Open main menu

File:MP3c-3.gif

 
File:MP3c-3.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FASTILY (TALK) 00:43, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 02:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Yoga Photos Flagged for Deletion

Hi Clpo13,

Thank you for bringing the copyright concerns to my attention.

I am confused about your statement: "Reason for the nomination: Files are from the website http://mryoga.com/, which has a non-free copyright notice (All Rights Reserved) at the bottom."

I have double checked www.MrYoga.com website and found that the content on www.MrYoga.com website is shared under the Creative Commons Licence, much like the Wikipedia content is. It states: "Content is licensed under the Creative Commons License."

Please see the attached screenshot of the website and please visit www.MrYoga.com.

screenshot of www.mryoga.com website stating that the content on said website is licensed under the Creative Commons Licenscing

Please let me know how I can undo the flags for deletion on the photos that I have uploaded.

MilenaGlebova1989 (talk) 20:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi MilenaGlebova1989. This appears to be a recent change. When I nominated the files for deletion, the copyright notice said "All Rights Reserved": [1]. It's fine if the owner of the website has changed the conditions to allow reuse. However, the current terms are too vague. What version or edition of the license? There should also be a link to the license text. See COM:LICENSING. If these issues are addressed, you can leave a comment to that effect at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MilenaGlebova1989. clpo13(talk) 20:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi again Clpo13,

Thank you for your prompt response. I will send an email to Mr. Yoga, Inc. with your following suggestion: "the current terms are too vague. What version or edition of the license? There should also be a link to the license text. See COM:LICENSING. " and request the specifics of the licensing.

If you have any specific suggestions that I can forward to Mr. Yoga, Inc. in this regard, please feel free to let me know.

I'd love to keep this valuable content up, so everyone on Wikipedia/Wikimedia can benefit from this.

MilenaGlebova1989 (talk) 20:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Well, the uploads are already licensed as Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0, so I'd suggest that. clpo13(talk) 20:45, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, Clpo13, for the suggestion.

Just to confirm, in order for Wikipedia to keep using the photos in question, you recommend that the www.MrYoga.com website states the following at the bottom of their website:

"Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0" ?  

If this is correct I will go ahead and send an email to Mr. Yoga Inc.

Would you like me to update you when the MrYoga.com website has the above statement for Creative Commons in place?

MilenaGlebova1989 (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


Hi Clpo13,

I have contacted the Mr. Yoga, Inc. office, and they have adjusted their website to allow the usage of their photos as outlined under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0, just like you recommended.

Thank you for your suggestion, it was implemented. They now have a link to Creative Commons website on every page of www.MrYoga.com.

Please fee free to let me know if I need to do anything further on my end.

Thank you, MilenaGlebova1989 (talk) 14:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Seiran.gif

 
File:Seiran.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Podarok panu.jpg

 
File:Podarok panu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

IgorMagic (talk) 04:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Ti zapisalsya dobrovolcem 1920 Moor.svg

 
File:Ti zapisalsya dobrovolcem 1920 Moor.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

IgorMagic (talk) 04:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Clpo13, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

 

Hi Clpo13, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | 中文(臺灣) | +/−

Storkk (talk) 13:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lupin on Hurricane Ridge, August 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Mountains in background weren't as noisy as I was afraid they would be --Daniel Case 02:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:9M-AGK at BTJ.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:9M-AGK at BTJ.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:9M-AGK at BTJ.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

- FlightTime (open channel) 14:41, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:9M-AGO at BTJ, January 2018.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:9M-AGO at BTJ, January 2018.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:9M-AGO at BTJ, January 2018.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

- FlightTime (open channel) 14:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:9M-FYC at BTJ, January 2018.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:9M-FYC at BTJ, January 2018.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:9M-FYC at BTJ, January 2018.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

- FlightTime (open channel) 14:59, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Sajal Aly (cropped).jpg

 
File:Sajal Aly (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

jdx Re: 19:50, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

 
If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Clpo13, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Majora/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! --Majora (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

@T Cells, Majora: Thank you! I hope getting promoted a few minutes ahead of schedule won't be an issue. I'll start checking out files for review and ask around if I have any trouble. clpo13(talk) 22:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm not opposing you as a license reviewer, but I do have a question. Will you check files like XXXTentacionFebruary2018 (cropped).png more thoroughly in the future? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: certainly. My comment there was based on a very brief look at the cropped photo, including reverse image searching it on Google Images and TinEye, neither of which showed any results indicating it came from anywhere other than Wikipedia or Flickr. The original photo was deleted with the edit summary Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing, and I wasn't sure if that meant it was a case of Flickr washing or something else, which is why I asked the deleting administrator to comment on it. clpo13(talk) 15:51, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
In addition to the above: PD-mark is not a license, but you knew that as you answered a question about it in your license reviewer request, so I'm a bit puzzled by this DR. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Replied on DR page. clpo13(talk) 15:51, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

--Don (talk) 00:11, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Chromy-to-Pope-heart-of-peace (cropped).jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Chromy-to-Pope-heart-of-peace (cropped).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Chromy-to-Pope-heart-of-peace (cropped).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macintosh Plus interior 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Macintosh Plus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Dr. Bernd Gross

File:Petra Köpping 2018 (10).JPG

"claim of own work at dewiki, backed up by high resolution and Exif data"

You are correct. There are a lot of photos by this Dr. Bernd Gross, all taken with the same camera or another (earlier, probably) model from the same (Panasonic DMC-FZ) series.

insource:"Dr. Bernd Gross" prefer-recent:1,7 returns over 20000 results and this user can't defend any DR because he's been banned from Commons by oversighters. As usual with that, it's not clear why but he's still contributing as users and bots can move whatever he uploads to dewiki to Commons. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: thanks for the information. I also found this. Fun stuff... clpo13(talk) 20:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Samsung WB350F front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Samsung WB350F back.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Hendre painting section.jpg

 
File:Hendre painting section.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

(talk) 15:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Replied

I replied. Thylacoop5 (talk) 23:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Approval

Automation of DRs

Commons:Help desk#How can I automate mass deletion requests

Please edit your message. (@Jeff G.: as well) I eat bananas is either trying to harm Commons or a complete idiot. That's not a flame or an opinion but a verifiable fact. He requested a bot permit despite not knowing any programming language, screwed with the MOTD, nominated Wikipe-tan for deletion, imports files from enwiki with improper license information (including one of a toy car, the very thing he knows can't survive on Commons), copy pastes Guanaco without attribution, doling out barn stars like candy and their very very worst crime of all: nominating me for admin.

Nobody should ever tell this user about the existence of any tool. This is TheMillStone. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Clpo13, Jeff G.: they haven't made use of it yet as far as I can tell? Their last act was the installation of Wikibreak enforcer. So if they haven't/hadn't read your reply yet, removing the information may keep them in the dark a little longer. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: oops, I thought they used VFC to nominate the Wikipe-tan images. I'll remove my reply entirely. clpo13(talk) 17:47, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | +/−


 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#I eat bananas 101. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Aaah nice to use this barnstar Victuallers (talk) 19:35, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Clpo13/Archive 1".