User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive24

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coimbra December 2011-19a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:03, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trafaria December 2011-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AzaToth 21:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Photo usage

Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used some of your pictures.

I found your pictures here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bumblebee_October_2007-3a.jpg I attributed this picture as described on that website: Alvesgaspar with this link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Alvesgaspar and also added a link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tipulidae_April_2008-2.jpg I attributed this picture as described on that website: Alvesgaspar with this link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Alvesgaspar and also added a link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hoverfly_December_2007-8.jpg I attributed this picture as described on that website: Alvesgaspar with this link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Alvesgaspar and also added a link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672

Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 07:33, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

P.S. Thanks for taking the pictures and making them available.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bumblebee October 2007-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 10:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasp October 2007-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. (Why is type of file name?) --Jkadavoor 10:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#July_13.2C_2012

Azatoth has really pissed me off this time. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fly December 2007-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Llez 05:37, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasp September 2007-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. -- JLPC 20:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat March 2010-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beetle April 2009-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:23, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lixus April 2010-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. Added to Category:Lixus angustatus. --Jkadavoor 06:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bug 2007-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bug July 2010-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beetle May 2009-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:19, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Alves - could you add some location data to File:Nerium oleander flowers leaves.jpg, please! - MPF (talk) 09:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

• Hi, MPF! Location added. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Advice

Some of your stuff is absolutely amazing! I use Nikon D90. Can you please tell me which lense(s) you are using? Would really appreciate your answer! Keep up the great work! M.

• Answered by email. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Porto Covo July 2012-2.jpg

Bonjour, J'aime l'harmonie et la simplicité de cette photo. Tu devrais la nominer comme image remarquable. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

• Merci, moi aussi! Mais j'hésite, le minimalisme n'est pas tellement apprecié ici... Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armeria July 2012-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo July 2012-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JLPC 08:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo August 2012-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo July 2012-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Organ in Coimbra

Hello Alvesgaspar, I just saw your feedback, so, what do you think about the crop and noise/sharpness of the original one: File:Monasterio de Santa Cruz, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 09.JPG? the contra is the perspective distortion, but in my eyes not that bad. Regards, Poco a poco (talk) 13:49, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

• Jebulon did a good job with the geometric distortion and it is a shame that image quality is not good enough. Concerning the original, I don't think it is good enough due to noise and distortion. There is nothing we can do about camera location but image quality can be much improved by using a tripode and a lower ISO setting. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I know, but I don't usually use tripods in churches, unless I explicitly have a permission for that. By the way, I uploaded a new version of the nominated file. Did you get the email I sent you a few days ago? Poco a poco (talk) 14:48, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

• • I did receive two emails from you in July. But I've been out of town and it is possible that I missed something during my vancancies. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo July 2012-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argiope July 2012-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argiope July 2012-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:55, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Permission for figure

Dear Alves, from the Dutch Wikipedia site "Yellow spidercrab)" I want to use the figure of the yellow spidercrab in the upper right corner. I want to ask you to give me the permission to use this figure for my book about Charles Darwin. It will be a student textbook.

Best regards Paul

Paul Wrede Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Molekularbiologie und Bioinformatik 14195 Berlin --Paul wrede (talk) 12:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

• No problem, Paul, go ahead. Please make the proper credit, something like "Joaquim Alves Gaspar, Wikimedia Commons". -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo August 2012-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --King of Hearts 03:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine cone July 2012-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

FPC Vyborg

With the current version, I've just reduced saturation a bit (from TIFF, Photoshop -10), but I actually would not make large changes on a file already QI promoted. However, if you like, pls. check out the new version, Thanks & kind regards, - A.Savin 19:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus August 2012-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus August 2012-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dipsacus August 2012-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments although missing contrast in the thumbnail, good quality & contrast in full size --Herzi Pinki 09:09, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus August 2012-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 09:37, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Permission of photo

Dear Alves (Alvesgaspar)

for our student textbook about Charles Darwin (in German: Die Entstehung der Arten, illustriert und kommentiert) we want to use your nice photo the wasp (Wespenschwebfliege): Chrysotorum intermedium. We ask you for permission to use this figure for the student textbook published by Wiley-VCH (commercial use).

Best regards

Paul

Prof. Paul Wrede Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Molekuarbiologie und Bioinformatik Arnimallee 22 14195 Berlin paul.wrede@charite.de --193.175.73.201 11:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo August 2012-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo August 2012-5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aveiro March 2012-4a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aveiro March 2012-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments at least QI --Villy Fink Isaksen 12:30, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aveiro March 2012-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, although it could be sharper --Poco a poco 07:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: Glebionis ou Chrysanthemum?

Olá! Pois, estava agora mesmo a investigar isso. Eu alterei porque a fonte do wikispecies ([1]) dava o Chrysanthemum como nome principal, e é assim que está também no artigo da wiki-en. Mas depois ao procurar mais fundo encontrei isto, e sobretudo isto, que refere inclusivamente o processo de alteração da nomenclatura ([2]). Vou voltar a colocar tudo como estava, e acrescentar uam nota com as fontes sobre o assunto, a ver se mais ninguém cai no mesmo engano que eu. Abraço, -- Darwin ^Ahoy! 12:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus August 2012-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 18:31, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus August 2012-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Musikalisches Opfer

Salut mon ami !

Je t'écris en Français, pour que tu t'exerces !

Oui, j'ai souhaité mettre cette ligne de musique sur ma page, sans indication, pour que ceux que ça intéresse cherchent un peu, et reçoivent le message: c'est pour eux (donc toi!) une petite "Offrande Musicale", et c'est joli. J'avoue avoir pensé à toi, quand nous fredonnions dans la voiture alors que je te ramenais à ton hôtel... Tu te souviens ? Quel bon moment !!

Je trouve ce "thème du Roi" mystérieux et un peu magique. Evidemment que Frédéric II a lancé un défi à JS Bach ! Mais celui-ci l'a relevé, et avec quelle force et quelle maestria !

Ce début de fugue, c'est ce qu'on appelle en musique un "Ricercar", et là Jean Sébastien Bach a été encore plus fort, il a fait un acrostiche avec le mot "RICERCAR", puisqu'il a donné un titre latin à l'"Offrande Musicale": Regis Iussu Cantio Et Reliqua Canonicae Arte Resoluta, ce qui veut dire: "Thème réalisé par ordre du Roi et le reste résolu par l'art du canon". J'adore cette histoire !

Amitiés,--Jebulon (talk) 16:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

• Et je te réponds en Français, pour pratiquer les erreurs... Oui, c'est une histoire presque incroyable. Penser que Bach était considéré, au temps de cet épisode, comme un réactionnaire, voire un anachronisme, pour ceux qui suivaient les vents du classicisme (comme son fils)! Ce que me frappe dans le génie de Bach ce n’est pas l’originalité (Bach n’était pas du tout un «original», comme d’ailleurs Mozart), c’est la beauté alliée à la suprême perfection. Beaucoup de musiciens de son temps connaissaient l’art de la Fugue mais très peu d’entre eux ont réussi à faire des fugues complexes … et belles. Bon, parler de Bach et de la musique me fait l’envie d’y revenir. Dommage que je n’ai pas le talent ! On va peut-être avoir l’opportunité de chantonner quelques thèmes baroques, comme l’année dernière. C’est certain, je serai à Paris en Décembre: [3]. La BnF va me payer le voyage et l’hôtel ! Amitiès, Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:41, 26 August 2012 (UTC)