User talk:Bgag/Archive 21

Latest comment: 1 month ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle La Chimba, Santa Ana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milestone in Costa Rica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milestone in Costa Rica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenal Volcano 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caño Negro Wildlife Refuge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Irazú Volcano 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Irazú Volcano 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Irazú Volcano 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cráter Playa Hermosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica of Our Lady of the Angels, Cartago 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cráter DIego de la Haya 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:51, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cráter DIego de la Haya 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica of Our Lady of the Angels, Cartago 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:51, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica of Our Lady of the Angels, Cartago 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica of Our Lady of the Angels, Cartago 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San José de Orosi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sirena Ranger Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Nacional Manuel Antonio 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Nacional Manuel Antonio 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San José de Orosi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sierpe River, Costa Rica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Regional de San Ramón 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street sign in San Ramón, Costa Rica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenal Volcano 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-legged honeycreeper in Costa Rica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal terns in Tárcoles River 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keel-billed toucan in Costa Rica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jongmyo Shrine 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeongnyeongjeon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeongnyeongjeon 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 03:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla La Mariana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Mural in Peguche.jpg

 
File:Mural in Peguche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Ulaanbaatar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Ulaanbaatar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaisan Memorial 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaisan Memorial 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaisan Memorial 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benevento 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benevento 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo (Benevento) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo (Benevento) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo (Benevento) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo del Oro Procolombino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Leaning out, otherwise ok --Plozessor 03:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 12:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bukchon Hanok Village 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bukchon Hanok Village 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bukchon Hanok Village 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bukchon Hanok Village 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Injeongjeon Hall 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Ulaanbaatar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! T-34-85 in Ulaanbaatar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of the Buddha in Ulaanbaatar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Damdin Sükhbaatar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to Genghis Khan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turquoise-browed motmot in Costa Rica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Drow male 20:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Bgag/Archive 21".