Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

File:Kdenlive 16 04 1.png

Hello!

Sorry, my english is very poor.

I uploaded a screenshot of the Kdenlive program only for ilustration pourpose, for this article: [1]. It's de spanish version of this: [2]

thanks!

Piero71 (talk) 11:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Escut de la Vall d'Alba.svg

Hello!

This representation of a coat of arms is potentially different from the one used by the armiger (municipality or organisation) in question.
  =  

“Sable, a lion
rampant or”
This coat of arms was drawn based on its blazon which – being a written description – is free from copyright. Any illustration conforming with the blazon of the arms is considered to be heraldically correct. Thus several different artistic interpretations of the same coat of arms can exist. The design officially used by the armiger is likely protected by copyright, in which case it cannot be used here.
Individual representations of a coat of arms, drawn from a blazon, may have a copyright belonging to the artist, but are not necessarily derivative works.
Further information: Commons:Coats of arms  and Template:Coa blazon

català | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | Nederlands | русский | svenska | ไทย | українська | +/−

--Macondo (talk) 16:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - May - Birds in their habitat

Hi Elisfkc. I removed two of your entries to the photo challenge since they were taken by a different photographer who is not on Commons. Entries are only for your own photos. -- Colin (talk) 17:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

@Colin: I did not know that. I'll take my submission out of the hats photo challenge as well then. Elisfkc (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. I haven't looked at that challenge yet. -- Colin (talk) 17:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

File

File File:Inaguration in Kardamyla Chios 2008.jpg is now corrected, thanks for the note. Wolfymoza (talk) 05:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello

This file is under cc-by 4.0 licence. ¿Why do you want to delete it? --Mr. Moonlight (talk) 20:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

You didn't provide the source of where the file comes from. Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Well, another licence police.

Whats about old fashioned talk?? Pfff --Arch (talk) 17:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

@Arch: hi there. I am a licence reviewer, so it is my job to actually see if the licenses on images are correct. The reason I tagged a couple of your images, including File:Euert van Wisscell.svg & File:Hermen van Wittene.svg with the wrong license template is that the images seem to be something that are reproductions of an older work. This means that the images you have created should be licensed as public domain and not as a CC-BY-SA-3.0. This would still allow them on Commons, but would just provide different permissions to it. The wrong license template does NOT flag the image for deletion, rather it just means that someone should review it to see if that is the correct license. Personally, I only use the template when I believe a file is under the wrong free license and should be under another free license. I hope this helps explain to you why I tagged those two images as such. --Elisfkc (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Its not your job, you're not getting payed by this. Some people can made mistakes that are very easy to solve. Show a little humanity next time and look who made those uploads, I'm almost 10 years uploading, somethimes things can go wrong, its a lot more friendly if you open a topic on my talkpage than smashing with tags. I'm not a newbie anymore, but still a human. Humans can made errors, ok? Take a look at it now, they're ok now. I was experimenting with the "fine" upload tool that is not OK for this kind of uploads. --Arch (talk) 18:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
It might not be my job, but it is something I volunteered to do, and I enjoy reviewing others images. The tags are a way to open a discussion about the images, which is why it also leaves a message on your talk page. I understand you are human, but part of being human is learning from mistakes. I did not know about the experimenting, but enjoy doing that and good luck. --Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Like I'm volunteer to, uploaded more than 5000 svg's, thousands of pictures, wich cost me lots of time. Its the collaboration that should made it fun. This way feels like counteraction, do you understand? Its so much more fun to open a talkpage with a question, you will learn to meet other people on a much more constructive way. Did you look in the meanwhile? Is it OK now? --Arch (talk) 18:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Seems fine to me, but what do they represent? --Elisfkc (talk) 18:16, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm glad to! :) They're 600 year old coats of arms, most family's are extinct after 600 years, its pure cultural history. I guess that in the future this complete medieval book can be very valuable for all kinds of topics on Wikipedia, specially Northern Europe, England, Scotland, France, Belgium, Netherlands and parts of Germany. Some must be identified, this is very exciting. --Arch (talk) 18:21, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Technically, a CC licence is totally ok in this case because even if the images are reproductions of public domain paintings, the SVG code is copyrightable on its own. So unless Arch made his recreations using a totally automated program without his own input, he is entitled to licence his files as copyrighted Creative Commons. De728631 (talk) 18:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't realize that. I'm sorry Arch, that is my mistake. --Elisfkc (talk) 18:37, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Don't worry. SVG copyright is a little known thing and it's not really enforced on Commons either; so on the other hand there are thousands of similar public domain SVG files where the creators could theoretically claim copyright but just licensed their files with PD-old or something. De728631 (talk) 18:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
@Elisfkc, it OK, I'm sorry too for my hard response, I see you did responded very civilized to it, so compliments! @De728631 tnx for expaination. Indeed, the images are moren than 600 years old and in public domain, and yes, its possible that creators can made new files from images wich are not in de PD. I think that the problem is "Upload Wizard", its asking of the material is "own work", most not English speaking people will think: Yes, I made it myself, so this is ok. Than it will say to put it under CC4 (Anyone may use, share or remix this work, as long as they credit me and share any derivative work under this license.) so, you think, ok. In the next part it wil ask for description, date (very important!!!???) and category. Not a word about "source". I've tried Upload Wizzard, becausse my old Commonist isn't working anymore, and It cost me more time to upload, than made the files. But I can understand that another is questioning the strange licensing. I scrathed behind my head for a while, but uploads a day earlier went well. I did change them in the meanwhile to prevent the same trouble in the future. Well, case closed. Wiches you both a swell evening. Regards, --Arch (talk) 19:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Ousmane Tanor Dieng redimensioné.jpg

 
File:Ousmane Tanor Dieng redimensioné.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Re: watermarks

Please, you must see Category:Fiore S. Barbato and OTRS agent User:Elitre--Threecharlie (talk) 22:26, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Elisfkc,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Border on File:Ellie Stein 1990-aj jaroj en San Diego.jpg

Hi, Elisfkc. I can't find any border on File:Ellie Stein 1990-aj jaroj en San Diego.jpg: am I missing something? --Rrburke (talk) 12:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@Rrburke: click and drag it around a little. You'll see the white border. Elisfkc (talk) 16:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Found it. Thanks. --Rrburke (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Logos

Before tagging a logo for speedy deletion, please check first if the logo is simple. If it is too simple, then don't tag it. If it is simple but debatable, nominate it for deletion. If it is obviously complicated, then prepend with {{Logo}} (not {{subst:logo}}!). You just tagged a too simple logo (File:WALL·E Logo.svg) for speedy deletion, and I removed it. You also tagged some debatable logos (like File:Finding Nemo logo.svg) for speedy deletion instead of nominating it for deletion. Please review COM:TOO first before you tag more logos for speedy deletion. Thanks, Poké95 03:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

To me, they all seemed past too simple. Elisfkc (talk) 03:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Epcot International Flower & Garden Festival 2013 (8551838604).jpg

 
File:Epcot International Flower & Garden Festival 2013 (8551838604).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Disney's Art of Animation Resort (7135497565).jpg

 
File:Disney's Art of Animation Resort (7135497565).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Various

Hi Elisfkc. Sorry if I've overloaded your routines... for the future I'll use the tool you've indicated to me. For the cropped file, I asked at the village pump, and I tought I was ok to upload the orginal one, with watermark, and the cropped one, without. For the future, I'll upload the watermarked one, and than cropped & overwrite it (is it ok?). Tks, mac 12:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

@Mac9: Thanks. The watermark issue I don't care about as much as the right licensing, I more just want to notify people when there is a watermark in their image. Elisfkc (talk) 17:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of Linares (Spain).svg

Hello I uploaded an own with elements of other file as you can see at the infobox. Could you explain me the reason why the licence is wrong in your opinion? It is not a copy. Thanks so much --Heralder (talk) 18:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

I didn't see that you added your own parts to it. I thought it was just a coat of arms that's been in use for a while. Elisfkc (talk) 18:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
This coat of arms as others are widely reproduced and it is not an exact copy (a clear violation). It is not an original design created in the article, it can be seen in different works: [3] [4] [5]
Please check:

600px

  • 1 This design appears in other works, so with an own design this coat of arms is accepted
  • 2 See the crown is different (the base, stones and plates are clear different)
  • 3 See the different lines of the console (external element)
  • 4 Different type of letters and crosses
  • 5 Different shell design
  • 6 Logenze and castle clear from  , it is shown at the infobox

It is not a copy violation of this work as these examples done by different authors (also respected by me) [6] [7] [8]. --Heralder (talk) 18:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Hi, I just want to say that I'm guessing the people who uploaded the two Owen Hart pictures to Flickr didn't know that the copyright they taged was incorrect. In heighsight I should probably have realized that they were both promotional pictures, but I got way too enthusiastic when I found more pictures of that person since they're hard to find. I wasn't trying to cheat or anything. Sorry.*Treker (talk) 04:19, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Not a problem, I've done it before as well. Elisfkc (talk) 06:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

criteria for speedy deletion?

File:Discovery Family logo.svg This image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. See WP:PD#Fonts and typefaces or Template talk:PD-textlogo for more information.--EEIM (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

@EEIM: thought I saw the Discovery Earth globe logo in there. Sorry Elisfkc (talk) 21:40, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Watermark

Hi, its me again. Thanks for being so cool with me and checking all my uploads and such. I'm feeling really stupid for asking this but what exactly is the watermark in this picture? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Harry_J_Smith_runner.jpg Sorry for bothering again.*Treker (talk) 23:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

@*Treker: not a problem. I believe the bottom right of the image has a watermark. Elisfkc (talk) 02:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks again. I'll try to fix another image.*Treker (talk) 21:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 10:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

AN/U

See here. Natuur12 (talk) 08:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Jack London - Wyga okładka.jpg

Elisfkc What do you mean writing "Book cover"?

Yes, it is a book cover => like all files in the Category:Book covers of works by Jack London
It was published in 1925.
The author of this cover (Kamil Mackiewicz) has died in 1931.
The file has got correct licence. Can you give me an explanation? Wieralee (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
@Wieralee: thought it was older. Sorry about that. Elisfkc (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Plan Aubagne.png and File: Plan Aubagne 2.png

Hello Elisfkc, You have tagged 2 of my pictures indicating that they were missing source information. I have indicated that they are from www.francetopo.fr and it is clearly written (in French) under the presentation tab that the maps are free to use : "Le site FranceTopo.fr propose une cartographie de la France, gratuite et sous licence libre, essentiellement basée sur la mission SRTM de la NASA (pour le relief) et le projet de cartographie collaborative OpenStreetMap (pour tout le reste).» So these files should not be deleted from wikimedia. I have perhaps made a mistake in the information provided. can you help me modifying that, or should I replace the files with maps from OpenStreetMap? Thanks

Ludo33

@Ludo33: I did not see that. I am going to remove the no source tag and add the license review template, so that another license reviewer can look over it. Elisfkc (talk) 18:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thanks a lot ;-) Ludo33

Hi

Thanks for that :) I must have been confused... And a question about FlickreviewR 2: Amir Farshad Ebrahimi, the original uploader of this photo, is on the bad authors list. But I googled the photos from same day and they seen original. Not agency photos or copyvio I think. --Logom (talk) 20:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

@Logom: not a problem. The bad authors list means that the Flickr user has been known to upload files that they do not have a right to license, and then they freely license the file. This causes a copyrighted file to make it past the review bot. It does not mean that file is a copyright violation, it just means that there is a chance it is licensed wrong. Elisfkc (talk) 21:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Oh, I understood the working principle of FlickreviewR now. Thanks for information. --Logom (talk) 21:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
@Logom: not a problem. Elisfkc (talk) 21:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Egypt

I apologize. I went on flickr, found those picture with 2.0 license and added them, I didn't know that the author wasn't the owner of the pictures --Captain Awesome (talk) 05:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

File:QANTAS Regional Jet (27349594552).jpg

 
File:QANTAS Regional Jet (27349594552).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Helmy oved 02:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

File:C-17A Globemaster III expends countermeasure flares to defeat a simulated surface-to-air missile shot from a Man-Portable Aircraft Survivability Trainer system during a training mission at the Bollen Live-Fire Range Complex (26217307222).jpg

Such long names makes problems on many web cites. You can manage a short name => and a long description. Our Commons browser is searching in names and in descriptions, too...
We had a discussion recently: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:File_renaming#Over-long_file-names
Yours, Wieralee (talk) 07:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Got it, asking for a shorter name now. Elisfkc (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Bola Penalty.jpg

 
File:Bola Penalty.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 09:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Ceremonia de bautizo y lanzamiento del buque oceanográfico con capacidad polar BAP Carrasco (26600095950).jpg

I'm sorry, but it seemed to me like the license says we are free to share and adapt.

Check again please. Thanks. --Elelch (talk) 21:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

@Elelch: not for Commons. See Commons:Creative Commons copyright tags --Elisfkc (talk) 21:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Re:File tagging File:Dm fm V5.jpg

I talked with the author from the picture and results he private de picture. Now is available to see it. Can you remove the quick deletion, please?--VictorPines (talk) 06:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

  Done Elisfkc (talk) 06:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

CenturyLink Field

Hello It's possible upload this photo from Flickr?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/usembassypanama/9016896438/in/photolist-eJMXaG-pNZziz-fVdvGM-y2CuZD-yjaRzV-yjQBPr-yifLrG-yjaN7c-y2EjyK-yifGcQ-xn9k4A-xnhsVk-pJojoT-fVdKv9-pNWZXh-gizW13-bA8p8t-p52xDL-a6k5ny-jmeqMi-jmcGPp-pBHSY2-twsDgJ-fVdXFi-BmkgFX-tep443-dXbyei-tLHxco-tLDfws-rV2Kzg-wdBTqD-fVdHLC-fVdHzf-aJrM4X-nnBiTq-bhHZHz-fVdx6i-ukVim2-q1Divr-twAJFX-nnBbaQ-giC5mV-twoeRf-fVdZvv-nn2tEe-sS96op-xZpeBu-fVdZnp-x5G2zL-fVdDsq

I think is possible upload with template:PD-USGov

My english is very poor--Marinaio56 (talk) 07:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

The image is not originally from the US Embassy. It was published by the embassy in 2013 before the FIFA World Cup Qualifier at the stadium, while the image was taken in 2011. Also, the license listed makes it not allowed. Elisfkc (talk) 00:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

--  Gazebo (talk) 09:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Paultons Park Images

Hello, please can you undo the removal of the Paultons Park images that you carried out yesterday?

All images are on Flickr and free of copyright. See > https://www.flickr.com/photos/paultonspark

Thank you

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesnow2011 (talk • contribs) 09:11, 22 June 2016‎ (UTC)
@Jamesnow2011: no, I cannot because the images on Flickr are copyrighted with All Rights Reserved. Many of your images that you uploaded also were not on the Flickr account, leading me to tag them with the no source template. If you would like the pictures to be used, please have your employeers switch the licensing on the Flickr account to either CC-BY-2.0 or CC-BY-SA-2.0. Thanks, Elisfkc (talk) 18:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)


Hello :@Elisfkc: , all of the images are marked in the Creative Commons as sourced via Flickr. The images on Flickr are set to be downloaded by anyone. Please can you assist to help get these images available on the Wiki page? Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesnow2011 (talk • contribs) 13:40, 23 June 2016‎ (UTC)
@Jamesnow2011:   Done Elisfkc (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Photographs by Pedro Caetano (duplicate)

Hi Elisfkc, all the images in Category:Photographs by Pedro Caetano (duplicate) were uploaded by me in duplicate with the tool "Flickr-to-Commons" (???). If you can delete them, or, if you please, ask someone with rights to do it; and also the category in reference. Thank you in advance --JotaCartas (talk) 04:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

@JotaCartas: you can request them for a speedy delete by adding {{SD|G1}} to the top of each file's page. Elisfkc (talk) 04:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
@Elisfkc: This situation was reported as a bug in Flickr2commons, latter I will ask for speed deletion of the files an the category. Thank you --JotaCartas (talk) 05:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Categorisation

Hi,

I appreciate your concern regarding categorisation. However, I think it's only fair to point out that I'm aware of this (and in fact generally quite fastidious on the matter!).

The reason this image wasn't categorised straight away is that I'm in the middle of transferring a number of images from Flickr and it's easier to categorise these in bulk *after* they've all been uploaded.

Five minutes after upload is probably a bit too quick off the mark, to be honest; it's generally more helpful to leave it a while and see if the user is planning to categorise it after they've finished doing what they're doing.

All the best,

Ubcule (talk) 19:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Ubcule: I figured as much, but I thought I'd give you a heads up anyways. Elisfkc (talk) 19:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Flickr License Review - Let the robots do the hard work! :-)

Hi again,

I noticed that you License-reviewd the file Commodore MAX BASIC manual and cartridge.jpg; this is appreciated, but the FlickreviewR 2 bot usually does that automatically for Flickr imports (typically within a few minutes or under an hour).

The bot does seem to occasionally get confused (and fail) when fetching the licenses from Flickr. This seems to require manual intervention. If you're interested in dealing with Flickr imports, it's probably a better use of your time to find out how you can help there.

I'm not an expert in that area, but you can probably find out how to do that from some more experienced reviewers and administrators.

All the best, Ubcule (talk) 21:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Ubcule: thought I saw that the review bot had failed to review it & wanted a human review. That's why I did that, thanks for pointing it out. Elisfkc (talk) 21:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
The bot usually leaves an entry in the history if it's failed to review. Even so, like I said, there are probably easier ways to check, but you'll have to ask someone who's more involved with that than I am!
All the best, Ubcule (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Flickr Review US Embassies..

Why did you tag so many images from US embassies for 'flickrreview'? You do realise most images from US embassies are not tagged under the appropriate licence on flickr right? so a n00b licence reviewer who doesn't know this will tag if for deletion right? I don't have the time to fix your 100's of mistakes, go fix them yourself, 99% of all images taken from US embassies flickr accounts will all be under non-free licences because firstly, there is no "PD-USGOV" option on flickr for them to keep in in the right licence as "US Government Work" licence is chosen by flickr for limited flickr accounts only....and also, regardless of what licence they are under on Flickr, as long as its an image taken by an employee of the US Embassy, it will fall under PD-USGov so there is never a need to 'review' theses images manually as it will create a waste of time which can be spent reviewing other images which need proper checking....--Stemoc 00:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

@Stemoc: That's why I tagged the images for license review instead. Elisfkc (talk) 00:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
yes, after 'flickrreview' failed...they basically cannot be reviewed, go try out one.....this will either create more problems or more issues, a category for it being part of the US Embassy would have sufficed, which you have added, there was nothing more that should have been done..again, they cannot be reviewed because we do not have the right templates to do so..--Stemoc 00:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)..
@Stemoc: I am confused. How can they not be reviewed by a license reviewer (not flickr review, but license review)? And isn't the license template (which I think you are asking about) PD-USGov-DOS, since the embassies are a part of the State Department? Elisfkc (talk) 02:07, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
@Elisfkc: @Stemoc: Most of these have EXIF with info that confirms they're US Gov works. When I find those in the review cat, I usually just review/pass them as a formality, since I'm basically confirming that they're from a known/confirmed US Gov source and hence are PD-USGov, rather than than the Flickr licenses, which are invalid from a Commons standpoint. I've seen a few of these that don't have the usual EXIF details. A review of these is probably a good idea just to be safe, but I certainly wouldn't miss having to review the ones with full EXIF. INeverCry 17:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Filemover & rollbacker

I've seen plenty of good rename requests from you, so I've given you the filemover right. I've also added rollbacker in case it comes in handy. A guy with 100k edits needs some tools.   INeverCry 17:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

@INeverCry: sweet, thank you! Elisfkc (talk) 17:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File Giuseppe Sala

I've received the authorization of the Municipality of Milan to upload the file on wikipedia. --Poigne (talk) 18:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

@Poigne: Great! Send your proof of authorization to the OTRS team. We can undelete the images after they receive the proof, if need be. Elisfkc (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
There is a problem...i wrote him on facebook, how can i do? --Poigne (talk) 18:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
@Poigne: Screenshot the conversation on Facebook, then email that on to OTRS. Elisfkc (talk) 18:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

François mass DR

I had one of my own like this a couple years ago with a big mass DR of Ukrainian FoP stuff. I ended up going back through and doing mostly single DRs with author/date info when I could find it, which was pretty often since I could do the searches pretty well in Russian. It may be a bit tougher if you have no French beyond a few words as I do. You could always ask someone like Yann or Christian Ferrer if you really need help with some of these. Just a note - that "no valid reason for deletion" just means I was too fast to hit enter with DelReqHandler, and forgot to write up the rationale first...in case you wondered...   INeverCry 19:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

@INeverCry: not a problem. I just wanted someone to make a decision on the images & for the uploader to understand the problem with many of the images. Thanks for the explanation and note. Elisfkc (talk) 19:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Heh, FoP DRs aren't too popular, though at least we have the January 1st restoration party each new year. I've done the most DRs of Ukraine FoP cases on Commons, and I've closed/deleted the most Slovenian and Russian FoP DRs. I've had a couple of contentious threads here from my efforts and a long one on ru.wiki, where the nicest description of me was "a competent warehouseman"... INeverCry 19:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Jumbers theare pool squash.jpeg

Please do not know what to do you help me put the right license for this puts please. <spam style=FBMD0f000758010000ab0b00000a240000d2280000762d0000483f0000ac64000087660000>Juzehj zeen</spam> 18:42, 04 July 2016 (UTC)

@Juzehj zeen: It needs a source to begin with. Elisfkc (talk) 16:49, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Please delete the photo JeziorkoDaisy

Tomasz leśniowski

  Done Elisfkc (talk) 16:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

File:ELP.jpg

 
File:ELP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 18:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 16:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

RE:Cropping images

Thank you, I wasn't aware of the CropTool. I apologise if I was inadvertently a nuisance. Again, thanks! -- RickMorais (talk) 18:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Playwright, Composer, and Performer Lin-Manuel Miranda, 2015 MacArthur Fellow.webm

 
File:Playwright, Composer, and Performer Lin-Manuel Miranda, 2015 MacArthur Fellow.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

czar 02:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Watermark in Copa Libertadores cropped.jpg

Hello Elisfkc, how are you? I notice you have add a tag to Copa Libertadores cropped.jpg, mentioning a watermark and/or a timestamp on the image. Could you please point to me where this watermark or timestamp is, so I could see if I could remove it myself? Thanks. Felipebini (talk) 00:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, sorry to bother you again. Perhaps the supposed watermark you referred to was the number "960" in the lower-right section? If that was so, that is not a watermark: as you can check on the original uncropped image in flickr, the structure behind the trophy had the numbers 1960 and 2009, referring to the first and (then) last years of the competition. If that was not the case, I would be thankful if you pointed out where is the watermark. Cheers. Felipebini (talk) 21:28, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
@Felipebini: that was the one I was seeing. Elisfkc (talk) 21:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Reventtalk 21:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Playwright, Composer, and Performer Lin-Manuel Miranda, 2015 MacArthur Fellow (audio only).opus

 
File:Playwright, Composer, and Performer Lin-Manuel Miranda, 2015 MacArthur Fellow (audio only).opus has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Tagging simple logos for Speedy

Elisfkc, please don't tag simple logos for Speedy like this and this again, since these files has been already nominated for deletion and seems too simple (at least for me). --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amitie 10g: got it. Elisfkc (talk) 16:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
In fact I wonder why you bothered tagging any of that uploader's images again when they are already nominated for deletion. Seems like a waste of time and effort to me. Ww2censor (talk) 17:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Gary Johnson + William Weld

Hi, I saw that you put an advice on this file because it has not source. SO, I ask you for some help. I don't know how to use the Flickr template, so can you do it? I will see how you did and I will learn it. The source is this. I hope you understand what I've written, my English isn't very good. :(

Thank you however. --Giacomo Antonio Lombardi (talk) 11:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

@Giacomo Antonio Lombardi: Ww2censor took care of it. Elisfkc (talk) 16:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Flickr images

OK, I officially don't understand how to select Flickr images. All of the images I selected were commercial use. As an example, the file Etha Wragge says "Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms." So long as the creator is attributed. I did not crop this file. The same is true of the Melo Trible picture.I think in some of the other cases I may have cropped pictures I wasn't supposed to, but generic notification templates do not help a Commons user learn this stuff. Rikster2 (talk) 10:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

@Rikster2: Commons:Flickr files should help you understand which licenses are ok for Commons and which are not. Elisfkc (talk) 17:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Patroller

I've given you the patroller right. A lot of the files we review are uploaded by non-autopatrolled users. When you do license reviews, check under the license. You'll often see a little link that says "mark this edit as patrolled". You might as well since you're reviewing it. You can also mark galleries and other pages edited by non-autopatrolled users as patrolled if they come in your way. Don't go out of your way or put yourself out though. INeverCry 06:39, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Drake photo addition

I've just added a photo to the Drake article found on Flickr, in a similar manner to a photo of Drake you endorsed for usage on Wikipedia earlier. Please see it does indeed follow fair use guidelines for usage on Wikipedia. PsychopathicAssassin 13:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

@PsychopathicAssassin: fair use images are not allowed on Commons, nor are they allowed on Wikipedia pages about people, unless the person has died and there are no free images available. Elisfkc (talk) 18:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

US Air Force image

You are a licence reviewed, so you could have just fixed it like I did, instead of doing this. Ww2censor (talk) 19:15, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

@Ww2censor: it's my upload, so I thought I wasn't allowed to review it. Elisfkc (talk) 19:16, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Ah, that's true. However you could have just left it alone and the failed Flickreview would have prompted someone to deal with it. It might be better to consider uploading directly from the USAF website and using the appropriate template like I do and avoid the whole Flickr review altogether. They really don't even really require review. Thanks anyway. Ww2censor (talk) 19:20, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
I changed it to license review to make sure that someone else didn't just delete it without seeing the fact that it was from the Air Force. The reason I do it from Flickr is that it's easier for me. Elisfkc (talk) 19:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
If they are good reviewers they will know that US government work is PD, and as I suggested, it may be easier for you but the Flickr upload, in these instances just gives everyone more work when there is already enough copyright work to be dealt with, but you decide. I've saved a lot of these but it takes some time to do so. Of course I could just not bother and do something else. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 22:02, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Jan Godlewski (architekt) pictures

I added flickr links to all pictures Godlak67 (talk) 20:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

@Godlak67: links are either wrong or not public, because they end up as a Flickr "Page Not Found". They need to be publicly accessible to be reviewed. Elisfkc (talk) 21:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
@Elisfkc: i made now all those pictures public on flickr, hope it will work Godlak67 (talk) 14:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
@Elisfkc: i have a question: can i at some point make the picture private again on flickr ? wiki robots check links once orthey come back regularly ? thanks in advance Godlak67 (talk) 18:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
@Godlak67: yes, I believe you can, since it is only checked once. However, I would suggest asking on Commons:Village pump/Copyright to makes sure. Elisfkc (talk) 06:52, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Tina Fey (7334208146).jpg

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:Tina Fey (7334208146).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch | English | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | norsk | português | português do Brasil | slovenščina | svenska | русский | українська | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 20:36, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Rights with Google books

Hello Elisfkc

Do you think it is possible to use an image from an american book dated 1854 in Google book, copied with a screenshot and transformed in Photoshop, in order to transfer it in Commons ? I think it belongs to public domain, the drawer is anonymous.

Here is the Google book link

The book title : The National Magazine: Devoted to Literature, Art, and Religion, Volume 4

Thank you in advance

Tubamirum (talk) 10:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

@Tubamirum: I believe so, however this is more a question to post on Commons:Village pump/Copyright, where you should be able to get a more definitive answer. Elisfkc (talk) 17:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Ok, I'll do it.
Thank you
Tubamirum (talk) 19:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Nehru Nkrumah Bombay 1958 P01.jpg

 
File:Nehru Nkrumah Bombay 1958 P01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Kenan Sofuoğlu 2010.jpg

Did you read the deletion discussion, as linked on the image talke page, and view the copyright on wayback machine source you added? I thought the closing admin would have given a good review at the same time. Ww2censor (talk) 22:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

@Ww2censor: I did not see it originally, until I was looking at the other files uploaded by Alfonso Galuba. That's when I went back, found the wayback machine source & deleted the no source tag. Elisfkc (talk) 01:47, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Indeed, sometimes I miss the image talk pages too so need to see if there is anything there first, but I wonder why Ronhjones has tagged it the way he did. I have asked him. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 09:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Re: Quanto à imagem de Dagoberto Nogueira Filho

Caro colega,

Não compreendi seu questionamento, pois as informações solicitadas já constam no infobox do ficheiro correspondente. Peço que verifique com atenção.

Cordialmente, YoudaCamper (talk) 20:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

@YoudaCamper:
English: As I do not understand Portuguese, I am using Google Translate to translate to Portuguese from English. The url you have provided does not show the file you uploaded. As such, there is no way to prove that the image is freely released. Please link directly to the image, such as File:Secretary Kerry Chats With Commerce Secretary Pritzker Before the Opening Session of the Annual U.S. India Strategic and Commericial Dialogue at the Jawarhalal Nehru Bhawan in New Delhi (29339167775).jpg.
Português: Como eu não entendo Português, estou usando o Google Translate para traduzir para Português de Inglês. O url que você forneceu não mostra o arquivo que você enviou. Como tal, não há nenhuma maneira de demonstrar que a imagem é libertada livremente. Por favor ligar diretamente para a imagem, como File:Secretary Kerry Chats With Commerce Secretary Pritzker Before the Opening Session of the Annual U.S. India Strategic and Commericial Dialogue at the Jawarhalal Nehru Bhawan in New Delhi (29339167775).jpg.
Elisfkc (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
@Elisfkc:
English: As I do not have full command of English, I am using Bing translator to translate from Portuguese to English. I made the switch from URL questioned, since the original link brings only the stock photos of Brazil's Federal Senate. Thus, the new URL is the source of the image, the Agency's official Senate account on Flickr. Going on second thoughts, I am available.
Português: Como eu não tenho pleno domínio do inglês, estou usando o Bing Tradutor para traduzir de português para inglês. Fiz a troca do URL questionado, já que o link original traz apenas o banco de imagens do Senado Federal do Brasil. Sendo assim, o novo URL é a fonte da imagem, a conta oficial da Agência Senado no Flickr. Havendo dúvidas, estou à disposição.
YoudaCamper (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
@YoudaCamper:   Done Elisfkc (talk) 20:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

US Air Force images

I think it would be better to find the original military images and fill in the details from there as that would save us time because the Flick versions have a false license. As you know US government work is in the public domain. I keep fixing them. You can start looking for their images at: http://www.af.mil/News/Photos.aspx and then fill in the military template fully as have. This is it Template:ID-USMil. Thanks for uploading some very fine photos. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 11:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Eu acho que seria melhor para encontrar as imagens originais militares e preencher os detalhes de lá como que nos poupar tempo porque as versões Flick tem uma falsa licença. Como você sabe US trabalho do governo é de domínio público. Eu continuo corrigi-los. Você pode começar a olhar para as suas imagens em: http://www.af.mil/News/Photos.aspx e, em seguida, preencher o modelo militar plenamente quanto tem. Este é ele Template:ID-USMil. Obrigado por carregar algumas fotos muito finas. Boa sorte. Ww2censor (talk) 11:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Bosnischer Talgo

Hallo, i want to upload this photo of a talgo train of the Railways of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. I know it says "all rights reserved" but I asked the author of the photo by email to use the photo for a article about the ŽFBH Railways. He said i can use it, but now i don't know how to upload on commons because it still says "all rights reserved". What do i have to do to upload on commons? I hope you can hepl meǃ And sorry for my bad englishǃ Combi2000 (talk) 17:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

@Combi2000: Use the Commons:OTRS method to prove that they released the rights. Elisfkc (talk) 18:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cindy Lou Who meets Kermit the Frog (420355501).jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cindy Lou Who meets Kermit the Frog (420355501).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

DMacks (talk) 03:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Kermit is not free, so one cannot take a picture of him and declare the result to be free. See Commons:Deletion requests/Derivative works of Sesame Street puppets. DMacks (talk) 03:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Same for:
DMacks (talk) 03:29, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
@DMacks: I have opened normal deletion requests, since the permission for the image does exist and I am contesting your nomination. Elisfkc (talk) 18:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Okay, I'll leave a comment there later today. DMacks (talk) 18:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

hey Mr Elisfkc

I have a yahoo account which is related to Flickr , I wanted to joining us on Flickr did you hear about the questions please tell us. PrinceNijam (talk) 22:20 21 September 2016

@PrinceNijam: I am sorry, I don't understand. It will likely be easier for me if you write in your native language and I will use an online translation service to translate. Elisfkc (talk) 17:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Szechenyi's Monal-Partridge

Hiǃ You've deleted an image I've uploaded, stating that it's copyrighted. I found this in the public domain on FlickRː https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/22702090910/. Has that user uploaded an image with copyright, nicked it from somebody else? Or what is the reason for your deletion? Silltruten (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

@Silltruten: That's exactly the reason. The user, wagon16, is on the Flickr bad authors list for "VPC discussion... multiple images with clear copyright watermarks claimed as PD". Elisfkc (talk) 19:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
@Elisfkc: Oh, I see. Terribly sorry, did not know of this. I will double-check any additions with the "bad authors list". Thank you so much for your info. Could you please also delete FileːArses insularis.jpg and FileːMeliphaga orientalis.jpg, uploaded by me from the same user? Or maybe they're already gone. That would save my day. Silltruten (talk) 19:33, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
@Silltruten: already done. I would suggest using Commons:Flickr2Commons from now on, since it will check for this issue before uploading the image. Elisfkc (talk) 19:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
ː:@Silltruten: I will, thanksǃ Silltruten (talk) 19:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Reason for new upload ?

Please provide the reason for uploading a new version of this image: File:Sunset at the beach near the harbor of Scheveningen, The Hague (2015).jpg Regards, --oSeveno (talk) 10:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

It was the original Flickr image. By uploading that version, it was able to pass the automated review. Elisfkc (talk) 14:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Jason Merritt "Krysten Ritter" (8158928564).jpg

 
File:Jason Merritt "Krysten Ritter" (8158928564).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stemoc 10:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

File:An F-35 Lightning II completes a flyover of USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000). (29774535153).jpg

 
File:An F-35 Lightning II completes a flyover of USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000). (29774535153).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DAAyanz (talk) 02:40, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Please Delete File:TimeWarner 2004.svg

Hello!i want you to delete "File:TimeWarner_2004.svg",so i can revert "File:Time Warner_wordmark.svg". Thanks.

Ragilnih

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragilnih (talk • contribs) 13:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
@Ragilnih: Done, but next time you can just tag it as a duplicate yourself. Elisfkc (talk) 17:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Aucorsa photo

Please put the photo back. Chemcoes (talk) 13:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

@Chemcoes: first off, the image was not properly sourced. Second, it was a copyright violation, since it was a logo. Third, now that the image is deleted, I do not have the ability to restore it. Elisfkc (talk) 15:06, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Translated with Google Translate:
Español: En primer lugar, la imagen no era originario correctamente. En segundo lugar, se trataba de una violación de derechos de autor, ya que era un logotipo. En tercer lugar, ahora que se borre la imagen, no tengo la capacidad para restaurarlo.
Elisfkc (talk) 15:06, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
But the original photo is just an Aucorsa's bus with the logo printed, I just cut the rest and let de logo. Otherwise, how can I add a logo without violating copyright? Thanks, and sorry if I was rude, it wasn't my intention. Chemcoes (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
@Chemcoes: you can't add a logo without violating copyright. Elisfkc (talk) 01:22, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
@Elisfkc: and how articles like Sony has the logo on it? Chemcoes (talk) 18:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
@Chemcoes: because the Sony logo is under the Threshold of originality Elisfkc (talk) 01:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

File:The Lion King (17197175466).jpg

 
File:The Lion King (17197175466).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DS (talk) 14:53, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

about wrong licence on some pictures

Hi,

see User_talk:The_Titou bottom , there 4 picture which you say the licence is incorrect . But on this picture, there is a template {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0|GFDL}}! I dont understand . Make what you want with those images but please attention only onFile:Infiltration.jpg because is used on main space on wp:fr - regards --Titou (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

@The Titou:
English: You said that the licenses were CC-BY-SA-4.0 and GNU Free 1.2, because you released them. However, the images are screenshots of Wikipedia, which is licensed as CC-BY-SA-3.0. You need to replace {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0|GFDL}} with {{Wikimedia screenshot}}. I am translating this into French using Google Translate, since that seems to your primary language, but I do not speak it.
Français : Vous avez dit que les licences étaient CC-BY-SA-4.0 et GNU Free 1.2, parce que vous les avez libérées. Cependant, les images sont des captures d'écran de Wikipedia, qui est autorisé sous le nom de CC-BY-SA-3.0. Vous devez remplacer {self|cc-by-sa-4.0|GFDL}} avec {{Wikimedia screenshot}}. Je traduis cela en français en utilisant Google Translate, car cela semble à votre langue principale, mais je ne le parle pas.
Elisfkc (talk) 14:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Give Kids the World (3446758955).jpg

 
File:Give Kids the World (3446758955).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 12:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Source for "File:Roman Laurel Drawing.jpg"

Will a link to the Flikr page I found it on suffice? Iazyges (talk) 21:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

@Iazyges: Yes -Elisfkc (talk) 21:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Ok, I've added in the link. Iazyges (talk) 21:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Elisfkc/Archive 2".