Open main menu

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Security camera, September 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:33, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Odpowiedź

Ten wandal skasował z Commons - Category:Wiązownica (województwo podkarpackie) - na jakiej podstawie?

Jeżeli on skasował moje utworzone kategorie, to ja mu usunąłem część zawartości jego strony. Żądam aby tę kategorię przywrócił

— Preceding unsigned comment added by In eegent (talk • contribs) 18:15, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

This vandal was deleted from the Commons - Category:Wiązownica (województwo podkarpackie) - on what basis?

If he deleted my created categories, I deleted some of his page content. I demand that this category be restored
translator: Google Translate via clpo13(talk) 18:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Proszę wybaczyć złe tłumaczenie. Będziesz musiał zapytać Yanna, jakie jest jego uzasadnienie, ale usunięcie rzeczy w zemście spowoduje tylko zablokowanie Twojego konta.
You'll have to ask Yann what his reasoning is, but deleting things in revenge will just result in your account being blocked. clpo13(talk) 18:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Solar Eclipse - March 2015.webm

 
File:Solar Eclipse - March 2015.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Per EUMETSAT's website at https://www.eumetsat.int/website/home/AboutUs/TermsofUse/index.html: "Unless otherwise noted, you may download and copy content from the EUMETSAT website(s) for your own personal and non-commercial use. For any other use of the content, you must request authorisation from EUMETSAT." and "Satellite data and products are not released under Creative Commons licence and remain subject to the rules of EUMETSAT’s Data Policy and/or applicable third party data policies. The Creative Commons licence also does not extend to the EUMETSAT logo, its constituent elements or other elements of EUMETSAT’s corporate visual identity."
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 18:43, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Please come back!

You are missed.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:23, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

I know there's a lot of shit going on here, but what triggered the retirement? Some things are being worked on. I just hope it wasn't anything I did. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:59, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Articulated chassis made of two Bullock tractors back to back July 1915 experiment.jpg

 
File:Articulated chassis made of two Bullock tractors back to back July 1915 experiment.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--ghouston (talk) 22:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

And this is what I get..

For all the work I put into improving things here, sometimes doing things few others can, this is the thanks I get: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Alexis Jazz trashing EXIF and disrupting DR.

And I don't know if we'll ever see Guanaco again. Here are his editstats: User:Alexis Jazz/Guanacostats (forgot to adjust colors for Commons editcounts..nevermind that). He also took a break in February/March so maybe. He planned a re-evaluation for Jcb. I would probably be the main driving force to make that evaluation a meaningful one. But I just might be blocked for good faith edits and voicing my opinion before that can even happen. And the question rises: does Commons even deserve my time.

Also pinging Donald Trung. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:27, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

That's bad, I don't see why they want to crucify you over the fact that the images you removed the EXIF data for are in in the DR because they are nominated for having a bad license in the EXIF data. Jan Arkesteijn should be the one cleaning it up, but another volunteer is removing the EXIF in good faith, although I wouldn't advise you to continue as not only the licenses get removed. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:36, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
@Donald Trung: I've already adjusted my method, see the five images. I can upload the other 250+, all I need is a green light. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Marco Verch (is a bastard)

File:United States presidential election results, 1828-1852.svg

 
File:United States presidential election results, 1828-1852.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

B dash (talk) 09:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

SVG file

Thanks for your <svg> help. Could you also say something about the "rendering problem" (post continued!)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stamcose (talk • contribs) 19:06, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
No problem! Replied at Commons:Help desk#SVG file not accepted. clpo13(talk) 19:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Pixabay

Can I just add {{Pixabay}} to files, or do I have to include the file ID as a template argument? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:57, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: the documentation says it's required, but the template will still work fine without it. Since the template has to be replaced with {{subst:PBLR}} for license review, it doesn't matter to me as long as the ID or source URL is somewhere on the page. Including the ID in {{Pixabay}} just makes the process slightly quicker ({{Pixabay|12345}} to {{subst:PBLR|12345}}, for example). clpo13(talk) 17:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 
I hope u liek backlox
Found a way to add the ID anyway. Category:Unreviewed files from Pixabay had 35 files in it, now 844. And I'm not done yet. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Paris Rain (30909102376).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Hi, picking up on this being put again in the sandbox report, though the image itself is on Flickr, the pixabay image referenced does not exist there and redirects to a generic search. If it were on pixabay, then we could add that as the first line of the source parameter, and the webarchive version would get picked up.

It may need to be marked as no source, simply because there is no evidence that the source existed on pixabay or the archives. -- (talk) 18:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20170130101712/https://pixabay.com/en/paris-eiffel-tower-landmark-1791044/. Unfortunately, the image itself wasn't saved, but since the page did exist – and had appropriate tags and matching metadata – I'm inclined to believe the sources of the derivative are legit. I think it'd survive a DR, at least, if it came to that. clpo13(talk) 19:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

A simple comment?

Good evening, user Clpo 13. The edition you did in the deletion request of File:Presentacion-de-La-Tremenda-Corte.ogv, is it a vote against or a simple comment? Thanks for your attention.

Attentively.... --Villalaso (talk) 01:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

  • @Villalaso: it's just a comment, but you should be aware that deletion discussions on Commons are not simple votes (see COM:DR). The reviewing administrator, whoever that might be, will evaluate the discussion and determine what appropriate action to take, based not only on the comments, but also on local and international copyright laws and Commons policy. clpo13(talk) 17:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Someone was being not so nice earlier with the overzealous copyvio accusation (he seems to do it a lot to other people), thanks for removing it! Is it okay for me to clear that from my discussion page now, or should I let someone else do it? B4shful (talk) 23:26, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

@B4shful: you're welcome. I assume Patrick missed the OTRS tag when he patrolled the image. Since the speedy deletion tag was in error, I don't see any reason you shouldn't remove the notice from your talk page if you want. clpo13(talk) 23:30, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Request

Hi @Clpo13:. Since you posted on my talk page to clarify (and thank you very much!), I will reach out to you about how I need to proceed on next steps to save my image from speedy deletion.

I just sent an long note explaining my picture creation process and provided detectable evidence on the image itself on EugeneZelenko's Talk page, and I also provided an example of the image that inspired my work (An old illustration of Ann Hutchinson) followed by my own image on my own talk page, User talk:wtfiv. I put my image beneath it, so that the inspiration and the non-derivative nature of it can be seen. From what I've read on speedy deletions, just don't think there is evidence that my work fits into any of the elements of the "speedy deletion" category, unless I'm just misunderstanding something.

EugeneZelenko may not yet have had a chance to reply to my latest post yet and he is a responsive admin, so my request to you may still be a bit premature. But I am a little concerned that in the last discussion, EugeneZelenko insisted on an additional demands to "prove" the work is mine to move me off the speedy delete list (e.g., he wanted me to resubmit a bigger image when the image I submitted was within a few pixels of the original canvas I created and then repeated the attribution claim. I'm reaching out because I want to be proactive, as I'm proud of my work (see the image comparisons) and would like to ensure that is not prematurely deleted. Of course, I have requested that it be taken off the deletion list altogether, but I did ask that if he still felt that I am doing some copyright violation that he at least put my image on a normal deletion track so I could have it judged fairly by consensus.

My understanding, if I read the documentation correctly, is that normal deletion generates a discussion page. I gave details on his talk page). At this point, I'm starting to feel that I'm at the mercy of one person's judgement. It may be a seasoned judgement, but not necessarily correct in this case. If he and I cannot agree as to the status of the work, is there a way that I can garner other opinions and insight first? Any help or direction you can offer would be appreciated. Thank you very much.Wtfiv (talk) 08:41, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

EugeneZelenko did reply and admitted a second opinion would be good, though he still had his own personal reservations, but the template remains the same, the clock is still running, and I'm unsure how to open a discussion that can reach a consensus in time. Could you help?Wtfiv (talk) 16:05, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

I've been going through the guidelines and potential issues to the best of my ability. My understanding is that I can convert a speedy deletion to a regular one, which I did, so now there is a discussion page. I copied information from my talk page to start the discussion, but kept your account name out of it in case you rather not be involved. (Though I'd welcome your weighing in if interested.) Even though you didn't have time to reply to this, I just want to thank you for the potential of being available. Your simple clarification on my talk page helped me to figure out- after some trial and error- how to get started.Wtfiv (talk) 18:37, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

@Wtfiv: sorry for not replying sooner, I didn't have Internet access for a while there. I agree that a discussion is the best way to go. FWIW, after reading your posts, I don't think there's any problem with the image. I'll chime in at the discussion when I get a chance. clpo13(talk) 16:48, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate both your note here and on your feedback on the discussion page.Wtfiv (talk) 17:54, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Categorization

Hi, clp013, coming across this file after adding this file to the Category:Helen Bannerman, I was wondering if you know more about this issue of he Story of Little Black Sambo 1899 First Edition, as the publishing dates do not correspond. Thank you for your time. :-) Lotje (talk) 04:11, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2019!

 This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2019}} to your userpage!

Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in the United States. Thanks to people like you it was a great success, with over 1,900 people contributing over 10,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. If you haven't seen the winners yet, be sure to check them out here.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information. Just like last year, you'll be able to upload your photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

If you've traveled and taken photos of monuments in non-US countries, you can see if those countries are also participating here.

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Clpo13/Archive 2".