Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:DAJF

Category:Images by User:Christian Ferrer taken in 2016Edit

Hello. Why did you remove it the from Category:2016 photographs by photographer? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christian Ferrer (talk • contribs) 12:23, 2 January 2017‎ (UTC) (UTC)

@Christian Ferrer: Hi. The hierarchy of categories contained in Category:Photographs by photographer is actually intended for photographs by non-Wikimedian authors. As you appear to be a Wikimedia user/contributor, Category:Images by User:Christian Ferrer taken in 2016 shouldn't really be included in that hierarchy. --DAJF (talk) 12:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
In that case I suggest you to remove too the other categories or to let mine because the other are non-Wikimedian authors too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
However I'm sorry to have been a bit hard, you acted in good faith, and you likely don't deserve a bad reaction from me... though a solution should be searched. Thanks you to have pointed that. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
That's OK. It is not very clear, as only the parent category (Category:Photographs by photographer) mentions this. I'll add a similar note to the year categories (such as Category:2016 photographs by photographer) to make it clearer. --DAJF (talk) 13:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Ok, after an afternoon of reflection, I decided to remove all my own categories since 2012 from this main category because you're very likely right. Furthermore this is not so much important for me, I did it because I saw some of my colleagues to do it, that's all. But don't be surprised if when you remove the user categories of some other users, that they have a reaction a bit strong, some Wikimedia photographers are a bit (too much) proud. If you do so, good luck. But in all cases best wishes! Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding. I hope 2017 is a good year for you! --DAJF (talk) 02:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tobu 8000 series in green and white livery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tobu 8000 series in "Flying Tojo" blue and yellow livery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Pictures deletedEdit

You are wrong, these images are under license public domain from this site https://pixabay.com/.--Canbel (talk) 10:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

@Canbel: OK, my apologies. It wasn't obvious, because you had for some reason uploaded much lower resolution versions. Can you therefore upload the original high-resolution images and also remember to add the {{LicenseReview}} tag to these and all other images you upload from external sources in future please? That way, a review or admin can check the license promptly and prevent any future problems. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 11:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Done!:).--Canbel (talk) 11:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


ご指摘の「過剰な分類について」の件にてEdit

はじめまして。画像整理屋と申します。日々の多大なる活動の件、ご苦労様です。

さて、貴方様よりご指摘のありました「過剰な分類について」の件ですが、大変お待たせ致しましたが該当部分は全て削除致しましたので、お知らせ致します。

次に偶然目にした些細な件で申し訳ございませんが、右側

の画像で、元々のカテゴリー「Category:Containers of JR Freight」から、 2017年2月15日 (水) 09:44付けで「Category:Shipping containers in Japan」へと変更されています。

多言語に精通され又、長きに渡り重責の役務を色々と担っていらっしゃる貴方様の事でしょうから、この度のご指摘と同様に元々のカテゴリー区分けに重大な瑕疵があっての事と思いますが、ご面倒ながら小学生並みの無知な私にも分かる様に、この経緯を前項の件と同様にご教示いただきたく思いますので、何卒宜しくお願い致します。

乱文にて失礼します。--画像整理屋 (talk) 00:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

@画像整理屋: こんにちは。昨日の「過剰な分類について」の件で、枚数が多くて大変な作業だった作業かもしれませんが、ありがとうございます。 ただ、同様にCategory:Shipping containers in Japanに分類されている画像は、上位カテゴリであるCategory:Containerizationにも入れるべきでないです。それも二重カテゴリ化になり、なるべく避けなければならないことです。
また、上記のFile:UC5-5079 【日本通運】.jpgの画像についてのけんですが、日通が所有するコンテナだと思って、当初のCategory:Containers of JR Freight(JR貨物所有コンテナ用のカテゴリ)が適切ではないと考えてCategory:Shipping containers in Japanへと変更させていただきました。もしJR貨物が所有するコンテナでしたら、Category:Containers of JR Freightに入れるべきですが、日通が所有する物のようで、さらに正確だるCategory:Nippon Express (NITTSU) containersへ変更させていただきます。これで間違いないでしょうか? --DAJF (talk) 07:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
早々のお返事をありがとうございます。
さて、Category:Containerizationにも入れるべきでないとの再々の指摘により、正直申し上げて、私の成す事が全て裏目になり、もはやどの様に振り分ければ良いものかがわからなくなってしまいました。このままでは各資料個々の履歴が汚れ続け、他の方々にもご迷惑となりますので、よって暫くの間消える事に致しました。短い間でしたが色々お世話になりました。またご迷惑序に大変お手数ですが、私の落書きの削除始末を貴方様の感性によりお願いしたく思いますので、宜しくお願い申し上げます。
また先般の画像の件ですが、確かに正真正銘の日通が所有するコンテナには間違いありませんが、この辺りが難しい所で該当のコンテナは、国際海上輸送用又は国内海上輸送用の何れの場合も問わず、船舶での輸送が全く認められていない「日本国内での鉄道専用」としてJR貨物指定の登録形式に則って使われている、いわゆる「鉄道コンテナ」となります。無論、トラックへ積載してカーフェリーでの輸送は可能ですが、通常の海上用コンテナの様に単体での輸送は、コンテナの強度に関わる国内の法律の関係で一切できません。
ただし、鉄道と船舶(日本国内又は、韓国や中国等の日本近海区域に限定)何れにも共通して使用出来るコンテナとしてJR貨物に登録されている、日通の鉄道コンテナ形式(例えば、Category:国鉄UC7形コンテナCategory:JR貨物U30B形コンテナ等)も僅かながら存在しています。
知ったか論で長くなりましたが、何れにしましてもこの度の日通コンテナに関してはもし貴方様が十分に納得して頂きましたならば、処理して頂ければ幸いです。--画像整理屋 (talk) 09:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
@画像整理屋: 返事が遅くなってすみません。画像整理屋さんがアップしていただいたコンテナの画像はとても歓迎されるようで貴重な資料になりますので、Commonsから消える必要はありませんが、画像の振り分けについて、まだわからない部分がありましたら、その辺の振り分け編集だけは控えた方がよろしいかと思います。
また、先程のFile:UC5-5079 【日本通運】.jpgの画像についての件で、Category:Nippon Express (NITTSU) containersの方へ振り分けましたので、問題ないと思いますが、「Shipping containers」とは英語で海上輸送用の物に限らないですので、そういった「日本国内での鉄道専用」のコンテナもCategory:Shipping containers in Japanの中に振り分けられても問題ないです。 --DAJF (talk) 01:43, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

ピオレ姫路についてEdit

お疲れ様です。さて、自分が作成したCategory:Piole HIMEJICategory:Piole Himejiに変更されていることを確認しました。これは公式サイトや日本語版の表記に従って「HIMEJI」と大文字表記にしたのですが、これをカテゴリ名で使うことは間違ってることなのでしょうか。そのようなルールであるならば従うつもりですが、よく分からないのでご指導いただければと思います。よろしくお願い致します。--Phronimoi (talk) 18:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

はじめまして。コメントありがとうございます。正式なルールは確かに見当たりませんが、なるべく英語のルールに従いますと,日本でよく見かける「すべて大文字」の表記は叫びのようにも見えますし、頭文字と捉えられますので、「ピオレ・エイチ・アイ・エム・イイ・ジェイ・アイ」ではなく「ピオレ・ヒメジ」であることをわかりやすくするために、普通に「Piole Himeji」にした方がよいと判断しました。Category:SonyCategory:Seiyuなどもご参照いただければと思います。 --DAJF (talk) 02:09, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
ご丁寧な説明をありがとうございました。今後は気をつけます。--Phronimoi (talk) 08:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Please help me, copyright issuesEdit

Hello, Please help reviewed the picture, thanks you.

File:Black Pink on Seoul Music Awards 2017.jpg and File:Black Pink on Golden Disc Awards 2017.jpg

Appreciate your help.--TEI-BA 留言 06:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

  Done: Hi. I have reviewed and confirmed the licenses for the two images you mentioned. In future, please add {{LicenseReview}} after the license information to alert any admin or reviewer that the files need reviewing. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 11:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecatedEdit

Hello DAJF, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Tagging copyviosEdit

Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Regards, Yann (talk) 16:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the comment. I was using the License Review tool, which automatically tags copyright violations for speedy deletion, but it looks like it doesn't also inform the file uploader, so I'll be more careful about this in future. Thanks for the heads-up. --DAJF (talk) 23:24, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Tadotsu Fisheries High School.jpgについてEdit

File:Tadotsu Fisheries High School.jpgについて、上書きをした2010年時点でCommons:Overwriting existing filesは存在していません。あなたはこのガイドラインを遡及して適応しており、このファイルについてあなたが行ったことは一切根拠がありません。こちらにとってみればあなたによって上書きを「された」意識です。余計なことをしないで元に戻してください。--ラハール (talk) 13:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

一連の差し戻しについてEdit

今回のあなたの行動に私は非常に悪印象を抱いています。まず、あなたが私にメッセージを書いた時点で、どのファイルに問題があったかをすべて明示すべきです。こちらとしては私が過去にアップした大量の画像の中から、あなたに指摘されたファイルを探し出さなければならないし、そうこうしている間に(少なくとも24時間以内に)あなたは過去に上書きしたすべての画像を差し戻しました。トークページで対話を呼びかけている割には、こちらに考慮の暇を与えない行動は呆気にとられます。

次に、差し戻しを行うことでそのファイル(上書きをした側)は履歴として隠れてしまうことを知っていますよね?それを回避するために、こちらはあなたに差し戻されたファイルを別名でアップし直さなければなりませんが、なにせ最近のファイルから古いファイルまで機械的に差し戻されており、膨大なオリジナルファイルの中から当時のものをピンポイントで探し出すことは骨が折れます(残っていないものも数多い)。こういう時、あなたならどうしますか?「それでも折角、労力を割いて撮った画像なんだから、別名でなんとか復活させよう」と考えませんか?上書きしてしまったファイルを別名にする方法は「差し戻し」だけでないはずです。分割による履歴継承も考えられます。ただ、一つ一つのファイルをいちいち依頼に出すと管理人に多大な労力をかけてしまうため、この場合は一括で依頼をするべきだと考えました(時間的という意味で)。全節の対処からどうやらあなたは「分割」を知っていたようですが、なぜそれでも差し戻したんですか?あなた自身の手で。(その意味わかりますか?)

最後に、何かを行動する前に、いま述べたことをあなたに伝えるためにトークページは存在します。それが全く生かされていません。こちらに全く準備・検討させる時間を与えないであなたが差し戻し行ったことで(おそらくあなたに悪意はなかったと信じますが)、不要な労力がかかるんですよ。そのことを忘れないでください。これはあなたに対して私が感じたことですが、ボットじゃないんだから機械的な編集はやめて、少し考えたらどうですか。その過半数が有意義な編集だったとしても、時としてはた迷惑な行為になるかもしれないと深く考えてください。私の真意がわかったところで、この一連の差し戻しについて、私が上書きしたファイルをすべて元に戻してください。分割するにしても、新しいものはアップし直すにしてもそこから始めます。--ラハール (talk) 15:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

@ラハールさん、こんにちは。お返事ありがとうございます。 気分を悪くしたようで申し訳ありません。確認しましたら、確かにファイルの上書きについての方針は2010年頃にまだ確定できていませんでしたが、その以前に上書きされたファイルについても、分割できたらよいと考えています。
先日のFile:Tadotsu Fisheries High School.jpgで行われた分割の作業は、管理人さんしかできませんので、他のファイルについては、できればラハールさんか誰か(私)に新しい方の画像を別のファイル名で再アップロードした方が早いと思います。ラハールさんがコモンズで現役ですので、ご自身でしていただくのが望ましいと思いますが、もしご面倒でしたら、私の手でもしてあげますよ。 (File:EF200-14 20090520.jpgのような感じになります)
ちなみに、当時アップロードされた画像が手元のパソコンなどに残っていなくても、差し戻しされたファイルの履歴から簡単に拾えます。
もし私の手で作業を進めてほしいのであれば、気軽に仰ってください。--DAJF (talk) 03:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
JNR Class ED15 electric locomotives.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seibu Railway 9000 series EMU in "Red Lucky Train" livery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Your reviews of some Pixabay sourced imagesEdit

Hello DAJF, you reviewed some images copied to Commons from Pixabay. Unfortunately you did use the wrong license tag template. Please fix this. I am not a license reviewer, so I couldn’t repair this on my own. What you have to do is: Remove {{cc-zero}} and {{LicenseReview|…}} and insert {{Pixabay}} with the necessary params by using {{subst:PBLR|<ID>}} with <ID> being the file ID which is the last, numerical part of the source URL. As far as I see these files are affected:

As side effect the explicit addition of [[Category:Images from Pixabay]] should be removed. — Speravir – 00:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

  Done. Thanks for letting me know. I didn't know about the specialized {{Pixabay}} template, but I have now updated all of the eight files above to use this template. Thanks once again. --DAJF (talk) 00:49, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
No problem, you’re welcome. — Speravir – 01:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Stop changing only one languageEdit

Not trying to start an argument, but you keep changing the descriptions of the English on my images without changing the Japanese. That makes me look insane for those of us who can read both. It seems you can use both, so why only mess with the English? If you are unable to change both, please refrain from changing just one. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 01:54, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

@Nesnad: Hi. I don't normally alter the Japanese descriptions unless there are any obvious errors that need fixing, but apologies if I have accidentally messed up something along the way on any your images. Are you saying that the English and Japanese descriptions are out of sync after I edited them? If you can post a link to a particular image where I made a mistake, it would be easier to comment more specifically, and I'll be happy to go back and fix any errors if necessary. --DAJF (talk) 00:54, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Every single one you've edited the English but not the Japanese, every time making them inconsistent. Every time. File:TanashiStation-NorthExit-a-Aug14-2015.jpg Here's an example from 2015. You have a long history of making my uploads inconsistent and I doubt you can or will go back and fix them all. So at least please stop that now... Thanks, Nesnad (talk) 01:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
@Nesnad: Hi. I had a look at the image you mention, but I'm confused now. The English and Japanese both look OK to me (the station name is correct, and they both say it's the north entrance), so I'm not sure what the inconsistency you mention is. If you're saying that the English description is longer than the Japanese description, then that's surely OK too, as I don't think it's written anywhere in the guidelines that descriptions in different languages have to be of identical length. When I upload images I've taken myself, I usually include only a brief Japanese description alongside the more detailed English description, and other (Japanese) editors might come along later and pad out the Japanese description. That's fine and that's how Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia works, with everyone chipping in to make small improvements where they can. Sorry if I'm missing something, but I still don't see what the problem is here. --DAJF (talk) 01:30, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
That was only one example. If you think they convey the same level of information, you are lying to me or yourself. Lets not pretend they are equal, just say "oops" and go about fixing it or refraining from doing that. If you need a more obvious example, look at File:TanashiStation-platforms-Aug14-2015.jpg from the same time period. Your edit makes me look illiterate. You have done this countless times. If you have the skills go back and fix them all please. Otherwise, just stop making them unbalanced from now. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 15:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
@Nesnad: If you could point me in the direction of any official guidelines that state or recommend that descriptions in different languages have to be 100% identical, I'll be happy to comply with them. If no rule yet exists, maybe you could start a thread at the Commons:Village pump and see what other people think about setting up such guidelines. --DAJF (talk) 02:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
That is rude. Do I have to point out: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_be_a_jerk Would you like me to follow your uploads and shorten all your English descriptions? Those are my uploads, please don't be a jerk about it. Gosh. Nesnad (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
@Nesnad: If you were to add or expand descriptions on images I have uploaded (as I believe I have been doing with some of your images), that would be greatly appreciated, and I'll be happy to click the "Thank" button, as I often do when other editors make improvements. --DAJF (talk) 22:49, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
If you could point me in the direction of any official guidelines that state edits must only add or expand, I'll be happy to comply with them. If no rule yet exists, maybe you could start a thread at the Commons:Village pump and see what other people think about setting up such guidelines. Really mean it. I hope instead of sounding snarky this helps you feel a bit of what I'm feeling in my interaction with you. It feels like you see yourself as the ultimate authority and disregard my feelings even though Wiki is a collaboration not a dictatorship. Nesnad (talk) 14:25, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks D for your continued work in checking YouTube licenses. You have assisted me a great deal. I was getting to think that it was unrequired but you just spotted some where I had failed to check enough. So Thanks. Ooops and thanks again Victuallers (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
@Victuallers: That's OK. Sorry some of your uploads had to be deleted, but you just need to check that the YouTube videos are published under a Creative Commons license. If it's just the standard YouTube license, unfortunately, they can't be uploaded to Commons. Anyway, thanks for uploading. --DAJF (talk) 09:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Help for some stuffEdit

Hey, I noticed that you kindly let me know of some copyrighted pictures that were unavailable for Wikimedia. I could really use some help for this criteria-especially knowing if a photo has a copyright or not. Thanks!!!!!! Have a great day!! DoctorSpeed (talk) 20:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

@DoctorSpeed: Hi. The guidelines covering copyright and licensing on Commons can be read at Commons:Licensing, but to summarize, pictures found on the web (i.e. not take by yourself) can only be used on Commons if they are explicitly published under a free license. Even if the web page does mention that the images on it are copyright, we always have to assume that they are unless it is explicitly indicated otherwise. If you are uncertain about the copyright status of an image you find on the web, you can always ask for advice at Commons:Village pump/Copyright before uploading it to Commons. The copyright rules can be a bit confusing at first, but I hope this makes more sense now. --DAJF (talk) 00:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Hiroo StationEdit

Sorry, that's the first time I ever saw a disambiguation page on Commons. I didn't even know these existed here. --Voyager (talk) 09:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

@Voyager: Hi. That's OK. Disambiguation pages are handy when there are categories for stations with the same name in different locations like that. No problem! --DAJF (talk) 12:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

削除依頼や差し戻しについてEdit

個々の写真に対する削除依頼などの中で、具体的で客観的な理由を、削除依頼ページ内で日本語を用いて説明されないのは非常に不愉快です。 どの部分にどのような問題があって削除したのかが説明されておらず、とても気分が悪いです。以前にも同じような投稿がありましたので拝見しました。 また、説明がある場合にもその説明(理由)がそれの削除や差し戻しの理由に当てはまらないものがあり、非常に気持ちが悪いです。 削除依頼が出ているものについては、理由が明示されていない以上、またどの画像に対しての理由かも明示されていない以上、とても不愉快です。 明示しないまま差し戻すのであれば、トークページやWikiメールなどでこちらに直接明示して頂きたかったです。 そちらの言い分もあるでしょうが、単に英語で典型的な文章を張り付けて依頼を出されただけではそちらの意図や言い分を理解できず、こちらの言い分も聞かないままあれこれされるのは、とても不愉快です。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebirth10 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

@Rebirth10: こんにちは。 File:Riversaikun Rapping Bus.jpgの話でしょうか? Rebirth10さんのトークページに「File:Riversaikun Rapping Bus.jpg」が削除依頼されているとはっきり書いてありますから、わかりにくいはずはないと思いますが。また、削除依頼は基本的に英語で書くのが普通ですが、Rebirth10さんにとって不便がありましたら申し訳ありません。簡単に言いますと、その画像は著作権のあるイラストの写真ですので、コモンズにアップすることはNGです。今後、気をつけてください。--DAJF (talk) 04:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
「その画像は著作権のあるイラストの写真ですので、コモンズにアップすることはNGです。今後、気をつけてください」
とありましたが、その旨があの表示では理解できませんでした。今後は先にその説明をWikiメールでお知らせ頂くか、英文に続けて説明を加えて頂きますよう、お願い致します。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebirth10 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "DAJF".