Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Benoît Prieur/Archives 2014

< User talk:Benoît Prieur

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 AnnouncementEdit

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Auditorium Maurice Ravel, Lyon, Rhône, France..JPGEdit

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que cette photo devait être détruite , je n'en comprends pas bien la raison. Il me semble que ce monument est considéré comme œuvre d'art et qu'il faille attendre 80 ans près le déces de ses architectes ? Je pensait pourtant que en France il était possible de photographier et d'utiliser les photos l'extérieur de tout les batiments sans aucune autorisation.

Merci de m'éclairer

--188.73.39.81 11:57, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour,
Tout d'abord c'est juste une proposition de suppression. Je ne suis pas absolument certain de la pertinence de cette proposition qui peut déboucher sur une conservation. En France, au contraire d'autres pays, il n'y a pas liberté de panorama. Une photographie d'un monument est alors acceptable ici, 70 ans (en général) après la mort de l’architecte.
N'hésitez pas à apporter un éclairage et à donner votre avis ici [1].
Cordialement, --Aga (d) 12:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

CopyviosEdit

Bonjour,

Quand tu ajoutes des notices de violation de droits d'auteur, il faut informer celui qui a déposé l'image sur Commons. Et dans ce cas, il faut indiquer pourquoi c'est une violation. Tu devrais utiliser le gadget qui permet de faire cela automatiquement. Merci pour ton aide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Salut,
Tu utilises le gadget QuickDelete pour les copyvios ? (je viens de l'installer). Auquel cas, c'est l'option Pas de permission ?
Merci de ta réponse et de ton message.
Cordialement, --Aga (d) 14:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
En fait c'est Signaler une contravention au droit d’auteur (amené par AjaxQuickDelete ?).
Encore merci. --Aga (d) 15:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

AdministratorEdit

Hi, have you ever considered becoming an administrator at this project? Jcb (talk) 14:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jcb,
Actually not really. I should read first Commons:Administrators that I probably never read  .
I'm going to think about that possibility.
Regards, --Aga (d) 14:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

File:OSM-Man in Glasgow, Scotland seriously injured after being hit by car.jpegEdit

Thanks for tidying this, I was in a bit of a hurry. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

You 're welcome. Done according [2]. --Aga (d) 15:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

About files I have uploadedEdit

I have noticed that you have tagged some of the files I have uploads as copyright violation. But you can see CC-BY icon on the right below of the page. --Leedkmn (talk) 18:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Similar case can be seen in other files like File:IU at K-collection in Seoul, 11 March 2012 01.jpg which is also distribued like the ones I have uploaded. --Leedkmn (talk) 18:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Leedkmn,
I'm not sure this mention is sufficient. I suggest you follow this procedure Commons:OTRS (only one or two emails to send) in the goal to confirm that you are the author of these pictures.
Regards, --Aga (d) 18:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm not the author of those files. I just found that those files are distributed CC-BY 2.0 KR (Tistory's default CC version is 2.0 KR), so I have uploaded them. If the files I have uploaded should be deleted, I doubt why those files uploaded from http://wasabcon.tistory.com/621 still remains intact(ex. File:Lee Yeon-Hee in 2013.jpg and much more. distributed in the same way). I have tagged files I have uploaded LicenseReview, So I hope someone with experience in confirming Tistory's files can review those files. --Leedkmn (talk) 18:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
I'll revert your copyvio tagging. Thanks. --Leedkmn (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

In this case, what we need is only {{LicenseReview}}, not OTRS. Revicomplaint? 23:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

And a side   Info that I have passed all of his uploads. Revicomplaint? 14:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Portraits de papes avignonaisEdit

bonjour,

Ses peintures sont des reproduction, à l'identiques, en espace publiques, de peintures du milieu du XIXème siècle exposées au Palais des papes d'Avignon. Il s'agit donc de copies d'oeuvre dans le domaine public. Comment l'indiquer ? JPS68 (talk) 08:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour,
C'est un cas particulier en effet.
Je vais commencer par en aviser l'admin qui "gère" les photos en question. Après, il me semble que préciser un peu plus tout cela en description pourrait suffire.
Cordialement, --Aga (d) 09:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Salut JPS68,
On me suggère que tu ajoutes cette explication sur chaque discussion relative à la possible suppression (tu peux faire un copier/coller de cet éclairage et le rédiger en français).
Cordialement, --Aga (d) 14:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Léotine Drapier-CadecEdit

Bonjour,

Vous avez supprimé une fresque représentant Léontine Drapier-Cadec. Je vous signale qu'une image analogue est présente sur le site de WIKI-Brest : http://www.wiki-brest.net/index.php/Fichier:Ecole_Quatre_Moulins13.jpg avec la licence Creative Commons BY-SA

Merci de rétablir cette image.

Bien cordialement,

Ggal (talk) 20:17, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour,
Le fait que l'image soit présente sur un autre site avec la licence adéquate n'indique toutefois pas que l'auteur est d'accord avec cette diffusion.
Si l'auteur indique qu'il est ok avec cela (via OTRS par exemple), pas de problème.
En attendant, je ne peux pas faire grand chose (je précise d'ailleurs que j'ai juste signalé un possible copyvio. Je n'ai pas supprimé l'image, je n'en ai pas le pouvoir).
Cordialement, --Aga (d) 07:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais Idéal - mai 2014 - 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais Idéal - mai 2014 - 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Invitation to take part in the categorization of QIEdit

Dear Agamitsudo! Your images were reviewed and have been promoted to Quality Image status. Congratulations! I invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. All new images with this status are automatically placed to the page Commons:Quality_images/Recently_promoted. They have to be manually tagged with relevant categories using the QI categorization tool (see link at the top of the page, the author of this tool is User:Dschwen). Very few users do this job now, so a large number of uncategorizated photos accumulates on this page time to time… --Bff (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guédelon - mai 2014 - 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Château dans un paysage ou Demoiselle rejoignant son chevalier.JPGEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Château dans un paysage ou Demoiselle rejoignant son chevalier.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 04:33, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Château et donjon de Chaumont.JPGEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Château et donjon de Chaumont.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 04:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Comminges et Adélaïde au couvent de La Trappe.JPGEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Comminges et Adélaïde au couvent de La Trappe.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 04:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Intérieur de la cathédrale Saint-Jean-des-Rois de Tolède.JPGEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Intérieur de la cathédrale Saint-Jean-des-Rois de Tolède.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 04:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Perte de nomination dans VIEdit

Bonjour, tes deux renommage dans VI ont détruit tes nominations. Refait les avec le nouveau nom. La bonne idée c'est de ne pas renommer pendant :) ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Oups désolé :( --Aga (d) 16:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 1 - Jean-Christophe Péraud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grégoire Tarride in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antoine Lavieu in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean-Christophe Péraud in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jérôme Baugnies in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benjamin Giraud in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Viktor Okishev in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

-- Tuválkin  01:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cédric Pineau in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Julien Jurdie in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romain Bardet in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jonathan Paredes in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 4 - Julien Jurdie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 1 - Rémy Di Grégorio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 1 - Grégoire Tarride.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pieter Serry in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jordi Simón in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lachlan Morton in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olivier Rouyer in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of église Saint-Florent de Thil (Ain) south-west view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarah Bouhaddi in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomas Degand in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Francis De Greef in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jérôme Gilbert in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zhandos Bizhigitov in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flèche motocycliste Beynost - 2014 - (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

VIEdit

Pense à laisser un peu d'espace autour des sujet car les correction de perspective vont t'en manger. Je vais fermer et promouvoir tes deux images qui sèchent en haut de la liste. Tu aurais dù suivre mon conseil de refaire la nommination avec le nouveau nom. Je le ferait dans la jouréne car il faut que je me rappelle comment on fait... Bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Salut,
Pour le conseil, je me suis déjà dit : "mais pourquoi n'ai-pas pris de marge à droite et à gauche" => c'est en forgeant photographiant qu'on devient photographe (mais je partais de loin ;-)).
Pour la nomination, je ne me souvenais plus de ce cas là. Je regarde tout de suite.
Merci pour tout, --Aga (d) 05:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
En fait, je ne sais pas trop quoi faire pour que le bot agisse : peut-être remettre le nom d'origine (la redirection actuelle).
OK ça a marché! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frederik Backaert in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marco Minnaard in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Si tu peux faire quelque chose...Edit

Salut,

À la suite d'une mauvaise manip' avec Cropbot, ces deux photos ([3] et [4] ont un historique. Est-il possible d'effacer les 2 derniers historiques pour avoir quelque chose de plus propre. Petro [pronto?] 13:01, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Salut,
Là, je n'en sais rien du tout. Il faudrait poser la question sur Commons:Bistro : je suppose qu'un admin Commons a la possibilité de masquer certaines images de l'historique. --Aga (d) 13:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
OK. J'ai demandé au Bistro. Petro [pronto?] 14:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Église de l'Assomption de Courlaoux west views.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thibaut Pinot in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jérémy Leveau in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

wiki-day bordeaux 2014Edit

Bonjour Agamitsudo. Y'aurai pas un souci entre "Category:Wiki-Day Bordeaux 2014" et "Category:Wikiday Bordeaux 2014" ? A+ --Franck (talk) 17:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Salut,
Je n'avais pas vu qu'il y avait déjà quelque chose. Je corrige de suite.
Et te répond rapidement sur Wp.
--Aga (d) 17:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

bonjour mtr j'aime ces ata ma maman ces mariama manga à ziguinchor elle et de PDS ensient militente elle lée morteEdit

j'aimerer vous rancontrait je suis en france je vous aime baucou ma maman elle me parlle tous jour de vous ma maman elle étai votre repréjentente en baje casamence

Bonjour,
Je crois qu'il y a méprise. Même si je connais un peu le Sénégal, je n'ai jamais mis les pieds à Ziguinchor ni même en Casamance.
Bien cordialement, --Aga (d) 09:02, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Carré Frais.JPGEdit

  File:Carré Frais.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hangsna (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Eugène BénetEdit

Bonjour, Vous avez créé sur wikimedia la page du sculpteur Eugène Bénet, l'orthographe de Bénet avec un accent a été modifié sur wikipedia au vu de sa nomination dans l'ordre de la Légion d'honneur ou Bénet est bien mentionné avec un accent (ainsi que sa signature Eug. Bénet). Cordialement. --Pierre-Dominique 07:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Salut,
  Done => Category:Eugène Bénet.
--Aga (d) 08:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean-Christophe Devaux.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Bruxelles, novembre 2014 (1).JPGEdit

  File:Bruxelles, novembre 2014 (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

67.87.46.39 22:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Fudge Ripple.jpgEdit

  File:Fudge Ripple.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 13:31, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Diran Kelekian.jpgEdit

Pay attention to licensing Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Diran Kelekian.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.


Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | português | svenska | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Benoît Prieur/Archives 2014".