Copyright status: File:Chemin sur l'île (Neyron) en janvier 2021.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Chemin sur l'île (Neyron) en janvier 2021.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chemin sur l'île (Neyron) en janvier 2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Ici est né de Claude Louis Mathieu (astronome) à Mâcon (janvier 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 15:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buste de Théodore Jouvet, Valence-(janvier 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I'd wished angle of view would be slightly more in front. Image quality is good though! --Etaped 22:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Façade de l'Hôtel-Dieu de Beaune - porte en bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 17:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magasin de musique Azzato, rue de la Violette (Bruxelles).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Steven Sun 03:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!Edit

Dear Benoît Prieur

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magasin d'instruments de musique, rue de Lorraine (Beaune).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is on!Edit

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciel jaune-orangé en février 2021 dans l'Ain en raison des vents apportant du sable du Sahara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 00:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

crèche de Noël église Saint-Pierre de MâconEdit

Bonjour, il semblerait que la Crèche de noël 2020 de l'église Saint-Pierre de Mâcon que vous avez photographié, ressemble à celle de la Basilique Notre Dame des Enfants, fabriquée à Vaucouleurs.

Cordialement. --Ideefixe (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

@Ideefixe: Bonjour,
Je ne connais pas l'histoire de la fabrication de cette crèche, mais effectivement il y a ressemblance.
Vaucouleurs est un lieu spécialisé en réalisation de crèche ?
Merci pour la découverte en tout cas, ----Benoît (d) 16:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
PS : peut-être faisiez-vous référence à cela => [1] ? ----Benoît (d) 16:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
@Benoît Prieur: Merci pour votre réponse. Oui, je faisais référence à cela => pres-de-bourges-une-commune-recupere-sa-creche-disparue-depuis-30-ans.--Ideefixe (talk) 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoCEdit

Hello Benoît Prieur,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Repère kilométrique 35.103 - Route des Échets (Mas Rillier).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour du château de Miribel (ruines) en février 2021 (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Pavotière (Miribel).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restaurant Le Saint Martin, place Saint-Martin à Miribel (Ain).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Comment The left side of the building is not vertical, while the rigt side is OK, the same is for windows. Can you correct it?   Done Thank you for the observation. --Benoît Prieur 20:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Une cabane dans un arbre, Chemin de Lazare (Mas Rillier).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 02:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte en bois de la Villa des Sources à Miribel (Ain).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 09:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urgence climatique - inscription Grande rue (Miribel) - février 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 14:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de l'Église rénovée et l'église de Neyron en février 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrée du fort de Sermenaz (février 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. Perhaps there is a big contrast but ok --Ezarate 22:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tractopelle près du fort de Sermenaz (Neyron) en février 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemin de ronde autour du fort de Sermenaz (en février 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --MB-one 16:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Un chemin dans les bois du coteau à Beynost en février 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boîte à livres, chemin des Grandes Terres (Neyron).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Cross-wiki harassmentEdit

Can you, please, delete this file? --Mykola7 (talk) 14:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

@Mykola7:   Done. ----Benoît (d) 14:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passage entre deux cours du Palais des Ducs de Bourgogne à Dijon en février 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality (and I remember walking through this passageway repeatedly when I visited Dijon in 2012). -- Ikan Kekek 22:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque commémorative au policier Joël Chambault, rue des Forges (Dijon).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --A.Savin 12:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Fontaine sculptée place Darcy (Dijon) en février 2021.jpgEdit

 
File:Fontaine sculptée place Darcy (Dijon) en février 2021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 05:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline: Max Blondat décédé en 1925. Cordialement, ----Benoît (d) 06:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Stèle d'Eugène Piron (Dijon) - médaillon par Paul Gasq.jpgEdit

 
File:Stèle d'Eugène Piron (Dijon) - médaillon par Paul Gasq.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline: Paul Gasq décédé en 1944. Cordialement, ----Benoît (d) 06:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Stèle d'Eugène Piron (Dijon) - inscription - signature de Paul Gasq.jpgEdit

 
File:Stèle d'Eugène Piron (Dijon) - inscription - signature de Paul Gasq.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline: Paul Gasq décédé en 1944. Cordialement, ----Benoît (d) 06:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Statue endommagée (jardin Darcy) en février 2021.jpgEdit

 
File:Statue endommagée (jardin Darcy) en février 2021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline: Non identifiable, (possiblement, sans certitude) François Rude décédé...en 1855. Cordialement, ----Benoît (d) 06:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Statue dans le jardin Darcy (Dijon) en février 2021.jpgEdit

 
File:Statue dans le jardin Darcy (Dijon) en février 2021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline: (probablement) François Rude décédé...en 1855. Cordialement, ----Benoît (d) 06:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


File:Viaduc du Chavanon - July 2012 - 1.JPGEdit

 
File:Viaduc du Chavanon - July 2012 - 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Also

(note: notice added by user other than nominator: JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC))

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Su Santidad Papa Francisco.jpgEdit

 
File:Su Santidad Papa Francisco.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Frodar (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Monuments_historiques_in_SenegalEdit

 

Monuments historiques in Senegal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 05:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte d'En-Bas (Pérouges) en avril 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Souterrain depuis la rue des Rondes à Pérouges en avril 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque reprenant une phrase de Robert Bréban à Pérouges (avril 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La rue du Prince en direction de la place de la Halle ensoleillée (avril 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 08:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue drone de la cité médiévale de Pérouges (avril 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality ! --Sebring12Hrs 13:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque en hommage de la Libération de Pérouges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 06:48, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Halle à Pérouges en avril 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Filaterie (Pérouges) en avril 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)