Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Axel Pettersson (WMSE)!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Contents

Re:WLPA announcementEdit

Hi Axel,
it should be fairly easy to get a unique list of people that uploaded images of Austria and Sweden (Finland did not participate in WLM last year), but I am afraid I am unable to get a list of people that uploaded pictures of Barcelona only (as opposed to the whole Spain). Since there is no page about the participation of Spain as a whole, I'm assuming that only Catalonia (or just the city of Barcelona) is taking part, right? odder (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Sure—I have both lists ready and waiting, but where do I get the template from? {{Welcome to WLPA}} doesn't exist at the moment… odder (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
This is now ready—the bot sent the announcement to 441 users. odder (talk) 14:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Axel—apologies for such a belated reply. I just wanted to let you know that I did have a look at the list of Hebrew participants, but due to encoding problems (a file that hold this data on Toolserver is… weird, to say the least), I haven't been able to get a working list of Hebrew users from there (and there's no working API holding this data, either). I spent a few hours searching for a solution, but had to consider myself defeated in the end. I'm sorry I didn't contact you before, I think I just forgot about this :( odder (talk) 20:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
No worries, and thanks for all help. I also learned that the hebrew uploads are going through piwiki, is that what causes the weirdness? /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 21:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
No, it's just encoding problems—though now I think of it, I could've sent the invitation to those of the Israeli participants that did not have any Hebrew characters in their usernames… ah well. odder (talk) 22:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Coast of Peru from Arica to Chincha.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Coast of Peru from Arica to Chincha.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 15:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Axel, I do not know what script are you using for uploading the files but File:Coast of Peru from Arica to Chincha.jpg and possibly others do not have a license and adds bad categories and nonexisting institution templates. --Jarekt (talk) 15:42, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Other files with no license

--Jarekt (talk) 19:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jarekt, I used Multichills Europeana search tool query-thing to find and upload those files. I'll go through them. Thanks for telling me. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
I am not familiar with this tool, but it looks like it might still have some issues. I will check with user:Multichill about it. --Jarekt (talk) 11:29, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
I don't know how familiar Maarten is with the tool either. He did some extra work in the beginning of the summer to get it working, but I think it still needs some tlc to do the job properly. It might also bee that the GLAMToolset project makes this tool obsolete and the willingness to fix it is very low. It made it a little easier to find images from Europeana and the uploads were maybe a little bit automatized, but in the long run I'm not sure it helped. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 12:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Der Londoner Traktat vom 8. Mai 1852.pdfEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Der Londoner Traktat vom 8. Mai 1852.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

GLAM dashboardEdit

I have no idea why Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 in Sweden/Reports is not being populated. It could be a simple syntax problem in the request, or something odd about the source directories. I am busy with other projects and real life stuff, so can't really test out ideas at the moment, though it might be solved by re-writing the request lines. These seem to have been a boundary case and broke the script, hopefully it will now cope with these types of 'zero-returns'. -- (talk) 16:14, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

MyNewsDeskEdit

Did you ever get to talk to MyNewsDesk about the copyright status of images posted on their website following you saying this was happening back in 2012 per this discussion? Ww2censor (talk) 16:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi @Ww2censor:, and thanks for the reminder. They replied a while back that their legal team adviced them to change the default license to (C) All rights reserved and that they planned to implement that during the fall. When I tried to upload an image now it looked as if they had changed it also. I've asked if they have documented (blog post, newsletter or similar) the change, and proposed a common statement if not. I also asked if they would tell their costumers to make sure their content has the correct license, and we'll have to wait and see. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
I was looking through some old posts and saw this one but also notice that within the last year quite a number of files have been uploaded making 1788 per this search and 1599 appear to be from their Swedish users. IIRC back in 2012 there were only about 125 images from MyNewsDesk. I wonder how that will affect those images which have supposedly been released with a free image. The precautionary principle should apply and they may all have to be deleted unless they are specifically known to be free. I wonder how long we will have to wait and see what they have implemented. Thanks for replying. Ww2censor (talk) 16:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
I guess it might be a bit of Streisand effect involved in that the number of uploads are going up. I kind of agree on the precautionary principle, as it would be some kind of unintentional flickr MyNewsDesk washing of images otherwise. I'll ask the people at MyNewsDesk if they have an opinion on what to do with the images uploaded here. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 14:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Were you able to get any response on this? Ww2censor (talk) 11:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:Mötesplats_skola_2013Edit

Sturm (talk) 07:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:En liten film om GLAMig data.webmEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:En liten film om GLAMig data.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 20:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

  Fixed /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 09:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

WikiLoves EarthEdit

Hej

Wiki Loves Earth 2017 in Sweden Har ni pratat med STF om att dom också pushar detta?!?!? Känns som dom är lite snabbare nu

- The Swedish number

etc..

Syns kanske ikväll? - Salgo60 (talk) 06:54, 1 June 2017 (UTC) , 0705937579

MyNewsDesk againEdit

You never responded to the post User_talk:Axel_Pettersson_(WMSE)#MyNewsDesk. So what happened to this issue? Ww2censor (talk) 06:52, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth winnerEdit

Hi Axel,

Leaving this message here since I saw you added a WLE tag to File:Tallmon 1.jpg, and because the uploader hasn't otherwise edited on Commons. It looks like that image has been hosted on Flickr for a couple years prior to being uploaded here, with "all rights reserved". That creates a licensing problem requiring COM:OTRS. Since the user who uploaded it has the same username as the Flickr account, this seems like a typical good faith matter (i.e. it's not obvious to the owner that an extra step is involved). Didn't know if you had contact with this user otherwise via WLE such that you could request emailed permission sent to OTRS? — Rhododendrites talk |  17:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Structured Data feedback - What gets stored where (Ontology)Edit

Greetings,

There is a new feedback request for Structured Data on Commons (link for messages posted to Commons: , regarding what metadata from a file gets stored where. Your participation is appreciated.

Happy editing to you. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 22:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

First structured licensing conversation on CommonsEdit

Greetings,

The first conversation about structured copyright and licensing for Structured Data on Commons has been posted, please come by and participate. The discussion will be open through the end of the month (March). Thank you. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Multilingual captions testing is availableEdit

Greetings,

The early prototype for multilingual caption support is available for testing. More information on how to sign up to test is on Commons. Thanks, happy editing to you. - Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons IRC Office Hour, Tuesday 26 JuneEdit

Greetings,

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Tuesday, 26 June from 18:00-19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find more details, as well as date and time conversion, at the IRC Office Hours page on Meta.

Thanks, I look forward to seeing you there if you can make it. -- Keegan (talk) 20:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

What properties does Commons need?Edit

Greetings,

Structured Commons will need properties to make statements about files. The development team is working on making the software ready to support properties; the question is, what properties does Commons need?

You can find more information and examples to help find properties in a workshop on Commons. Please participate and help fill in the list, and let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Björn Hagström with Wikimedia Sverige.png and File:Banafshe Hejazi with Wikimedia Sverige.pngEdit

Hi Axel Pettersson, could you please provide the ticket number, which you should have received from OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 19:01, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out Túrelio. I don't have the ticket numbers, but the emails with permissions were sent to permissions-sv on the 25th (Björn) and 26nd (Banafshe), with me as CC. I'll provide the ticket numbers if they are given to me before they are added to the images. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 23:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I didn't mean validated tickets. But usually, when you send something to OTRS, you do - rather immediately - get the ticket #, which just means that all mails etc. are now associated with that number. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Nothing coming back to me from OTRS unfortunately, and the authors (who sent the mails to OTRS) has not sent any replys with ticket numbers to me so far. I'll see if they have recieved anything back. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 08:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Expiry of GWToolset user group membershipsEdit

There is a proposal on the Bureaucrat's noticeboard to automatically expire GWT memberships after one year unless the user requests an extension. Please add your views and suggestions to the discussion. The reasonably informal process for getting access to GWT access will remain as is.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Revi. 15:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data feedback - Depicts statements draft requirementsEdit

Greetings,

A slide presentation of the draft requirements for depicts statements on file pages is up on Commons. Please visit this page on Commons to review the slides and discuss the draft. Thank you, see you on the talk page. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:20, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data feedback - structured licensing and copyrightEdit

Mockups of structured licensing and copyright statements on file pages are posted. Please have a look over the examples and leave your feedback on the talk page. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

New discussion on Commons talk:Structured dataEdit

Hello. I've started a new, important discussion about creating properties for Commons on Wikidata. Please come join in, if the process is something that interests you or if you can help. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data - upcoming changes to viewing old file page revisionsEdit

How old revisions of file pages work are likely going to have to change for structured data. There is information about the change on the SDC hub talk page, please read it over and leave feedback if you have any. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data - IRC office hours today, 4 OctoberEdit

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Commons today, 4 October 2018, from 17:00-18:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find date/time conversion, as well as a link to join the chat in your browser if needed, on the IRC Office hours page on Meta. I look forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 05:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data - search prototypeEdit

There is a search prototype for structured data on Commons available. Please visit the search prototype page on the structured data hub for information on testing and feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data - IRC office hour today, 1 NovemberEdit

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Commons today, 1 October 2018, from 17:00-18:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find date/time conversion, as well as a link to join the chat in your browser if needed, on the IRC Office hours page on Meta. I realize this may be short notice for some people; I am experimenting with advanced notice times to see what works best for the most people, I'll be giving more warning before the next office hour. I look forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data - IRC office hour today, 1 NovemberEdit

The above message says 1 October in the body when it should say 1 November, as the subject line says. Apologies for making a new section by mass message, it's the only way to get this out quickly. See you in twenty minutes! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data - copyright and licensing statementsEdit

I've posted a second round of designs for modeling copyright and licensing in structured data. These redesigns are based off the feedback received in the first round of designs, and the development team is looking for more discussion. These designs are extremely important for the Commons community to review, as they deal with how copyright and licensing is translated from templates into structured form. I look forward to seeing you over there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)


File:Träffa Wikipedia 2014, Blockholm.jpgEdit

 
File:Träffa Wikipedia 2014, Blockholm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BevinKacon (talk) 20:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Multilingual captions beta testingEdit

The Structured Data on Commons team has begun beta testing of the first feature, multilingual file captions, and all community members are invited to test it out. Captions is based on designs discussed with the community[1][2] and the team is looking forward to hearing about testing. If all goes well during testing, captions will be turned on for Commons around the second week of January, 2019.

Multilingual captions are plain text fields that provide brief, easily translatable details of a file in a way that is easy to create, edit, and curate. Captions are added during the upload process using the UploadWizard, or they can be added directly on any file page on Commons. Adding captions in multiple languages is a simple process that requires only a few steps.

The details:

  • There is a help page available on how to use multilingual file captions.
  • Testing will take place on Beta Commons. If you don’t yet have an account set up there, you’ll need one.
  • Beta Commons is a testbed, and not configured exactly like the real Commons site, so expect to see some discrepancies with user interface (UI) elements like search.
  • Structured Data introduces the potential for many important page changes to happen at once, which could flood the recent changes list. Because of this, Enhanced Recent Changes is enabled as it currently is at Commons, but with some UI changes.
  • Feedback and commentary on the file caption functionality are welcome and encouraged on the discussion page for this post.
  • Some testing has already taken place and the team are aware of some issues. A list of known issues can be seen below.
  • If you discover a bug/issue that is not covered in the known issues, please file a ticket on Phabricator and tag it with the “Multimedia” tag. Use this link to file a new task already tagged with "Multimedia."

Known issues:

Thanks!

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk), for the Structured Data on Commons Team 20:42, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data - file captions coming this week (January 2019)Edit

Hi all, following up on last month's announcement...

Multilingual file captions will be released this week, on either Wednesday, 9 November or Thursday, 10 November 2019. Captions are a feature to add short, translatable descriptions to files. Here's some links you might want to look follow before the release, if you haven't already:

  1. Read over the help page for using captions - I wrote the page on mediawiki.org because captions are available for any MediaWiki user, feel free to host/modify a copy of the page here on Commons.
  2. Test out using captions on Beta Commons.
  3. Leave feedback about the test on the captions test talk page, if you have anything you'd like to say prior to release.

Additionally, there will be an IRC office hour on Thursday, 10 January with the Structured Data team to talk about file captions, as well as anything else the community may be interested in. Date/time conversion, as well as a link to join, are on Meta.

Thanks for your time, I look forward to seeing those who can make it to the IRC office hour on Thursday. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - development update, March 2019Edit

This text is also posted on the Structured Data hub talk page. You can reply there with questions, comments, or concerns.

A development update for the current work by the Structured Data on Commons team:

After the release of multilingual file captions, work began on getting depicts and other statements ready for release. These were originally scheduled for release in February and into March, however there are currently two major blockers to finishing this work (T215642, T217157). We will know more next week about when depicts and statements can likely be ready for testing and then release; until then I've tentatively updated the release schedule.

Once the depicts feature is ready for testing, it will take place in two stages on TestCommons. The first is checking the very basics; is the design comfortable, how does the simple workflow of adding/editing/removing statements work, and building up help and process pages from there. The second part is a more detailed test of depicts and other statements, checking the edge-case examples of using the features, bugs that did not come up during simple testing, etc. Additionally we'll be looking with the community for bugs in interaction with bots, gadgets, and other scripts once the features are live on Commons. Please let me know if you're interesting in helping test and fix these bugs if they show up upon release, it is really hard to find them in a test environment or, in some cases, bugs won't show up in a testing environment at all.

One new thing is definitely coming within the next few weeks, pending testing: the ability to search for captions. This is done using the inlabel keyword in search strings, and will be the first step in helping users find content that is specifically structured data. I'll post a notice when that feature is live and ready for use.

Thanks, let me know if you have questions about these plans. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - early depicts testingEdit

The Structured Data on Commons development team has the very basic version of depicts statements available for early testing on Test-Commons. You can add very basic depicts statements to the file page by going into the new “Structured Data” tab located below the "Open in Media Viewer button." You can use the Latest Files link in the left side nav bar to select existing images, or use the UploadWizard to upload new ones to test with (although those images won’t actually show up on the site). The test site is not a fully functional replica of Commons, so there may be some overall problems in using the site, but you should be able to get a general idea of what using the feature is like.

Early next week I will call for broad, community-wide testing of the feature similar to what we did for Captions, with instructions for testing, known bugs, and a dedicated space to discuss the feature as well as a simple help page for using statements. Until then, you're welcome to post on the SDC talk page with what you might find while testing depicts.

Thanks in advance for trying it out, you'll be hearing more from me next week. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - testing qualifiers for depictsEdit

As you might have seen, testing is underway for adding qualifiers to depicts statements. If you have not left feedback already, the Structured Data on Commons development team is very interested in hearing about your experience using qualifiers on the file page and in the UploadWizard. To get started you can visit Test-Commons and chose a random file to test out, or upload your own file to try out the UploadWizard. Questions, comments, and concerns can be left on the Structured data talk page and the team will address them as best as they can. Thank you for your time. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons - IRC office hours this week, 18 JulyEdit

The Structured Data team is hosting an IRC office hour this week on Thursday, 18 July, from 17:00-18:00 UTC. Joining information as well as date and time conversion is available on Meta. Potential topics for discussion are the testing of "other statements", properties that may need to be created for Commons on Wikidata soon, plans for the rest of SDC development, or whatever you might want to discuss. The development team looks forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - testing other statementsEdit

You can now test using other statements for structured data on the file page on Test-Commons. Some datatypes are not yet available, such a coordinates, but further support will be extended soon. You can find more information about testing on the SDC talk page. The team looks forward to your feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Axel Pettersson (WMSE)".