Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)Edit


Dear AntiCompositeNumber,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Random? Missouri? Show me?Edit

I see now. You are acting as a gate keeper. A troll.

Well bully for you.

What just happened to a page of writing.

Just disappeared after i went to fetch a url link since i dont want to be committing a copyright violation when uploading a tintype of long dead potentially important american figures by a long dead anonymous photographer.

This is not random. I take that as an insult. Yes i am making a claim. You make me out to be a copyright criminal. Well shill. Check this out. https://www.jazzres.in/2021/04/earp-brothers-tintype-discovered-by_9.html

You dont know a damn thing about missouri so please quit with the ‘show me’.

https://www.jazzres.in/2021/04/earp-brothers-tintype-discovered-by_9.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzresin (talk • contribs) 04:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[]

TalkbackEdit

  Hello, AntiCompositeNumber. You have new messages at BananaYesterday's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

— Preceding unsigned comment added by BananaYesterday (talk • contribs) 19:56, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[]

will be more carefulEdit

Hello, About the File:Actress Shin Hyun Been for Sunset In My Hometown Cine Concert on June 19, 2018.jpg At first Your bot has tagged me because I only included the License in text not tag. Before this I uploaded many photos at once cause I saw from some page of wikicommons that has the same source ie. tistory blog so I think Oh I can use it but the fact it was not permitted. I got it that the photo should from the site that has CC Creative Commons license so I searched for the source and finally found it but it is "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Korea (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR)" in this website https://blog.naver.com/jins3112/221308938291 , However this one can't be used for commercial purpose, not sure if wikipedia is a commercial one? By the way, I added the tag (CC-BY-2.0 KR) right after I was warning from the bot and I was confused like how to deal with the bot's warning after adding the license tag. I apology for that. And I want someone to review if (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR) can be used or not and just found out from your link that it cannot. For now,I know from the referred link/table "Summary of Creative Commons licenses on Wikimedia Commons " what kinds of CC that can be used it is so helpful I was very confused and new to this kind of things/edits. Thank you I will be more careful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winniebeen (talk • contribs) 18:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[]

The file of Calci is a mistake form the uploader...Edit

I know the guy, he is old and made a mistake. He uploaded basically the same file again in the wrong box of Wiki Loves monuments, that's why it originally had the wrong name. I fixed the name, than talked to him asking to pay attention, that's when we realzed what happened and I was asked to remove it. I simply made a redirect link. He is not so expert to ask a deletion request, and it was just simpler.

If there is some pedantic rule, than keep it. but there is practical reason to keep both. I am fine in any case. it will increase the number of file of WLM... and it's not my fault.--Alexmar983 (talk) 03:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[]

@Alexmar983 The two files have different lighting, so I can't delete either as a duplicate. I could merge them, but I'd want to hear from Renato camilli themselves before doing so. In the future, please don't redirect files that already exist, as it removes the attribution and licensing information without removing the file. Instead, tag them with {{Duplicate}} or nominate them for deletion. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[]
He won't even see this tag, he is not an expert user, mainly a WLM uploader. It's an intense season and there is no time to tutor a user to do a procedure. Keep both.--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Galerida macrorhyncha distribution map.png.Edit

Dear bot :-) you tagged the file above because of "contradictory information about the license". I rewrote that part and hope it is now clear that

  1. I made the map myself
  2. I used a source to be able to put data in a map
  3. I cited this source as exactly as possible

I hope this is enough - but at my userpage User talk:Andreas von Stackelberg the warning is still existing. Can I do something to get rid of it? Thx! Andreas von Stackelberg (talk) 23:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[]

@Andreas von Stackelberg Looks good to me. In general we encourage people to archive their talk pages instead of deleting, but there's nothing wrong with removing a bot notice about something you've fixed. You can just undo the edit or remove the section. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[]
By the way, you should list the source of the blank map of Africa that you used. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Do you want to know your number?Edit

(5+4)x(6+0)-(3)=51. B = answer. B ÷ 3 = A. A + (√9) = 26. 26 + π to the nearest whole number is 29. Your number is 29.-Mathematical natural (talk) 03:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Are there already tasks?Edit

Hello!

I was wondering if you knew if there were Phabricator tasks files about these two queries: Special:Search/filetype:audio_-fileh:0 (WebM video files misidentified as audio) and w:Special:Search/file:_local:_filetype:video_fileh:0 (OGG audio files misidentified as video)?Jonteemil (talk) 20:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[]

@Jonteemil Not aware of one for OGG, but someone did already file phab:T285022 for WebM. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[]
Oh, right, I did file a task for the WebM files. Should I file one for the OGG files as well?Jonteemil (talk) 20:52, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[]
@Jonteemil Might as well. I'd expect it to be a related but slightly different problem. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[]

RequestEdit

Hello AntiCompositeNumber! May I request for the update on translation marks at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/São Tomé and Príncipe? I felt best to request such instead of doing that on my own. Thanks. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[]

@JWilz12345   Done AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Some baklava for you!Edit

  This is shit okay Ashsdmdjsjsnudnsis (talk) 08:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[]