparkEdit

Ze zien er prachtig uit. Ik doe het langzaam want ken enige concentratieproblemen. maar die gebouwen staan er nog wel een tijdje.Ceescamel (talk) 08:15, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

MozartbrugEdit

Hoe wist je dat ik hem nodig had?Ceescamel (talk) 14:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Hoi Cees,
Ik probeer nu overal waar ik kom in Amsterdam, heel goed op te letten wat interessant kan zijn en probeer dan zoveel mogelijk (detail) foto's te maken. Ook probeer ik de Gemeentemonumentenlijst kompleet te krijgen. Ik was afgelopen zaterdag vol goede moed begonnen, maar helaas werd het weer na 2 uurtjes alweer slecht. Maar ik blijf hoop houden dat ik een keer een hele volle dag kan fotograferen. Ook ben ik blij dat je mij gevraagd hebt om dit te doen. Het heeft mijn ogen echt geopend. Ik wist niet dat er zoveel moois in Amsterdam te zien en fotograferen is.
Tot later en succes met al je artikelen
Alfvanbeem (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)"
Graag gedaan, sinds mijn "kleine" project Stadhouderskade kijk ik ook mijn ogen uit. Als je wil, wil je dan ook nog wat foto's maken van de beelden rondom De Kom. Voor de Kinderburg moet ik het doen met de zwartwitfoto, wel mooi authentiek....Ceescamel (talk) 10:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Te vroeg geklaagd, ik heb ze gevonden...Ceescamel (talk) 10:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Jatwerk?Edit

Er is iemand die over jouw rug geld wil verdienen aan je werk:

http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-vertrouwen-eni-02312975-op-het-amsterdam-rijn-kanaal-foto-3-76275804.html

Lijkt mij toch niet de bedoeling zonder naamsvermelding. --Stunteltje (talk) 06:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hello there. Alf has released the images in Category:Vertrouwen (ship, 1957) under a CC0 1.0 licence. So while it would have been nice to notify him, this type of licence does not require attribution nor any other permission or renumeration of the original author. CC0 means essentially that you waive as many rights as legally possible. De728631 (talk) 12:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Brug 408Edit

Hoi, op 8 mei heb je een foto geupload van een deel van brug 408 in Amsterdam (C. Schuystraat/Breitnerstraat). Heb je soms nog ergens een foto van de hele brug?Ceescamel (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Hoi Cees, nog niet! Zal ik zo snel mogelijk doen!
Groetjes, Alf
Hoi Cees, ik was er vorige week om foto's te maken, maar de hele brug lag open door wegwerkzaamheden dus het zal nog even duren.
Groetjes, Alf

File:PH-JMP.JPGEdit

  File:PH-JMP.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Marc Lacoste (talk) 10:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Alfvanbeem".