Open main menu

Contents


Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Abwasserkanal, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, 2018-08 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The entire series of five photos is well done. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, 2018-08 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 02:48, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Dom, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Capitol, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 02:48, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 02:48, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentor, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentor, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Handwerkerhäuser, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Handwerkerhäuser, 2018-08 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 13:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 10:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Milseburg 15:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Molenturm, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I can forgive the sign, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altena, Burg, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:22, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altena, Burg, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altena, Burg, 2018-02 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altena, Burg, 2018-02 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Herberge, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Herberge, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Matronentempel, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Matronentempel, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Molenturm, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 11:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haus Neuhofs, Krefeld-Uerdingen (west view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Michael, Krefeld-Uerdingen (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station building of the Krefeld-Uerdingen railway station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rheintor (“Rhine Gate”), Krefeld-Uerdingen (closed, city side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altena, Burg, 2018-02 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altena, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Bahnhof, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Bahnhof, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Anfield CemeteryEdit

You seriously want to see 5cm of a lightning conductor? You want me to wait for another sunny day in Liverpool? You want me to disrupt my very busy plans for Heritage Week and take an eight mile trip to take one shot to include a very minor detail? I'm disheartened. I may give it all up. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

You over-dramatise the whole situation. Look, you have two options while taking a photo for Commons/Wikipedia: 1. You take a relevant photo and don‘t observe every little detail. But then you have to live if there are issues that don‘t fit the criteria for a QI. And the composition is one of the both main factors. The composition doesn‘t have to be magic, but solid and without any disturbance. And it‘s necessary that all relevant parts are on the photo. That doesn‘t fulfit your photo, so it isn‘t a QI. If you nominate it nevertheless, you have to live with an oppose vote. 2. You know you want to take a QI so you check all relevant issues and something like this shouldn‘t happen.
And it‘s not only about 5 cm. After straightening the verticals (which is necessary, too), there‘ll be some more cm cropped. You should plan some space over the pillar.
If you‘re disheartened because one of your images isn‘t a QI, you really do something wrong. You have to be attentive if you want to take a QI; if it isn‘t possible for you because you‘re busy, you have to live with less QIs. And if you don‘t agree with my vote, you can change this status to „discuss“ and send it to the Consensual Review. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 22:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality, could be a bit sharper --Sixflashphoto 01:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Michaelskirche, 2018-02 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Michaelskirche, 2018-02 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Haus Neuhofs, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 15:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Michaelskirche, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Michaelskirche, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. (Sharpness could be better.) --XRay 05:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. (Sharpness could be better.) --XRay 05:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Haus Neuhofs, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Smial 10:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Haus Neuhofs, 2018-02 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Nice to see the change of perspective in comparison to the version with moderate wide angle lens! Very useful. --Smial 10:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Bügeleisen, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 11:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Bügeleisen, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 17:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Bügeleisen, 2018-02 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 17:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Anna, Krefeld-Inrath (east facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wasserturm an der Gutenbergstraße, Krefeld-Kempener Feld (view from the northwest).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Zollamt, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Kempener Allee 9, 2018-07 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Kempener Allee 9, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Kempener Allee 9, 2018-07 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Bügeleisen, 2018-02 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Gutenbergstraße, Wasserturm, 2018-07 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:14, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Landgericht, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Stadthaus, 2018-07 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Stadthaus, 2018-07 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 14:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Stadthaus, 2018-07 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Acceptable for QI. IMO sharpness could be better. --XRay 12:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-10.jpgEdit

 
File:Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Graf-Luitpold-Straße 6-8, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Vengolis 02:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühlenhaus, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Vengolis 02:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Vengolis 02:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Vengolis 02:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Vengolis 02:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, Offizierskasino, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, but I prefer a building that is not under construction --Michielverbeek 13:28, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Me too, but sometimes it's unavoidable (and I prefer a construction instead of an abandoned monument) and for QI it isn't important :) --Carschten 13:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, Offizierskasino, 2018-07 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, Offizierskasino, 2018-07 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Gutenbergstraße 39, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Mariae Rosenkranz, Mülheim an der Ruhr-Styrum (southwest facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mühlenhaus, Rheinberg-Ossenberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schlosskapelle Ossenberg, Rheinberg (view from the east).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former officers' mess of the Husarenkaserne Krefeld (view from the north).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Vengolis 05:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Vengolis 05:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Vengolis 05:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 04:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühlenhaus, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Martin, Hillesheim (exterior from the south).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Kempener Allee 9, Krefeld-Kempener Feld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Customhouse of Uerdingen, Krefeld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Graf-Luitpold-Straße 6-8, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühle, 2018-04 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühle, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühle, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühle, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protestant Luther Church with parish hall, Mülheim an der Ruhr-Speldorf (exterior from the south).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior with the choir of the Protestant Luther Church Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main pipe organ (by Willi Peter in 1963) of the Protestant Luther Church Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Side organ (by Willi Peter) in the right aisle, Protestant Luther Church Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 06:16, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 06:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Gutenbergstraße 46, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 06:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
“Friedrichsthor” of Altena Castle (south facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
War memorial of Bönninghardt, Alpen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central nave inside the Stiftskirche St. Peter und Paul, Obermarsberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Kempener Allee, Kaserne, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 14:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Kempener Allee, Kaserne, 2018-07 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality, but composition could be better: A lot of grass in the foreground. Categorization could be better: Entrance, gate,... --XRay 14:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
  Done improved categorization, thank you! The grass was part of the composition to show the neglected, abandoned situation, but I'm not sure if it's successful. --Carschten 18:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good for me. --Rbrechko 11:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 15:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Rbrechko 12:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Rbrechko 14:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Rbrechko 14:51, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, St. Mariae Rosenkranz, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 15:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Why the second nomination? Charlesjsharp 08:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't understand what you mean, that are two different images. --Carschten 11:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
We would normally just nominate the best one. Charlesjsharp 08:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
I definitely disagree with that: You see two different images with two different compositions, one with the parish hall and one without. So both can be QI. --Carschten 16:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Nothing wrong with promoting multiple similar or nearly identical good quality images. This one needs a slight horizontal perspective correction --Trougnouf 17:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
  Done @Trougnouf: thank you for your feedback! I uploaded a new version. --Carschten 18:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
  Support Good quality, thank you! --Trougnouf 00:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altar of the Protestant Luther Church Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pulpit of the Protestant Luther Church Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior with the organ gallery of the Protestant Luther Church of Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canopy and entrance of Stadthaus Krefeld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 22, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Hansastraße 19, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 03:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Hansastraße 19, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 26, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Hansastraße 29, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 03:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 22, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good for me. --Rbrechko 13:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 22, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 14, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 14, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 14, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Rbrechko 10:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:48, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House Graf-Luitpold-Straße 6/8, Rheinberg-Ossenberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wasserturm Vinn, Moers (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Überwasserkirche, Münster (exterior from the south).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Hansastraße 33, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 15:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Solbad Raffelberg, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 07:17, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Solbad Raffelberg, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 15:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Solbad Raffelberg, 2018-04 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 07:17, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Raffelbergpark, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Solbad Raffelberg, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Raffelbergpark, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Raffelbergpark, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, St. Mariä Himmelfahrt, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, St. Mariä Himmelfahrt, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, St. Mariä Himmelfahrt, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Rbrechko 09:39, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, St. Mariä Himmelfahrt, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Solbad Raffelberg, 2018-04 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:34, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Looks good. --Rbrechko 09:40, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central nave inside Überwasserkirche, Münster.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gutenbergstraße 41, Krefeld (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gutenbergstraße 39, Krefeld (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niederberg Coal Mine, shafts 1 and 2, Neukirchen-Vluyn (general view from the north).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Corneliusstift, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 06:53, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Corneliusstift, 2018-07 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 06:53, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 06:51, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:26, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Niederstraße 36, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 21:09, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Corneliusstift, 2018-07 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Corneliusstift, 2018-07 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:45, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gutenbergstraße 39, Krefeld (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blaue Brücke/Styrumer Brücke, Mülheim an der Ruhr (view from the south).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Art nouveau facade (1906) of the Wolfsburg, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Niederstraße 20, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 15:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Bruchstraße 18, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Zur Krone, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Zur Krone, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Corneliusstift, 2018-07 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:18, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Mariensäule, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Siegfriedmühle, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haus Darup, Nottuln (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of St. Fabian und Sebastian, Nottuln-Darup.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alte Kellnerei, Rheinberg (exterior from the west).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tor der Toten, Rheinberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Stadtmauer, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Stadtmauer, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 02:56, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, RömerMuseum, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, RömerMuseum, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:56, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, RömerMuseum, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Stadtmauer, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marienkirche Woquard, Krummhörn (south facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior with the pipe organ of St. Johannes Nepomuk, Burgsteinfurt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pulpit of St. Maria Magdalena, Goch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former main building of the Hammann leather factory, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krefeld, Haus Rheinhorst, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. The foreground (wall, cars, posts) are a little bit disturbing. --XRay 07:11, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Half-timbered house Hansastraße 29, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Mariä Himmelfahrt, Rheinberg-Ossenberg (exterior from the north).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corneliusstift, Krefeld (main facade from the northwest).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niederstraße 36, Krefeld-Uerdingen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zur Krone, Krefeld-Uerdingen (south facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Casino, Krefeld-Uerdingen (exterior from the north).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haus Rheinhorst, Krefeld-Uerdingen (exterior from the northwest).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southeast tower of the city wall of Uerdingen in front of the former castle, Krefeld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niederstraße 26, Krefeld-Uerdingen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niederstraße 20, Krefeld-Uerdingen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bruchstraße 18, Krefeld-Uerdingen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Category:Alte Brauerei (Pilsum)Edit

Hallo Carschten, diese von Dir erstellte Kategorie ist seit längerer Zeit leer. Kommt da noch was an Inhalt oder wurde die Kategorie versehentlich erstellt und kann gelöscht werden oder was ist damit los? Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019Edit

 
Hallo Carschten,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:27, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!Edit

 

Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!

However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize the contest, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:

  1. Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
  2. Go to your preferences
  3. Scroll down to Email Options
  4. Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
  5. Click Save

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herderplatz, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herderkirche, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Gauforum, 2019-09 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --DXR 22:09, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Gauforum, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Neues Museum, 2019-09 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 22:37, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Neues Museum, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 22:37, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Stadtschloss, 2019-09 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Stadtschloss, 2019-09 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Sternbrücke, 2019-09 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Sternbrücke, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Bauhaus-Museum, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Haus am Horn, 2019-09 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good--Armenak Margarian 18:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Reithaus, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. Should be a bit darker IMO --Ermell 14:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Reithaus, 2019-09 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Reithaus, 2019-09 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Graben, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Park an der Ilm, Sphinxgrotte, 2019-09 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

The photo tilts slightly to the right side. --Steindy 10:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
  Done image rotated. A small horizontal tilt is normal because of the side view. --Carschten 10:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
This is not a real side view. I also had not voted against, but asked you to make this small and simple correction. Everything fits, which is why I like to agree with   Support. --Steindy 12:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Park an der Ilm, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Vorwerksgasse, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Deutschritterhaus, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Galerie Eigenheim, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Galerie Eigenheim, 2019-09 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 08:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:34, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herder-Denkmal, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:34, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Stadtschloss, 2019-09 CN-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 08:20, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Hanooz 08:26, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Geleitschenke, 2019-09 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Marktstraße 2, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 20:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herderkirche, 2019-09 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good enough for QI. Maybe you can eliminate the cut person at the bottom totally. --Milseburg 17:48, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 17:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Stadtschloss, 2019-09 CN-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Milseburg 10:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Stadtschloss, 2019-09 CN-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Stadtschloss, 2019-09 CN-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 06:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, 2019-09 CN-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:04, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar, Stadtschloss, 2019-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I think, it's slightly tilted to the right. --Imehling 13:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
  Done @Imehling: new version uploaded, thanks! --Carschten 18:05, 1 October 2019 (UTC) Thanks. It's ok now. --Imehling 06:51, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Carschten".