User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive31

Blatta orientalis

Hello Alvesgaspar,

You reverted my removal of the category "Blatta orientalis" for the image "File:Cockroach August 2012-2.jpg". I noticed someone else tried to remove it previously as well. The appearance of the pictured specimen contradicts scientific descriptions of the species. Famales of B. orientalis have almost no tegmina (the outer wings; they extend just past the thorax), and males of the species have tegmina that cover only about two thirds of the abdomen.

The pictured specimen has tegmina that extend past the tip of the rear abdomenal segment. They are clearly damaged, and may have reached past the cerci, but even as pictured would be an extreme outlier for the species.

This 1838 drawing and this 1913 drawing both illustrate the limited length of the male tegmina. They also show that the abdomen of the male is around the same width as its pronotum (the shield behind the head), whereas the pictured specimen has an abdomen almost 50% wider than its pronotum.

This source describes the male body length as 20-25 mm, and the length of tegmina as 12-16 mm.

Other details (cerci, pronotum, styles) have less pronounced deviations, but I'm hopeful that the tegmina alone convince you of its misidentification. The image in question is used in the Wikipedia pages of several languages as an illustration in articles about Blatta orientalis.

Regards. ––Agyle

• Thank you, I believe you are right about the misidentification. Any strong feelings about the right species? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:55, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vinca March 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jbribeiro1 02:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marble sculpture Gulbenkian March 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caparica January 2014-3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:30, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2014-13a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 00:02, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2014-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:52, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments dust spot right side --Cccefalon 06:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC) --  Done, thank you -- Alvesgaspar 11:11, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:18, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2014-17a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A dustspot (see annotation) and please remove the birds which are not cleary recognisable as birds. --Cccefalon 13:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC) --  Done -- Alvesgaspar 13:56, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:33, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2014-15a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but I have a problem seeing it, it looks a bit pixelated (at full size). Do you have the same problem? Maybe you saved it bigger than it is, I don't know. --Kadellar 15:24, 26 April 2014 (UTC) -- You are quite right, my lousy image program is to blame. A new version was uploaded -- Alvesgaspar 19:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Thanks for reworking. --Kadellar 21:54, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2014-7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality; find the sunbathing lady --A.Savin 16:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Finally found her on the rooftops -- Sanyambahga 10:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estrela April 2014-5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 04:50,29 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estrela April 2014-4a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2014-3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estrela April 2014-7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Fine by me --RalfHuels 08:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2014-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:31, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2014-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 22:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estrela April 2014-10a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tilia May 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estrela April 2014-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice --Moroder 19:04, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callophrys May 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMO --Cccefalon 04:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cistus May 2014-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoverfly April 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cistus May 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railing May 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cistus May 2014-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 09:02, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campilhas May 2014-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very beautiful. --Heuschrecke 18:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexandra May 2014-1b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I am sorry but IMHO this image is not sharp and could be nice more size (it is not a requirement but having a camera Nikon D800E) --The Photographer 03:22, 11 May 2014 (UTC)  Support Enough sharp for QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 19:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tipulid May 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Clarification of rules Wikimedia:

Hi,

Ckyba had said on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Moonrise_over_Nationalpark_M%C3%BCritz.jpg#File:Moonrise_over_Nationalpark_M.C3.BCritz.jpg."It wasn't clear to us if it was 50 edits on the commons, or on any wiki project. pmisson is an active wikipedian (in Spanish): https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Especial:Contribuciones/Pmisson&offset=&limit=100&target=Pmisson Ckyba (talk) 12:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC)"

Could you clarify if you need to have 50 editions in wikipedia or any project?

Thanks, Pmisson (talk) 20:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Pmisson,

Sorry, the rule refers clearly to the Commons' account: "Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote" (bold is mine). I suggest you nominate your photo to Valued image candidates, though nothing is guaranteed! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:22, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rubus May 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Graphium 07:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo May 2014-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. (But please remove the dust spots right of the building) --P e z i 19:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avena May 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

QI

Hi,

I think you made a small mistake here and reviewed the wrong image (Polo_World_Cup instead of the second insect image).--ArildV (talk) 17:46, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you, it is fixed now. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthidium May 2014-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 13:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coreopsis May 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-14a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kniphofia May 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:44, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-27a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice to see Madrid by other users. Titles could be better. Did you see Plaza Castilla's epic symmetry fail? --Kadellar 15:30, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-41a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clouds May 2014-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-50a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-32a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-45a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Maathavan 10:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-43a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Maathavan 10:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your castle

I like your new castle! I took some photos of that as well in Madrid in February - not uploaded yet. --Slaunger (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• I like it too. I still have a panorama to process but doubt that it will become better than this one. The problem is the too short shooting distance due to the Cervantes monument. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Agreed. I also have some photos, where I have the Cervantes monument between the camera and the the building, to get less geometric distortions of the building, but then the monument obscures far too much, and I have problems with a nice evening sunlit facade giving a huge contrast to dark shadows at the monument and surrounding vegetation. --Slaunger (talk) 19:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. But: Please add geo location. --XRay 18:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-42a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add geo location. And - may be - the template for panoramics. --XRay 18:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almudena Madrid May 2014-11a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great photo !!! --Jacek Halicki 07:28, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 12:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Madrid

Welcome to my humble home! --Slaunger (talk) 22:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Haha nice castle, did you know it has just been sold? 265 million, a bargain! I hope you liked Madrid, even with the bad light. Those days the weather changed quite a lot and sometimes there was great light, sometimes awful. That's the eternal problem of being a visitor, you can't be there all days and wait to get the best light. If at anytime you come back, you can make me know and maybe we can go and take some pictures. Churches are usually nicer in the inside, because a lot of them are too sober on the outside ;) Cheers! --Kadellar (talk) 17:43, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

@Kadellar: : It rained almost all the time, while I was in Madrid in February. But one sunny evening, it was like this. So I was lucky . --Slaunger (talk) 22:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-64a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --P e z i 23:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-65a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 02:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-63a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-57a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa June 2014-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-72a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-56a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-71a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitral Madrid 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality, however left side leaning inwards. --Cccefalon 04:49, 13 June 2014 (UTC) --  Done Thank you, done Alvesgaspar 09:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-74a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa June 2014-14a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 13:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa June 2014-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Files of Paris with bad file names

Sorry Alvesgaspar! But Cat-a-lot is not working now. I will do it later.--Paris 16 (talk) 20:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa June 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 10:12, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-39a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 17:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo June 2104-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eristalinus June 2014-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 20:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eristalinus June 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 13:05, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo June 2104-3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. I like the simplicity of the composition a lot. --Frank Schulenburg 02:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yucca May 2014-2b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aesculus May 2014-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-93a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-88a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality image now. --Cayambe 06:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo June 2104-5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-92a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:39, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-81a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:39, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-84a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:39, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Populus June 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 14:39, 27 June 2014 (UTC)