Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


November - December 2018

Contents

Structured Data - IRC office hour today, 1 November

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Commons today, 1 October 2018, from 17:00-18:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find date/time conversion, as well as a link to join the chat in your browser if needed, on the IRC Office hours page on Meta. I realize this may be short notice for some people; I am experimenting with advanced notice times to see what works best for the most people, I'll be giving more warning before the next office hour. I look forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data - IRC office hour today, 1 November

The above message says 1 October in the body when it should say 1 November, as the subject line says. Apologies for making a new section by mass message, it's the only way to get this out quickly. See you in twenty minutes! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Silver Freya (ship, 2011).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

The First 7 images

Dear Christian,

Can you kindly review just the top 7 images by Lymantria. I always review his other images but I think a second reviewer is preferable too--just in case--for a precaution. I don't feel comfortable being the only reviewer here. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Once someone filed a DR on an account with youtube clips and I marked most of the images but luckily there was a second reviewer of one of the images too...and he supported me. If not, I could not say that someone else also reviewed an image from the youtube account thereby proving it was once free before the license was changed. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:53, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
  Done No problems. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:03, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Thanks for your help here. It is not good to just have one reviewer of images from one account in most cases. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:35, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data - copyright and licensing statements

I've posted a second round of designs for modeling copyright and licensing in structured data. These redesigns are based off the feedback received in the first round of designs, and the development team is looking for more discussion. These designs are extremely important for the Commons community to review, as they deal with how copyright and licensing is translated from templates into structured form. I look forward to seeing you over there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Generałowie podczas Święta Wojska Polskiego 2007.jpg

Could you undelete this file? The license was valid. The photo was taken in 2007 and the licensor's license terms for photos from MON were changed in September 2013. There's more photos taken by MON on Commons (the ones i mentioned in the deletion request: File:Czołg lekki PL-01 (01).jpg, File:Czołg lekki PL-01 (02).jpg, File:Gen. Marek Dukaczewski.JPG, File:Jarosław Kraszewski.JPG). There's even an entire category of them. ElCet (talk) 22:29, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Not sure that I can undelete it, I remember to have hesitated. The template {{MONCopyright}} is explicit "this template is no longer usable for uploads after this date" (September 2013) however the deleted file was uploaded here the 3 August 2018. While it's true that the photo was maybe available at source before September 2007, it does not really matter because now your source is not free, and I guess that what matter for the validity of this kind of source is the license at the time of the upload. This is not a CC license, and nothing say us that such conditions were irrevocable, see User:Nemo5576/MON. Sorry from my point of view your source is not OK. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:21, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
What about the files i mentioned? File:Gen. Marek Dukaczewski.JPG and File:Jarosław Kraszewski.JPG were uploaded in January 2018. File:Czołg lekki PL-01 (01).jpg and File:Czołg lekki PL-01 (02).jpg were uploaded in 20 September 2013. The license was changed before 14th of September. Also, User:Nemo5576/MON doesn't specify if the license is valid for files uploaded to Commons or MON. Photos taken by MON before September 2013 don't mention their authors. ElCet (talk) 09:54, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't know about the other files, I closed one DR, the other DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jarosław Kraszewski.JPG was closed with the rationale "files from the Ministry of National Defence of Poland", but IMO if this rationale is good/ok then a relevant license tag should be used instead of the ambiguous {{MONCopyright}}. Really sorry, but I'm not going to undelete this image, if another administrator wants to take responsibility for restoring it, then it's fine for me. Maybe you should make a request at Commons:Undeletion requests. Sorry again. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Unjustified deletion of useful file

"Thank you" for your efforts to diminish wiki. I'll definitely never work to enrich the project by third party photos... I'll never convince them to share their photos here again. --Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 21:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

You should have been advised to get the copyright holders to contact us with permission by OTRS, or you could have asked for guidance. You left it for six weeks. I'd advise going the OTRS route, then once that has arrived, request undeletion. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

The page you linked as source has a clear "All right reserved" at bottom. The other page you quoted have indeed a CC-BY license, but sorry, at first view this license seems to applies only to that web page. They have to replace the "all right reserved" by the CC-By license on the page(s) that you use as source, or they have to remove the "all right reserved" from the bottom of their pages and then to create a term of use page with a clear lisencing statement. Otherwise indeed as pointed by Rodhullandemu we need a permission via OTRS. Sorry if I damaged your enthusiasm, it's clearly not my goal. But you can not expect to upload a file whose source is " all right reserved" and that this file be reviewed and kept, can you? Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

The link Leoboudv gave (http://www.delta.gov.ge/product/gmm-120/) doesn't work. Which image was it? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:53, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
This image from this page. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
People have hard understanding of our rules. I tried to explain to them that it is necessary to replace the "all right reserved" by CC-By license but they failed, instead they placed it in every article separately. I am disappointed because there in no one who is against to use the photos under free license but because of "bureaucracy" we are damaging wiki. --Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 11:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #337

3 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these images if you can.

I upload them since there are No images on Commons of 'Lachnellula calyciformis' and Very few of Scleroderma bovista. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done thanks you for your uploads. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Christian for your help. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Holy Emperor Guan's True Scripture to Awaken the World Cover deletion request

Hi Christian Ferrer,

As you can see on the copyright status, I am the artist for the picture. I would like to know how to make my copyright status better so that I can avoid deletion request? FYI, this is my second entry on the matter as the first one also encountered copyright problems.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamerson fargone (talk • contribs) 08:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

1 image

Dear Christian,

Please review this 'great' image when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:36, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done yeah, mushrooms that grows on mushrooms. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Christian. I didn't know it was that type of mushroom. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
The living world is fantastic, I feel lucky to see all these interesting pictures that we have here. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Авторское право

Добрый день!С удивлением обнаружила,что Вы являетесь инициатором удаления моих личных файлов с моей страницы Википедия.Просьба вернуть файлы с изображениями моих кукол.Заранее благодарна,Иващенко Инга,автор кукол,автор изображений Inga.in (talk) 21:32, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Melanophyllum haematospermum (Bull.) Kreisel 958778.jpg

Dear Christian,

Please review the single image above when you can. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Thank You for your help Christian. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:19, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

André Gorz

Dear Christian Ferrer, you deleted File:Αντρε_Γκορτζ.jpg as a copyright violation. What about File:André_Gorz_(cropped).jpg, I fear you should then also delete this derivative work... -Beyond-growth-UOL-2018 (talk) 10:52, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #338

7 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these images when you can.

Commons has no Entoloma tjallingiorum OR Entoloma pigmentosipes images at all and only 3 E. unicolor photos.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done good images Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You for your help Christian. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:48, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fantastic (ship, 1996) - Sète - October 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fantastic (ship, 1996) - Sète - October 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

MathiMathias2004

¿WHY DO YOU WANT TO DELETE MY FILES?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MathiMathias2004 (talk • contribs) 03:16, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I answered in the deletion request. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 19 November 2018 (UTC)


2 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these 2 images when you can.

Commons has only 5 images of this species. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:41, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your help Christian. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #339

Question technique

Bonjour Christian. Si OK pour vous, je vais vous poser ma question en français (je me débrouille en anglais et je contribue d'ailleurs dans cette langue mais ce sera plus commode).

Concernant un article sur un service de la police nationale française, le chef de service me propose de me "donner" quelques photos pour parution sur WP. Ces photos appartiennent à son service (pas au service com du ministère) et elles ont été prises à différentes époques par des membres de ce service qui, à mon avis, ne sont pas identifiés (et ne doivent d'ailleurs absolument pas l'être). Je me propose de les publier - en indiquant bien sûr que je n'en suis pas l'auteur - mais je ne sais pas trop comment et notamment quel type de licence choisir (j'imagine un type assez restrictif mais compatible WP). Par ailleurs, comme ces photos montrent des personnes ne portant pas d'uniforme permettant d'identifier le service ou le pays, j'envisage d'insérer dans chaque photo un bandeau du type NOM DU SERVICE - PARIS, éventuellement complété par toute information utile (n°OTRS?) de manière à éviter toute confusion et à assurer que les photos ne soient pas réutilisées hors contexte.

Pouvez-vous m'aider sur cette question? Merci d'avance et bien cordialement. --Domenjod (talk) 16:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Bonjour je vois deux problème ici. A mon avis dans le cadre de la police nationale, il y a deux possibilités :
soit les photos on été prises dans un cadre professionnel et dans ce cas les photos appartiennent de facto au ministère, et je ne pense pas qu'un service particulier puisse se substituer au ministère pour publier de telles photos;
soit les photos ont été prises à titre particulier et dans ce cas les droits d'auteurs reviennent de facto aux photographes. Seuls les titulaires de ces droits d'auteur (donc les photographes) peuvent donner la permission (soit par OTRS, soit par l’intermédiaire d'une publication existante) pour une publication sous l'une des licences autorisées ici. Donc dans ce cas non plus, je ne pense pas que le service concerné puisse se substituer aux photographes pour donner l'autorisation de publier les photos.

La seule solution est que chaque titulaire des droits d'auteurs de chaque photo envoie une permission à com:OTRS, ou que les photos soient déjà disponible de façon légitime sur le WEB avec une licence compatible. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:28, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Re-bonjour et merci pour la réponse rapide. Je craignais un peu d'entendre cette réponse. Cependant, dans le livre le plus récent qui m'a servi de référence pour l'article, la majeure partie des photos provient du service, avec la phrase : Sauf mention contraire, toutes les photos font partie de la collection particulière de (nom du service). Je vais me rapprocher d'eux dès que je le pourrai afin d'essayer de comprendre ce que cela implique et, si toujours OK pour vous, je reviendrai vers vous. Encore merci, --Domenjod (talk) 18:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour, la nuit portant conseil, j'ai une question supplémentaire sur votre premier point (appartenance des photos au ministère) avant que je me rapproche de mes interlocuteurs : il me semble que de nombreux services (pas forcément de police) publient énormément de photos sur les réseaux sociaux. Pensez-vous que cette activité soit centralisée ou existe-t-il une forme de délégation d'autorité "de facto" pour cette activité? Merci d'avance. --Domenjod (talk) 08:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Les photos présentes sur les réseaux sociaux ne sont pas libres de droits, même lorsqu'elles sont "publique", il faut donc une autorisation supplémentaire. Mais normalement la même règle s'applique : lorsqu'un agent de l'État, quel qu'il soit, prend une photo dans le cadre de son travail, alors le "copyright" de la photo est détenu par l'État. Si la photo est prise à titre privé alors le "copyright" est détenu par le photographe, à moins, que le photographe ai librement cédé ses droit (généralement il faut une trace écrite, ou au moins un mail, ou une publication faites par lui-meme avec une licence compatible). Je tiens aussi à souligner que dans votre premier messages vous dites à propos des licences : "j'imagine un type assez restrictif mais compatible WP", attention Wikimedia Commons a des règles strictes, et l’auteur d'une photo doit consentir à autoriser les modifications ainsi que la réutilisation dans un but commercial. Voir com:Licensing. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Bien noté, merci. Pour la réutilisation, à mon avis, l'idéal aurait été une licence du type CC BY-NC-ND ou, au minimum, avec une exigence de reproduction à l'identique (d'où mon idée d'intégrer dans la photo un texte identifiant l'origine) et, si ça n'existe pas chez WP, ça complique un peu les choses...Mais en fait, je suis peut-être plus royaliste que le roi en matière d'exigences. Je vais vérifier ça. Merci encore. Je me permettrai de revenir vers vous en cas de besoin. Cdt, --Domenjod (talk) 13:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hafnia Taurus (ship, 2011).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

deleted images

Hello Christian Ferrer.

I just read the message about the images that were deleted. I do not think there is a reason for this, because:

a) Yesterday I started the creation of a page in wikipedia about the "Ephemera Archive" (of which I am a member), which, because it is still incipient, has not yet been published (https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php ? title = Ephemera & action = submit).

b) The edited images are the covers of the Ephemera Collection books (our property), published by Editora Tinta da china.

c) I am also co-author of two books.

d) The covers of these books are published on various websites, particularly in online bookstores.

From what I have just described I think there is no reason why the covers can not illustrate the entry in wikipedia on the Ephemera Archive, so I ask you to revert the delete done.

I am available for any additional clarification.

best regards

Júlio Sequeira


deleted images:

File:Autocolantes do PPD.jpg

File:Autocolantes das organizações da FUR.jpg

File:Luz nos livros.jpg

File:Uma nova concepção de luta.jpg

File:A conquista das almas.jpg

File:Amorzinho.jpg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpps1965 (talk • contribs) 11:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Hello, for every thing that have been already published somewhere we requires that this publication was explicitly published under a compatible license, otherwise the copyright holder (even if it is you) have to send a permission to our permission system. In case of book covers the publishers usually also have some (if not the full) rights over the covers of the books that they publish. E.g. Stephen King himself can not give to us the permission to use one of his book covers, the permission must come from the publisher, but anyway even for the exceptional cases the copyright holder, whoever he is, must send a permission by email. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:28, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Photograph

Dear Sir or Madam,

I tried to upload a photograph to my page. The photographer granted me permission. It has been deleted. What now? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.24.76.101 (talk) 13:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Hello, if you don't log in then I don't know who you are and I can not answer. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:16, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

My name is Nic Dunlop and it was a portrait taken of me by a colleague (Nana Chen) who granted me permission. How do I prove this to you? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 118.175.232.36 (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

What was the account used to upload the image(s)? Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
In all cases the permissions must be sent by the copyright holders to our permission system. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata Gallery update

Just as a heads-up, I rewrote {{Wikidata Gallery}} (or more precisely, created {{Wikidata list/Gallery item}}) so that it now uses Module:WikidataIB and should be multilingual in the same way as the infobox is. Existing galleries won't have been updated, though, you can update them by making this change (or using {{Wikidata Gallery}} to recreate it). Let me know if you spot any problems with the new version. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 23:00, 23 November 2018 (UTC)


4 images and a note

Dear Christian,

Please review these images when you can.

Secondly, For this image you added the satellite coordinate but now there is an error message.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:52, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done for the reviews, regarding the error message "Lua error in Module:Coordinates at line 699: Tried to read nil global frame.", that affect all files, I thinks that is @Jarekt: who made something to Module:Coordinates. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Thank You for your help. I think it might be Jarekt too. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:55, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Only 1 month until Christmas now Christian. I may need to go on 'strike' with 2136 images in this category. Yikes! Too many people using bots to upload images. I'll be more selective reviewing images as I have other things to do. Your images were reviewed. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks you for your help, that is a lot of images.... Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:26, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Certifications

Hallo dear Ferrer. I am new wikipedia poster, so I just want to know, Can I publish personal scanned certificates and certificates on the person’s wikipedia page? If yes, please notice how can I do that Thank you in advance


{{subst:Ծանուցում/Անաղբյուր|Արամայիս Ալավերդյան}}-- Mikifinn (talk) 12:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Hello, copyrights on certificates are held by the institutions that deliver them. You can not upload these certificates here. See com:Licensing. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

2 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these 2 images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

  Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Thank You Christian for your kind help here. I will review yours now. At home I cook most of the dishes since my mum died in 2015. I can mark some images in this category but when its 2200+ images, I must tell you I can only focus on a few images. Its way too much. I don't know where the other reviewers are sadly. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:30, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks you, every weeks I review a few dozen of images from this category. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
  • @Leoboudv: Thank you for reviewing my upload and I am very sorry for your loss. I will be happy to help clear the backlog but I am not a reviewer. // sikander { talk } 12:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • @Christian Ferrer: Where should I go to apply for reviewer permission? Thank you. // sikander { talk } 12:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Found it: Commons:License review/requests // sikander { talk } 12:22, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #340

2 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these images when you can.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atlantis Araceli (ship, 2007).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:OlgaGarcia.jpg

Hi Christian,

Thanks for your message regarding File:OlgaGarcia.jpg tagging. To be honest I need some help. License from author was provided via email and it is documented in this ticket - https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2018112210006505

The license is provided to all the pictures in the folder mentioned in my upload. I wanted to refer to this ticket when I uploaded this specific picture but if I chose the license I didnt find a place to add comments and if I chose other source license type was nowhere to be selected.

I am planning to upload more pictures from this folder, what is the best option to use to avoid creating more admin work for you and the other volunteers?

Thanks Junta (talk) 20:49, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Hello, there is a backlog for the permission system and there is a queue, before someone looks and confirm the permission. I don't have access myself to that system neither to your ticket above. You have to wait that an authorized user do it. I'm not a specialist about the permission system of Wikimedia Commons, but I guess you have to use {{OTRS pending}} with the right parameters, for the file mentioned above as well as for all the others potentially to come. If you have still difficulties I think that Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard is the right place to ask questions. Sorry for not being able to help you more. Note that if this is the same permission than for File:Laia Aleixandri.jpg, then the permission seems to have been already checked and maybe you should ask directly in Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard what to do for this file and for the other you want to upload. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

6 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these images when you can.

Thank You. Commons has No Boletellus jalapensis, Coprinopsis narcotica OR Coprinopsis melanthina species. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

1 final image from November

Dear Christian,

Please kindly review this excellent image when you can.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done I wish you a good weekend Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your kind help Christian. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:26, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

2 rare images

Dear Christian,

Please kindly review these 2 images if you can please.

  • The Observation Comments on MO for them is that these are very important images. They are the only images of this species on MO...I checked. This species does not exist on Commons. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
  Done good catch Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help Christian. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Diethynylbenzenes incomplete close

Looks like not all the files in the bulk nom actually got deleted. DMacks (talk) 07:39, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

And thank you for the prompt handling! DMacks (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

File deletion

What in the world are you saying? That files File:DWCSJ (header).png File:DWCSJ (seal).png   are not free? I CREATED ALL OF THEM! EVEN THE SEAL!! I MADE THEM FOR THE WEBSITE OF THE SCHOOL https://dwcsj.edu.ph WHICH I AM THE WEBMASTER!! I CREATED THOSE FILES IN QUESTION WHICH YOU ALL OF A SUDDEN DELETED WITHOUT PROOF OF YOUR REASON!!
Jhonil Avanzado (talk) 01:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Seeing the rhetoric, I guess you don't expect an answer,do you? Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Viking Sky (ship, 2017) and GNV Cristal (ship, 1989).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viking Sky (ship, 2017) and GNV Cristal (ship, 1989).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #341

Borrado de Fotos

Dear Cristian

I get in touch with you because image and video files of articles that were already published and others that I was preparing have been erased. All photos and videos are my property or I have authorization to use them. It is possible that being a novice has made some mistake when documenting them.

For all this I ask you to reconsider your decision or that you are so kind to indicate me what is the error so that I can solve it.

The deleted files are the following:

File:Barco de cerco de Pescaturismo.jpg
File:Barco de arrastre de Pescaturismo.jpg
File:Barco de palangre de Pescaturismo.jpg
File:Barco de artes menores de Pescaturismo.jpg

Thank you very much,

Merce Garcia

--Mercè Garcia Roca (talk) 08:56, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Hello, the images were deleted because they have been previously published in the Web. Example File:Barco de artes menores de Pescaturismo.jpg can be seen in [1] that is "all right reserved". As per our policies com:Licensing and com:Scope we accept only free content. There is two way to upload this photo here, 1/a free compatible license is added at the bottom of the website instead of the "All right reserved", or 2/ the copyright holder, even if it is you, must send a permission to our permission system. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

RECLAMO POR GRAVE ERROR COMETIDO POR CHRISTIAN FERRER AL ELIMINAR EL LIBRO ALMALIPSIS AMOR Y CALVARIO

BUENAS NOCHES SR. CHRISTIAN FERRER USTED ELIMINÓ LA CONTRIBUCIÓN QUE HICE A WIKIMEDIA COMMONS AL SUBIR A ESTA PLATAFORMA WEB EL LIBRO "ALMALIPSIS, AMOR Y CALVARIO" no es gratuito y que por lo tanto se eliminó. PERMÍTAME ACLARARLE QUE YO SOY EL AUTOR LEGAL DE DICHO LIBRO, TENGO DOCUMENTOS PARA DEMOSTRARLOS. Y YO DECIDÍ QUE MI LIBRO PASARÍA A SER DE USO GRATUITO, Y POR LO TANTO NO EXISTE RAZÓN PARA QUE SE HAYA ELIMINADO. PIDO UNA EXPLICACIÓN A LA BREVEDAD POR FAVOR, PUES SIENTO QUE SE ME HA MALTRATADO AL COMETER TAN GRAVE ERROR EN ESTE CASO POR PARTE DE USTED.

ATTE. BRAYAB PABLO CAMPOSANO LOPEZ

ESCRITOR

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brayan pablo camposano lopez (talk • contribs) 03:56, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Por todo lo que ya ha sido publicado anteriormente, el o los propietarios de los derechos de autor de textos e imágenes (portada del libro), debe enviar un permiso a com:OTRS; lee tambien com:Licensing. Si esta es la primera publicación, entonces me temo que el archivo está fuera de nuestro alcance. Atentamente, Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Incomplete deletions

Hi! Thanks for taking care of some of the backlog of deletion requests. Just a heads-up: some of your deletion actions seem to be incomplete, for example File:Logo Prince Nice.jpg and File:Prince Nice.jpg from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Erdiyanto bin ismanto and File:Simsky-Boris.jpg from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mi.sim. LX (talk, contribs) 18:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Agaricus californicus Peck 177128.jpg & File:Mycena corticola (Pers.) Gray 398615.jpg

Dear Christian,

When you can, please review these 2 images. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:06, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons Newsletter - Fall 2018 edition

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates
Things to do / input and feedback requests

Current:

Since the last newsletter:

Presentations / Press / Events
Partners and allies
  • The info portal on Structured Commons now includes a section on GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums).
  • We are currently planning the first GLAM pilot projects that will use structured data on Wikimedia Commons. One project has already started: the Swedish Heritage Board researches and develops a prototype tool to provide improved metadata (translations, data additions...) from Wikimedia Commons back to the source institution. Read the project brief.
  • The documentation for batch uploads of files to Wikimedia Commons will be improved in 2019, as part of preparing for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. To prepare, the GLAM team at the Wikimedia Foundation wants to understand better which types of documentation you already use, and how you like to learn new GLAM-Wiki skills and knowledge. Fill in a short survey to provide input!
Stay up to date!

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 17:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Cortinarius elatior Fr 703703.jpg

Dear Christian,

Please review this good image when you can. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:22, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Christian. I managed to review your images. Goodnight from Metro Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:26, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

  Thank you for your help with bringing the "Panorama" issue to a good end.   Cart (talk) 10:13, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #342

My work File:ДВД Агент национальной безопасности.jpg

ru:Википедия:Лицензирование_изображений#Цифровые_копии_и_фотокопии_объектов,_находящихся_в_общественном_достоянии

I took these photos. This is not a scanned image of some book or DVD cover, but a photo of the product and a collage created by me personally.

According to the laws of the United States of America, reproductions of two-dimensional objects of art (paintings, photographs, book illustrations) cannot be subject to copyright, unless the creation of a reproduction has made some creative contribution (for example, retouching effects). For example, if you take a photo of Dzhokondu from a direct perspective, your photo will not create a new copyright, and it can be used as a public domain (see the information about the trial Bridgeman Art Library against Corel).

Я сделал эти фотографии. Это не отсканированное изображение какой-то обложки книги или DVD, а фотография продукции и созданный лично мной колаж.

По законам Соединённых Штатов Америки репродукции двухмерных объектов искусства (картин, фотографий, книжных иллюстраций) не могут облагаться копирайтом, за исключением тех случаев, если при создании репродукции был внесён некий творческий вклад (например, эффекты ретуши). К примеру, если вы с прямого ракурса сфотографируете Джоконду, ваша фотография не создаст новый копирайт, и её можно будет использовать как общественное достояние (см. информацию о судебном разбирательстве Bridgeman Art Library против Corel). Geniusjun (talk) 17:14, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

  • No this material is not free, see Commons:Derivative works and com:Licensing. Seeing your comment above, the question is more "how much is there of copyright infringement on this file alone?" rather than "is this file a copyright violation?". Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
This is the my work and a collage created by me personally! Geniusjun (talk) 22
58, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

3 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these images below when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:38, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Viking Sky (ship, 2017) - Sète - December 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viking Sky (ship, 2017) - Sète - December 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

1 image

Dear Christian,

Please review this image when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:53, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:25, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your kind help here Christian. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:46, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

4 images

Dear Christian,

Please kindly review these images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:18, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Multilingual captions beta testing

The Structured Data on Commons team has begun beta testing of the first feature, multilingual file captions, and all community members are invited to test it out. Captions is based on designs discussed with the community[2][3] and the team is looking forward to hearing about testing. If all goes well during testing, captions will be turned on for Commons around the second week of January, 2019.

Multilingual captions are plain text fields that provide brief, easily translatable details of a file in a way that is easy to create, edit, and curate. Captions are added during the upload process using the UploadWizard, or they can be added directly on any file page on Commons. Adding captions in multiple languages is a simple process that requires only a few steps.

The details:

  • There is a help page available on how to use multilingual file captions.
  • Testing will take place on Beta Commons. If you don’t yet have an account set up there, you’ll need one.
  • Beta Commons is a testbed, and not configured exactly like the real Commons site, so expect to see some discrepancies with user interface (UI) elements like search.
  • Structured Data introduces the potential for many important page changes to happen at once, which could flood the recent changes list. Because of this, Enhanced Recent Changes is enabled as it currently is at Commons, but with some UI changes.
  • Feedback and commentary on the file caption functionality are welcome and encouraged on the discussion page for this post.
  • Some testing has already taken place and the team are aware of some issues. A list of known issues can be seen below.
  • If you discover a bug/issue that is not covered in the known issues, please file a ticket on Phabricator and tag it with the “Multimedia” tag. Use this link to file a new task already tagged with "Multimedia."

Known issues:

Thanks!

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk), for the Structured Data on Commons Team 20:42, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Obernberg am Inn Adlerwarte Rotmilan-0136.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Obernberg am Inn Adlerwarte Rotmilan-0136.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #343

File:Hippasteria phrygiana (MNHN-IE-2014-78).jpg

The license for this image seems to be missing at the source. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:38, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

thank you for your vigilance, very good job. The image is indeed not free, and I just deleted it. It was an inattentiveness mistake. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nord Stingray (ship, 2009).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

2 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these 2 images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Vents du Sud - Le Grau-du-Roi 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vents du Sud - Le Grau-du-Roi 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Image deleted on Cynthia Nielsen's page

Hi Christian, I own the image that I posted of Cynthia Nielsen. However, I am new to Wikipedia, so perhaps I did not follow protocol. I did read an entry and uploaded the image first to Wiki Commons. Can you help me as to what I should do to correct any

errors so that I can reload the image? Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kzolatova (talk • contribs) 16:40, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Битва экстрасенсов.jpg

What's different? That file is not free to use but nobody deleted the file. Geniusjun (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

image deletion question

Hi Christian, I own the image that I posted for Cynthia Nielsen's page. The image was also used for her Academia.edu website and PhilPeople website. Since I own it, I simply retrieved it from Internet. However, I can provide the original photograph. Should I reload the original photograph to Wiki Commons? If not, how should I proceed? Thank you very much for your help. --Kzolatova (talk) 17:09, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Hello Kzolatova, if you own an image that have been previously published somewhere where you can not change a restrictive license towards a license compatible within our policies, then the right way to proceed is to contact our permission system. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2019! ;)

    * Happy Holidays 2019, Christian Ferrer! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 08:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)

    * Happy Christmas time and all the best for 2019, Christian Ferrer! *
  • Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
  • Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом!
  • Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком!
  • ... :)

-- Poco2 13:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)

    * Merry Christmas and all the best for 2019, Christian Ferrer! *
  • Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
  • Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом!
  • Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком!
  • ... :)

Ermell (talk) 16:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Deleting my photos

I noticed that you are trying to delete the photos that I took at the Bears game. I downloaded the photos on my computer and used the scissor tool to zoom in on individual players. Do you want me to send you all the original sized photos that I took at the game as proof?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LaDanian1000000 (talk • contribs) 06:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
  • I'm not trying to delete yours photos, otherwise, as I am an administrator, I would have managed to do it. The photos are nominated for deletion in this page. All the comments you have to make about it, should be placed directly in the page, in order to help the closing administrator if they have to keep or to delete the files. I do not want you to send me photos, however if you indeed upload the original photos in Wikimedia Commons with the full resolution, and with EXIFs, that would make it very credible that the photos are "own works". Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

2 images

Dear Christian,

Please help review these 2 images below.

Finally, may I wish you a belated Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year for 2019. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done thank you, Happy Holidays! Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:33, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks Christian for your kind help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Why was my content deleted

Christian, I am the Digital Marketing Manager for Sentry Air Systems, and I am confused as to why we cannot use our photos and logo for our Wikidata page

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaidlebird (talk • contribs) 18:36, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Hi,

First, to be eligible for hosting on Wikimedia Commons, all files and other content, included logos, must fall within the Commons scope.

Secondly, logos and trademarks are accepted in Wikimedia Commons only if

  1. they are in public domain (help) for a specific reason; or
  2. they are freely licensed by their owner, in such case please include a web link; or
  3. they are below the threshold of originality; or
  4. the copyright holder sends directly a permission to OTRS, where you can read how to do it. Note that even if it is you who are the copyright holder, you must send this permission.

Note also that the permissions system (OTRS) is run by volunteers and there is a queue, if your image has been deleted, and you have sent a permission (before or after deletion), do not re-upload again the erased image yourself, it's forbidden. If the permission is valid and the image meets the criteria of our project scope, then it will be automatically restored.

Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #344

2 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these 2 images when you can.

Thank You and Have a good 2019. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your kind help Christian. I appreciate it. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:50, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Roreto.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Roreto.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Last 4 images of 2018

Dear Christian,

Please review these 2 images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you for all your help in 2018 Christian. Do enjoy the new year. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Christian Ferrer/Archive34".