Open main menu



Ciao CyberXRef. Ho visto che è stata proposta per la cancellazione una foto che ho scattato a una scultura di Ercole Drei [1]. La scultura è esposta in un parco pubblico (l'EUR), ed è visibile a tutti, senza restrizioni di sorta. Tuttavia, mi pare di capire che sia ancora sotto copyright perché l'autore è morto da meno di settanta anni. Non sono pratica della legge in questione, anche se a lume di naso mi sembra incoerente che un oggetto sia esposto perennemente e all'aperto, in modo del tutto gratuito e a tempo indefinito, e poi non si possa fotografare. Ho scattato la foto per illustrare almeno con un'immagine la pagina dello scultore su Wikipedia, comunque non voglio crearte problemi, perciò lascio la decisione a chi è più competente di me. Grazie dell'attenzione. Un cordiale saluto. --Antonella (talk) 13:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

@Antonella Nigro: - Mi dispiace, non parlo italiano.
La legge italiana sul diritto d'autore non contiene alcuna eccezione per le fotografie scattate in luoghi pubblici.
Si prega di consultare it:Libertà di panorama#Italia & Commons:Freedom of panorama/table --CyberXRef 22:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear CyberXRef, I've seen that has been proposed for deletion a photo I took of a sculpture by Ercole Drei. The sculpture is located in a public park in Roma (E.U.R.), and is visible to everyone without restriction of any kind. However, as I understand, it is still under copyright because the author died less than seventy years ago. I am no practice of the question, even if it seems me incoherent that an object perpetually and free exposed outdoor, for indefinite time, could not be photographed. I took this picture to illustrate at least with an image the sculptor page on Wikipedia, however I do not want to create problems, so I leave the decision to you and those who are more competent than me. Thanks for your attention and I apologize for my English. Best regards --Antonella (talk) 14:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

These 3 imagesEdit

Dear sir/madam,

Since you helped Dennis find a defense mil source for 1 images, can you give the original source for these 2 images Or is the camera metadata sufficient:

Finally, this image has a problem because the uploader uploaded the low resolution version of the photo and did not give a direct online source for it:

I think the first 2 images can be kept in a regular DR but as for the third image, I have no idea. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

@Leoboudv:: All these Sochi photos were just recently posted on the DOD website news feed (I saw them on my RSS feed). One set of photos are on the site: the other set is linked to Sochi slideshow here I bet these images are there. --CyberXRef 08:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • That's fine. Thanks for your help for the first 2 sources. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 17:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Morden to Sutton Map Mockup.pngEdit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Português | svenska | 中文 | +/−

Hello! Thank you for uploading File:Morden to Sutton Map Mockup.png to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

What did I leave out? The description was left identical, the date was copied over (note that you have truncated the date and removed the time), the author was properly cited and linked, and the licenses were exactly as the author specified (GPL 1.2+ with migration marked (as to allow attribution SA 3.0)). --CyberXRef 03:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
The disclaimers on the GFDL license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
ah so I did! Thanks. Why exactly are there two identical templates with and without a disclaimer? --CyberXRef 03:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Actually, I just found WP:FIXGFDL. --CyberXRef 03:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
(Edit conflict){{GFDL}} => {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}} = {{GFDL-en}}
{{GFDL-user-en-no-disclaimers}} => {{GFDL-user-en-with-disclaimers}}
Those are just the GFDL en templates; there are plenty of other languages with local disclaimers. IMO it really is just easier to use CommonsHelper. You don't need a TUSC account to run it (although it's helpful), and there are alternatives if you don't like it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Alright, thanks. --CyberXRef 03:58, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SRP entrance close.JPGEdit

Please see my reply to your comment—I'm completely confused... —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 06:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

@ATinySliver: Sorry for the late reply; Over a third of the photo is covered by a sculpture. If you look here Commons:Freedom of panorama or more easily here Commons:Freedom of panorama/table; there is no freedom of panorama in the US for 3d artworks. Therefore the photo is copyrighted by the artist until 70 years after the artist has died. (With a few exceptions such as previous to 1932.) --CyberXRef 04:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. I measured it out and its actually less than one-quarter of the image but, as I read over C:Dm and C:FOP#US, that may be irrelevant. I'm going to be back in the area in a week or two and I'll try making something similar but acceptable for Commons. Meantime, just in case this image should be speedy deleted, I've replaced it with File:SRP entrance wide.JPG at Santa Rosa Plaza. —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 07:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Cupid StadiumEdit

Lupo 09:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Declaration of State of Israel 1948 1.jpgEdit

File:Declaration of State of Israel 1948 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Triggerhippie4 (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2017 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in UkraineEdit


Запрошуємо взяти участь у міжнародному фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Звертаємо увагу, що завантажені матеріали будуть враховуватися у тій версії файлу, що був на час завершення конкурсу, тож якщо у Вас гарне фото, вантажте його одразу у високій роздільності. З регламентом конкурсу можна ознайомитися тут.

Якщо у Вас дуже багато фото, скористайтеся масовими завантажувачами або зверніться до нас.

Окрім традиційних номінацій за найкращі фото і найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, у конкурсі також є спецномінація для Ваших відеоматеріалів про пам'ятки. Якщо у Вас розмір відеофайлу завеликий для конкурсного завантажувача, спробуйте скористатися стандартним завантажувачем, але не забудьте поставити ідентифікатор пам'ятки. Якщо виникатимуть будь-які труднощі — пишіть нам на wlm

Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 21:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Вікі любить Землю 2019 в Україні триває до 31 травня!Edit


З 1 по 31 травня триває сьомий конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» (Wiki Loves Earth), метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Протягом травня ви можете завантажувати власні фото природно-заповідного фонду України та змагатися за призи. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Цього року є деякі зміни в правилах, зокрема:

  • фотографії пам'яток, які на момент початку конкурсу не мали жодної ілюстрації на Вікісховищі або у Вікіпедії, отримують коефіцієнт 10 в кількісній номінації. Якщо ви маєте фото ще не проілюстрованих пам'яток — це збільшить ваші шанси на перемогу;
  • окрема спецномінація для аерофотозйомки (фото з дронів тощо).

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте на сайті конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wle – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in English). 22:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "CyberXRef".