User talk:Bulwersator/archive

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bulwersator!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Rely_Tampons.jpg edit

 
File:Rely_Tampons.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Southern_toc_logo.png edit

 
File:Southern_toc_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Emc seal.gif edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Emc seal.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Emc seal.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply


File:Satellite image of the Ayeyarwady delta.jpg edit

Thanks for letting me know, I have searched the original source for the image: http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view.php?id=52762. There is a problem because the image is obtained by the SeaWiFS sensor and according to the terms of use: All SeaWiFS, OrbView and IKONOS imagery are controlled by the GeoEye group (http://www.geoeye.com), and permission for use must be requested of them directly. The file should be deleted.Cameta (talk) 20:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dates on files transferred from Wikipedia edit

Would you mind using internationalised dates (using {{ISOdate}}) for images transferred from Wikipedia, like File:Tata Consultancy Services Vadapalani 2.JPG (which I've added this to), rather than Polish? —innotata 21:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Bulwersator. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Undeletion requests edit

Thank you for taking my suggestions for filing the undeletion requests for the various coat of arms for Germany. I made a sub-section for you at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Otto_Hupp_Undeletion_Requests so make your request as normal, but use a third level header (===) instead of a two level header (==). Thanks again. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

What is there now will work very good. I am going to ask for help from other admins to look at the requests. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 20:00, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given edit

 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 17:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

You're now a filemover edit

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

 

Hi Bulwersator/archive, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Trijnstel (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Czy twój jest plik, czy zdjęcie edit

I jedno i drugie. Ja osobiście zrobiłem zdjęcie i ja je obrobiłem cyfrowo. Ale temat już chyba upadł, chodziło o rodzaj licencji, że nie dzieło, ale dokument.Ziuk1867 (talk) 11:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

HotCat and auto-save edit

If you want a HotCat that always auto-saves, you don't need to copy the whole gadget. Instead, you could just enable the gadget and replace your copy in User:Bulwersator/common.js by the code shown at Help:Gadget-HotCat#Intercepting the page edit HotCat will make. That gives you the best of both worlds: you'll automatically have any fixes that are made to the gadget, and it'll always auto-save for you. Lupo 20:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, are you using HotCat in multi-cat-mode or in singe-cat-mode? -- RE rillke questions? 19:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Not important.
User:Rillke/checkCat.js for your special needs.
  1. Adds a cats are ok - link to the category-section
  2. Removes the "check categories template" from the file-page when categorizing with HotCat.
-- RE rillke questions? 20:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

For commenting on one my my IFD. Please see the larger context here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks very much for the informations! I know HotCat, good idea, i didn't think to use it in commons too ;-). For the licence, now i uploaded a pic but i have problem with the license, I could edit later beacuse with the tag "Free screenshot|template=GPL" I had this message: This does not seem to be valid wikitext, or does not contain a license. The preview is ok, but i cannot save it.. --Kirk39 (talk) 01:04, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Revert edit

Oh, what do you mean by [this]? The image is changed so much than I cannot claim myself its author. I made the photo about anti-governmental activity. As soon as it was made a chauvinist anti-people image, I cannot stay its author.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I am not the author. In my image there was a political slogan about government. Now they make this image a chauvinist one with an anti-Semitic slogan, so I cannot stay its author. The sense of my photo was different. As soon as the sense of photo is completely changed, this is a derivative.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 08:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deprecated License edit

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Van Jacobson2.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 16:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Avelino Cadilla edit

Hello Bulwersator, I saw you told me there was a deletion request for one of the files I have uploaded (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avelino Cadilla n. 1153 - 1941.jpg); I have answered there. As I have written in the deletion request, I think the file should not be deleted, since it is actually a photograph and not a drawing. I really hope that the file will not be deleted, since I used the correct license. :-) --Triple 8 (msg) 11:39, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, have a nice day! :-) --Triple 8 (msg) 15:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Logo czegośtam edit

[1] Masur (talk) 19:48, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


File rename edit

Hi Bulwersator,

I noticed that you renamed File:Maria Wittekówna.jpg. I was wondering which reason from Commons:File_renaming#What_files_should_be_renamed.3F this is based on. Would you clarify? Any file renames at Commons should be in line with this guideline. In case of doubt, editing the file description is preferable. --  Docu  at 12:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


<moved>

"Maria Wittekowna" and "Maria Wittekówna" looks similar, but there are completely different names (ó is the same sound as u and completely different than o), so it is a "5. correct obvious errors in file names". It may be a bit more complicated as ó is sometimes unavailable, in situations like this ó is usually replaced with o. Bulwersator (talk) 23:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

<moved>
You renamed it from
File:Maria Wittekówna.jpg
to
File:Maria Wittekówna - grób.jpg
It seems it was already spelled correctly. Please don't rename without a valid reason. --  Docu  at 07:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

CheckCategories auto-removal script now included in HotCat edit

Hello Bulwersator, thanks for testing User:Rillke/checkCat.js. This script is now available by default with HotCat. Please remove this line from your User:Bulwersator/common.js. When now categorizing with HotCat and a {{Check categories}} is found, script will prompt what to do. To restore the old behavior without prompting, simply click on Don't ask again and then on Remove {{Check categories}} when editing using HotCat without prompting, wait until the yellow box disappears and confirm. That's all.

Kind regards RE rillke questions? 12:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Little Girl + glasses.JPG edit

 
File:Little Girl + glasses.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sarah (talk) 15:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove code without prior discussion. You just removed all categorization effect from all images which is a significant collateral damage.

All images tagged with PD-Afghanistan needs to undergo a review as we realized recently that Afghanistan has a copyright law. Images not old enough per Afghanistan are the only ones that "fail". These images will undergo a second review and will not be speedy deleted unless it is clear they aren't salvageable.

Documentation is clear on the template itself.

-- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 02:51, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Dinosaurs on pl.wiki edit

Fastily never edited pl.wiki; he is not editing much at all these days, and mass-reverts by a newcomer never look good to the regular editors. Thus if I were you, I would just go and revert CommonsDelinker as soon as possible, not waiting for help (or ask for help on pl.wiki, not here). Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:RocktheUniverse2010Sign.JPG edit

 
File:RocktheUniverse2010Sign.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 05:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deprecated License edit

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Słupsk railway station.JPG, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 22:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Sbllogo.png edit

 
File:Sbllogo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Surrey Arms (pre 1965) edit

I wondered if you felt up to creating a version of the Arms of the County of Surrey in England before 1965.

"Per pale Azure and Sable a Fess per pale Ermine and Or in chief a representation of the Crown of King Edgar proper and a Sprig of Oak fructed Argent."

An image can be found here [2] Aetheling1125 (talk) 09:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Highflyingplanec.JPG edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Highflyingplanec.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Highflyingplanec.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:22, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

DR of logos edit

Hello,

Your nominations of every logos without any research about ToO is not helpful. Admins have enough without extra useless DRs. Thanks, Yann (talk) 03:21, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Thunderbird logo2.jpg edit

Are you really certain that your nomination at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thunderbird logo2.jpg is correct? According to Category:Mozilla Firefox logos, old Firefox logos are unfree whereas new Firefox logos are free (as {{MTL}}{{Trademarked}}). The same does, I believe, also apply to Thunderbird logos (new logos being free and old logos being unfree), and I don't see any discussion about Thunderbird version numbers in the deletion request. It is a bit confusing, and I've made mistakes myself by nominating wrong versions of the Firefox logo for deletion. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:35, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Gay Pride Parade Long Beach California.jpg edit

 
File:Gay Pride Parade Long Beach California.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lovell-ja.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lovell-ja.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:41, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Ghana COA.jpg edit

 
File:Ghana COA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 20:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deletion requests edit

Hi, Bulwersator. I recommend you to request deletion with normal DR. Because most of them were also published in Cumhuriyet and other newspapers after 1924. I think the uploader might scanned re-printed images. Anyway it's beneficial for every user to determine the date of first publication. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:BC Electric Building plaque.JPG edit

 
File:BC Electric Building plaque.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Armenia chess olympiad.jpg edit

 
File:Armenia chess olympiad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:11, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Harkness House, 1908.jpg edit

FYI: I reverted your {{subst:npd}} here. Please use a standard deletion request instead of speedy deletion if you feel that the previous deletion request was wrong. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:SEPTA_Railroad_stations edit

 

Category:SEPTA_Railroad_stations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mackensen (talk) 00:42, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 02:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Apollo12 cf.jpg edit

 
File:Apollo12 cf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:39, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Caroline Moore.jpg edit

 
File:Caroline Moore.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrew Gray (talk) 10:52, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open edit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last yearReply

Return to the user page of "Bulwersator/archive".