Open main menu

May - June 2014

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good but please fix the dust spot --Poco a poco 19:08, 28 April 2014 (UTC)   Done thanks --Christian Ferrer 19:26, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yatchts in Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --A.Savin 13:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:La Grace (ship, 2010), Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Grace (ship, 2010), Sète, Hérault 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --A.Savin 13:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishing net, Étang de Thau, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me. --Bgag 16:43, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ramassis Neighbourhood, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greater Flamingos, Lido de Thau, Sète 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 22:22, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 14:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 12:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination

Thanks for your proposal. Feel free to nominate. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greater Flamingos, Lido de Thau, Sète 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice mood. --NorbertNagel 19:20, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

QICresult

Good morning Christian. Thank you for handling the longtime files in the CR section of QIC. Just a hint: The bot will only process the files with QICresult tag when the status is switched from "Discuss" back to the appropriate status like "Promotion", "Decline" or (for inconclusive results) "Nomination". Have a good day. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 06:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sedov (ship, 1921), Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 16:57, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greater Flamingos, Lido de Thau, Sète 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --ArildV 07:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sedov (ship, 1921), Sète, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:21, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sedov (ship, 1921), Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:37, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sedov (ship, 1921), Sète, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 08:09, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sedov (ship, 1921), Sète, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality --Halavar 08:21, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemins du Vent (ship, 1948).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 13:51, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --A.Savin 14:07, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Perhaps less magenta in the windows of the Marrakesh but already good quality. --Cccefalon 06:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC) Good eyes, I did not see! thanks, I will uploaded a new version soon --Christian Ferrer 11:37, 8 May 2014 (UTC) Nice composition Christian, imo mutch better then your FP nomination. The foreground (the habour) are a integral part of the image here.--ArildV 13:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)   Done new version without CAs at the boat windows, thanks ArildV, I would have nominated it without the cut boat at left --Christian Ferrer 04:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sedov (ship, 1921), Sète, Hérault 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality --DKrieger 19:09, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sedov (ship, 1921), Sète, Hérault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Advice

You seem to have forgotten Commons:Assume good faith. Your comments here and here are unacceptable. If you have proper reason to believe an editor is engaged in "harassment" and "sabotage" then Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems is where you should post your complaints, along with diffs highlighting the issues, and evidence you have attempted to resolve the issue. I should warn you that neutral admins will take a dim view of anyone abusing that noticeboard to settle personal grievances.

We are both here to contribute great pictures for Commons and to participate in reviewing to determine what is amongst our finest images. I suspect for both of us photography is a hobby and we are interested in improving our technique through advice and constructive criticism. Neither of us are world-class photographers and we all have much to learn and skills to improve. Part of that involves becoming better at judging which of one's own images are great and why, and which don't work and why. I think that is a skill which you in particular seem to be struggling with. It isn't enough to buy a fancy camera and expensive lenses and expect the FP gold stars to flow. If that's all you want, then you will continue to be disappointed that I'm not here to help you. But if you want to improve as a photographer, then you should actually appreciate critical comments on your work far more than a no-comment support.

As far as FP nominations are concerned, I think you should continue to improve your skills in selecting images that are the finest on Commons (not just the finest you took that day), learn to accept the review process is not perfect, and that you will win some and lose some and it doesn't always seem fair. Perhaps then we can engage on friendlier terms?

If you have problems understanding my comments in English, I'm sure Saffron Blaze will be happy to translate and to give additional advice in your native language. -- Colin (talk) 07:24, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

  • Colin, I read the title and first words.... but not the rest. I'm far to be perfect and maybe you defends a cause just but not in a right way IMO. In this [1], you have write (...) show your photos to your mum.. Here is my answer : if you want to discuss, make it discuss with your mum. I did not read your message and shall not read following them unless they are called Escuses -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:30, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:01-01-2014 - Messeturm - trade fair tower - Frankfurt- Germany - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:01-01-2014 - Messeturm - trade fair tower - Frankfurt- Germany - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:42, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sedov (ship, 1921), Sète, Hérault 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI --A.Savin 11:24, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouzigues, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --VT98Fan 14:23, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, Hérault 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, Hérault 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice! -- Der Wolf im Wald 08:40, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, Hérault 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --A.Savin 11:14, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, Hérault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 09:15, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaruc-le-Vieux, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI --A.Savin 13:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 16:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --VT98Fan 12:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
ok for me --Smial 11:23, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Smial 09:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

POTD

Nous avons une bien belle image du jour...--Jebulon (talk) 22:48, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --VT98Fan 06:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinet, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 16:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinet, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality Mariofan13 16:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinet, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --VT98Fan 18:24, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinet, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 10:18, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

QI discussions

Hi mate. I noticed you supported my nominations File:London MMB «P9 River Thames.jpg and File:Chalkwell railway station MMB 02.jpg which were at QI. I had already gone through and declined them on the grounds that they had been at discussion for a week without any support. The Thames picture had just the one comment, and you didn't change it from Decline, thus it was removed. FWIW I think you're completely right about these two and the declines are bogus, but the will of the masses two has spoken. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleppo Pines grove, Pinet, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good --A.Savin 11:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC) The new version is good as well. --A.Savin 11:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinet, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --ArildV 08:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinet, Hérault 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 08:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinet, Hérault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 08:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleppo Pines grove, Pinet, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 06:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sedov (ship, 1921) and Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 09:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinet, Hérault 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 06:57, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleppo Pines forest, Pinet, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support OK --A.Savin 13:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dead Aleppo Pine, Pinet, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:06, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dawn on Sète and the Étang de Thau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice. --ArildV 01:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinet, Hérault 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support very good --A.Savin 12:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Croix du Mont Saint-Clair, Sète, Hérault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. --ArildV 06:11, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaruc-les-Bains, Hérault 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --P e z i 16:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poussan, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 06:35, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belvedere of Saint-Clair, Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 16:15, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sète from Saint-Clair 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI --A.Savin 10:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sète from Saint-Clair 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good --A.Savin 10:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pine forest and Mediterranean Sea, Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pine forest of Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --P e z i 21:17, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pine forest of Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --P e z i 21:17, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pine forest of Sète 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleppo Pine and the sandspit, Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:57, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dawn on Sète and the Étang de Thau.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dawn on Sète and the Étang de Thau.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scolymus hispanicus, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 13:51, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamarix gallica, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 17:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eryngium maritimum, Vic-la-Gardiole 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tamarix gallica (French Tamarisk) in natural habitat..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oenothera biennis, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good --A.Savin 10:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eryngium maritimum, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Llorenzi 08:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eryngium maritimum (Sea holly). Habitat : pebble area of the littoral zone..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oenothera biennis (common evening primrose). Flowers and buds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eryngium maritimum (Sea holly). Plant with buds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach, Vic-la-Gardiole 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The cyan saturation is a little bit too much, however it is good quality and QI. --Cccefalon 10:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach, Vic-la-Gardiole 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 09:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matthiola sinuata, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support OK --A.Savin 10:57, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang de Vic, Vic-la-Gardiole 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Strong artefacts on the grass and foliage (esp. at the bottom, and at the very left) --A.Savin 12:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)  Done --Christian Ferrer 17:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC) Sorry but it does not look sufficient to me, perhaps bad development / overprocess --A.Savin 10:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Alexander, new version again, better? --Christian Ferrer 11:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)   Support OK - looks somewhat better with the grass now --A.Savin 22:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Crushing

Bonjour, Le crushing n'est pas un gros problème, même avec les anciens programme, les problèmes sont lourds dans le cas ou tu as plusieurs bâtiments sur des perspectives différentes. Photoshop CC semble bien le gérer. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crithmum maritimum (Sea fennel). Habitat: pebble area of the littoral zone..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trunk aground, Vic-la-Gardiole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support OK --A.Savin 09:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crithmum maritimum, Vic-la-Gardiole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Matthiola sinuata. Habitat: pebble area of the littoral zone..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de Vissou, Cabrières, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 08:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de Vissou, Cabrières, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:24, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scabiosa atropurpurea, flower, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de Vissou, Cabrières, Hérault 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 07:15, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de Vissou, Cabrières, Hérault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de Vissou, Cabrières, Hérault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and rich in details. --Cccefalon 08:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trail in Cabrières, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 10:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boyne Stream, Cabrières, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 15:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de Vissou, Cabrières, Hérault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:50, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scabiosa atropurpurea subsp. maritima (Sweet scabious). Flower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabrières, Hérault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:33, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trunk aground, Vic-la-Gardiole 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 16:09, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabrières, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 15:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pic de Vissou, Cabrières, Hérault, France. View from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suaeda vera, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scabiosa atropurpurea subsp. maritima (Sweet scabious). Flower bud..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Suaeda vera (Shrubby Sea-blite). Branches..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reassembly of the Tivoli Bridge, Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Maybe a bit saturated but QI. --JLPC 16:33, 27 June 2014 (UTC)  Done thanks, new version a little bit less satured --Christian Ferrer 20:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Christian Ferrer/Archive7".