User talk:DKrieger/Archiv 2010

Koordinaten für Essinger jüdische Grabsteine.

Ich habe sie bei drei Photos kontrolliert, bei zweien weist Google Maps auf die Essinger Altstadt, bei einem auf einen nördlichen Vorort von Landau. Essingen liegt aber ca. 4 km ENE der Landauer Stadtmitte und der Friedhof sogar noch östlich des Ortes. Gruß -- 79.217.162.113 18:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Danke für die Info, ich werde das nach und nach kontrollieren. Zwischen Garmin und Geotag gibt es wohl manchmal Probleme. --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 19:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstanz 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:19, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast path DSC 8907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Where is this image, the south west coast path is pretty long, and I can't see coordinates, and the image page itself doesn't even mention England! Harrias 15:43, 14 November 2010 (UTC)--Sorry, coordinates were still hidden in the EXIF Header --DKrieger 16:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC) Good (geocode and description added)Ankara 12:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Removal of vote

Hi DKrieger, I trust your removal of my vote here was not intentional? --Slaunger (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Defenitely a stupid mistake, I am really sorry! --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 22:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Lieber Dietrich!

No problem, I knew it was an accident. I bet you had an edit conflict and somehow replaced the text in the edit conflict window? I would appreciate the cup of coffee next time (which would be the first time) I come to Friedrichshafen. I remember well, so be careful, in 17 years, a cold February morning I will suddenly be standing on your door step, freezing and asking for that cup of coffee. Anyway, my vote was neutral, so removing it probably did not mean a thing. --Slaunger (talk) 22:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! But we also brew a really strong tea

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boscastle DSC 7402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful colours, nice composition and detail. People give good idea of scale. --Avenue 00:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blankenheim Pfarrkirche Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--V-wolf 19:27, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast path DSC 8967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. --Cayambe 16:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirsau-Marienkapelle 039.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 22:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Cydonia oblonga (Quinces).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Cydonia oblonga (Quinces).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Die gute Arbeit. Ich gratuliere dich.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:18, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Hallo George, vielen Dank für das Lob! Gruß vom Bodensee --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Guten Tag Dietrich!

 ::Du kannst die Zeichen in der Beschreibung der Datei für die Galerie verwenden:

• = {{QI seal}}
• = {{VI seal}}
• = {{FP star}}

Gruß vom Winnyzja --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:37, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Hallo George, vielen Dank, das kannte ich noch nicht. Ich glaube ich sollte mich mehr mit der wiki-syntax auseinandersetzen. Dein Deutsch ist übrigens wirklich gut! Viele Grüße aus Friedrichshafen --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Danke. Mir gefällt der Verkehr Deutsch. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:44, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michaelstow DSC 8243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and celtic. A geotag would be appreciated. --Jebulon 22:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC) -- Geotag added, thank you --DKrieger 13:11, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria laach teufel schriftrolle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. The camera data are missing, why? --Cayambe 09:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC) Hello Cayambe, I would also be glad to know , especially because a lot of images are concerned. At least I found a version with an intact EXIF and will upload it soon --DKrieger 17:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gehrenberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut --George Chernilevsky 21:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tintagel DSC 7889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful colors, good DoF, correct exposure. --Murdockcrc 19:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tintagel DSC 7484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I love the composition, very good quality, nice colors. Maybe FP? --Carschten 17:22, 15 December 2010 (UTC) Seed head (?) projecting over left edge would need tidying up first IMO. --Avenue 07:57, 17 December 2010 (UTC)