User talk:Code/Archive 2

← Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3 →

File:Tamm Albus.jpg

Hello Code ! can yo add notes for the two dustspots please? I think i found one but not the both, thanks :) -- Christian Ferrer 08:15, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

@Christian Ferrer: Hello Christian, sorry, it's very hard to spot them with the image notes-tool, I can only see them when I open the picture at full resolution. However, they are nearly unvisible. One is in the upper left corner, another one is at the left middle side. I don't mind if they remain, for me this is FP anyways. Have a nice weekend! --Code (talk) 10:50, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Perspective correction

Code,

Is there a way to apply perspective correction to images in GIMP, hopefully one that isn't terribly difficult? I'm a relative newcomer to the Quality Images process, and I've noticed many (maybe most) of my images are failing for this reason. Also, is there something I'm doing wrong with my camera settings that is causing the problem, or is it just a matter of post-processing? Any advice you can offer would be much appreciated. Thanks!

Michael Barera (talk) 03:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Michael,

I don't know much about GIMP but there seems to be a possiblity to apply perspective correction as well. Anyways - there are some other tools which could help you, I would try ShiftN for example.

Your camera settings seem good to me, I would apply a little more sharpness and sometimes you should lighten up the dark parts of your pictures a little bit. Are shooting in RAW? Postprocessing is much easier and gives much better results if it's done using the RAW files.

--Code (talk) 05:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Code. No, I'm not shooting in RAW, and I'm (currently) not processing any of my photos at all. Everything that you're talking about (sharpening, lightening, perspective correction) is done in post-processing, right? Sorry, I'm new to all of this. Thanks again! Michael Barera (talk) 02:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, it's mostly done during postprocessing. However, lighting is also a matter of composition. You should look carefully how the scene is illuminated before taking the photo. Sometimes I have to wait some weeks until the light is good for to take a certain photograph. E.g. in this case: The chapel has a very unfavorable location. It is oriented to the north and that’s why there’s only a very short time window each day in which some morning sunbeams touch the chapel. Another example is this building: The sun shines on it only during a few hours in the early morning. The same problem appears with this one. You see that it is very important to decide carefully when to take a certain photograph. Then you will have to use the right camera settings. Then the postprocessing is very important. Therefore you will need the RAW file to get the best results. --Code (talk) 05:28, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schaubergwerk Kupferplatte Jochberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 141019 Sprung über die Spree und Paul-Löbe-Haus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 150801 Marthashof, Berlin-Mitte, Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 150820 Nordbahnhof Carré.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alchemilla vulgaris with raindrops.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linienstraße 40 (Berlin-Mitte).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linienstraße 40, Berlin-Mitte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 150830 Amtsgericht Tempelhof-Kreuzberg, Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Biebrich, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, Westflügel, 150905, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Biebrich, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, 150905, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Biebrich, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, Ostflügel, 150905, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elisabethenplatz, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, 150905, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienhaus, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, 150905, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.-ArildV 07:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilig-Geist-Kirche, Werder an der Havel, 150912, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Meeresstern, Werder (Havel), Kirchturm, 150912, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality. --ArildV 10:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Meeresstern, Werder (Havel), Kirchturm, Frontalansicht, 150912, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mutig, aber völlig richtig! --Hubertl 12:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bockwindmühle, Werder (Havel), 150912, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Heilig-Geist-Kirche, Werder (Havel), 150912, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Heilig-Geist-Kirche, Werder (Havel), 150912, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandkorb bei Sonnenaufgang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the dust spot (annotated).--Jebulon 09:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)  Done --Code 09:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC) Support Are you crazy to weak up so early in the morning ? --Jebulon 10:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinterhof Kopenhagener Straße 16, Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg, 150913, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very interesting and good.--Jebulon 09:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Biebrich, Nordseite, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, 150904, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe crop on right side and top --Uoaei1 05:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilig-Geist-Kirche, Werder (Havel), 150912, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alois-Senefelder-Denkmal, Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg, 150801, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is there a chance to have less pitch black in the shadows?--DXR 21:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)  Done Thank you, I just brightened up the shadows a little bit. --Code 07:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC) @DXR: Could you please have another look? --Code 17:46, 23 September 2015 (UTC) Oops, sorry! Forgot about this one and didn't get the ping... --DXR 07:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Bibliothek, Bebelplatz, Berlin-Mitte, 150926, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:52, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutscher Dom, Gendarmenmarkt, Berlin-Mitte, 150926, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:44, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche, Innenraum, Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg, 150806, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Wow! 11!elf --Hubertl 05:57, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus, Eberswalde, 150926, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alte Bibliothek, Bebelplatz, Berlin-Mitte, 150926, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alte Bibliothek, Bebelplatz, Berlin-Mitte, 150926, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geldzählerbrunnen, Pappelplatz, Berlin-Mitte, 150927, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Dein letztes Bild, die Herz-Jesu-Kirche.

Kannst du was darüber sagen? Ich nehme an: HDR mit 5 Bildern, Querformat mit drei Bildern (Einstellungen) nach oben als Pano. Linse? --Hubertl 07:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, ich hab nur bei den Metadaten geschaut. Steht natürlich alles in der Beschreibung... Höchst ausführlich. Ich bin wirklich sehr beeindruckt! Das mit dem 50mm Dingens ist natürlich interessant, ich habe dasselbe, nur mit f/1.4, verwende es aber leider viel zu selten. Stitching mit Hugin? HDR mit PS? Oder alles in einem Stück mit PTGui? --Hubertl 07:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Danke für das Lob, Hubertl. Ich bin selbst schon etwas stolz, das muss ich zugeben. Ist das vielleicht das bislang beste Architekturfoto, das ich gemacht habe. Meine Bewerbung für den church interior-club, sozusagen. Gestitcht mit PTGui, alles an einem Stück. War aber viel Arbeit, weil es damals erst mein zweites Multirow-Panorama war und ich den Panoramakopf versehentlich noch nicht korrekt eingestellt hatte. Musste also viele Kontrollpunkte von Hand setzen. Das Objektiv ist zwar superscharf, neigt aber bei Gegenlicht leider zu heftigen lila lens flares (wenn man genau hinschaut, sieht man das auf dem Bild leider auch). Ich muss mir dringend ein besseres 50mm zulegen, vielleicht das Sigma Art, aber momentan lässt es die Kasse leider nicht zu. Wie sind da Deine Erfahrungen mit dem 1.4er? Das könnte eine preisgünstige Alternative sein. --Code (talk) 07:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Zugegebenermaßen, ich habe mein 1.4-50mm bislang fast nur im Innenbereich eingesetzt (Studio, Portrait). Aber die Lichtleistung und das wirklich wunderbare Bokeh reizt schon, es verstärkt zu verwenden. Wie ich aber in letzter Zeit feststelle, ist die Arbeit mit jedem Objektiv eine völlig neue Herausforderung, man muss sich fast schon an jedes Ding einzeln herantasten und die Schwächen und Stärken suchen. Und das geht halt nur über methodisches Vorgehen, was dann halt viel Zeit kostet, aber auf diesem hohen Niveau wiederum viele gute, für QI völlig akzeptable Nebenergebnisse bringt. Überall findet man Stärken und Schwächen. Die zwei Linsen, welche mich bis jetzt am meisten überzeugt haben, waren das 70-200 2.8 II IS USM, da sag ich fast uneingeschränkt "perfekt" dazu. Dann das 100mm Macro 2.8 II IS USM für Studioarbeit. Auch hier für diesen Anwendungsbereich ohne Einschränkungen, interessanterweise bin ich aber auf Entfernung von der Schärfe her nicht wirklich überzeugt. Ähnlich das 24-70 L 2.8, an die wirklich perfekte Schärfe muss man sich erst herantasten. Aber ich bin zuversichtlich, die 5Ds R wird irgendwann auch in unseren Händen liegen. Als Stativ-Fotografierer, die wir ja beide sind, ist das dann sicher noch ein zusätzlicher Anreiz.

Ich werde heute noch ein paar Bilder hochladen, welche ich mit dem neuen 11-24mm L 4.0 gemacht habe. Nicht einfach zu handhaben, nicht jedes Motiv eignet sich dafür. Gedacht ist es hauptsächlich für Innenräume, Deckenfresken, dort und dann, wo man nicht ausreichend Zeit hat, den Panoramakopf einzurichten. Aber auch hier kann man gut vorbereiten, denn im Grunde hat jedes Objektiv seine fixen Einstellungen, die man auf der mm-Leiste eingibt. Aber wie gesagt, auch, und gerade dieses Objektiv verlangt eine intensive Auseinandersetzung, speziell auch, weil bei 11 mm die perspektivische Verzerrung schon enorm ist. Es ist ein tolles Ding, auch wenn man Wunder nicht erwarten darf. Es ist genau das optische Gegenstück zu unserem 400mm-Monster.

Ich werde nächstes Jahr WMAT den GigaPan Epic Pro zur Anschaffung vorschlagen, Ich bin überzeugt, dass man damit die Aufnahmezeit auf ein Drittel verkürzen kann. Ich selbst habe den Manfrotto Panokopf inkl Nivellierscheibe, aber leider zu wenig Zeit, mich wirklich intensiv damit zu beschäftigen. Und genau das ist meiner Meinung nach der Hauptgrund, warum sich so eine Anschaffung lohnen könnte. Es ist die Zeit. Und zwei Drittel Zeitersparnis während der Aufnahme bedeutet, dass man das Hauptproblem, nämlich die Leute in den Kirchen, etwas besser in den Griff bekommt.

Meiner Meinung sind beide Bilder, die Kirche und die alte Bibliothek, klare FP-Kandidaten! Es freut mich darüber hinaus, dass du, - erinnere dich noch an unsere ersten Gespräche - inzwischen wirklich den Eindruck vermittelst, die Aufgaben die du dir stellst zu beherrschen und auch zu kontrollieren. Und nicht umgekehrt. --Hubertl 08:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Hubertl: Bin Deinem Ratschlag gefolgt, was FPC anbelangt, aber irgendwie ist die Resonanz zurückhaltender, als ich gehofft hatte. Manchmal ist FP komisch. Liegt wahrscheinlich daran, dass momentan täglich unglaublich viele neue Nominierungen hinzugefügt werden. Ansonsten glaube ich, dass ich mir für die Panoramafotografie das Sigma Art 50mm f/1.4 zulegen muss. Damit erzielt Diliff ja exzellente Ergebnisse. Bin jetzt aber auch ein wenig auf dem Astro-Trip gelandet, da bräuchte es eine Lichtstarke Weitwinkel-Festbrennweite. Ach, Geld müsste man haben. --Code (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Das Ergebnis zählt - somit ist es FP. Congratulations. --Hubertl 21:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi guys. I saw my name pinged so I used Google translate to decipher your conversation. ;-) I can definitely recommend the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art lens, but I've heard many people say that Canon's relatively old 50mm f/2.5 macro lens is very sharp too, and has minimal lens flare. It might be a good way of upgrading from the 50mm without spending too much, if you are primarily interested in using it for panorama work. I even considered it at one point instead of the Sigma 50mm f/1.4. The Sigma is excellent but it's not completely immune to flare either. It still pokes its head up sometimes for me. What is usually more important is having enough overlap between frames so that if lens flare does happen, hopefully there is an overlapping neighbouring frame that you can use to mask the flare out. Diliff (talk) 18:24, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, Diliff, these are both good hints. On the German Amazon-Page of the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 somebody wrote that it was completely impossible to get lens flares with it (he considered that a disadvantage). I will have a look at the 50mm f/2.5. --Code (talk) 05:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

If he thinks it's impossible to get lens flares with it, then I have some news for him. I've experienced lens flare quite often with it. ;-) In fact, my last FP had a little lens flare that nobody mentioned, you can see it directly above the large bright light shining straight at the camera. It's usually these bright halogen lights that cause the flare and yes it's quite minor. But it does happen. And even when there isn't an actual flare, there is still loss of contrast sometimes (although PTGui is pretty good at equalising it between frames in the panorama). Also, lens flares are more obvious in HDR photography than in normal photography, because you usually have to take a significantly overexposed image as part of the bracketing, and a flare that was very minor in a correctly exposed scene becomes much more obvious in the overexposed image. And then when you tone map the HDR file, the lens flare of the brightest exposure is kept because it is considered useful data for the scene. The same effect in HDR photography also enhances the star effect from the lens iris, because the brightest exposure has the strongest star effect. There's no easy way to avoid this because you need the overexposed image to capture good shadow detail elsewhere. Diliff (talk) 17:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

That makes sense. However, I never see any lens flares in your pictures. Must be some kind of magic. ;-) I'm very happy with my EF 50mm f/1.8 regarding sharpness, but what really bothers me is that there is no focus scale and that it creates heavy lens flares. The EF 50mm f/2.5 macro has both - and the Sigma as well. I don't really know which choice to make. The larger aperture is interesting, too, of course. --Code (talk) 17:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

You should do what I suggested already multiple times... get Magic Lantern. ;-) It is better than just having focus scales - it actually gives you a (slightly more accurate) focus point estimation as well as the estimated in focus range based on the aperture you select. Diliff (talk) 19:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadt Ranis, Panorama, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Herz-Jesu-Kirche, Innenraum, Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg, 150806, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Herz-Jesu-Kirche, Innenraum, Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg, 150806, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wohnhäuser, Pößnecker Straße, Ranis, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:16, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zionskirche, Innenraum, Berlin-Mitte, 151011, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pößnecker Straße 32, Ranis, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria-Magdalenen-Kirche, Eberswalde, 150926, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:36, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria-Magdalenen-Kirche, Eberswalde, Orgel, 150926, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your nomination of my photo on FB.
Sincerely,
--Famberhorst (talk) 05:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC), Dominicus Bergsma.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsehturm und Bode-Museum bei Sonnenaufgang, Berlin-Mitte, 151011, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadt Ranis, Ortseingangsschild, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Posthirsch Hotel, Pößneck, 151003, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support foregroun shadow is pretty strong, but nevertheless QI for me --Iifar 18:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Ranis Eingang, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Ranis, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. (IMO you should reduce the blue sky, better 1 to 2 thirds.) --XRay 06:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdamer Platz, Berlin-Mitte, 151011, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilsenhöhle, Ranis, Nordhöhle, 151004, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. Hard to get the impression as it is directly at the location. --Hubertl 06:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilsenhöhle, Ranis, Südhöhle, 151004, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. Hard to get the impression as it is directly at the location. --Hubertl 06:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Rollback.

good morning Code,
The photo was yesterday IQ rejected because the picture was skewed (see IQ page0. I will turn back to him.
Sincerely,--Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC) Dominicus Bergsma.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durchgang zur Ilsenhöhle, Ranis, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Margarethen, Ranis, Westfassade, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Ok for the intentional perspective view. --Cayambe 07:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Margarethen, Ranis, Haupteingang, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:14, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael (Engerda), Eingangsportal, 151003, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael (Engerda), Eingangstor, 151003, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandensteiner Teich, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enzianbäumchen, Blüte, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Margarethen (Ranis), Westfassade, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paul-Löbe-Haus, Berlin-Mitte, 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anhalter Bahnhof, Portikus Rückseite SW, Berlin-Kreuzberg, 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anhalter Bahnhof, Portikus Rückseite SO, Berlin-Kreuzberg, 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amtsgericht Tempelhof-Kreuzberg, Berlin, Familiengericht, 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

About "standard nomination template"

Sir: Where can I find the "standard nomination template"? I don't know how to edit because I participate in the selection at first time. Thankyou very much.--Shanghai, the biggest city in CHN 13:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legolas1024 (talk • contribs) 13:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

@Legolas1024: Please follow the instructions given here. --Code (talk) 15:31, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

{{reply to|Code]] Thank you !!--Legolas1024 07:03, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Biebrich, Nordseite, 150726, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdamer Platz, Berlin-Mitte, 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:47, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zionskirche, Altar, Berlin-Mitte, 151011, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zionskirche, Berlin-Mitte, Innenansicht, 151011, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 151024, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 151024, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 140406 Bode-Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treppenturm, Deutsches Historisches Museum, Berlin, 150118, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Paul-Löbe-Haus, Berlin-Mitte, 151024, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paul-Löbe-Haus, Berlin-Mitte, 151024, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amtsgericht Tempelhof-Kreuzberg, Familiengericht, 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zionskirche, Innenraum, Berlin-Mitte, 151011, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zionskirche, Innenraum, Berlin-Mitte, 151011, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Ranis, Vorburg, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marinepeilturm, Kap Arkona, Rügen, 150610, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 10:19, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marinepeilturm, Kap Arkona, Südansicht, 150610, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 09:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marinepeilturm, Kap Arkona, Eingangsbereich, 150610, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 09:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magistratsschirm, Schönhauser Allee, Berlin, 150705, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magistratsschirm, Schönhauser Allee, Berlin, bw, 150705, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kap Arkona, Rügen, 150610, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:38, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seebrücke in Sellin, Rügen, 150620, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seebrücke Sellin, 150620, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karpfenhof, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, 150726, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 07:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael, Sagard, Rügen, 150620, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Meeresgruss, Sellin (Rügen), 150620, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Fernsicht, Sellin, 150620, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Vineta, Sellin (Rügen), 150620, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 06:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bode-Museum, 151011, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reste eines alten Stegs, Juliusruh, Rügen, 150618, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Svantevit (Juliusruh), 150614, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality, but be carreful at oversharpening, the leaves on the right are at the limit. --Christian Ferrer 08:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin, 150607, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:42, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandkorb am Strand von Juliusruh bei Sonnenaufgang, 150617, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Stunning composition. Great colors. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alter Steg, Juliusruh (Rügen), Sonnenaufgang, 150617, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sowjetisches Ehrenmal (Berlin-Tiergarten), 150214, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 05:59, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dyckerhoff Verwaltungsgebäude, Mainz-Amöneburg, 150405, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biebricher Straße 65, Mainz-Amöneburg, 150405, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotunde, Schloss Biebrich, Nacht, 150405, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Difficult lightening. --Hubertl 10:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Factory, Berlin-Mitte, 150501, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bürohaus Leipziger Straße 124, Berlin, 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments with a correction of perspectives it would be a Quality image --El Golli Mohamed 17:37, 18 November 2015 (UTC) @El Golli Mohamed: What do you mean? The perspective is corrected. --Code 18:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)  Support QI 4 me. --Palauenc05 09:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC) ok Quality image --El Golli Mohamed 16:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC) Support

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenaufgang, Kap Arkona, Rügen, 150613, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What colors! --Johann Jaritz 08:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Promenade, Juliusruh (Rügen), 150613, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alter Steg, Juliusruh (Rügen), Sonnenaufgang, 150613, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow!. --Johann Jaritz 08:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenaufgang, Kap Arkona, 150613, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow! --Johann Jaritz 08:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! U-Bahn-Viadukt in Berlin-Kreuzberg, 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komatsu PC290 Raupenbagger, 150913, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:56, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Schloss Kochberg, Burggraben, 151003, ako.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Kochberg, Burggraben, 151003, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neue Synagoge (Berlin), Kuppel, 140525, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:55, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! U-Bahn-Viadukt in Berlin-Kreuzberg (Farbe), 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alter Steg, Juliusruh (Rügen), Sonnenaufgang, 150617, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alter Steg, Juliusruh (Rügen), Sonnenaufgang, 150617, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Posthirsch, Pößneck, 151003, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahntower, Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 141027, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 08:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenaufgang am Strand von Juliusruh (Rügen), 150617, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent picture. Must have been very hard to photograph. --Jacek79 20:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus Orlamünde, 140609, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Danke für Deine Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2015!

Hallo Code!

Vielen Dank, dass Du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 mitgemacht und Deine Fotos von Kulturdenkmalen mit der ganzen Welt geteilt hast! Weltweit wurden im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs über 230.000 Bilder hochgeladen. 38.953 davon stammen allein aus Deutschland, wo sich 866 Teilnehmer beteiligt haben.
Hier findest Du weitere statistische Informationen zu den Ergebnissen von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015.

Und so geht’s jetzt mit dem Wettbewerb weiter:

• Die WLM-Vorjury hat alle im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs hochgeladenen Bilder gesichtet und bewertet.
• Vom 16. bis 18. Oktober tagte die Hauptjury in Fulda und legte auf Basis der Vorjury-Bewertungen die Platzierung der besten Aufnahmen fest. In der darauf folgenden Woche wurden dann die besten Bilder des Wettbewerbs und natürlich die Preisträger veröffentlicht.
• Für die Vergabe unserer tollen WLM-Preise wird dann Wikimedia Deutschland in den Wochen bis Weihnachten nach und nach alle Preisträger anschreiben und bitten, sich einen Preis aus unserem Sachpreispool auszusuchen. Bitte sorge daher dafür, dass Du in Deinen Account-Einstellungen Deine E-Mail-Adresse hinterlegt hast und auf ggf. dort ankommende Mails innerhalb von höchstens einer Woche antwortest.

Auch wenn der diesjährige Wettbewerb jetzt vorbei ist, möchten wir Dich einladen, auch weiterhin Fotos hochzuladen und bei der Pflege von Wikipedia-Artikeln und Listen zu helfen. Wikipedia und Wikimedia Commons leben durch Menschen wie Dich, die ehrenamtlich helfen, freie Inhalte zu erstellen und für alle zugänglich zu machen. Weitere Informationen dazu, wie genau Du an der Wikipedia mitarbeiten kannst, findest Du in unserem Tutorial, und wenn Du Dir dabei eine persönliche Unterstützung wünschst, kannst Du Dich einfach an unser Mentorenprogramm wenden.

Viel Glück für den Wettbewerb und viel Spaß bei der weiteren Mitarbeit in der Wikipedia und hier auf Commons wünscht Dir das Wiki Loves Monuments Team Deutschland 2015 (Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC))

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Strandkorb bei Sonnenaufgang.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Strandkorb bei Sonnenaufgang.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful holidays

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 15:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paul-Löbe-Haus, Westseite, Frontalansicht, Berlin-Mitte, 151223, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum für Architekturzeichnung, Berlin, 150516, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundeskanzleramt, Weihnachtsbaum, Blaue Stunde, Berlin, 151223, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paul-Löbe-Haus, Westseite, Berlin-Mitte, 151223, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:12, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichstagsgebäude mit Weihnachtsbaum bei Nacht, Berlin, 151223, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:12, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin - Museum für Architekturzeichnung bei Nacht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:41, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	Have a great 2016. -- Colin (talk) 11:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Reichstagsgebäude mit Weihnachtsbaum bei Nacht, Berlin, 151223, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reichstagsgebäude mit Weihnachtsbaum bei Nacht, Berlin, 151223, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rettbergsaue, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, 150726, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:15, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Biebrich, Wiesbaden, 150726, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:15, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadt Ranis, 150530, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I am delighted. Beautiful and charming town. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Bank, Krumme Lanke, Berlin, 151227, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:15, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basketballkorb Spiegelung Mauerpark, Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg, 151226, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büro- und Geschäftshaus Litfaß-Platz 1, Berlin-Mitte, 160101, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wohn- und Geschäftshaus Ackerstraße 29, Berlin-Mitte, 160101, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 23:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria-Magdalenen-Kirche, Eberswalde, Innenansicht, 150926, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilig-Geist-Kirche, Werder (Havel), Innenansicht, 150912, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Paul-Löbe-Haus, Westseite, Berlin-Mitte, 151223, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paul-Löbe-Haus, Westseite, Berlin-Mitte, 151223, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weihnachtsmarkt Erfurt, 151216, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Überwachungskamera, Bundesfinanzministerium, Berlin, 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony Center, Berlin-Mitte, 150607, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwache Oderberger Straße, Berlin, 150215, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundeskanzleramt (Berlin), 150515, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundeskanzleramt, Berlin, 150515, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schokoladen, Ackerstraße 169, Berlin, Fassade, 140808, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:13, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schokoladen, Ackerstraße 169, Berlin, 140808, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter, Naturschutzgebiet Assberg-Hasenleite, Thüringen, 160116, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support May be a bit dark, but IMO still good quality. --XRay 10:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schneebedeckte Tanne, Naturschutzgebiet Assberg-Hasenleite, Thüringen, 160116, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scheunentür, Großkochberg (Thüringen), 151003, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Maria-Magdalenen-Kirche, Eberswalde, Orgel, 150926, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria-Magdalenen-Kirche, Eberswalde, Orgel, 150926, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trabant in Ranis (Thüringen), 150725, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark but nice and QI for me -- Spurzem 18:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Paul-Löbe-Haus, Westseite, Frontalansicht, Berlin-Mitte, 151223, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paul-Löbe-Haus, Westseite, Frontalansicht, Berlin-Mitte, 151223, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:50, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AEG Beamtentor Brunnenstraße, Berlin-Wedding, 160206, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Well captured. --Cccefalon 15:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regierungsviertel, Berlin-Mitte, Blaue Stunde, HDR, Panorama, 160206, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 20:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gustav-Heinemann-Brücke, Berlin-Mitte, Blaue Stunde, HDR, 160206, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regierungsviertel, Berlin-Mitte, Blaue Stunde, Panorama, 160206, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent work! --Ermell 08:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

COM:QIC#File:Baden-Baden_10-2015_img08_Merkur_tower.jpg

Würdest du dir überlegen, dein Kontra zu streichen oder zumindest auf meine Einwendungen sinnvoll einzugehen? Ich finde nämlich die Argumente in der Tat aus der Luft gegriffen, sorry. --A.Savin 15:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsehturm, Berlin, 160213, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotes Rathaus, Berlin-Mitte, Turm, 160213, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotes Rathaus, Berlin-Mitte, Fassadendetails Ostseite, 160213, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorfkirche Stralau, Berlin-Friedrichshain, 160213, ako (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorfkirche Stralau, Berlin-Friedrichshain, 160213, ako (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Stadthaus, Westseite, Berlin-Mitte, 160213, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gustav-Heinemann-Brücke, Berlin-Mitte, Blaue Stunde, 160206, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Stadthaus, Berlin, 160213, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abteibrücke und Insel der Jugend, Berlin-Treptow, 160213, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abteibrücke, Brückenturm, Berlin-Treptow, 160213, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abteibrücke mit Brückenturm, Insel der Jugend, Berlin-Treptow, 160213, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bode-Museum, Nacht, Berlin-Mitte, 141214, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 07:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkstein Wisentgehege, Ranis, Thüringen, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandsteinsäule Roons, Ranis, Thüringen, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandsteinsäule mit dem Gedicht Roons, Ranis, Thüringen, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linienstraße 40, Berlin-Mitte, 150823, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willy-Brandt-Haus (Berlin), 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willy-Brandt-Haus, Berlin, 151024, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linienstraße 40, 150816, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trauernder, Sowjetisches Ehrenmal, Berlin-Treptow, 160213, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality, highly sought composition and perfect timing! --Christian Ferrer 08:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Marienkirche, Berlin-Mitte, Turm, 160213, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus der Bundespressekonferenz, Ostseite, Berlin, 141019, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments RGB255 reflections not avoidable; nice play with sun and shadow. --Cccefalon 08:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotes Rathaus, Berlin, Südseite, 160213, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Regierungsviertel,_Berlin-Mitte,_Blaue_Stunde,_Panorama,_160206,_ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Regierungsviertel, Berlin-Mitte, Blaue Stunde, HDR, Panorama, 160206, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 23:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche, Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg, Orgel, 150806, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Woher die Info?

Hallo. [1] Ich konnte weder in der BVG Hausordnung ein Verbot finden, noch irgendwo im Netz eine Erwähnung. Wo soll stehen, dass es verboten ist, in U-Bahn Berlin zu fotografieren? Dass die meisten Bahnhöfe schlecht fürs Hochladen auf Commons sind wegen FoP-Einschränkungen, steht natürlich außer Frage. MfG --A.Savin 22:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Siehe hier und hier. Die BVG steht auf dem Standpunkt, dass es kein explizites Verbot braucht, sondern umgekehrt immer einer Erlaubnis. Das Kammergericht hat es in der Entscheidung zwar für zulässig gehalten, Aufnahmen auch ohne Erlaubnis zu veröffentlichen, das allerdings nur wegen einer Abwägung von Eigentum und Meinungs- bzw. Kunstfreiheit. Also kein genereller Freifahrtschein. --Code (talk) 08:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

In Wien ist es ähnlich... Man wird, wenn man mit dem Stativ arbeitet, höflich drauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass das nicht erlaubt ist - steht nicht in der Hausordnung. Ich denke, dass es hier aber mehr um Persönlichkeitsrechte geht welche sie einmahnen als um was anderes. Aber es ist trotz der sehr offenen Panoramafreiheit bei uns eben so, dass ein Betreiber Hausrecht hat. Aber solange er nix sagt, solange darf man bei uns tun was man will. Unter Berücksichtigung der auch in der Öffentlichkeit geltenden Einschränkungen. Nur ist es so, dass unsere U-Bahn-Stationen - bis auf die historischen - kaum was hergeben. Man fährt gerne damit, weil es modern, funktionell und sauber ist, aber das wars dann auch schon. Außer, man will das 2000te Bild der Rolltreppe haben.--Hubertl 08:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Lizenz

ich hab das jetzt endgültig repariert. Ich frage mich halt dann schon immer, wie geht es Leuten mit sowas, die neu hier ankommen, wenn schon ich so herumfuhrwerken muss inkl. mehrerer Hinweise von anderen. Wikipedia ist keine einfache Sache. --Hubertl 08:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berliner Dom, Westfassade, Nacht, 160309, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 15:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berliner Dom, Nacht, 160316, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Berliner Dom, Nacht, 160316, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berliner Dom, Nacht, 160316, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichstagsufer, Berlin-Mitte, 360x180, 160401, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very informative view! --Hubertl 18:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volksbühne, Berlin-Mitte, 150823, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 09:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Denkmal, Rheinufer, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, 160409, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnolienbaum, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, 360x180, 160409, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinufer, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, 360x180, 160409, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inschrift, Sowjetisches Ehrenmal, Berlin-Tiergarten, 160328, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bronzestatue, Ansicht von Süd-West, Sowjetisches Ehrenmal, Berlin-Tiergarten, 160328, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sprung über die Spree, Berlin-Mitte, 160401, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fassade Wilhelmstrasse 65, Berlin-Mitte, 160417, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin, 160328, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Biebrich, 360x180, 160409, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. Possible FP? Certainly good enough for QI. --Peulle 22:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bronzestatue, Sowjetisches Ehrenmal, Berlin-Tiergarten, 160328, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 20:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neue Synagoge, Berlin-Mitte, 160328, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Ranis, Thüringen, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, very crisp --A.Savin 00:13, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platane, Schlosspark Biebrich, 160407, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bronzestatue, Ansicht von Süd-Ost, Sowjetisches Ehrenmal, Berlin-Tiergarten, 160328, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. sry, had to delete rest of comments as it produced an error msg. --Peulle 15:15, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rundbau Monbijoustrasse Ecke Ziegelstrasse, Berlin-Mitte., 160328, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Magnolienbaum, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, 360x180, 160409, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Magnolienbaum, Wiesbaden-Biebrich, 360x180, 160409, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Sebastian, Berlin-Wedding, 160429, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pegel Biebrich, Rheinufer, Wiesbaden, 160409, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe some others don´t like this silhouette of the Morus nigra, I presume, but for me it´s ok. --Hubertl 14:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marie-Elisabeth-Lüders-Haus, Berlin-Mitte, 160328, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Even more than QI --Hubertl 14:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Sebastian, Berlin-Wedding, 360x180, 160429, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:St. Sebastian, Berlin-Wedding, 160429, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St. Sebastian, Berlin-Wedding, 160429, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche, Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg, 360x180, 160427, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin Hauptbahnhof, 160505, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin Hauptbahnhof und Humboldthafen, 160505, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaiser-Wilhelm-Akademie (Berlin), 160505, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin Hauptbahnhof, Südfassade, 160505, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sozialgericht Berlin, 160505, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Factory Berlin, Eingang, 160505, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berliner Mauer, Bernauer Straße, Berlin, 160326, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:16, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reste der Berliner Mauer, 160326, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berliner Mauer, Bernauer Straße, Berlin-Mitte, 160326, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:49, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsehturm, Berlin, 160402, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:16, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin, 160521, ako (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin, 160521, ako (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:31, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berliner Dom, Ostseite, 160402, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just excellent. But: clone out the crane at the right (should be easy imo) and you have a photo of this place without cranes; incredible? )) --A.Savin 15:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC) @A.Savin: Mitte ohne Kräne? Undenkbar. Danke jedenfalls für den Hinweis, ich werde gelegentlich mal einen Retusche-Versuch starten. --Code 17:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin, 160521, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. I tried to take the same picture some weeks ago, but the scaffolding was back then at the front --Poco a poco 08:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Blaue Stunde, Berlin, 160521, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick von der Mühlendammbrücke Richtung Dom, Berlin-Mitte, 160528, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick von der Mühlendammbrücke, Berlin-Mitte, 160528, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus des Reisens, Berlin-Mitte, 160528, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocus chrysanthus, Berlin-Charlottenburg, 160319, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Blaue Stunde, Berlin, 160521, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Blaue Stunde, Berlin, 160521, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick von der Mühlendammbrücke Richtung Dom, Berlin-Mitte, 160528, ako (retouched).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent.--Jebulon 19:31, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Danke sehr

Hallo Ansgar. Einfach mal danke fuer die tollen Kugelpanoramen, die Du hier hochgeladen hast. Ich habe mir jetzt schon einige davon angesehen beim testen meines Panoviewers (der jetzt seit kurzem auch Unterstuetzung fuer hohe Aufloesungen hat). --Dschwen (talk) 15:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

@Dschwen: Hallo Daniel, danke für Deine Nachricht, ich habe mich sehr darüber gefreut. Bei der Gelegenheit auch vielen Dank für die Installation des neuen Viewers, es ist toll, dass man die Panoramen jetzt auch in höherer Auflösung betrachten kann. Ich habe noch einige Kugelpanoramen in Arbeit. --Code (talk) 21:23, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Potsdamer Platz pictures

Kudos for the series of photos of Potsdamer Platz that you submitted to QIC today! I particularly like this one, and I'll be happy to submit it to FPC when I can, unless you do so first.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Thank you, Ikan! I would feel honoured if you'd nominate one of my pictures for FP. Thank you and all the best! --Code (talk) 11:34, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

I'll be happy to do it, after my current nominations play out. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 160606, ako (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Wonderful. Nice exposure time. --XRay 07:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 160606, ako (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Wonderful. --XRay 07:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 160606, ako (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellmau, Tirol, 160615, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 20:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick von Hochsöll, Tirol, 160622, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilder Kaiser, Tirol, Panorama, 160624, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Berliner Dom, Ostseite, 160402, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berliner Dom, Ostseite, 160402, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hintersteinersee, Scheffau, Tirol, 160615, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hintersteinersee, Scheffau, Tirol, 160615, ako (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hintersteinersee, Scheffau, Tirol, 160615, ako (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:54, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hintersteinersee, Scheffau, Tirol, 160615, ako (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heißluftballon über Ellmau, Tirol, 160625, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 20:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hintersteinersee, Scheffau, Tirol, 160615, ako (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellmau und Hartkaiser, Tirol, 160623, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zionskirchplatz, Berlin-Mitte, 160328, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Christian Ferrer 05:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Nationalgalerie, Berlin-Mitte, 360 Grad Panorama, 160101, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wilder Kaiser, Tirol, Panorama, 160624, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wilder Kaiser, Tirol, Panorama, 160624, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter im Naturschutzgebiet Assberg-Hasenleite, Thüringen, 160116, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. After checking your options, you went... left? --Hubertl 06:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais am Festungsgraben, Zeughaus, Deutsches Historisches Museum, Berlin-Mitte, 360 Grad Panorama, 160101, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not really a spectecular motif, but verry good quality. --Milseburg 10:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Reichstagsufer, Berlin-Mitte, 360x180, 160401, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reichstagsufer, Berlin-Mitte, 360x180, 160401, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moltkebrücke und Kanzleramt, Berlin, 160505, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Upper building seems somewhat skewed, but good quality.--Famberhorst 05:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichstagsufer, Berlin, 360x180, 160401, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heißluftballons über Ellmau, Tirol, 160625, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brennholzstapel, 160730, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Superb quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry...

... about what happened there. You took my defense and only got bitten in return. Keep up the good work ! - Benh (talk) 17:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, Benh. I really enjoy your pictures on Flickr. It's a pity that you don't participate on FPC any more. --Code (talk) 16:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Sadly I don't participate much either now, but that's mainly because I'm not really finding time for photography, not because of FPC. But wow, I can see that Livio is still the same argumentative, difficult person that has caused others to take him to arbitration in the past. A leopard cannot change his spots, I suppose. :-) I can see that his image almost passed and that is a crime in itself, the image simply isn't good enough. Badly lit, too much contrast, unsharp yet oversharpened with a large radius which gives the impression of a watercolour painting, and yes the cropping of frescos the ceiling too... Oh dear... Diliff (talk) 11:28, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes. Hard to understand that so many participants support every of his nominations regardless how bad the image is. It's a mystery. Nominations of others are being examined with much more precision and sincerity. --Code (talk) 11:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

I think the reason has already been mentioned... Nobody wants to have an argument with him, instead they want to encourage him to continue his work. But I think this uncritical support actually diminishes the quality of his work. When he was getting a lot of criticism (last year), his quality actually started to improve. He started using HDR and panoramic stitching. Now it seems that he's stopped? I haven't looked at his uploads to see though, maybe I'm wrong. Many of the buildings he visits are really quite beautiful (even if Italian baroque/renaissance isn't my favourite style of architecture) but his images often fall short of really doing them justice which is a shame, since he clearly spends a lot of time visiting them and not so much time on making the image worth the time spent! Diliff (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spreeresidenz, Berlin-Charlottenburg, 160807, ako (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spreeresidenz, Berlin-Charlottenburg, 160807, ako (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 17:23, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spreeresidenz, Berlin-Charlottenburg, 160807, ako (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spreebogen, Berlin-Moabit, 160807, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 05:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandkrugbrücke, Berlin-Mitte, 160824, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

AN/U

The situation with Livio and Savin's block is being discussed at AN/U: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Unfair_block_by_A.Savin. I've mentioned you there, especially as I feel that your behavior toward Livio was unfriendly and baiting. INeverCry 20:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kammergericht, Berlin-Schöneberg, Plenarsaal, 160809, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:55, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kammergericht, Berlin-Schöneberg, Treppenhalle (2), 160809, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:55, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kammergericht, Berlin-Schöneberg, Treppenhalle (1), 160809, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:55, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Joseph, Berlin-Wedding, 160724, ako (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:58, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nachzeichnung eines Wachturms BT-9, Mauergedenkstätte Bernauer Straße, Berlin-Mitte, 160827, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minerva und Mars, Schloss Biebrich, 160409, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 360x180, 160403, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 05:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minerva und Mars, Schloss Biebrich, Rotunde, 160409, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunnen 49, Berlin-Mitte, 160827, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Code!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 360x180, 160403, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 360x180, 160403, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Querkanal 5, Stralsund, 150614, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Joseph, Berlin-Wedding, Kanzel, 160724, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Joseph, Berlin-Wedding, 160724, ako (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments So sharp ... how did this one not get promoted sooner? --Daniel Case 05:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kammergericht, Berlin-Schöneberg, Treppenhalle, 360x180, 160809, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice!--Famberhorst 15:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liesenbrücken, Ansicht von Süd-Ost, Berlin-Wedding, 160827, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landgericht Berlin, Littenstraße, Eingangshalle, 360x180, 160906, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bravo! Some tile joints at the very bottom do not match exactly which doesn`t matter. --Ermell 07:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Joseph, Berlin-Wedding, Herz-Jesu-Altar, 160724, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 22:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kammergericht, Berlin-Schöneberg, Treppenhalle, 360x180, 160809, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kammergericht, Berlin-Schöneberg, Treppenhalle, 360x180, 160809, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Nachtrag zu zwei Löchdiskussionen

Moin Code! Dein letzter Satz unter Commons:Deletion requests/Interior of St. Peter (Hamburg-Groß Borstel) ist schon ganz richtig. Ich möchte mich für den Ton zunächst erstmal entschuldigen. Du siehst daran aber schön, wie sehr ich mich zu dem Zeitpunkt geärgert habe. Ich hätte zu Deinen Hinweisen noch die eine oder andere Frage und Anmerkung. Aktuell bin ich privat aber extrem im Stress und habe sehr sehr wenig Zeit. Vor Mitte Oktober komme ich kaum dazu, mich wieder ein wenig mehr mit WP und Commons zu befassen. Also bitte wundere Dich nicht, wenn es ein wenig dauert, bis ich mich wieder bei Dir melde. Viele Grüße, --Dirtsc (talk) 12:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regierungsviertel, Berlin-Mitte, 150515, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Bibliothek, Berlin-Mitte, 150308, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederwalddenkmal, Rüdesheim am Rhein, 140726, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I like the light and view.--ArildV 06:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie, Berlin-Mitte, 150509, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochhäuser am Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 141209, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Colour profil im EXIF

Hallo Ansgar,

ich antworte darauf auch der Einfachheit halber in Deutsch, und damit es nicht die Abstimmung aufbläht auf deiner Diskussionsseite. Ich nutze meistens mehrere Programme, je nachdem was beim Bild gemacht warden soll. Im Normalfall wird aber mindestens das Bild in meinem RAW-Konverter CaptureNX2 geöffnet. Die EXIF, die in dem Pano von den Olympiabauten zu sehen ist, ist eine Kopie eines RAW-Bildes, was ich unbearbeitet als JPG abgespeichert habe. Das aus dem Grund weil durch das Stitchen die EXIF logischerweise nicht übernommen warden. Ich verwende zum kopieren der EXIF dieses Programm. Vielleicht kommst du mit der Beschreibung einem möglichen Fehler von mir auf die Schliche. Auch wenn ich den grundsätzlichen Sinn einer sauberen EXIF verstehe, nervt mich das Thema trotzdem, insbesondere weil es für mich selbst keine wirkliche Relevanz hat. Nichtsdestotrotz: wenn ich etwas künftig mit wenig Aufwand vernünftig und sauber machen kann, mache ich es natürlich gerne. Beste Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Alles klar, danke für die Information. Ich werde versuchen, heute Abend eine kleine Anleitung zur Reparatur des Problems zu schreiben. Ich kann verstehen, dass Dich das Thema nervt, aber es kann schon echt einen Unterschied machen, gerade bei zunehmender Smartphone-Nutzung und so weiter. Da können die Farben schon sehr unterschiedlich dargestellt werden. --Code (talk) 06:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

@Taxiarchos228: Ok, sorry für die Verspätung. Ich habe mich in die Problematik nochmal eingelesen. Capture NX ist ja offenbar der Nikon-eigene RAW-Konverter. Ich weiß nicht, ob der per default Color Profiles in den Bildern speichert, aber jedenfalls kann man da so einstellen. Ich vermute allerdings, dass Deine Bilder bis zum Stitching über ein Color Profile verfügen. Womöglich überträgt die Stitching-Software (Du nutzt Hugin, nehme ich an?) das Profil nicht in das fertige Panorama (was seltsam ist, bei PTGui werden zwar nicht alle Metadaten übernommen, aber das Farbprofil auf jeden Fall, aber mit Hugin kenne ich mich nicht aus). Dann solltest Du mittels Exiftool nicht nur die sonstigen Metadaten übertragen, sondern in das fertige Panorama auch ein Farbprofil einfügen. Das kann Exiftool auch. Die Profildateien gibt es beispielsweise hier. Überhaupt ein Profil einzubetten ist schon extrem wichtig. Zwar werden sowohl Fotolabore, als auch diverse Softwareprodukte oft standardmäßig sRGB verwenden, wenn kein Profil eingebettet ist, verlassen kann man sich darauf aber nicht. Die Unterschiede können schon erheblich sein, Colin hat das mal ganz gut dargestellt. Ich hoffe, das hilft erstmal. --Code (talk) 06:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

@Taxiarchos228: Kleine Ergänzung: Die .icc-Dateien kannst Du unter Windows auch hier finden: C:\Windows\System32\spool\drivers\color. Außerdem ist es mit exiftool möglich, das Farbprofil aus einer JPEG-Datei zu extrahieren, um es in eine andere JPEG-Datei einzufügen. Bei Bedarf kann ich Dir auch zwei Farbprofile per Mail schicken. --Code (talk) 05:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

So sieht das Menü für das Farbmanagement bei Capture NX aus: bis auf den Haken kann man noch die diverse Farbräume wählen und das war`s, mehr gibt es da nicht

Ich werde die Einstellungsoption im Capture NX2 mal prüfen. Ich stitche mit PTGui. Allerdings sind die Bilder bereits im Original ohne entsprechende Einbindung. Siehe z.B. dieses unveränderte Einzelbild (hier das Bild in Jeffrey's Image Metadata Viewer). --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

na super, gerade wollte ich hier [2] nachschauen, da ist die Seite nicht mehr verfügbar. Ich habe mal trotzdem im Farbmanagement vom Capture NX geschaut. Es gibt dort neben diversen Farbräumen, aus denen man wählen kann die Möglichkeit einen Haken zu wählen bei "Dieses anstatt des eingebetteten Profils verwendet". Der Haken war raus, erreiche ich mit dem Haken rein dass er die Einbettung dann vornimmt? --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

@Taxiarchos228: Also bei mir funktioniert der Link. Hat die Einstellung bei Capture NX was gebracht? Ich verwende die Software selbst nicht (bin Canon-User und nutze sonst nur Lightroom und Photoshop), daher kann ich Dir bei Capture NX nicht wirklich weiterhelfen. Es ist wirklich sehr seltsam, dass bei Dir nicht automatisch ein Profil eingebettet wird. Das kann ich mir nicht richtig erklären. --Code (talk) 04:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Der Link funktioniert nicht, wegen Zeitüberschreitung bricht mein Browser irgendwann ab. Das wäre auch nicht das Problem, du könntest mir den Text ja kopieren oder ggf. eine PDF von der Seite erstellen und sie mir zuschicken. Allerdings hat das anhaken nichts gebracht. Ich hatte gestern noch in einem Versuch das File:Kreta - Potamon-Stausee2.jpg Bild vom Potamon Stausee mit der neuen EXIF hochgeladen. Es kommt die selbe "Fehlermeldung" der angeblich oder tatsächlich fehlenden Einbindung. --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:32, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Nur so ein Gedanke: meinen Bildschirm neu zu kalibrieren bringt für das Problem nichts? Eine Kalibrierspinne + Software hätte ich. --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

P.S. Lt. dieser Anleitung auf Seite 1/2 wird übrigens empfohlen den Haken NICHT drin zu haben (so wie es vorher bei mir auch vorbelegt war). --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

@Taxiarchos228: Mit der Bildschirmkalibrierung dürfte das nichts zu tun haben, denke ich. Aber offengestanden ist mir das Problem ein Rätsel, jeder normale RAW-Konverter sollte von sich aus stets ein Farbprofil einbetten. Hast Du mal spaßeshalber eine andere Software ausprobiert, z.B. Lightroom oder so? Auch wenn Du das Bild anschließend in GIMP oder Photoshop bearbeitest, sollte eigentlich ein Farbprofil eingebettet werden. --Code (talk) 08:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Aber wenn bereits unter der Originaldatei im Capture NX diese Info fehlt dann pflegt diese doch Gimp oder andere Verarbeitunsgprogramme auch nicht ein. Das ergibt für mich keinen Sinn. Danke für deine Bemühungen, allerdings werde ich das Vorhaben erst mal auf Eis legen. Hier jage ich einem Phantom nach weil sich einige Benutzer als selbst erkorene EXIF-Daten-Überwacher gerieren und glauben, sie müssten Kontrastimmen für etwas vergeben, was gar nicht Teil des FPC-Regelwerks ist. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

• Sorry to get myself in here. @Taxiarchos228: Do you think you could send us a file right after exportation from Capture NX ? To check if the embedded profile is there. I'm wondering if this doesn't come from the uploader you might use. - Benh (talk) 21:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Interior of St. Franziskus (Gummersbach)

War ein Fehler von mir. Danke für den Hinweis! Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 15:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

@Ies: Keine Ursache. Die Bilder sind sehr schön, mir tut es wirklich leid, dass sie gelöscht werden müssen. Ich habe selbst so viele Bilder von modernen Kirchen und bin echt traurig, dass ich sie wahrscheinlich nie werde hochladen können. Das Urheberrecht ist schon echt dysfunktional in der Hinsicht. Viele Grüße und vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis. --Code (talk) 18:11, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Ellmau, 160618, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 05:05, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Heimsuchungskapelle, Ellmau, 160617, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Heimsuchungskapelle, Ellmau, 360x180, 160615, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Nice, and definitely a QI. Ikan Kekek 00:04, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Ellmau, 360x180, 160618, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 05:04, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 160606, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --Christian Ferrer 06:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur, Berlin-Mitte, 141108, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Söll, 160622, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria-Heimsuchungskapelle, Ellmau, Tirol, 160612, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality and very pleasant atmosphere. -- Ikan Kekek 09:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschinger Kapelle, Going am Wilden Kaiser, 160621, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality for QI, to my eyes, and pretty chapel. -- Ikan Kekek 09:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Heimsuchungskapelle, Ellmau, Tirol, 160618, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality for QI, in my opinion, and very pretty at full-page size on my monitor. -- Ikan Kekek 10:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landgericht Berlin, Littenstraße, Eingangshalle, Oben, 160906, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Very good quality and composition. -- Ikan Kekek 08:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landgericht Berlin, Littenstraße, Eingangshalle (2), 160906, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 05:35, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landgericht Berlin, Littenstraße, Eingangshalle (1), 160906, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landgericht Berlin, Littenstraße, Eingangshalle, Seitliche Ansicht, 160906, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Max-Schmeling-Halle, Berlin, 150705, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a dust spot at left side. --Ajepbah 05:32, 7 October 2016 (UTC)  Done Well spotted, thanks for the hint. I removed it. --Code 06:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC) Thanks, now it looks good for me. --Ajepbah 06:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stampfanger-Kapelle, Söll, Tirol, 160622, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wallfahrtskapelle Stampfanger, Söll, Tirol, 160622, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo, however some sunny parts of the photo are a bit overprocessed --Michielverbeek 06:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stampfangerkapelle, Söll, Tirol, 160622, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but a dust spot at the left. --Ajepbah 06:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you for the hint. --Code 07:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC) Now it's ok ;-) --Ajepbah 18:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebesschlösser, Dyckerhoffbrücke, Wiesbaden-Schierstein, 160923, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dyckerhoffbrücke, Wiesbaden-Schierstein, 160924, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 06:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Treppenturm, Deutsches Historisches Museum, Berlin, 150118, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Treppenturm, Deutsches Historisches Museum, Berlin, 150118, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:04, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landgericht Berlin, Littenstraße, Eingangshalle, 160906, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunning and WOW!. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria-Heimsuchungskapelle, Ellmau, Tirol, 160615, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pfarrkirche Ellmau, 160618, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfarrkirche Ellmau, 160618, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochhäuser am Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 160606, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool. Ist das richtig? Mitten in Berlin kann man Sterne am Himmel sehen? Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:46, 17 October 2016 (UTC) @Basotxerri: Ja, siehe z.B. auch hier, hier und hier. --Code 16:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)  Comment I'm really impressed... I think there less stars visible here in Vitoria (population 240.000). --Basotxerri 20:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Bildnutzung

Hallo Ansgar

Auf unserer Seite

http://www.hostelman.com/attractions/germany/berlin/berlin/landmark/berlin-hauptbahnhof/

nutzen wir ein Foto von Dir.

Ich hoffe Du bist damit, und mit der Art der Kennzeichnung einverstanden.

Liebe Grüße in die Heimat aus Odessa, Ukraine.

Joachim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hostelman (talk • contribs) 16:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Joachim, danke für den Hinweis. Natürlich kannst Du das Bild gerne nutzen. Die Kennzeichnung ist allerdings nicht ganz richtig, das Bild steht nicht unter der Lizenz "CC BY-SA 3.0", sondern unter der Lizenz "CC BY 3.0 (DE)". Bitte ändere die Kennzeichnung und den Link entsprechend. Vielen Dank! --Code (talk) 07:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo,

hiermit möchte ich Dir im Namen der Jury zu Deiner erfolgreichen Teilnahme am diesjährigen Denkmal-Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments in Deutschland ganz herzlich gratulieren.

Insgesamt wurden in diesem Jahr rund 39.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen hochgeladen und für die Bebilderung von Artikeln und Listen in der Wikipedia zur Verfügung gestellt. Aus dieser großen Zahl heraus erreichten Deine obigen tollen Fotos Plätze unter den Top 100 – ein Erfolg, der dementsprechend hoch einzuschätzen ist.

Die 100 Bilder aller Preisträgerinnen und Preisträger kannst Du Dir hier anschauen.

Ich hoffe, dass der Wettbewerb Dir mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet hat wie uns. Auf ein Wiedersehen im Jahr 2017!

i. A. --Nicola (talk) 06:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Nicola, vielen Dank! Ich freue mich sehr über diese Auszeichnung. --Code (talk) 07:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Bei der einen ist es ja nicht geblieben :) --Nicola (talk) 08:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kammergericht, Berlin-Schöneberg, Treppenhalle (1), 160809, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kammergericht, Berlin-Schöneberg, Treppenhalle (1), 160809, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Kalkscheuneklein.jpg

Hallo Ansgar, bitte nimm es mir nicht übel, aber ich brauchte gestern auf die Schnelle eine kleinere Version deines Fotos für das WMDE-Vereinswiki, weil die Software dein Original auf Teufel komm raus nicht einbinden wollte... Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 22:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Kein Problem und viele Grüße! --Code (talk) 05:37, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sandkrugbrücke, Berlin-Mitte, 160824, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sandkrugbrücke, Berlin-Mitte, 160824, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park am Gleisdreieck, Berlin, 161113, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:10, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Kombo Kamera + Objektiv

Hallo Code, apropos diesem Edit von dir habe ich mir schon länger gefragt, ob es nicht möglich wäre, ein Bot damit zu beauftragen, die Exif-Daten in Kategorien umzuwandeln? Das ist nur ein Use Cases von mehreren (wir haben auch Kategorien für Belichtungszeit z.B.). Würde dieser Ansatz schon mal besprochen und aus einem guten Grund ausgeschlossen? Viele Grüsse! Poco² 12:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Ja, das fände ich klasse. Die Idee wurde kürzlich mal in COM:FORUM disktuiert, blieb aber ohne Ergebnis ([3]). Ich habe leider keine Ahnung von Bots, aber wenn sich jemand fände, der so etwas bauen könnte, wäre das natürlich großartig. Hat mich übrigens gefreut, Dich mal persönlich kennenzulernen und ich hoffe, Du bist gut wieder zurückgekommen. Grüße! --Code (talk) 12:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Panoramatechnik-Frage

Hallo Code!

Da Du Tipps bei technischen Fragen anbietest, möchte ich tatsächlich mal eine solche stellen. Bei dem Bild hier hast Du ja einige direkt ins Objektiv strahlende Laternen dabei. Gibt es irgendwie einen besonderen Trick, wie man vermeiden kann, dass es Geisterbilder durch Reflektionen zwischen den Linsen gibt? Ist das am Ende der Grund, warum Du da 81(!) Einzelbilder gebraucht hast, um ggf. störende Reflektionen zu maskieren? Ich habe nämlich dieses Problem hier (ist ein WIP im Alpha-Stadium aus 57 Einzelbildern, meine Rechnerkiste arbeitet rund 12 Stunden, wenn ich das mit Hugin stitche). Nachträglich werde ich da nichts mehr retten können, aber wenn ich nochmal so etwas vorhabe, wüsste ich gerne, was ich besser machen kann. LG Grand-Duc (talk) 21:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Grand-Duc, in der Tat hatte ich bei dem Problem da ein paar Probleme mit Lensflares und dergleichen, weil das alte 50mm-Objektiv da leider etwas anfällig ist. Das meiste habe ich über Masken gelöst, ich habe das Bild mit PTGui fertiggestellt, das hat ziemlich gut geklappt. Ein paar Flares habe ich dann am Ende noch mit Photoshop beseitigt. Eine bessere Lösung fällt mir da leider auch nicht ein - außer vielleicht, ein besseres Objektiv zu benutzen (mittlerweile habe ich das 50mm Sigma Art, bei dem es fast ausgeschlossen ist, Flares zu erzeugen). Ich kann Dir ansonsten nur raten, mit verkleinerten Einzelbildern zu arbeiten (8 bis 12 Megapixel genügen völlig) und das Ergebnis dann nochmal etwas kleiner zu rechnen. Der Qualitätsgewinn ist dann wirklich enorm. Wenn Du willst, kannst Du mir auch gerne mal die Einzelbilder zur Verfügung stellen und ich versuche, was PTGui daraus machen kann. Viele Grüße. --Code (talk) 12:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

*lach* Ausweislich deiner Homepage hattest Du dieselbe kamera wie ich (EOS 500D), bei der ja logischerweise "8-12 MPx" deutlich mehr als die Hälfte der nativen Auflösung darstellt... Was die Rohbilder vom Portalkran angeht: Das ist eine ziemliche Datenmenge (insbesondere als 16-Bit-Tiff aus meinen RAWs). Das wird dauern, das hochzuladen - kann ich das dir dann via Cloud-Speicher (Mega.nz) zukommen lassen? LG Grand-Duc (talk) 11:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Naja, bei der 500D sind 8MP für die Einzelbilder sicherlich ok. 16bit-TIFFs braucht es sicherlich nicht, ich mache meine Panoramen meistens mit 8bit-JPEGs (Qualität 85). Das grenzt die Datenmenge stark ein. Cloudspeicher ist sicherlich eine gute Idee für den Datentransfer. --Code (talk) 12:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Du hast eine E-Mail zu dem Thema. :-) LG Grand-Duc (talk) 15:42, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Sehr guter Artikel

Dein aktueller Artikel bei irights.info bringt's natürlich anschaulich und treffend auf den Punkt! Wünschen wir ihm gute Reichweite... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:14, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

360° panoramas template ?

Hi Code,

Just uploaded my first 360x180° panorama. I'm taking the easy way and just asking you : are there some best practice when adding a 360° panorama to article ? Do you just put the equirectangular projection right in the article, or is there any much more appropriate template to your knowledge? Pinging @Colin and Diliff: as well. Thanks ! Benh (talk) 19:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Benh, I don't think that there's a best practice but for dewiki Martin Kraft created a template {{PanoViewer}} for that purpose (see de:Geschäftsgebäude für die Zivilabteilungen des Landgerichts Berlin I und des Amtsgerichts Berlin I here for example. Before he made that template I simply added a link to the pano to the "Weblinks" section of each article. --Code (talk) 20:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry I'm not able to advise. I keep meaning to do one myself. -- Colin (talk) 20:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

I was sure I came across a "360x180" template today but I just can't get my hands on it again. Maybe that was during a nap. Thanks for your answers. - Benh (talk) 22:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)