Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dirk-Franz!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Contents

File:"Alter Hafen-vor 1914".Bremerhaven. Ölgemälde.H. Kohnert.jpgEdit

 
File:"Alter Hafen-vor 1914".Bremerhaven. Ölgemälde.H. Kohnert.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 07:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello. If you have the permission to publish this painting, please send your permission following this procedure: COM:OTRS/de. Once your e-mail will be reviewed, the file will be restored. If the painter died less than 70 years ago, we need the permission of his legal successor(s), in order to be sure there is no copyright violation. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 14:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Please also send the permission for this other file. Thank you. BrightRaven (talk) 14:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Permission to publish paintingsEdit

Hi, BrightRaven, thanks for the immediate response. As far as I see, I do not need to ask for a permission of the painter because I am his legal successor myself. Hans Kohnert is my grandfather; my father is Franz Kohnert, mentioned in the wikipedia article as son of Hans Kohnert. Frankly speaking, I do not know how to proof this by means of the procedure: COM:OTRS/de. However, I could send you a copy of my birth certificate if neccessary. The paintings are family property and the fotos were taken by myself. Kind regards, Dirk-Franz --Dirk-Franz (talk) 14:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Verschieben Category:Former factories in HannoverEdit

Hallo Dirk-Franz, was ist denn da passiert: Category:Former factories in Hannover leitet jetzt weiter auf Category:Former factories in Melle / Wiehengebirge, das ist doch bestimmt keine Absicht ?! Als Folge hat auch User:Wieralee die Kategorien selber nach Melle verschoben! -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 07:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Gerd, nein das war in der Tat keine Absicht sondern ein Versehen! Ich bin Neuling auf wikimedia commons und wollte eine neue Category "Former factories in Melle / Wiehengebirge" erstellen. Dafür hatte ich die Category "Former factories in Hannover" als Vorlage genommen. Leider hat das aber nicht funktioniert. Zwar habe ich den Fehler sogleich bemerkt, wußte aber nicht, wie ich ihn rückgängig machen kann. Darauf habe ich gleich gestern Abend noch meinen ehemaligen mentor Lyc2008 (wikipedia) um Hilfe gebeten, ich weiß aber nicht, ob die Nachricht ihn erreicht hat. Könntest Du mir dabei helfen?

In Vorbereitung eines wikipedia-Artikels über die ehemalige elterliche Meller Möbelfabrik, Melle, und die mit ihr verbundene Firma Pundt & Kohn, Geestemünde/Bremerhaven hatte ich mehrere Fotos auf wikimedia Commons hochgeladen, diese möchte ich gern in die neu zu schaffenden categories Category:Former factories in Melle / Wiehengebirge bzw. Category:Former factories in Bremerhaven einordnen. Ich fürchte nur, das übersteigt meine Fähigkeiten. Entschuldigt bitte alle Unannehmlichkeiten, die ich durch diesen inkompetenten Eingriff verursacht habe. Viele Grüße, Dirk-Franz, --Dirk-Franz (talk) 08:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Dirk-Franz. Das mit der Hannover-Kategorie habe ich repariert. Du hattest ja bei einigen Dateien schon die Kategorie Category:Pundt & Kohn angegeben, die habe ich jetzt angelegt indem ich auf den (bisher roten) Kategorienamen geklickt habe und dort die übergeordneten Kategorie(n) in eckigen Klammern eingetragen habe. Zu den Orten gibt es meist eine Kategorie "Economy of ...", unterhalb derer dann die Kategorie für ehemalige Unternehmen liegt. Bei Bremerhaven heißt die Category:Defunct companies of Bremerhaven, anderswo halt "Former factories in..." oder so ähnlich. Zu Melle gibt es die Kategorie Category:Economy of Melle (Lower Saxony), ich habe deine Category:Former factories in Melle / Wiehengebirge mal dort einsortiert. Du kannst ja für die Möbelfabrik dann auch eine Kategorie erstellen. - Beachte bitte noch VOR dem Hochladen von Bilder, dass die Bilder nur dann urheberrechtlich frei sind, wenn entweder du selber alle Rechte an den Aufnahmen hast oder der Fotograf schon mehr als 70 Jahre tot ist. Das ist bei Aufnahmen aus den 1930er Jahren nicht einfach. Aber Achtung: Urheber eines Fotos ist der Fotograf, nicht: Du! Wenn der Urheber nicht genannt und nicht zu ermitteln ist, kannst du als Urheber {{Anonymous}} und als Lizenz {{Anonymous-EU}} eintragen, aber nur wenn das Foto vor mehr als 70 Jahren veröffentlicht (!) wurde. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 12:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
vielen Dank, Gerd, für die rasche und konstruktive Rückmeldung, Deinen Einsatz und für die nützlichen Tipps! Ich werde mich am Wochenende bemühen, sie auch umzusetzen. Viele Grüße, Dirk-Franz,--Dirk-Franz (talk) 12:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Dirk-Franz, die korrekte Verfahrensweise ist, sich erstmal zu informieren. Du schreibst es war ein Versehen? Dazu war nötig ein Klick, „Melle / Wiehengebirge“ schreiben und wieder ein Klick. Also, wenn du dich über etwas informiert hast und es nicht verstanden hast oder du nicht weißt wo du die Infos finden kannst, dann fragt man nach, z. B. einen Benutzer oder z. B. im deutschsprachigen com:Forum (steht oben in der Willkommensbox). Es muss auch nicht jeder Benutzer eine Kategorie erstellen können, man kann auch jemanden bitten dies zu tun. Und neue Kategorien sollten mindestens zwei Einträge (Unterkategorie oder Bilder) haben. Stell dir mal vor so etwas geschieht öfters und die Beobachter sind nicht mehr aktiv. Warum „Melle / Wiehengebirge“? Normal wär „Former factories in Melle (Lower Saxony)“ wegen Category:Melle (Lower Saxony). Gerd Fahrenhorst die richtige Verfahrensweise ist sie wieder zurück zuschieben. Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 13:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Stimmt, zurückschieben (und Rücknahme der übrigen Änderungen) wäre besser gewesen. Und dein Hinweis bezüglich der Schreibweise Melle (Lower Saxony) ist natürlich auch richtig. Deine Kritik an der Vorgehensweise ist inhaltlich korrekt, etwas freundlicher könntest du mit unerfahrenen Usern aber schon sein, jeder fängt mal unerfahren an und macht mal Fehler. Dirk-Franz, verschiebe doch bitte die Category:Former factories in Melle / Wiehengebirge nach Category:Former factories in Melle (Lower Saxony). - Die Regel mindestens zwei Einträge sehe ich nicht als zwingend, wenn es in die einheitliche Systematik besser passt braucht das m.E. nicht sein. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 16:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Ich habe ihn sachlich informiert. Jedem geht es nicht jeden Tag gut. Doch über Unterstellungen in der Wikimedia-Welt solltest du mal drüber nachdenken. Sowas mache ich jedenfalls nicht. Und das andere hast du noch nicht gut durchdacht außerdem ist es eine Regel die es schon lange gibt. Ende. --Jean11 (talk) 17:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Jean11, auch Dir vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Ja, Du hast Recht, ich hätte mich vorab besser informieren sollen, und das Chaos das ich da anscheinend angerichtet habe bitte ich nochmals zu entschuldigen. Auf den Gedanken, eine extra category einzurichten bin ich übrigens nur gekommen, weil nach dem Hochladen mehrerer Bilder ich mich vom System wikimedia dazu aufgefordert fühlte (sogar noch hervorgehoben in roter Schrift) eine solche category zu erstellen. Vielleicht wäre es für greenhorns wie mich hilfreich, wenn wikimedia diezbezüglich zukünftig einen Warnhinweise hinzufügen würde, dass dies nur etwas für erfahrene Nutzer ist? Für mich habe ich jedenfalls die Lehre daraus gezogen, dass ich lieber die Finger davon lasse, ich will ja auch kein Experte auf wikimedia werden. Daher bitte ich Dich etwaige Unstimmigkeiten, die noch bestehen sollten, ausnahmsweise stellvertretend für mich zu erledigen. Vielen Dank im Voraus! DFK, --Dirk-Franz (talk) 20:23, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Dirk-Franz, danke für deine positive Antwort. Einsicht ist für mich genug. Oben in der Willkommensbox (mehr Infos links Gemeinschaftsportal) ist der Link „Erste Schritte“, dort zu finden sind die Links „Einordnen und Kategorisieren von Bildern“ und „Einsortieren von Dateien“ (rechts) die zu com:Erste Schritte/Sortierung führen. Dort findest du den Abschnitt Commons:Erste_Schritte/Sortierung#Kategorien, ist dieser nicht klar genug?, sollte etwas ergänzt oder geändert werden? Wenn ja, was? Wenn du sonst Fragen hast kannst du auch mich fragen, auch per E-Mail. Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 10:12, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Kategorisierung der hochgeladenen BilderEdit

So, ich habe jetzt mal Category:Meller Möbelfabrik angelegt und dort die Datei File:Meller Möbelfabrik-Juli 1929.jpg einsortiert und dabei deren ursprüngliche Kategorien entfernt. Dirk-Franz, magst du diese Datei mal als Beispiel nehmen und deine hochgeladenen Bilder ebenfalls in diese Kategorie bzw. Category:Pundt & Kohn einsortieren sofern das passt? Sage Bescheid wo du Schwierigkeiten hast. Kannst bei der Gelegenheit evtl. auch gleich die Angaben zu source, author und license überprüfen bzw. anpassen (s.o.); unter source könnte die genaue Quelle stehen wenn du die Datei aus einem Buch oder Zeitschrift entnommen hast. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 15:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Gerd, herzlichen Dank für die tatkräftige Unterstützung. Die eingescannten Fotos stammen alle aus den mir vererbten Familien- bzw. Firmenunterlagen der MMM bzw P & K. Die Fotos, die ich eingestellt habe, hat z.B. mein 1973 verstorbener Vater 1929 /1930 gemacht. Ich habe sie nur digitalisiert (abfotographiert und bearbeitet). Ich finde es schwierig zu beurteilen, wie wikimedi mit solchen Fällen umgeht. Rein rechtlich gesehen, bin ich der legitime Erbe und Eigentümer, und ich denke, das ist wikimedia am wichtigsten zu wissen. Insofern würde source=Own work ja stimmen. Andererseits will ich mich auch nicht mit fremden Federn schmücken, sondern z.B. meinem Vater die Ehre erweisen, die ihm gebührt. Könnte ich denn "source=Template:Franz Kohnert" schreiben, ohne damit eine erneute Diskussion auszulösen, ob ich von dem den auch die Erlaubnis habe, und author=Dirk-Franz, bzw. "permission= " offen lassen? Im Falle des Krumnack logos habe ich Deinen Empfehlungen gemäß als source: {{Anonymous}} und als permission {{Anonymous-EU}} eingetragen, weil das Bild schon älter als 70 Jahre und der owner/Autor unbekannt ist. Was die Einsortierung angeht, so weiß ich nicht, ob ich Dich richtig verstanden habe. Du hast jetzt ja alle categories aus der Beschreibung der Bilddatei File:Meller Möbelfabrik-Juli 1929.jpg entfernt. Ich dachte, eine möglichst genaue und umfassende Einsortierung in die verschiedenen categories zu denen das Bild billigerweise gehören könnte, abgesehen von der unter der es einsortiert wurde, wären von wikimedia ausdrücklich erwünscht? Nun warte ich mit dem Umsortieren lieber erst einmal Deine Antwort ab, bevor ich wieder etwas falsch mache. Viele Grüße, DFK, --Dirk-Franz (talk) 17:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Dirk, bezüglich der Einsortierung geht es schon darum, genau den Inhalt des jeweiligen Bildes einzuordnen. In File:Meller Möbelfabrik-Juli 1929.jpg sind z.B. keine Möbel zu sehen, deshalb gehört es nicht in die Kategorie "Furniture" wo nur Möbel sein sollen. Und was die Transport-Kategorie da sollte, habe ich auch nicht erkennen können. Hingegen zeigt das Bild ein Gebäude in Melle, da passt die Kategorie Category:Buildings in Melle (Lower Saxony), die habe ich nun ergänzt. Dass es einen Möbel-Hersteller zeigt, ist jetzt indirekt erfasst durch die Kategorie Category:Meller Möbelfabrik, die ihrerseits in entsprechende Kategorien wie Category:Furniture manufacturers of Germany einsortiert ist, so dass das nicht für jedes Bild einzeln angegeben werden muss (und sollte). -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 17:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Bezüglich der Angaben zum Autor/Urheber würde ich vorschlagen, "source = Papierbild" und "author = Franz Kohnert" zu schreiben (ohne Template o.ä.). Es könnte zwar sein dass jemand sich nach deinen Rechten erkundigt, aber das wäre hier, anders als bei Gemälden, eher unwahrscheinlich; und wenn, müsste ein Hinweis dass du Erbe und damit Inhaber der Rechte bist, auch reichen. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 17:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Habe jetzt die von dir hochgeladenen Bilder nach Pundt&Kohn bzw. Meller Möbelfabrik kategorisiert. Sag Bescheid wenn du Fragen hast. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 19:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Danke, Gerd! Grüße, Dirk --Dirk-Franz (talk) 08:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Geestemünde-Plan.1863.jpgEdit

 
File:Geestemünde-Plan.1863.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Postkarte Pharus-Plan 1910Edit

Hallo Gerd, eben habe ich eine alte Postkarte von 1910 mit dem Plan von Geestemünde hochgeladen, ich habe vom Verlag Pharus, Berlin, die Erlaubnis bekommen, sie bei wikimedia commons hochzuladen unter Angabe der Verlags-website. Leider weiß ich nicht, unter welche der zahlreichen aufgelisteten licences das so zu subsumieren ist (das sind alles böhnische Dörfer für mich); könntest du mir diesbezüglichh nochmals helfen, damit sie nicht gleich wieder mit einem delete-request versehen wird? Viele Grüße, Dirk,

Hallo Dirk, ja das ist ein guter alter Plan. Du hattest ja auf der Commons-Seite schon die passenden Angaben gemacht. Die Lizenz bzw. hier die Erlaubnis reicht auf der Commons-Seite und muss nicht auf jeder Wikipedia-Seite wiederholt werden, das hast du ja eh nicht unter Kontrolle wo diese Datei mal verwendet wird. Formal: Wenn der Pharus-Verlag auch heute noch Eigentümer der Rechte ist (fraglich?), dann ist er derjenige der sagen muss unter welcher Lizenz er das freigibt; da es dem Verlag wohl im Wesentlichen um die Angabe seines Namens geht, vermute ich dass das so passt. - Ich habe die Kategorie P&K rausgenommen, denn der Plan zeigt ja etwas viel allgemeineres und kann ja auch so im Artikel P&K verwendet werden. - Achte noch darauf bei neuen Diskussionsthemen auch einen neuen Abschnitt/Überschrift zu machen, sonst wird das schnell unübersichtlich. Gruß, -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 14:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Danke, Gerd, auch hierfür sowie für die entsprechende Anpassung auf der P&K wikipedia-Seite!, Viele Grüße, Dirk-Franz, --Dirk-Franz (talk) 14:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hans Kohnert. Feldweg (Ölgemälde,1921).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hans Kohnert. Feldweg (Ölgemälde,1921).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 15:58, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hans Kohnert. Herbstlicher Buchenwald (Ölgemälde, 1921).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hans Kohnert. Herbstlicher Buchenwald (Ölgemälde, 1921).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 15:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hans Kohnert. Insel-Dünen (Ölgemälde,1923).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hans Kohnert. Insel-Dünen (Ölgemälde,1923).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 15:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hans Kohnert. Kornfeld (Ölgemälde,1921).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hans Kohnert. Kornfeld (Ölgemälde,1921).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 16:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hans Kohnert. Roggenernte (Ölgemälde,1920).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hans Kohnert. Roggenernte (Ölgemälde,1920).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 16:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hans Kohnert. Torfabstich (Ölgemälde,1921).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hans Kohnert. Torfabstich (Ölgemälde,1921).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 16:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hans Kohnert. Winterlicher Buchenwald (Ölgemälde,1920).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hans Kohnert. Winterlicher Buchenwald (Ölgemälde,1920).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 16:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hans Kohnert. Winterlliche Birkenlandschaft (Ölgemälde,1921).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hans Kohnert. Winterlliche Birkenlandschaft (Ölgemälde,1921).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 16:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Krumnack-Möbelfabrik, Melle, um 1908.JPGEdit

 
File:Krumnack-Möbelfabrik, Melle, um 1908.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:0-Hans Kohnert-Bäume+Weiden.1921.r.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:0-Hans Kohnert-Bäume+Weiden.1921.r.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sathish kalathil (talk) 09:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC) Hi, Sathish kalathil, thanks for the comments on my fotos of the paintings. I tried my best to follow your advice and added the requested "source" and "date" information for my fotos of the paintings of my grand-father, Hans Kohnert. I am his only legal heir and successor myself. Hans Kohnert is my grandfather; my father is Franz Kohnert, mentioned in the wikipedia article as son of Hans Kohnert. In case, the information provided does still not meet the requirements, I should be very glad to get your help t make it perfect, because I am rather inexperienced in this licence questions on wikipedia. Kind regards, Dirk-Franz --

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirk-Franz (talk • contribs) 17:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Postkarte-geestemünde-1910.jpgEdit

 
File:Postkarte-geestemünde-1910.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

mritz (talk) 12:46, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Konrad-Lammers.facebook.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Konrad-Lammers.facebook.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Konrad-Lammers.facebook.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ManFromNord (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Konrad-Lammers.Researchgate.jpgEdit

 
File:Konrad-Lammers.Researchgate.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ManFromNord (talk) 08:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wirtschaftswissenschaftler.©Illustration-alfons-holtgreveFAZ.24.08.2009.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wirtschaftswissenschaftler.©Illustration-alfons-holtgreveFAZ.24.08.2009.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wirtschaftswissenschaftler.©Illustration-alfons-holtgreveFAZ.24.08.2009.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ManFromNord (talk) 08:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Konrad-Lammers.Europa-Kolleg.sw.jpgEdit

 
File:Konrad-Lammers.Europa-Kolleg.sw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

File:0-Europa-Kolleg JAN2014-1337 Dr Konrad Lammers.jpgEdit

 
File:0-Europa-Kolleg JAN2014-1337 Dr Konrad Lammers.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: © EUROPA-KOLLEG HAMBURG 2014
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

The author of the foto, Michael Bogumil, Hamburg, as well as the Europa-Kolleg, Hamburg, agreed to publish the foto of late Dr. Konrad Lammers under the CC BY-SA 4.0 licence. If necessary, the agreement could be forwarded to the wikipedia authorities at any time by e-mail attachment.--Dirk-Franz (talk) 06:48, 9 May 2019 (UTC) The agreement has been send by e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on 9 May 2019 [Ticket#: 2019050910002204].--Dirk-Franz (talk) 07:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Dirk-Franz".