Open main menu

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Cnbrb!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 61556f322237a708641a426e7dc2a17fEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


File:Waterloo transport maps.jpgEdit

 
File:Waterloo transport maps.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--JD554 (talk) 09:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Trains & train interiorsEdit

Hi. Can you please not add cats such as "British Rail Class 313" to cats such as "Trains of London Overground" - not all 313s are LO, and there's a subcat for 313s of LO, which is already a subcat of Trains of LO. Understand that such train categorisation is an ongoing job because there are a lot of train photos on Commons, but we're doing our best to have a consistent system. Admittedly it can create redundant categories, when one train class has only ever operated by a single company, but in general it creates a comprehensive and clear category scheme. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, I was tidying up an over-populated category and these were actually in the top-level London Overground category, which is over-populated. I moved them down a level but I see there is a more precise category already there, and I should simply have removed them. Sorry about that. All sorted now? Cnbrb (talk) 12:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, no worries. I moved a load of 378s out of the top cat for you while I was at it. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Tram station at Central Park.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:55, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

File:UK high speed rail map.pngEdit

Hi,

This is a great map. I noticed that the section of track within the channel tunnel (between Folkestone and Calais, where the speed is limited to 160 km/h) is marked red. Is this just a schematic, or would you be willing to change the colour of the line where it passes under the channel to indicate that the line is not technically a high-speed rail line within the tunnel? Rnt20 (talk) 18:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Yes, good point. It's done. Cnbrb (talk) 10:29, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Also this is a map of high speed rail in the UK. Northern Ireland should be included as it is a constituent part of the UK. Iainturnerisgod (talk) 12:34, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
I agree & understand about NI and am happy tp shade in NI appropriately. However, railway articles tend to treat Great Britain and Ireland separately for historical reasons - see the Rail transport in the United Kingdom article. I wonder if the article should really be about GB only to be consistent with the other rail articles. That's all - no political commentary intended! (I wouldn't dare! :-) ) Cnbrb (talk) 13:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Hmm yeah. This map here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WCML_ECML_Midlands.png shows the whole UK and other maps show just GB when presenting info about railways. I think that either the article needs to be moved to 'High speed rail in Great Britain' or Northern Ireland needs to be added to the map. I also dont know whether the scottish plans announced this week for a high speed link between Glasgow and Edinburgh are at an advanced enough stage to add that route to the map? probably not just yet I would think. Iainturnerisgod (talk) 22:41, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Doubt it - it's all very vague right now! Cnbrb (talk) 01:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Fallowfield Station.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:20, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Edgware road kearney tube.jpgEdit

 
File:Edgware road kearney tube.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 13:43, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

London Midland liveryEdit

Hi. Images like File:Watford Junction railway station MMB 15 321415.jpg do not show London Midland livery. It's a London Midland train, but Silverlink livery. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, my mistake. Wasn't looking very closely. If you haven't done so already, I'll revert any mistakes, sorry about that. Cnbrb (talk) 16:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Transport MapsEdit

Hi there. I'm a huge admirer of the maps that you have created using OpenStreetMap such as File:Bromley north line connections.png and I was wondering how you do them. Do you use an external programme and if so, what? How do you get the background image from OSM? They realy are fantastic and I would love to be able to do it myself. Thanks. 07bargem (talk) 16:24, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Oh thank you! They're Photoshop jobs - bits drawn in layers over the top. The background image is just a screengrab of the OSM (or several pasted together). I found it effective to desaturate the background and raise the brightness so the top level illustration would stand out.Cnbrb (talk) 12:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Nickey LineEdit

From the map of the Nickey Line between Harpenden and Hemel Hempstead please delete "Duckhall Gasworks Halt". Despite extensive research I have been unable to find a station with that name. The section of line between Hemel Hempstead and Heath Park Halt never carried a passenger service so there was no requirement for a station.!!! Steamybrian2 (talk) 20:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

OK, I have taken out the halt, but retained the gasworks label for clarity. Hope this is better. Cnbrb (talk) 13:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

PhotoEdit

Hi I used one of you photos here. If you want me to remove it or something, leave a message on my wikipedia talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Staglit

Absolutely no problem - that's what commons photos are for. Thanks for letting me know. Just happy to see my contributions coming in useful. :-) Keep up the good work. Cnbrb (talk) 14:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Passenger ferries in Scotland mapEdit

There are a few issues with this map. Firstly Stranraer is not in Northern Ireland and no longer has a ferry service. The map is missing out all the inter island routes of Shetland and Orkney . Thirdly I think that the showing just one discontinued route is misleading as there are many routes that have existed in the past e.g to Norway.--FDent (talk) 16:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi - thank you - what a stupid mistake, thank you for pointing that out! Whilst moving labels around to replace Stranraer with Cairnyan, I obviously moved Stranraer across the sea instead of labelling it Belfast. As for Shetland & Orkney, can you point me in the right direction - are they Northlink or independent operators? I'll do my best to include them. Cheers Cnbrb (talk) 13:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamedEdit

20:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

{{Helpme}}

Hello Keegan
This doesn't really make sense. I hold two logins for English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, both named Cnbrb - they are both me. The stated aim in the announcement is that "users must have the same account name everywhere", which is fine, as I already have the same account name, except now you are going to force me to have two account names instead! Have you really thought this through?? Wouldn't it be more sensible simply to merge my two accounts? Renaming Wikimedia accounts is going to cause all sorts of problems - not least how you retrospectively reassign irrevocable CC licences to my new name. Cnbrb (talk) 19:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
P.S. I have just found Special:MergeAccount and entered my password but it does not work. It will not let me merge my accounts.
P.S. I looked at Special:MergeAccount and it states that "The accounts named "Cnbrb" on each of the following sites have been automatically attached to the unified account:
  • commons.wikimedia.org
  • en.wikipedia.org
  • www.mediawiki.org"
So why must my account be renamed if they have been renamed? Can anyone please explain this bizarre move? Cnbrb (talk) 13:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

{{Helpme}} Hello? It's been almost a week now. Can someone please advise on the above issue about the unwanted change to my account name. Cnbrb (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Hello? Hello? Hello? Is anyone there? 10:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

HELLO? Can you please do me the courtesy of replying Keegan? I want an explanation.Cnbrb (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Another week goes by and still no reply. Cnbrb (talk) 17:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Cnbrb,
the problem was that you had separate accounts here, at en.wp and elsewhere that were not attached to another. By visiting Special:MergeAccount you automatically created a new unified account for yourself, merging the separate accounts. See [1], the unified account was created on March 16, your commons and mediawiki accounts were attached on March 18. Since then new account were created automatically for other sites of the Wikimedia Foundation, this is done automatically each time you visit such a site while logged in to your unified account.
The whole point of the renaming effort was to rename non-attached accounts to make room for unified accounts. Since you now have a unified account, renaming is no longer necessary, and your account was not renamed several days ago when the big renaming project was executed. All is good. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 09:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
AT LAST. Thank you. 18:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

H2_phase_2.png - Leeds New Lane modification requiredEdit

Hi. On 30 November 2015 the government published their latest review on phase two of HS2. One of the changes they have decided on is for HS2 platforms to be built onto the existing Leeds railway station. Therefore the separate Leeds New Lane station will not be built. The document is here: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/480396/Higgins_-_The_Yorkshire_Hub.pdf

I have already updated the pages 'Leeds New Lane railway station' and 'Leeds railway station'. I am now in the process of updating the 'High Speed 2' page. There is one modification that I would like your help with if that's ok. The page includes the figure 'H2 phase 2.png' which you created. Would you be able to modify this figure by deleting the 'New Lane' part so that it just says 'Leeds'. The map will then be up to date. Thanks. --Gruffyddd (talk) 14:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

'Tis done. All the best Cnbrb (talk) 15:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

File:BSicon AETRAM white.pngEdit

 
File:BSicon AETRAM white.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
13:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

File:BSicon uvSBRÜCKEu.svgEdit

 
File:BSicon uvSBRÜCKEu.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
13:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

File:BSicon vuINT.svgEdit

 
File:BSicon vuINT.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
10:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

File:National Rail logo white.svgEdit

 
File:National Rail logo white.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

File:London Rail.svgEdit

 
File:London Rail.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:39, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

File:BR arrows.pngEdit

 
File:BR arrows.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Manchester metrolink logo.PNGEdit

 
File:Manchester metrolink logo.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:28, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Ashlyns School coat of arms.jpgEdit

 
File:Ashlyns School coat of arms.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 09:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Advertising posters, Ballymena (1982) - geograph.org.uk - 3522392.jpgEdit

 
File:Advertising posters, Ballymena (1982) - geograph.org.uk - 3522392.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

bjh21 (talk) 01:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Harry&Megan - the Royal wedding (27351872177).jpgEdit

 
File:Harry&Megan - the Royal wedding (27351872177).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

B dash (talk) 13:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Move for File:Oxford Circus tube station CLR emblem.jpgEdit

Hi, I have requested File:Oxford Circus tube station CLR emblem.jpg be moved to File:Oxford Circus tube station J Leon & co emblem.jpg. The emblem shown is not that of the Central London Railway, but of J Leon & Co. a newsagent that once occupied a kiosk in the corner of the building. The emblem and another on the other side of the corner are on the top of what were once external display cases for the kiosk. They are not part of the building structure and were not part of the building when it was constructed (links to images below). The kiosk space is now occupied by a cash machine.DavidCane (talk) 12:39, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

OK, thanks for alerting me. Seems fine, go ahead. Cnbrb (talk) 12:52, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Whittington Big Green Fair (5625458060).jpgEdit

 
File:Whittington Big Green Fair (5625458060).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Image come from a blog, likely flickr washing file
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

B dash (talk) 15:59, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Pierre II de Savoie investi du vicariat général par l'Empereur Richard.jpgEdit

Hi, Please read the license before nominating a file for deletion. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi, please look at the source before un-nominating a file for deletion. This image is quite clearly on sale by Getty images for £340 under a rights-managed licence. This is not free content. The painting may be 169 years old but the JPEG version is in this case non-free content and does not belong on commons. Thanks for taking the time to read these links. Cnbrb (talk) 14:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
It doesn't matter if Getty is trying to sell this. Actually Getty claim is a reprehensible offense in some places (sadly very few), and it is called copyfraud. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Well, good luck when Getty come to try and sue Wikimedia Commons! Cnbrb (talk) 15:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!Edit

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Cnbrb".