Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bijay chaurasia!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Contents

File source is not properly indicated: File:Vidyapati ji.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vidyapati ji.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Vidyapati ji.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Bijay Chaurasia (Childhood Photo).jpgEdit

 
File:Bijay Chaurasia (Childhood Photo).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - July - Food production and processingEdit

I had to remove File:Tomato_&_the_Bamboo.JPG from this challenge, as it was uploaded to Commons before the start of the challenge. Entries have to be uploaded during the challenge period. -- Colin (talk) 10:47, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little beautiful butterfly suck the marigold juice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok --Poco a poco 10:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Water MarkEdit

I have uploaded without water mark photo as you objected. pls check it. thanks. Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 14:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

@Sumita Roy Dutta: You Welcome & thanks for your upload..   -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 15:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Really helpful!Edit

Heya Bijay! It would be great if you could include any kind of location information with your images, ex: "English: Buddha Chowk is main juction of Kathauna Bazar and is city of Shambhunath Municipality ward no 6, is in saptari District..."... isn't super helpful because there's no state or nation! Also did you know about

Those two websites make it possible to add location tags to Commons !! For example, you would find the spot on earth, then "apply" on "tools.freeside" and you get output looks like this {{Location|48.87146|2.355}} which you add to the template of your photograph. Location pinpointing is a big help - especially as we get more photos, then people can search by your location, not just "white flowers on a fence"   Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: Thanks alot for the info and i'll concern for it -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 15:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wood carved roof decoration on the Chandeshwari Temple..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Below minimum size requirement! --Cccefalon 05:44, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
** Review again changes done --Bijay chaurasia 06:51, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  Weak support OK for me, but it could be sharper given the size. --C messier 21:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Three Gumba.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
You pushed luminance red and blue down too much. As a result, there is a fine white line between sky and gumpa. --Cccefalon 07:55, 15 September 2015 (UTC)   Comment luminance blue and red fixed.. --Bijay chaurasia 13:05, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Well done, the colours are now vivid and realistic. Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bageshwori Temple (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Reddish CA, sky blown out and perspective not done. Can be salvaged perhaps, you should give it a try and reprocess from scratch. --Cccefalon 15:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)   Comment Reprocessed, i do my best.  --Bijay chaurasia 05:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
  Comment You managed to tackle most issues, that's good. However, for perspective correction, you need to fiddle around with the "manual undistort" sliders in LightRoom. Use the left- and rightmost pilars as reference. --Cccefalon 19:52, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
  Fixed Thanks for your suggestion. fixed now.--~~~~
  Support Given that the foundation is rectilinear and the left pilars are not rectilinear in reality, I think that you solved the task. --Cccefalon 20:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gajur of Kankalini Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok --Poco a poco 18:09, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shiva Temple in the ground of 6344.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Shadows too dark, and I would clone out the wire. --C messier 07:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)   Done But unable to load new version file... @C messier: --Bijay chaurasia 15:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
  Support OK. --C messier 15:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kankalini Temple Bhardha Saptari 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good for QI.--Jebulon 19:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neta Chwok-6684.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neta Chwok 6683.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krishna Temple (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Dust spots on the left need to be removed.--Ermell 20:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)   Done Dust spot removed --Bijay chaurasia 22:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krishna Temple (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Dust spots on the left need to be removed.--Ermell 20:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)   Done Dust spot removed --Bijay chaurasia 22:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! God Ganesh statue. 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kankalini Temple Bhardha Saptari 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  CommentSlightly tilted, please correct, and I'll support.--Jebulon 19:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)   Done Thanks -- Bijay chaurasia 06:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)  Support As promised.--Jebulon 14:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bhaktapur Nepal.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bhaktapur Nepal.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 06:03, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bhaktapur square 1991.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bhaktapur square 1991.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 06:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Stupa of Boudhanath - Kathmandu 1991.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stupa of Boudhanath - Kathmandu 1991.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 06:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Out of scope files tagged as copyright violationsEdit

Please stop using {{Copyvio}} to tag files that are out of scope. {{Copyvio}} should only be used for copyright violations. Please raise a regular deletion request for files that are out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

candiates list on COM:QICEdit

Hi there, I have removed two nominations by yours (arbitrarily chosen). Please note that only 5 nominations per day are allowed. --A.Savin 01:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake (फेवा ताल) Sunset View 2158.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake (फेवा ताल).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Needs to be straightened. Also, something wrong with the ID --A.Savin 01:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
  DoneThanks for ur complement.. --Bijay chaurasia 07:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC) Yes, OK this way --A.Savin 01:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa lake 2604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake 2603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake 2606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 21:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake 2602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --A.Savin 01:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa Lake2605.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI in my opinion --J. Lunau 12:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phewa lake 029.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality., QI for me --J. Lunau 12:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotus Temple-Panoroma-Visit During WCI 2016- IMG 6471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Please correct tilt --Soloneying 00:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
True, it is tilted Poco a poco 09:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks   Done -- Bijay chaurasia 03:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
  SupportThanks. Good quality. I like the people in it. --Soloneying 12:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of Jallianwala Bagh-IMG 6348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


Code issues in User:Bijay chaurasia/vector.jsEdit

Hi Bijay chaurasia, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Bijay chaurasia/vector.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 30 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 12 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Own work}\} \<br \/\> ', //tagOpen
  2. ISSUE: line 12 character 23: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Own work}\} \<br \/\> ', //tagOpen
  3. ISSUE: line 12 character 26: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Own work}\} \<br \/\> ', //tagOpen
  4. ISSUE: line 12 character 33: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Own work}\} \<br \/\> ', //tagOpen
  5. ISSUE: line 21 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
  6. ISSUE: line 21 character 22: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
  7. ISSUE: line 21 character 24: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
  8. ISSUE: line 21 character 26: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
  9. ISSUE: line 21 character 28: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
  10. ISSUE: line 21 character 30: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagOpen
  11. ISSUE: line 30 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\n\n{\{subst:test|', //tagOpen
  12. ISSUE: line 30 character 22: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\n\n{\{subst:test|', //tagOpen
  13. ISSUE: line 30 character 29: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{Welcome}\}\n\n{\{subst:test|', //tagOpen
  14. ISSUE: line 31 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  15. ISSUE: line 31 character 14: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  16. ISSUE: line 31 character 16: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  17. ISSUE: line 31 character 18: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  18. ISSUE: line 31 character 20: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  19. ISSUE: line 39 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{subst:test2|', //tagOpen
  20. ISSUE: line 40 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  21. ISSUE: line 40 character 14: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  22. ISSUE: line 40 character 16: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  23. ISSUE: line 40 character 18: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  24. ISSUE: line 40 character 20: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  25. ISSUE: line 48 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '{\{subst:test3|', //tagOpen
  26. ISSUE: line 49 character 12: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  27. ISSUE: line 49 character 14: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  28. ISSUE: line 49 character 16: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  29. ISSUE: line 49 character 18: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose
  30. ISSUE: line 49 character 20: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: '}\}\~\~\~\~', //tagClose

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 15:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC).

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotus Temple ladder - During WCI 2016- IMG 6498.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 01:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotus Temple Front view with garden - During WCI 2016 - IMG 6499.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A bit dark overall but still ok --Poco a poco 10:02, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Lotus Temple-IMG 6497-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Christian Ferrer 09:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Temple night view - IMG 6323-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 21:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lotus Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pasupatinath Temple, Front gate Gajur-IMG 3500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The image is tilted and needs some perspective adjustment. A little bit better description would also be good, such as what part of the temple is shown in the picture. Please fix this. W.carter 17:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
W.carter  DoneThanks and sorry for late reply -Bijay chaurasia 16:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Well done! Excellent description (keep doing that) and good quality. --W.carter 10:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Lion in Entrance of Patan Museum -Bijay-IMG 3564.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good detail. Daniel Case 02:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden Window inside Patan Museum-IMG 3651.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice detail and symmetry. Daniel Case 02:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance of Patan Museump -Patan Durbar Square - IMG 3562.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice street view ... love that bird in the center. Daniel Case 02:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Western entrance of Pasupatinath Temple, Front Gate-IMG 3466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 06:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pasupatinath Temple from the bank of Bagmati river-Eastern side-Bijay- IMG 3358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and good description. --W.carter 23:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pashupatinath Temple Area- IMG 3360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and good description. --W.carter 23:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pasupatinath Temple area from the bank of Bagmati river-Eastern side-IMG 3359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and good description. --W.carter 23:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


Code issues in User:Bijay chaurasia/common.jsEdit

Hi Bijay chaurasia, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Bijay chaurasia/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 7 column 1: Unexpected token )

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 04:33, 20 September 2016 (UTC).

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Guardian lions, Mani Keshar Chowk, Patan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal NoticeEdit

  Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal


Hi Bijay chaurasia, Thank you for participating to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal competition and for sharing your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Please use this google form to submit your details. we will contact you for the further information. Thanks to the participation of people like you.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal NoticeEdit

  Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal


Hi Bijay chaurasia, Thank you for participating to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal competition and for sharing your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Please use this google form to submit your details. we will contact you for the further information. Thanks to the participation of people like you.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal Team

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Photographer's Barnstar
With best wishes-- Biplab Anand (Talk) 03:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks you @बिप्लब आनन्द: --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 03:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chana-Chick pea-Cicer arietinum-September 27, 2016-IMG 8013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naked wheat(Triticum aestivum) in Nepal-September 27, 2016-IMG 8014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naked wheat(Triticum aestivum) in Nepal-September 27, 2016-IMG 8015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sadhu in Janaki Temple, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7437.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sadhu in Janaki Temple, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7437.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sliced coconut in Vivah Mandap, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The description on the file's page has nothing to do with what's in the picture. New description should include latin name for the coconut. Narrower category also needed. W.carter 10:33, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
@W.carter:   Done Thanks  . -- Bijay chaurasia 14:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Now, that's much better! :) Good quality. --W.carter 19:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A vendor of Sadar Janak Chwok,Janakpur-September 22, 2016-7600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice, unusual and valuable picture, but please add the fire wood and tinder he's selling to the description and categories. W.carter 10:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
@W.carter:   Done Thanks for your review. --Bijay chaurasia 04:50, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 11:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vivah Mandap, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --A.Savin 15:57, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Light Lamp in Vivah Mandap, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me despite some noise --A.Savin 15:55, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance of Vivah Mandap, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Code 04:30, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janaki Temple, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 18:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ram Mandir, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Kroton 06:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ram Mandir, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --A.Savin 00:01, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I needed an additional category (added). Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ram Mandir, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Code 06:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janaki Temple, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I see no substantial different, but I guess we can let it pass --Poco a poco 11:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur Station, Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur Station, Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur Station, Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:44, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur Station, Nepal Railways-20160923-IMG 7914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 08:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Under construction bridge at Janakpur for new railway track-20160923-IMG 7916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
good quality --Christian Ferrer 07:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
- Good enough for me, and interesting motif. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support ok with one category added fro the vehicule (the main subject) --Christian Ferrer 08:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 09:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 09:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
- Good quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
- The picture may be too bright, overall, but where I'm really seeing problems is on the left and in the background, where it's not only too bright but lacks enough contrast and might be so blown it lacks sufficient definition and detail to rescue. So I'm not sure it's fixable, but give it a try and see. -- Ikan Kekek 09:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: Thanks for your review.. I think i can fix that out. But i need sometime becoz am bit busy for 2 days.ASAP iĺl -- Bijay chaurasia 11:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek:  Done Thanks -Bijay chaurasia 06:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Good job. Good quality now, overall, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 08:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Janaki Temple--IMG 7555-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:59, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned train stations in Janakpur-IMG 7917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok now. --Hubertl 10:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - September - Local culture/WinnersEdit

  Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Sadhu in Janaki Temple, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7437.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Local culture, in September 2016. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clay Pots-IMG 7301-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 15:39, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganga Sagar, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --A.Savin 17:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganga Sagar, Janakpur-September 22, 2016-IMG 7687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clay Pots-BW-IMG 7303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clay Pots-BW-IMG 7302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Clay Pots-BW-IMG 7303.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clay Pots-BW-IMG 7303.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The PhotographerEdit

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset at Ganga Sagar, Janakpurdham 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Not bad for lighting conditions like this, enough for QI --A.Savin 12:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7925.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abandoned Train at Janakpur station, Nepal Railways--IMG 7925.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 - NepalEdit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 - Nepal

Dear Bijay chaurasia, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 - Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 17th December, 2016 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 - Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Nepal Team

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagarkot hill-2539.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Perhaps it was better to focus on the top of the nearest hill to get to the top sharper. But still good enough for me.--Famberhorst 18:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagarkot -3009 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --A.Savin 14:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

ThanksEdit

Don't read too much into my vote. I voted for nearly all the pictures in the first stage. The only pictures I do not vote for are boring symmetrical ones such as this one. Abductive (talk) 16:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maithili Wikimedians User Group Logo.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wikipedia-logo-v2-mai.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shahil Khan in Group Photo - IMG 2328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 07:44, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wikipedia-logo-v2-dty.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

WLE InvitationEdit

  Wiki Loves Earth 2017 in Nepal


Hi Bijay chaurasia, We would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Loves Earth 2017 in Nepal competition during 1 May to 31 May, 2017 and share your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask a few minutes of your time before you start upload your valuable images from 1 May, 2017. Please use this new survey to submit your mailing address.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Earth Team

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanyam-0265.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Imo acceptable for QI --DXR 08:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Oren_KesslerEdit

Another Believer (talk) 21:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - NepalEdit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Nepal

Dear Bijay chaurasia
It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 29th July, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Loves Earth 2017 in Nepal Team

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kathputli (Puppet)-IMG 0335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! General Post Office - Basantapur-0336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 12:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kathputali (puppets) at Basantpur Durbar Square -0334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 17:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015Edit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal

Dear Bijay chaurasia, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015Edit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal

Dear Bijay chaurasia, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015Edit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal

Dear Bijay chaurasia, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swayambhunath Stupa -Kathmandu Nepal-0336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good enough for QI. --Peulle 10:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in NepalEdit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal

Dear Bijay chaurasia, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 11 November, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:30 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,
WLM 2017 in Nepal Team

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ख Devnagari letter in Unicode.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiki Love Villages.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:54, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
@Bijay chaurasia: Shouldn't it be Wiki Loves Villages? (in singular) --Basotxerri 20:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
@Basotxerri: Actually Project name is Wiki Love Villages -Bijay chaurasia 06:50, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
OK, then! --Basotxerri 17:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepali word in devanagri script.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Trougnouf 17:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

ThanksEdit

  • As i am being the amateur for the WIKI. I would like to thank you for giving me opportunity to attain the Wiki loves villages outreach program. --Nikesh Ghimire (talk) 01:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)





























.

File:Poonam Pandey Indian model and film actress.jpgEdit

 
File:Poonam Pandey Indian model and film actress.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Majora (talk) 04:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pashupatinath Temple cremations on the Bagmati River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Billy69150 16:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Celina Jaitly.jpgEdit

 
File:Celina Jaitly.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Majora (talk) 04:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Komatsu PC200-8 Hydraulic Excavator -Rakhu Bhagawati,Myagdi-0462.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wel come board at Baisari-Rakhu Bhagawati,Myagdi-0514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Some noise reduction and/or sharpening artefacts at full resolution, but good enough for me. --Prosthetic Head 14:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Taapsee Pannu.jpgEdit

 
File:Taapsee Pannu.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Invalid use of the Bollywood Hungama license. Is not a party or event. Photo shoots are not covered by the OTRS release.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Majora (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Edit

Hey, I noticed that the logo for the Maithili Wikipedia uses Eastern Nagari/Bengali script and I was thinking that it would better if it was in Devanagari since modern Maithili is written in Devanagari and the Maithili Wikipedia itself uses that script. It currently looks a little out of place on the homepage. What do you think? Thanks. Filpro (talk) 18:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ghanta in Changu Narayan-Changunarayan photowalk-WLV-3852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good composition, but unfortunately over exposed --Michielverbeek 06:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment   Done @Michielverbeek: Please review again. This version is better one. Thank You-- Bijay chaurasia 17:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Indeed, this version is looking better --Michielverbeek 17:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal — InvitationEdit

  Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal


Hi Bijay chaurasia, We would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal competition during 1 May to 31 May, 2018 and share your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask a few minutes of your time before you start upload your valuable images from 1 May, 2018. Please use this new survey to submit your mailing address.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Earth Team

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ghanta Ghar and Nepali Jame Masjid -IMG4170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good view of a street --Daniel Case 03:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:43, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

CA, mainly on top of the mountains (the sharpening technique (?) looks weird but that's not noticeable when viewed at 200% of screen) --Trougnouf 18:42, 6 June 2018 (UTC)  Comment Fixed   Done Thank You --Bijay chaurasia 03:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
  Support Very nice! --Trougnouf 11:56, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0781.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support OK, I'll give you this one --Daniel Case 19:24, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0741.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0741.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:The Heavenly Rara Lake - edited 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Heavenly Rara Lake.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Bijay chaurasia,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Biplab Anand, Rupika and Sam at New readers sessions- Wikimaina 2018 -3497.jpgEdit

 
File:Biplab Anand, Rupika and Sam at New readers sessions- Wikimaina 2018 -3497.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wikilover90 (talk) 21:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koshi Barrage -00003921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

There are CAs at the wires. Please fix it. And please try to improve the sharpness. --XRay 05:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
  Done Thank you--~~~~
  Support OK, thank you. IMO it'S good enough for QI now. --XRay 11:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - NepalEdit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal

Dear Bijay chaurasia
It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 8th September, 2018 at The Classic Bamboo, 11:45 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal (Revised Location Link)Edit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal

Dear Bijay chaurasia
It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 8th September, 2018 at The Classic Bamboo, 11:45 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - NepalEdit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal

Dear Bijay chaurasia
It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 8th September, 2018 at The Classic Bamboo, 11:45 am onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made Wiki Loves Earth 2018 - Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal Team

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holi at Basantapur-0272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holi at Basantapur-0271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Rbrechko 10:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holi at Basantapur-0304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Yann 14:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holi at Basantapur-0233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Yann 14:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holi at Basantapur-0241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Yann 14:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in NepalEdit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal

Dear Bijay chaurasia, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 15 December, 2018 at Siddhartha Cottage, Tinkune, 11:30 am onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

WLM 2018 in Nepal Team

Your best shot 2018Edit

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2018

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:43, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meeting point of Sunkoshi and Tama Koshi River from Beni Ghat-IMG0620-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support What a panorama! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pujari at Chinnamasta Temple-0774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:33, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrace Farming in Nepal in Rakathum VDC-0369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support OK for me. --Aristeas 09:27, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrace Farming in Nepal in Rakathum VDC-0384-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:26, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pujari in Janaki Temple-6495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Breathtaking colors, great composition. Stunning photograph. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
I changed the categorization from the messy catchall Category:Priests to the much more specific Category:Hindu priests. I recommend in the future for you to look for the most specific appropriate category. -- Ikan Kekek 03:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, Ikan! -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank You Ikan and Johann -Bijay chaurasia 07:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrace Farming in Nepal in Rakathum VDC-0375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrace Farming in Nepal in Rakathum VDC-0373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrace Farming in Nepal in Rakathum VDC-0377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Meeting point of Sunkoshi and Tama Koshi River from Beni Ghat-IMG0620-Pano.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Meeting point of Sunkoshi and Tama Koshi River from Beni Ghat-IMG0620-Pano.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Buddha inside Pullahari Monastery(Gumba)-IMG 9188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Paris Orlando 14:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pond of Kuruwapari Chaudharitol- Inaruwa, Kosi Municipality-WLV-2252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 17:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pond of Kuruwapari Chaudharitol- Inaruwa, Kosi Municipality-WLV-2251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 17:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamboo Hut Near Pond of Kuruwapari Chaudharitol- Inaruwa, Kosi Municipality-WLV-2263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Looks ok apart from the vignetting on top left --Poco a poco 18:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  Done Please review once again. Thank you @Poco a poco:--Bijay chaurasia 16:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pond of Kuruwapari Chaudharitol- Inaruwa, Kosi Municipality-WLV-2252.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pond of Kuruwapari Chaudharitol- Inaruwa, Kosi Municipality-WLV-2252.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tukuche Village-0660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 14:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tukche, Nepal-WLV-1451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tukche, Nepal-WLV-1450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jharkot Village-Upper Mustang Trek-1281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 14:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panaroma from poonhill-2019-BJ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Maybe a bit noisy, but considering the high resolution it reaches QI level. Also atmospheric and instruktive. --Milseburg 17:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured sound candidatesEdit

  We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
Dear Bijay chaurasia,
Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your sounds for the FS Tag.
You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now.
-- Eatcha (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Panaroma from poonhill-2019-BJ.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panaroma from poonhill-2019-BJ.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepalese Children in Tadapani, Ghandruk-Nepal-4428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Gooid quality --Michielverbeek 07:12, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demonstration Before Raft-Rafting in Trishuli River, Nepal-3060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Nepalese Children in Tadapani, Ghandruk-Nepal-4428.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nepalese Children in Tadapani, Ghandruk-Nepal-4428.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Jharkot Village-Upper Mustang Trek-1281.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jharkot Village-Upper Mustang Trek-1281.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Photo walk in StockholmEdit

It's only a few weeks until Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. I'd like to invite you to the Commons Photographer's photo walk. If you're planning on going to Stockholm in August, please consider joining this event. This is an opportunity to connect with other photographers, have fun together, and explore the beauty of an iconic Scandinavian city… All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Ranipauwa-Muktinath, Nepal-WLV-0916.jpgEdit

 
File:Ranipauwa-Muktinath, Nepal-WLV-0916.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Judithcomm (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Ranipauwa-Muktinath, Nepal-WLV-0907.jpgEdit

 
File:Ranipauwa-Muktinath, Nepal-WLV-0907.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Judithcomm (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Image Flagged: George LevyEdit

In regards the recently flagged image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:George_Levy_at_the_Gilmore_Car_Museum.jpg

Author George Levy has given me explicit permission to use his photo and has transferred copyright privileges to myself. For further inquiries, please contact Mr. Levy at his email: george@georeplease.com. I would ask that you contact George and/or remove the challenge promptly. Thank you.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waste containers and Cigarette Butts-8016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 06:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koteshwor, Kathmandu-8647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 06:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girl-Siddha Pokhari-8694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 06:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Cathedral Church-2017-5326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Ok imo --ArildV 08:09, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Swayambhunath Stupa -Kathmandu Nepal-0336.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Swayambhunath Stupa -Kathmandu Nepal-0336.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annapurna South, Himchuli, Machapuchare Himal-3794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Dirtsc 06:55, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Machapuchare Himal-3797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Dirtsc 06:55, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Machapuchare Himal-3797.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Machapuchare Himal-3797.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple-1973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple-1957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple-1968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Annapurna South, Himchuli, Machapuchare Himal-3794.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Annapurna South, Himchuli, Machapuchare Himal-3794.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Nepali Newar Peoples wearing traditional hat- Dhaka Topi-Patan Durbar Square-2061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance Wall of Patan museum-Patan Durbar Square-2053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple-1973.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple-1973.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Bijay chaurasia".