Open main menu

January - February 2015

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


Contents

2015

Je te souhaite pour toi et ta famille tous mes Vœux pour cette année 2015... Continu à bien soigner tes photos. Tu t'es fait, par ton travail, une belle place dans Commons. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


  * * * Bonne Année 2015! * * *
Head Uut aastat!
--Ivar (talk) 13:26, 2 January 2015 (UTC)  
Thank you very much for your greetings. I wish you a Happy New Year!--ArildV (talk) 13:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Ísafjörður, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 046.JPG

Hi Christian, I have no clue what you mean with your note. I cannot see anything in that area. Best regards and my best wishes for 2015! Poco2 21:23, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Hi Diego, thank you! There is like a clear circle near the location of the note, use the scroll bar to see it. My best wishes for you too! -- ChristianFerrer 22:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Water tower. Place royale du Peyrou, Montpellier, Hérault, France. View from Southeast..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bassac 16 Abbaye vue ESE 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bassac 16 Abbaye vue ESE 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance statue, Place royale du Peyrou 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 12:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place royale du Peyrou, southern wall, detail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 12:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place royale du Peyrou, southwestern wall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I would consider reducing the heavy amount of sharpening (look at the sharpening noise in the sky)--ArildV 12:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC) It is not so sharpened, I think it's more because of ISO 250 (why? I don't remenber), I will not change anything, please decline if you think it's not QI as it is. Me I think it is acceptable. --Christian Ferrer 16:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC) I think it is ok as it is, especially considering the size.--ArildV 17:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance statue, Place royale du Peyrou 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

--Famberhorst 06:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Pierre de Montpellier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very high quality. --Ram-Man 23:04, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place royale du Peyrou, southwestern wall 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
--ArildV 12:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place royale du Peyrou, southwestern wall 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place royale du Peyrou, right southwestern stairs 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place royale du Peyrou, right southwestern stairs 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place royale du Peyrou, right southwestern stairs 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 08:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Montferrand, Saint-Mathieu-de-Tréviers 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 13:27, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Montferrand, Saint-Mathieu-de-Tréviers 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 12:12, 03 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place royale du Peyrou, right southwestern stairs 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:10, 03 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place royale du Peyrou, southern wall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --P e z i 19:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The right statue of the eastern entrance of the Place royale du Peyrou, Montpellier, France. View from east..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pallenis spinosa, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smilax aspera, Sète 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Montferrand, Saint-Mathieu-de-Tréviers 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 09:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sète Harbour Sunset 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
greats.--Famberhorst 08:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dead pine branch, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Château d'eau du Peyrou, Montpellier 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Château d'eau du Peyrou, Montpellier 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia characias, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice.--Famberhorst 06:56, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale Saint-Gilles 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 09:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euphorbia characias ssp. characias (Mediterranean Spurge), leaves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Closure Taipei

Hi Christian, thanks for the closure. I think you picked the wrong image for promotion (it's a bit confusing due to the three alternatives). I would have waited, but of course the bot is pretty quick so I just fixed it. I hope this is okay for you. Best wishes, --DXR (talk) 19:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Back at home

Hi Christian, just wanted to let you know that I came back home yesterday night and now I have, again, access to all my pictures, not only those from Iceland (in the case you want to nominate something else for QI). Thanks again for your continous help!! I hope things are going well down there in! Poco2 09:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale Saint-Gilles 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry

The promotion for Johann Jaritz was an edit conflict, I avoid it in principle, to intervene in assessment processes of others.--Hubertl (talk) 12:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leptotes pirithous on Centranthus ruber, Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia characias, Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centaurea aspera, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sète Harbour Sunset 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sète Harbour Sunset 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 06:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia characias, Sète 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quercus coccifera, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia characias, Sète 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lonicera etrusca, Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 16:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia characias, Sète 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 06:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pomatias elegans, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonchus oleraceus, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 13:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouzigues, Hérault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 16:35, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouzigues, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 16:35, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château d'eau du Peyrou, Montpellier 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château d'eau du Peyrou, Montpellier 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support--Famberhorst 06:42, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Suaeda vera, Sète 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Suaeda vera, Sète 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lonicera etrusca, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK --Pleclown 11:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centaurea aspera, Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK --Pleclown 11:42, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouzigues, Hérault 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 15:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouzigues, Hérault 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 15:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale Saint-Gilles 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Dnalor 01 12:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarcophaga carnaria, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
What about another crop to focus on the fly and getting rid of a blurred branch? I left an annotation. --Cccefalon 06:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Done cropped --Christian Ferrer 07:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
  Support --Cccefalon 10:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale Saint-Gilles 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale Saint-Gilles 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 17:47, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sète Harbour Sunset 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale Saint-Gilles 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support--Famberhorst 16:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elizabeth Tower 2014-09-21 205MP.jpg

Your Oppose vote "for the no-cropped version" is a bit confusing in English. Do you mean you oppose the cropped one (the second one) and "prefer the no-cropped version"? -- Colin (talk) 17:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château d'eau du Peyrou, Montpellier 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château d'eau du Peyrou, Montpellier 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouzigues, Hérault 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ. --Palauenc05 08:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calliptamus barbarus, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me. --Bgag 15:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouzigues, Hérault 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Merveilleux. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:03, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Beauces, Bouzigues 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful mood. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château d'eau du Peyrou, Montpellier 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale Saint-Gilles 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Again perspective distortion. QI standard? --Dnalor 01 12:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
@Dnalor 01: in cases like this correction would be counter-productive. Mattbuck 22:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Air to air image of a Spitfire, taken over RAF Coningsby. MOD 45147974.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Air to air image of a Spitfire, taken over RAF Coningsby. MOD 45147974.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bouzigues, Hérault 06.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bouzigues, Hérault 06.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domaine de Restinclières. Prades-le-Lez 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domaine de Restinclières. Prades-le-Lez 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

PDF 3d

Merci je ne pensais pas que çà marcherai si bien. Nous avons une réunion au labo pour choisir quelque image de qualité pour les versement à venir. Pour l’instant cette expérience reste expérimentale et dans COMMONS. Dès ma fin du mois elle devrait être finalisée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Corydalus cornutus MHNT male.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Corydalus cornutus MHNT male.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!

You're the #1 thank giver in Commons! Congrats and thanks for being nice!

https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2015-February/076731.html

User:Fæ/sandbox Jee 03:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

good evening Christian Ferrer,

Thank you for your message. It is always a question if you put a photo on Featured picture candidates. The risk is there so that your photo is rejected. Too bad, but you can do about that.
Sincerely, Dominicus (Famberhorst).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Too dark, blue cast. Maybe it can be improved. --Code 08:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)  Done for both, thanks --Christian Ferrer 08:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  Support Much better! --Code 11:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Collops bipunctatus, U, Back, SD, Pennington County 2013-07-15-16.27.08 ZS PMax (9345938007).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Collops bipunctatus, U, Back, SD, Pennington County 2013-07-15-16.27.08 ZS PMax (9345938007).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lower Manhattan from Jersey City July 2014 002.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lower Manhattan from Jersey City July 2014 002.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D612 Bridge, Frontignan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Halavar 13:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tower Bridge view at dawn.jpg

I have uploaded an alternative crop and would appreciate if you could indicate a preference, or that you have no strong preference. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontignan, Hérault 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bridge of the D612 over the Canal du Rhône à Sète in Frontignan, Hérault, France. Seen from West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Thanks

  I am appreciated much for your FI nomination of one of my photos (File:Erik kırlangıçkuyruk - Iphiclides podalirius.jpg). Thank you! Zeynel Cebeci (talk) 19:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good I think. --Hockei 20:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemin de Saint-Clair, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 10:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemin de Saint-Clair, Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang of Ingril, Frontignan 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 09:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prunus domestica, Agde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Famberhorst 05:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pistacia terebinthus, Frontignan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Info regarding your comments and questions

Hi Zcebeci, I noticed you put noise reduction in the background, for exemple in this image, this is normal and logical, but it is difficult to follow exactly the outline and I can see the limit, here it's acceptable. I don't know if you use sharpening in your image, but if it's the case a solution is to sharpen only the plant and the insect, like that you have not to put noise reduction in the background or at least much less. In this image there also is a spider cloth pink (see note) is it CAs? -- Christian Ferrer 19:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC) →Hi Christian, Thanks a lot for information about the image mentioned in your talk above. Yes, if it is required I apply some degrees of sharpening to my photos, and I did it for the image mentioned. Coming to CA, I actually differentiated the case whem you pointed it. But as you could follow its other versions under the photo although I processed the RAW images with same measures, the first of two look like pinky probably due to CA effect. I use Sigma 150 mm macro lens and I know that it normally does not create this kind of artifacts. Maybe it occured because of taking pose in reverse light. On the other hand the natural color of this plant's flowers are pinky, pinky brown at the top of it. I hope this reply is informative for your questions. Please let me know if you have furher ones. Many thanks for your comments and concerns again, kindly. All the best.Zcebeci 19:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Corallus hortulanus head, Peru.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Corallus hortulanus head, Peru.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Erik kırlangıçkuyruk - Iphiclides podalirius.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Erik kırlangıçkuyruk - Iphiclides podalirius.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D612 Bridge, Frontignan 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D612 Bridge, Frontignan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang of Ingril, Frontignan 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang of Ingril, Frontignan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Personally, I would cut right piece, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 06:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)  Done thanks you for your suggestion --Christian Ferrer 19:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang of Ingril, Frontignan 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Hi,I have nominated this [1],if you want give a look. Thanx  --LivioAndronico talk 21:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Christian Ferrer/Archive11".