Open main menu
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

العربية | Azərbaycanca | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Zazaki | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | jbobau | 한국어 | Kurdî | Македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Contents

Category:Rottwerndorfer_Straße_45_K,_PirnaEdit

ProfessorX (talk) 19:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I was blocked for over-categorization. I know. During this blocking time I was never creating other accounts. So the reason is not fulfilled for being discriminated as suckpuppet. I uploaded 13000 pictures for Commons for free in many hours and hurds.Without failures. The administrators want not help me. In the matter of over- categorization they could have said that I only must rewrite the level for the Geogroup. So I had not so much work to do. I even did not make the mistake to undo all of these and was not vandalism. I said ok, I am waiting for the blocking time until all is over. Then came User Savin and blocked me without reality reason while I was already blocked. On the account Kalispera Dell on Panoramio nobody blocked and I uploaded only from there and it is a German photo ressource. --Blackwhiteupl (talk) 19:02, 30 March 2016 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "  Not done Using 6 accounts in order to circumvent blocks doesn't help your case. There's no reason to believe you will change your editing style and suddenly respect the rules the Commons community created. Valid block. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:24, 31 March 2016 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | 中文(臺灣) | +/−

To the reviewing admin: "During this blocking time I was never creating other accounts" is patently false, see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Blackwhiteupl. Note also that this unblock request comes approximately 40 minutes after a block of the latest sock [1] and a more strict hard block. Эlcobbola talk 20:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
It is written that I had been blocked due the over categorization. In this time I was not creating sockpuppets. Since the other administrator was suddenly blocking me forever while I was already blocked for a period of time, I created new accounts as sockpuppet to restore the locating data and wrong removed categories, by administrators and these edits had been not removed, because they saw it and made sense and no other could have done it. I did not upload photos. I did not vote in other cases about other matters with fake user names. I know that I shall not create several accounts on Commons that the administrators have a better overview. Administrators are having rules to do things good and having a lot to do with a mass on users which think that Commons is a playground for fun and is away in the next years. I uploaded no mass on copyvio pictures. It is ok, if you block me hard and it would be a year or three years. The next problem is that the people in Pirna must watch pictures about their town in future. Children can watch this data in the hundred years and see how it was. For example I took pictures of the Euthanasia memorial in Pirna, old town landscapes which are under danger of decay in this region here. I wanted to save it. Please block me a long time to have more time for your other cases and you can control it, if I would violate the reglementations again. With so much work I have done here, I know that it needs triple more time for it. I am not emotional here. For me it is not provoking here for being blocked. And in the last time I never the all pictures of Pirna in the Pirna category again. So the block made sense. The reason was the overcategorization and a block for more than a week. The uploaded photos here were photos which were not there on Commons before, of streets, buildings and landscapes. I had a lot of other admins writing me on and warned me if I still wil do something wrong, I am getting blocked or banned and I said ok and was stopping to do some failures. The blocking administrator was not warning me with the case of over categorization. He did not say stop or block and please remove these category Pirna from all pictures of Pirna. My plan is that you block me for a long time and I need a time out from here. The last months were a really taff time for me with uploading and categorization of pictures and adding manual the locations exactly. I got any chance here. Give me a chance please that we can have more trust. --Blackwhiteupl (talk) 05:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: ": It is written that I had been blocked due the over categorization. In this time I was not creating sockpuppets. Since the other administrator was suddenly blocking me forever while I was already blocked for a period of time, I created new accounts as sockpuppet to restore the locating data and wrong removed categories, by administrators and these edits had been not removed, because they saw it and made sense and no other could have done it. I did not upload photos. I did not vote in other cases about other matters with fake user names. I know that I shall not create several accounts on Commons that the administrators have a better overview. Administrators are having rules to do things good and having a lot to do with a mass on users which think that Commons is a playground for fun and is away in the next years. I uploaded no mass on copyvio pictures. It is ok, if you block me hard and it would be a year or three years. The next problem is that the people in Pirna must watch pictures about their town in future. Children can watch this data in the hundred years and see how it was. For example I took pictures of the Euthanasia memorial in Pirna, old town landscapes which are under danger of decay in this region here. I wanted to save it. Please block me a long time to have more time for your other cases and you can control it, if I would violate the reglementations again. With so much work I have done here, I know that it needs triple more time for it. I am not emotional here. For me it is not provoking here for being blocked. And in the last time I never the all pictures of Pirna in the Pirna category again. So the block made sense. The reason was the overcategorization and a block for more than a week. The uploaded photos here were photos which were not there on Commons before, of streets, buildings and landscapes. I had a lot of other admins writing me on and warned me if I still wil do something wrong, I am getting blocked or banned and I said ok and was stopping to do some failures. The blocking administrator was not warning me with the case of over categorization. He did not say stop or block and please remove these category Pirna from all pictures of Pirna. My plan is that you block me for a long time and I need a time out from here. The last months were a really taff time for me with uploading and categorization of pictures and adding manual the locations exactly. I got any chance here. Give me a chance please that we can have more trust. --Blackwhiteupl (talk) 05:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "A. Savin said about you: "enormous damage to Commons, much more than estimated before the 2-weeks-block". I trust him more than you. Also, you have created 8 sockpuppets meanwhile, this is very bad. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | 中文(臺灣) | +/−


Wow. "What a damage here!" He is uploading masses on pictures without freedom of panorama and gets no bans after more than thousands of deleted pictures by other administrators. He is still continuing. And any administrator is noticing it. --Blackwhiteupl (talk) 08:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Category talk:Frohngasse, PirnaEdit

 
Category talk:Frohngasse, Pirna has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category ⧼pageinfo-talkpage⧽, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sastognuti (talk) 15:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Frongasse without h is right. Look at the Street sign. --Blackwhiteupl (talk) 23:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC) @User:Sastognuti Das ist hier aber auch limitiert. Der Achim ist vom Innenministerium also Büttel vom Russen/ USA.... . Hochladen ist nur bis zu einer Grenze erlaubt. Oder uninteressanter Mischmasch ist noch erlaubt. Ich habe mich schon bei Wiki Commons beschwert und die sind auch so unfruchtbar wie die hier. Bei Panoramio haben die echte studierte Administratoren, die Informatiker sind oder Sozialtypen eben. Die sind hundert mal leistungsfähiger als die hier. Kein Wunder, dass Panoramio 100 mal mehr Photos hat als die hier. Panoramio ist viel Nutzerfreundlicher und wird noch besser werden. Bald werden dort auch Bilder archiviert werden, sodass Hacker keinen Zugriff mehr haben können. Ich empfehle Dir Kalispera Dell zu kontaktieren, die hat echt Ahnung und ist ein top Agent. Kannst ja mal Bilder hierher laden, wenn du programmieren kannst. Shizao weigert sich Bilder von Pirna hochzuladen. Neid eben. Aber Wiki habe ich echt nur als zweite Wahl hier, wegen den ständigen mangelhaften Administratoren, die ja schon in internationalen Medien als totale Versager dargestellt werden (Arte 2015 "Administratoren bekommen Prämien oder andere Geschenke, wenn gewisse Aufträge erfüllt werden, Leute zu sperren, damit ein Thema uninteressant bleibt." Durch verdeckte Journalisten. ). Panoramio hat 129000000 / 129 MIO Bilder und Wiikimedia had gerade jetzt ungefähr nur 30 Millionen Dateien, obwohl die älter sind. Massen an Leuten sagen, wie schlimm hindernd diese selbstgerechten Administratoren mit ihren Mängeln sind und nichts erreichen außer Nutzerschwund. Wikimedia hat immer weniger Nutzer durch solche. Zu recht. Und in Zukunft heulen die dann wieder herum, weil die dann keinen Sündenbock finden. Wikimedia hat gesagt zu wenig Schreiber und Hochlader zu haben. Bloß die Festangestellten lieben die Administratoren, so wie die sind hier. Die wollen und dann bekommen die es so. Punkt. Alle Deutschen Geheimdienst haben hier Administratoren, die arm sind und Geld brauchen. --Blackwhiteupl (talk) 23:48, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Because of that last message I blocked your talk page as well. Natuur12 (talk) 00:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Auf dieses Projekt schimpfen aber schon wieder mit dem nächsten offensichtlichen Sockenaccount unterwegs … Dir ist schon klar, dass du damit nicht nur deine Aussage schwächst, sondern auch an deiner Wiedereingliederung in die Gemeinschaft sägst? -- 32X (talk) 20:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Hills_in_SaxonyEdit

Jwh (talk) 07:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Advising love couple 119996673.jpgEdit

 
File:Advising love couple 119996673.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:39, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995356.jpgEdit

 
File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995356.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:50, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995358.jpgEdit

 
File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995358.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995360.jpgEdit

 
File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995360.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995361.jpgEdit

 
File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995361.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995363.jpgEdit

 
File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995363.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Elbe Pirna right side west- end 119995362.jpgEdit

 
File:Elbe Pirna right side west- end 119995362.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Elbe Pirna right side west- end 119996808.jpgEdit

 
File:Elbe Pirna right side west- end 119996808.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Elbe Pirna right side west- end 119996811.jpgEdit

 
File:Elbe Pirna right side west- end 119996811.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Elbe Pirna right side west- end 119996812.jpgEdit

 
File:Elbe Pirna right side west- end 119996812.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995365.jpgEdit

 
File:Elbe Pirna right side 119995365.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Elbe Heidenau Müglitz 120450356.jpgEdit

 
File:Elbe Heidenau Müglitz 120450356.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Kindergarten An der Gottleuba Pirna 1987 Group.jpgEdit

 
File:Kindergarten An der Gottleuba Pirna 1987 Group.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Kindergarten An der Gottleuba Pirna 1987.jpgEdit

 
File:Kindergarten An der Gottleuba Pirna 1987.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Kindergarten An der Gottleuba Pirna 1989 Group.jpgEdit

 
File:Kindergarten An der Gottleuba Pirna 1989 Group.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:33, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

sockpuppetEdit

User:Natuur12: Please block this sockpuppet >>> User:Wichlaugh. Thanks --Frze > talk 04:07, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Daphne Lantier beat me too it. Natuur12 (talk) 12:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Barbiergasse, Pirna 121401634.jpgEdit

 
File:Barbiergasse, Pirna 121401634.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Dohnaische Straße Pirna in color 119829851.jpgEdit

 
File:Dohnaische Straße Pirna in color 119829851.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 17:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Dohnaische Straße Pirna in color 119829992.jpgEdit

 
File:Dohnaische Straße Pirna in color 119829992.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 17:55, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Blackwhiteupl".