This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aristeas.

This is the user talk page of Aristeas, where you can send messages and comments to Aristeas.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.


Create jpgEdit

Hi, Aristeas, one help for me. Please upload the pictures in Vani Bhojan. Please I believing you upload the pictures. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2409:4072:286:D6E9:B4CE:DD7A:EEAB:5991 (talk) 17:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

TUSC token 0cacf2bff7ac256a0a10feed4ef7ebfaEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)Edit


Dear Aristeas,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

You've got mailEdit

Usage of your imageEdit

Hi,

I will use your image as part of a presentation talking about "structural knots" in architecture

Thanks, Martin —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.193.77.202 (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

বাংলাদেশে উইকি লাভস আর্থ ছবি প্রতিযোগিতা পুনরায় শুরু হয়েছে!Edit

সুপ্রিয় Aristeas! উইকিমিডিয়া বাংলাদেশ-এর আয়োজনে দেশের সংরক্ষিত প্রাকৃতিক বনাঞ্চল ও এর জীববৈচিত্র্যের ছবি নিয়ে বাংলাদেশে চতুর্থবারেরমত শুরু হয়েছে উইকিপিডিয়ার ছবি প্রতিযোগিতা উইকি লাভস আর্থ ২০২০। এক মাসব্যাপী স্থায়ী প্রতিযোগিতাটি ১ জুন, সোমবার থেকে শুরু হয়ে ৩০ জুন পর্যন্ত চলবে।

প্রতিযোগিতা পাতায় দেয়া তালিকা থেকে বাংলাদেশের প্রাকৃতিক সংরক্ষিত অঞ্চলের যেকোনো সময় তোলা ছবি জুন মাসে জমা দিয়ে প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশ নেওয়া যাবে। প্রতিযোগিতায় একজন একাধিক ছবি জমা দিতে পারবেন। প্রতিযোগিতা শেষে প্রতিটি দেশ থেকে সেরা ১০টি ছবি আন্তর্জাতিক বিচারকদের কাছে পাঠানো হবে এবং সব দেশের ছবি থেকে সেরা ১৫টি ছবি আন্তর্জাতিকভাবে বিজয়ী ঘোষণা করা হবে। বিজয়ীদের জন্য আলাদাভাবে আন্তর্জাতিক ও জাতীয় পুরস্কার রয়েছে।

  • ২০২০ সালের প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশগ্রহণ সম্পর্কে বিস্তারিত জানতে ভিজিট করুন: উইকি লাভস আর্থ ২০২০
  • আপনার যদি কোনও প্রশ্ন থাকে, তাহলে নিঃসংকোচে ইমেইল করুন wle wikimedia.org.bd ঠিকানায় অথবা যোগদান করতে পারেন ফেসবুকের facebook.com/groups/wlebangladesh গ্রুপে।

আপনি যদি টুইটার ও ফেসবুকে থাকেন, তাহলে হালনাগাদ সংবাদ ও আরো তথ্যের জন্য     @WLEBangladesh অনুসরণ করুন। আসুন সবাই মিলে উইকিপিডিয়ার মাধ্যমে বাংলাদেশের প্রাকৃতিক সৌন্দর্য বিশ্ব দরবারে তুলে ধরি। ধন্যবাদ!

#wleBangladesh দলের পক্ষে,
নাহিদ সুলতান, শনিবার ১৭:০৬, ০৬ জুন ২০২০ (ইউটিসি)

আপনি এই বার্তাটি পাচ্ছেন কারণ আপনি এর পূর্বে উইকিমিডিয়া বাংলাদেশ আয়োজিত ছবি প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশ নিয়েছিলেন

CopyrightEdit

Hallo Herr Eisele,

Ich wollte fragen ob ich ihr schönes Foto auf meiner Visitenkarte für Stocherkahnfahrten verwenden darf und falls ja, unter welchen Bedingungen?

Sie erreichen mich unter folgender Email Adresse: michael.karcz@web.de

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Michael Karcz —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.113.98.94 (talk) 07:07, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Featured PicturesEdit

Hi Aristeas - hope you're doing well, and congratulations on your latest FP (I wasn't sure that one would make it at first, but it is definitely deserving). Just a quick question for you - I wondered why you don't nominate your own photos at FPC? It's just that your output contains such a large number of deserving candidates that I'll never get to the bottom of all the ones I'd like to nominate. (As far as I can tell every picture of yours that's been nominated has passed so far.)

Looking through your submissions for WLM and WLE I think you could very quickly double or even triple your FP total and get some more visibility for some excellent images. If you're not sure which ones might do well at FPC, I'd be really happy to give you some suggestions of which ones seem likely to do well to me. Of course, if you don't fancy nominating your own photos, that's OK too and I and others will be happy to continue nominating those that seem good to us :) Cmao20 (talk) 01:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello Cmao20, thank you very much for your message, which is quite complimentary and encouraging! :) I have to think a bit over this – I am hesitant to nominate any of my images, but the reason is not easy to explain. So I will come back to you in some days. For now, thank you very much, and please be safe, --Aristeas (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello Cmao20, hope you are doing well, and I must apologize for not coming back to you and your kind message earlier. I am very sorry! I can just say that I was very busy in the last weeks and also had to inspect the various, often just subliminal reasons before I was able to explain them.
Above all I want to thank you heartily for your selfless effort to nominate photographs and scans made by other people as featured picture candidates! IMHO you and Ikan and Andrei and the other hard-working nominators are the real heros of the search for excellent pictures on Commons; if somebody nominates his/her own photos, there may be involved some self-interest and vanity, but you are the ones which really keep the FPC page running and guarantee that it keeps devoted to the search for fine pictures and does not get into danger to become a mere contest for credits and applause.
Epecially your short, but precise, accurate and well-formulated nominations which perfectly sum up the particular merits of a photo are very helpful and always very instructive.
Now, why do I not nominate my own photos on the FPC page? I am always in danger to write novels ;–), so forgive me.

  • I have the impression that if a photo is nominated on the FPC page by someone else it has better chances than if the same photo is nominated by the photographer himself/herself. This impression may be wrong, of course, but it is a simple reason why I hesitate to nominate anything myself.
  • Actually I have once tried to nominate one of my photos, but the nomination failed immediately and miserably because the first answer was a harsh ‘oppose’ by a prominent FPC regular. This, to be honest, did not exactly invite me to try to nominate anything else. Yes, I know, it is stupid to let oneself be intimidated by a single event, but that greeting was not exactly inviting nor welcoming.
  • Retrospectively I understand that the critique was justified, at least partially; I just did not see myself a certain technical problem in that photo. Now I see it, and try to avoid it everywhere, but I always have to think about each of my photos: What if this picture (which seems OK to me) does also contain some serious defect which I just do not see myself? I am just not sure ... so I better do not nominate it.
  • In addition, I do see technical shortcomings in almost all of my photos, of course. This is not surprising: when I develop and edit a photo, I look at it for quite a long time, sometimes for hours, therefore I must know better than anyone else that here a detail is not perfectly sharp, that there is some irregularity, etc. ;–)
  • I am often surprised which photos do appeal to other people and which don’t. When I contribute photos to WLM and WLE, I have always some favourites about which I think that they could have a chance to win. But very often these my favourite photos are sorted out even by the pre-jury, and if some of them reach the jury they almost never get under the 100 finalists. And on the other hand some photos of me which IMHO are full of defects get under the 100 finalists. So it seems I just cannot judge which of my photos appeal to other people and which don’t.

But sorry for wasting your time (I just wanted to explain that)! Of course I am very glad about your offer to give me some suggestions of which of my photos could have a chance on the FPC page! That’s a great offer, and it would help me very much to overcome the aforementioned unsureness about which photos could appeal to other people. If you could give me some suggestions, I will hopefully be able to take my courage in both hands and try (again) to nominate some photos myself. ;–)
In addition, I am very grateful and happy if you would continue to nominate some of my photos, too :–). As I said above, your nomination texts are excellent and IMHO definitely increase the chance of any image to get applause.
So thank you again and all the best, be save, --Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)


Hi Aristeas. Of course I am always happy to continue nominating your pictures, and I appreciate your kind words about the texts I write with each nomination. And thank you for the wider crop applied to the picture up for vote at the moment - although I would be surprised if the picture did not pass anyway.

I understand your reasoning, and I definitely know what you mean about seeing flaws more easily when they are your own photos and you've spent a long time on them. I had a look for the nomination of your own photo that you mention, I assume you are referring to this. That picture is IMO not your best; I would have given it a 'weak support' if I'd been around at the time. That said, it's considerably superior to many images in the stained-glass windows section. Compared to this, for instance, the colours and exposure are handled much better. I guess my objection to your shot is the large amount of noise in the darker areas. I like the fact that you have tried to capture the texture of the brickwork, but I can understand why Ikan Kekek felt that there was too much noise, especially in such a competitive category.

this is IMO the gold standard for a stained glass window at FPC. But your picture is good and I would have voted for it, it's just you have better work in the church-interiors genre. (This is an obvious FP of stained glass by you.) I suspect that if you had not withdrawn it it may well have been promoted. Getting 3 supports and 1 oppose within one day is not a disaster, and the consensus seemed to be building around 'Support.'

Below is a gallery of your images that I believe stand a good chance at FPC. Of course I do get it wrong sometimes   but I think most of these would pass. Cmao20 (talk) 17:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Cmao20, thank you very much for your instructive and encouraging answer! You are completely right, that was not my best photo and the noise level in the dark areas is quite disappointing. I have not referred to it in order to complain about Ikan’s ‘‘contra’’, I just wanted to explain why I am hesitant about nominating any of my photos at FPC, as I always have to think about which serious flaw I may miss this time ;–). (I have even re-done that photo in between, and while the new photo is better, it is probably still not good.)
But your explanation is helpful, and your gallery of possible FPs is really great, because it offers me a highly qualified second opinion about which of my photos could have a chance at the FPC page. I have to thank you very much for it, as for all of your continued effort! At the moment I am busy with some other things and also want to edit and upload some photos from my long backlog, but when I find some time I will try to nominate some of them myself. Thank you very much again and all the best, --Aristeas (talk) 10:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Gallery of possible FPsEdit

Bitte um HilfeEdit

Hello Aristeas,

today I am writing not about one of my own pictures, but I am asking you to help with the picture of a friend from Bangladesh. He nominated it as QI and got a comment that he should fix "Strange looking artifacts especially around the masts but also some other boat elements. Pity, because the picture is interesting." He does not know how to fix this and neither do I - perhaps you could help to improve this beautiful image?

Thanks a lot, --Kritzolina (talk) 20:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello Kritzolina, I have tried my luck ;–). Please take a look at the photo now (maybe you need to refresh the page in the browser first because the MediaWiki software sometimes still delivers old versions of images from some cache). Is it better? Hope it helps, --Aristeas (talk) 10:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks a lot Kritzolina and Aristeas for the cordial cooperation :).--Rocky Masum (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
You are welcome ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 14:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much, vielen lieben Dank, Aristeas! --Kritzolina (talk) 15:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tübingen - Stiftskirche - Chorgestühl - König David (weiches Licht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 19:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Bonfeld - Große Fruchtscheuer (Kirchhausener Str. 34) - Tor 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Besigheim - Altstadt - Fachwerkhaus Kirchstr. 10 - Ansicht von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonfeld - Oberschloss - Meierei - Torbogen mit Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Schwäbisch Hall - Altstadt - Am Markt 9 - Ansicht.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwäbisch Hall - Altstadt - Am Markt 9 - Ansicht.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esslingen aN - Altstadt - Doppelhaus Neckarstr. 55, Kanalstr. 28 - Ansicht von Hammerkanalbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:46, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esslingen aN - Altstadt - Altes Rathaus - nördlicher Gibel mit Abendsonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenloher Freilandmuseum - Weidnerhof - Ansicht von WSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:12, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwäbisch Gmünd - Stadtgarten - Stahlsches Schlösschen - Ansicht von NO in blauer Stunde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:12, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tübingen - Anlagensee - Ansicht im Juni mit Blick zum Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tübingen - Altstadt - Alte Burse - Ansicht von Neckarinsel im Februar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Liridon 10:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tübingen - Altstadt - Alte Burse - Ansicht aus Klosterberg im Oktober.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tübingen - Anlagensee - Blick vom Südufer auf Nymphengruppe und Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Liridon 10:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tübingen - Anlagensee - Blick auf Nymphengruppe und Uhlandgymnasium im Juni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pforzheim - Kollmar-und-Jourdan-Haus - Gebäude Bleichstr. 77 - Westfassade - die mittleren Büsten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beilstein-Billensbach - Schmidbachtal mit Neumühle von Süden im November.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freilichtmuseum Beuren - Fotoatelier aus Kirchheim u.T. - Innenansicht (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support GQ --Palauenc05 10:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löwenstein - Stocksberg - Stocksberger Jagdhaus von NW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good Quality. --Fischer.H 17:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tübingen - Stiftskirche - Kapelle SO - Gewölbe mit Wappen-Schlussstein - Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support High resolution, very sharp, possibly FP! --Palauenc05 15:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tübingen - Stiftskirche - Kapelle SO - Gewölbe mit Marien-Schlussstein - Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support like the other one! --Palauenc05 15:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonfeld - Evangelische Kirche - Westportal - Wappenrelief.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 05:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tübingen - Neckarfront - Blick entlang Neckar im Herbst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Beautiful and good quality --Jakubhal 13:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tübingen - Neckarfront - Gebäudestaffelung vom Hölderlinturm zum Stiftskirchenturm (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. Beautiful city! --IntelTesla 18:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freilichtmuseum Beuren - Fotoatelier aus Kirchheim u.T. - Außenansicht von SW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freilichtmuseum Beuren - Fotoatelier aus Kirchheim u.T. - Außenansicht von NO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freilichtmuseum Beuren - Fotoatelier aus Kirchheim u.T. - Außenansicht von NNO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Möckmühl - Blick vom Turm der Stadtkirche auf Hang und Burg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)