User talk:Basotxerri/Archive 12

Active discussions
Archive 5 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Llano 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality (BTW, I like cloudfalls) --Llez 15:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes, on the Canary Islands it's very likely to find cloud falls! --Basotxerri 08:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Llanos del Hospital 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 17:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Llanos del Hospital - Pino 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice.--Famberhorst 18:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - La Renclusa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 17:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañón de Añisclo - Río Bellós 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 12:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco del Montillo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 12:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco del Montillo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good light. --Aeou 11:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Camino Cinca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 11:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Refugio de la Renclusa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Not your most beautiful photo, but I think quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Surely it isn't  . Thanks for the review. --Basotxerri 08:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gipizuri - Leña 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gipizuri - Ermita 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Could be overall brighter, but ok --Poco a poco 09:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gorbea - Camino Mairulegorreta 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gorbea - Camino Mairulegorreta 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:00, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gorbea - Camino Mairulegorreta 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañón de Añisclo - Río Bellós 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:40, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Llano 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Llano 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Llano 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 21:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Llano 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Armenak Margarian 18:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Llano 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renclusa mountain hut, in Huesca, Aragon, Spain, view direction E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Pino 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Special.--Famberhorst 18:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Llano 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Stream a little bit overexposed, but OK. --XRay 09:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Llano 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Maybe f11 had been slightly better. But the tree stump is wonderful.--Famberhorst 16:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Llano 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naval 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice picture. The tower seems slightly tapered to go down.--Famberhorst 19:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Llanos del Hospital - Hotel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
very nice.--Famberhorst 17:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Llanos del Hospital - Hotel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galtür - Sport- und Kulturzentrum Silvretta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - La Besurta - Pista 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 19:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Anciles 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Lovely building. A bit dark on the right.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Anciles 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Naval (Huesca), in Aragon, Spain, view direction N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Naval (Huesca), in Aragon, Spain, view direction W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Cementerio Santa Isabel - Tumba 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 21:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Llanos del Hospital 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Llanos del Hospital 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 09:13, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Llanos del Hospital 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 09:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - La Besurta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful picture. Pity the picnik building left half is cut.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:56, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galtür - Jamtal - Sitzbank 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
On the dark side, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 19:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
  Done Brighter now, thank you! --Basotxerri 08:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Note: better for me now. Thank you.--Famberhorst 18:24, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Portal de Betoño 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Cementerio Santa Isabel - Tumba 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Cementerio Santa Isabel - Tumba 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Cementerio Santa Isabel - Tumba 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Cementerio Santa Isabel - Tumba 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Shame about the green barrel, but good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Cementerio Santa Isabel - Tumba 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:19, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aigualluts Plains, in Huesca, Aragon, Spain, view direction E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Cementerio Santa Isabel - Tumba 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle de Pineta - Llanos de La Larri 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle de Pineta 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle de Pineta 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
very nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle de Pineta - Parador 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good quality --Սարո Հովհաննիսյան 18:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bielsa - Camino Cinca 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bielsa - Camino Cinca 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Túnel de Bielsa-Aragnouet - Barrera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 19:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 19:09, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle de Pineta - Parking 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 17:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Cementerio Santa Isabel - Tumba 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I've looked at the photo 10 times before I decided. But the ring is sharp and beautifully pictured.--Famberhorst 16:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, Famberhorst. Using narrow DoF is always a problem here, I thought about it, too, before uploading the file. --Basotxerri 17:16, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco Trigoniero - Plana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. PumpkinSky 18:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The higlights are gone, can you fix that? Poco a poco 18:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
@Poco a poco: I've tried to fix this locally, do you think it's OK this way? --Basotxerri 19:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco Trigoniero - Plana 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. PumpkinSky 18:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco Trigoniero - Plana 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. PumpkinSky 18:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco Trigoniero - Plana 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. PumpkinSky 18:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Río Barrosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. PumpkinSky 18:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco Trigoniero - Refugio 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco Trigoniero - Refugio 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco Trigoniero - Refugio 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco Trigoniero - Puente 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco Trigoniero - Cascada 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Anciles 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice picture. Maybe the shadows on the dark side, but that may also be on my screen.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco del Montillo 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco del Montillo 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Barranco del Montillo 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Cruz de Guardia - Árbol 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Cruz de Guardia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Cruz de Guardia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielsa - Cruz de Guardia 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Cementerio Santa Isabel - Tumba 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Cementerio Santa Isabel - Tumba 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Cementerio Santa Isabel - Tumba 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 20:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Escultura 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, regading the difficut lightning conditions --Llez 17:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Goos quality --Llez 16:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Escultura 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Nice light. --Milseburg 16:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Mirador 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - CC El Boulevard - Parada de autobús 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC); Little bit noisy and unsharped, but a real Masterpiece! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 22:45, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
  Done Noise locally reduced, sharpness increased. --Basotxerri 16:01, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montes de Vitoria - Haya 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Playa 12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

QIC Nov 01

Any idea why the bot hasn't promoted those two photos? If not, do you know who would know what to do? PumpkinSky talk 12:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi PumpkinSky, nope, no idea. Not so long ago, there were some problems. Probably the best way to ask someone about the QIC bot, is on the QIC discussion page. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, done. I've also noticed some issues with the FPCBot lately. I know the FPCbot owner has left commons. It's been leaving some FifthDay promotions untagged as closed. PumpkinSky talk 15:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Ruinas 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A real good composition! I only not understand what You wanna show us. Focus is the tree, or the leaves not the building. It´s a 50:50. I Love the natural (rare) colour, but I don´t catch the idea behind, looks like a snap IMO --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 21:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
If you would like to decline, please do so. --Basotxerri 20:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
*  Comment Sorry, I really don't understand this review and what you want me to do. Could you explain it better, please? --Basotxerri 08:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC) Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elvillar - Chabola de la Hechicera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Armenak Margarian 19:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazeta - Robledal Isla 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --XRay 18:28, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazeta - Iglesia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Shadow a little bit disturbing, but OK. --XRay 18:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazeta - Fuente 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazeta - Cruces 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 19:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazeta - Cruces 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elvillar - Chabola de la Hechicera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 23:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elvillar - Chabola de la Hechicera 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elvillar - Chabola de la Hechicera 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice.--Famberhorst 18:02, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazeta - Cruces 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazeta - Entrada de una finca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguardia - Viñedo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 19:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguardia - Bodegas Eguren Urarte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 20:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguardia - Dolmen El Sotillo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguardia - Dolmen El Sotillo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Lake Ballard and skies

Hi Baso. Yes I saw this problem and am having trouble fixing it. What is "AC parameters"? I had -EV on it but apparently not enough. If I move the temp slider to the right to have a proper looking line of trees the sky is blown. If I move it to the left to have blue skies, the tree branches get burn spots. I've tried all I know in LR and a some stuff in PS I found via google but nothing gets both the trees and the skies looking properly. Is there something you know of in PS that has worked for you in this situation? As for camera shake on Salt Marsh 1, dumb me is still getting used to the D850 shutter. It and Mirror Up work different than my old camera and the shutter has a different "feel" to it. Thanks for any help. PumpkinSky talk 19:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

See Cart's user talk page. I posted there before I saw your note. Give me a little more time to finish. PumpkinSky talk 20:55, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi PumpkinSky, I have no idea of preparing images in Photoshop but I have similar problems when removing CAs in Lightroom using the "Fringe Selector". Have I written "AC parameters"? Sorry, I've meant "CA parameters" (chromatical aberrations), in Lightroom under Lens Correction -> Color. If you wish you could send me the RAW file and I try to prepare it, maybe I can see where's the problem (however, obviously I can't promise that I can fix it but I'll try). Strange what you're telling about the shutter. On some MFT cameras there is a problem called shutter shock: the shock caused by the shutter blurrs the image taken, it occurs on some cameras at about 1/160 s of exposure. Maybe something similar? Anyway, besides Granada's somewhat impolite or apparently aggressive comments neither the image should have been uploaded nor Johann should have promoted it (sorry, only my opinion, without offending). BTW, this is a cultural problem, too: in Germany they are more used to express things in a very direct way, in Spain e. g. this could be considered annoying and impolite. --Basotxerri (talk) 21:14, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Granada and Johann are both Austrian and their personalities are very different. But basically, you're right. I've emailed you a dropbox link. I have not tried Cart's ideas on photo 2. One photo 1 her ideas helped a lot but it's still not the way it should be. Thank you very much. PumpkinSky talk 21:37, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I didn't knew that Granada was Austrian and not German. Even between Germany and Austria there differences in behavior (even between different areas in Germany). Anyway, don't take everything serious, we're here for fun and learning! I'll have a look at your image tomorrow or on Tuesday. Now I'm going to bed, tomorrow I have to work. Best regards! --Basotxerri (talk) 21:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
New versions uploaded. Danke Sehr!! PumpkinSky talk 20:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peñacerrada - Paisaje 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--663highland 12:49, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguardia - Dolmen San Martín 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 13:54, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguardia - Dolmen San Martín 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 12:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elvillar - Viñedo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 12:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Hi. Good work!

YenWitch (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!   --Basotxerri (talk) 16:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peñacerrada - Paisaje 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. It´s digital b/w, not analog, but that´s not a critic--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elvillar - Chabola de la Hechicera 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
PRO!. - Private I will erase the fence (stamp out) in the middle of the image. Maybee a good base for b/w, too --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Euskalduna - Farolas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 09:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Euskalduna - Puente 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 09:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Euskalduna - Mineral de hierro 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguardia - Dolmen San Martín 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aeou 14:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
  Support. Lumix shoots great! I´m impressed, but may I ask: What lens, the 12 to 32mm ??.--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I'm quite happy with my MFTs. This lens is the 15mm Panaleica lens (Panasonic-built Leica lens). --Basotxerri 21:35, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
THX, maybee I must check this cam!Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañón de Añisclo - Vista general 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. PumpkinSky 16:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañón de Añisclo - Principio 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
FP? PumpkinSky 16:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, but I don't see potential here. --Basotxerri 19:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañón de Añisclo - San Úrbez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Violet fringes in the uuper left corner along the rock (see annotation), fixable --Llez 16:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
  Done --Basotxerri 16:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
  Support OK now --Llez 17:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañón de Añisclo - Puente 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 16:11, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañón de Añisclo - Río Bellós 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euskalduna Bridge, in Bilbao, Biscay, Basque Country, Spain, view direction W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Return to the user page of "Basotxerri/Archive 12".