Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Asurnipal!

Contents

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Asurnipal!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Europastimme-Cover-2013-01.jpgEdit

 
File:Europastimme-Cover-2013-01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 15:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Asurnipal, Du hast die Markierung revertiert. Das ist aber auf Commons so nicht einfach zulässig. Selbst wenn Du der Urheber bist wie Du es behauptest, akzeptieren wir Medien, die anderswo publiziert sind (wie hier) nur dann, wenn sie dort unter eine freie Lizenz gestellt sind oder wenn eine schriftliche Freigabe-Erklärung vorliegt, die an unser Support-Team weitergeleitet wird. Wärst Du bereit, eine entsprechende Freigabe-Erklärung zu organisieren? Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 17:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Hallo AFBorchert. Die Zustimmung kann ich bringen, kein Problem. Derzeit bin ich unterwegs, aber bis Ende der Woche musste es klappen Reicht die Zustimmung der Redaktion oder braucht es den Medien-Inhaber? Asurnipal (talk) 21:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Asurnipal, wir würden die Zustimmung der Urheber benötigen. Wenn dies Ende der Woche erfolgt, genügt dies. Eine Vorlage für die Erklärung gibt es hier. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 04:38, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Hallo AFBorchert. Ich sollte noch diese Woche die Zustimmungserklärung des Medieninhabers erhalten. Ist im Tagesgeschäft untergegangen. --Asurnipal (talk) 06:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Hallo AFBorchert. Ich habe Dir eine E-Mail gesendet mit der Zustimmungserklärung an den allgemeinen OTRS-Support. SG --Asurnipal (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scopeEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Dornbirn (Gütle), was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--Motopark (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Hallo User:Motopark. Vielen Dank. das habe ich fehlerhaft angelegt und erst nachher gesehen, wo der Fehler lag. Danke fürs entfernen. --Asurnipal (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Juristische Übersetzung.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Juristische Übersetzung.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Holz-Pilz.jpgEdit

Hallo Asurnipal! Hast du von diesem Pilz ein Foto von der Unterseite (Bei Pilzen immer wichtig)? Ich denke es ist der de:Zaun-Blättling, dazu müsste er aber eine lamellenartige Struktur auf der Unterseite haben. Schöne Fotos vom Rossbad in Krumbach hast du gemacht. Viele Grüße ins Ländle --Josef Papi (talk) 07:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Josef Papi. Leider nein, kein Foto von der Unterseite. Der Pilz war nur ein paar Zentimeter über der Kiesschüttung und ich konnte den Balken nicht drehen, weil eine PV-Anlage drauf steht. --Asurnipal (talk) 07:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Winsau AustriaEdit

Love the pictures, beautiful photos .... interested in Winsau, as my maiden name is Winsauer, and have traced family back to the 1500s .... would like to know more about the history of this beautiful place ....

Hello, in the German Wikipedia is below: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winsau more information to the place "Winsau" near Dornbirn, Vorarlberg, Austria. Under http://lexikon.dornbirn.at/ and the search term: "Winsauer" you will find people known to this surname from Dornbirn. Unfortunately, everything in German only.

File:Wendelin Weingartner.JPGEdit

 
File:Wendelin Weingartner.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Herwig van Staa.JPGEdit

 
File:Herwig van Staa.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

user catEdit

Nach Commons:User-specific_galleries,_templates_and_categories#Categories ist es zwar keine policy, aber weit geübte Praxis, User Categories vom Hauptkategorienraum zu trennen. Demnach gehörte Category:Asurnipal auf nur {{User category|Asurnipal}} reduziert. Die aktuelle Situation ordnet deine Bilder alle z.B. in Education in Austria, Education in Liechtenstein, Education in Switzerland, Academics from Austria usw. ein. Ich änder das mal, und hoffe auf dein Einverständnis. Solltest du als Person eigenständige Relevanz besitzen, dann bitte in einem parallelen Baum unter deinem Realnamen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Jaqen (talk) 13:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Aerialview VOGIS Diebsschloessle.pdfEdit

 
File:Aerialview VOGIS Diebsschloessle.pdf has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: See watermark left lower bottom
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Karfreitagsei Dotter,2011-08-19 20.31.34-1.gifEdit

 
File:Karfreitagsei Dotter,2011-08-19 20.31.34-1.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Karfreitagsei Dotter,2011-08-19 20.32.15-1.gifEdit

 
File:Karfreitagsei Dotter,2011-08-19 20.32.15-1.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Schnepfau Vorsaess Wirmboden.jpgEdit

 
File:Schnepfau Vorsaess Wirmboden.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Luftbild Montiola-Weiher.pdfEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Luftbild Montiola-Weiher.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Luftbild Montiola-Weiher.pdf]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth O (talk) 15:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Hallo. Ich habe schon in der Vergangenheit darauf hingewiesen, dass für diese Luftbilder eine Zustimmung des Landes Vorarlberg per E-Mail zur Verwendung auf Wikipedia vorliegt. Nachdem es auch damals niemanden interessiert hat, gehe ich davon aus, dass dies weiter so bleibt und wünsche frohes Löschen. SG, Asurnipal (talk) 07:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Zur Verwendung auf WP ist halt nicht genug. Du bräuchtest schon eine Freigabe, die auch die kommerzielle Nutzung weltweit erlaubt, die genaue Lizenz definiert und müsstest diese an das OTRS-Team schicken. Nur so als Hinweis. Hier in deiner Disk wird bei Löschanträgen nicht mitgelesen, sondern die Freigabe muss an der Datei selbst ersichtlich sein (durch Angabe des OTRS-Tickets). lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Grafik-Erzg-Sonnenfinsterni-68Prozent,20150320.jpgEdit

 B dash (talk) 13:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)


Hinweis zur Teilnahme an WikiDaheimEdit

Hallo Asurnipal, ich habe gesehen, dass du Bilder hochgeladen hast, die auch für WikiDaheim von Interesse sein könnten, z.B. Bregenz-Bezirksgericht-alter Eingang.jpg. Damit die Bilder an unserem Fotowettbewerb teilnehmen können, müssen sie mit der Commons-Vorlage WikiDaheim und dem entsprechenden Thema (topic) gekennzeichnet werden. Dies geschieht automatisch, wenn du die Bilder über unsere App https://Wikidaheim.at oder über die diversen Listen (Denkmallisten, Naturdenkmallisten, Public Art Listen, etc. in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia) hochlädst. Bei anderen Upload-Wegen musst du selbst dafür sorgen, dass das Bild mit den richtigen Bausteinen markiert ist, um am Wettbewerb teilzunehmen. Technische Hilfe dazu findest du unter de:Wikipedia Diskussion:WikiDaheim. Natürlich steht dir die Teilnahme mit deinen Bildern frei. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:50, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Karl Gruber (ÖVP).JPGEdit

 
File:Karl Gruber (ÖVP).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Permission of the painter needed via COM:OTRS.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Dies ist ein Bild in einer öffentlich zugänglich Galerie im Landhaus von Innsbruck. Daher besteht mE keine Urhebererchtsverletzung, da der Urheber in die Veröffentlichung zugestimmt hat.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Asurnipal (talk • contribs)
Hallo Asurnipal, ich habe das speedy jetzt mal durch ein no-perm ersetzt, damit du etwas mehr Zeit hast. Du schreibst "Urheber .. zugestimmt hat". Das Bild ist aber mit "unbekannter Urheber" markiert. Das passt nicht zusammen. Der entscheidende Urheber ist der Maler, nicht so sehr der Fotograf. Also, wer ist der Maler? Von wann ist das Gemälde? --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Karl Gruber (ÖVP).JPGEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Karl Gruber (ÖVP).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Karl Gruber (ÖVP).JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, der Urherber ist da mE nicht so wichtig. Der Maler erarbeitete mW dieses Bild entgeltlich im Auftrag der Tiroler Landesregierung, die auch damit das Nutzungsrecht hat (wie bei allen anderen Bildern dort). Die Tirloer Landesregierung wiederum stellt das Bild (und die anderen in der Galerie) öffentich zugänglich aus und es gibt dort auch keine Beschränkung zu fotografieren (Genehmigungsvorbehalt, Hausrecht etc). Ich habe mal nichts gesehen, dass dort das Fotografieren unzulässig oder an eine Genehmigung gebunden war (und dazu sehe ich mich immer um). SG, Asurnipal (talk) 09:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Asurnipal,
ähem. Also, abgesehen von den USA (work for hire) ist es in den meisten Ländern so, dass bei bezahlten Kunstwerken das Urheberrecht beim Urheber verbleibt und nicht auf den Käufer übergeht. Wenn du dir also ein Gemälde eines lebenden oder nicht schon 70 Jahre toten Malers kaufst, darfst du ein Foto von deinem Gemälde nicht auf Commons hochladen, weil du nicht Recht dazu hast, es sei denn, das wäre ausdrücklich mit dem Künstler im Kaufvertrag vereinbart worden. Von der Panoramafreiheit in Österreich ist das Foto auch nicht abgedeckt. D.h., du kommst hier nicht umhin, bei der Landesregierung nachzufragen, 1) wer der Maler ist (weil er sowieso genannt werden muss), und 2) ob sie (die Landesregierung) wirklich soviel Rechte vom Urheber erworben hat, dass sie Fotos des Werkes genehmigen darf. Ein Indiz für letzteres könnte sein, wenn z.B. Postkarten mit dem Foto des Gemäldes vor Ort verkauft werden. --Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Hallo Túrelio, wenn dies so wäre, wie Du schreibst, so dürfte kein einziges Bild aus einer Galerie oder einem Museeum, keine Bild einer zeitgenössischen Statue in einem Museeum, uU auch keine Einrichtung (Design) veröffentlicht werden, die aus A stammt, weil dann immer die Zustimmung des Urherbers/Schöpfers erforderlich ist. Dass dem nicht so ist, zeigen mE die vielen Bilder, die wir von Kunstwerken haben, die in Museen in A ausgestellt sind. Das Urheberrecht bleibt natürlich beim Künstler, aber er kann, so wie ich auch mit meinen Fotos die ich mache, die Rechte sehr weitgehend an den Auftraggeber oder an einen Dritten oder an eine Gemeinschaft oder auch die ganze Welt übertragen, ohne dass dessen Zustimmung zukünftig erforderlich ist. Da das Bild für die Landesregierung entgeltlich geschaffen wurde, die Nutzungsrechte mW an die Landesregierung übertragen wurden, das Bild öffentlich ausgehängt ist, kein Genehmigungsvorbehalt besteht und auch kein Hausrecht dem entgegenspricht, kann es mE nicht erforderlich sein, den Urheber oder seine Erben auch nochmals zu fragen, ob er/sie denn einer Veröffentlichung zustimmt(en), wenn er dies bereits zuvor getan hat und keine Einschränkungen getroffen hat (was im Landhaus nicht ersichtlich gemacht wurde). Dadurch, dass es öffentlich zugänglich ausgehängt ist das Bild, ist ganz klar, dass der Urheber einer Veröffentlichung zugestimmt hat, da brauche ich den Kaufvertrag nicht zu sehen. In allen Museen und Enrichtungen, die ich in A kenne ist, wenn es eine entsprechende Einschränkung durch den Urheber gibt bzgl. des Fotografierens, dies auch ausdrücklich ausgeschildert (schon zum Schutz des Ausstellers). Woher leitetest Du übrigens in diesem Zusammenhang die Verpflichtung ab, den Urheber des Bildes zu nennen? SG, Asurnipal (talk) 10:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Asurnipal, die letzte Frage meinst du hoffentlich nicht ernst. Du reproduzierst das Werk eines Künstlers und fragst warum du diesen nennen solltest? Wenn dir die Ethik dafür nicht reicht, dann vielleicht, dass es unenzyklopädisch ist, den Maler eines Gemäldes nicht zu nennen (sofern dieser nicht nachweislich vorgezogen hat anonym zu bleiben), oder halt das Recht: § 13 UrhG (D).[1] Vermutlich kennt das österr. Urheberrecht ähnliche Vorgaben.
Zu deinen rechtlichen Annahmen davor: ich kann diesen in keiner Weise folgen (s.a. Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#2D_art_(paintings_etc.) & Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Museum_and_interior_photography), habe aber natürlich nur meine Admin-Erfahrung ohne formaljuristische Ausbildung. Wenn du das unter Einbezug Dritter (ggf. im österr. Recht bewanderter) ausdiskutieren willst (andernfalls wird das Bild automatisch in 7 Tagen gelöscht), kann ich gerne das derzeitige no-perm-speedy in einen regulären LA umwandeln, der dann eine offene Diskussionsplattform bietet. --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Hallo Túrelio, wir reden da aneinander vorbei. Die Zitierung des dUrG ist in dem Zusammenhang nicht richtig. Das österreichische Gegenstück dazu lautet:

§ 20. (1) Der Urheber bestimmt, ob und mit welcher Urheberbezeichnung das Werk zu versehen ist.

(2) Eine Bearbeitung darf mit der Urheberbezeichnung nicht auf eine Art versehen werden, die der Bearbeitung den Anschein eines Originalwerkes gibt.

(3) Vervielfältigungsstücke von Werken der bildenden Künste darf durch die Urheberbezeichnung nicht der Anschein eines Urstückes verliehen werden.

Die Nennung des Urhebers des gemalten Bildes erfolgt übrigens auf dem von mir angeführten Bild genaus so, wie er es wollte, mit seiner Signatur. Es ist nicht normiert, dass dieses "übersetzt" (Klarname, Künstlername etc) werden muss. Verboten wäre, wenn ich nur Teile des Bildes zeigen würde, ohne die Signatur. Du siehst aber auch, dass sich das öUrhG ganz wesentlich im Detail unterschiedlich zum dUrG. Auch kann ein Maler zB auf dieses Recht, seine Urheberschaft zu nennen ausdrücklich oder stillschweigend verzichten, wenn er zB keine Signatur anbringt. Auch dies ist zu respektieren und der Verstoss gegen diese selbstgewählte Anonymität wäre dann strafbar. Zudem kann aus dem Foto selbst klar abgeleitet werden, dass ich nicht Urheber des gemalten Bildes bin, sondern dass es sich um eine (leider schlechte) fotografische Reporoduktion handelt.
Wenn es zudem solche internenen Regelung - wie Du schreibst - auf Commons gibt, sind die für uns intern bindend aber nicht extern. Ob es ethisch verwerflich ist, den Maler des Bildes nicht extra anzuführen, lasse ich mal dahingestellt. Ich habe auch niemals behauptet, Urheber des Bildes zu sein, sondern ich bin Urheber des Fotos, auf dem das Bild abgebildet ist (und Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Museum_and_interior_photography und Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#2D_art_(paintings_etc. deckt sich dabei mE mit meiner Rechtsansicht). In jedem Fall ist es für mich nicht so wichtig, dass dieses Bild erhalten bleibt. Also, wenn es Dir wichtig ist und Du die Meinung vertrittst, dass ich Unrecht habe, lass es löschen. Dann haben wir eben keines von Herrn Gruber, die Welt geht deswegen nicht unter und vielleicht bekommen wir mal ein anderes. SG, Asurnipal (talk) 13:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Karl Gruber (ÖVP).JPGEdit

 
File:Karl Gruber (ÖVP).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Mir geht es nicht darum, das Bild unbedingt gelöscht zu haben, sondern der urheberrechtlichen Situation und unsere eigenen Regeln zu entsprechen. Wie angekündigt habe ich nun den no-perm-SLA in einen LA umgewandelt, um eine breitere Diskussion zu ermöglichen. --Túrelio (talk) 09:41, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:MARSHALLING SIGNALS (EU)-Wingwalkerguide-01 ASD.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 22:36, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


File:MARSHALLING SIGNALS (EU)-Turns while backing to starboard-14a ASD.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 22:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


File:MARSHALLING SIGNALS (EU)-Turns while backing to port-14b ASD.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 22:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 09:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Adolf T. Schneider und Mario Adorf 2017 (Foto 4).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Adolf T. Schneider und Mario Adorf 2017 (Foto 4).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Adolf T. Schneider und Mario Adorf 2017 (Foto 4).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Krd 16:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

permission gesendet. Asurnipal (talk) 09:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wehrübung 2016 - Adolf T. Schneider 2016 (Foto 2).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wehrübung 2016 - Adolf T. Schneider 2016 (Foto 2).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wehrübung 2016 - Adolf T. Schneider 2016 (Foto 2).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Krd 16:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

permission gesendet. Asurnipal (talk) 09:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Verleihung Mérite Européen Adolf T. Schneider 2018 (Foto 5).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Verleihung Mérite Européen Adolf T. Schneider 2018 (Foto 5).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Verleihung Mérite Européen Adolf T. Schneider 2018 (Foto 5).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Krd 16:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

permission gesendet. Asurnipal (talk) 09:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Verleihung Bürgerprojektpreis durch Adolf T. Schneider 2016 (Foto 3).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Verleihung Bürgerprojektpreis durch Adolf T. Schneider 2016 (Foto 3).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Verleihung Bürgerprojektpreis durch Adolf T. Schneider 2016 (Foto 3).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Krd 16:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

permission gesendet. Asurnipal (talk) 09:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Adolf T. Schneider 2016 (Foto 1).gifEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Adolf T. Schneider 2016 (Foto 1).gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Adolf T. Schneider 2016 (Foto 1).gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Krd 16:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

permission gesendet. Asurnipal (talk) 09:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Markus Frischhut 3.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Markus Frischhut 3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Das Bild ist leider beim Hochladen sehr schlecht geworden. Es kommt ein Neues und eine neue Genehmigung dazu. SG, Asurnipal (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Hallo Patrick Rogel, die Genehmigung der Fotografin wurde inzwischen gesendet, SG, Asurnipal (talk) 08:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Friedrichshafen-Wahlplakat Udo Bullmann-01ASD.jpgEdit

Hallo Asurnipal, das Wahlplakat hängt a) weder außen noch b) irgendwo dauerhaft, wir brauchen also eine Genehmigung des Fotografen des Portraits. Viele Grüße, --Emha (talk) 12:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Friedrichshafen-Wahlplakat Udo Bullmann-01ASD.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Friedrichshafen-Wahlplakat Udo Bullmann-01ASD.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Emha (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Emha, vielen Dank für Deine Nachricht. Das Wahlplakat wurde zu tausenden ausgehängt an allen möglichen Orten. Auch in der öffentlich zugänglichen Halle dieses Konferenzzentrums. Wenn Du meinst, es wäre zu löschen, dann stelle ich mich dem nicht entgegen, es ist nicht so wichtig. Ich hätte nur, wenn ich es gewusst hätte, das Original gleich daneben fotografiert. SG, Asurnipal (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Asurnipal, öffentliches Aushängen ist leider kein Freibrief, etwas hier unter einer freien Lizenz hochzuladen, auch auf öffentlich zugängliches Pressematerial trifft das selbe zu. Der Urheber, also der Fotogarf, muss der freien Lizenz zustimmen, und ja: wenn Du der Urheber bist und den Menschen selbst fotografieren kannst, dann ist das alles einfacher :-) Viele Grüße, --Emha (talk) 16:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Asurnipal".