Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Own Work?

What do you think of "Own Work" for this image: File:Dakuku_Peterside_image.jpg? Seems to be sourced from http://www.onepageafrica.com/2016/11/ and the uploader added two other images that look similar but I couldn't find other sources for them. @sikander (talk) 22:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

norden.org images

Found this image sourced from norden.org which states the license is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. However, the image on Commons is licensed under cc-by-2.5-dk and doesn't mention the non-commercial restriction. Is this a copyvio? @sikander (talk) 14:17, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

@Siqbal: Sounds like it, but I'd double check with Commons:Village pump/Copyright to make sure this isn't a special situation. Elisfkc (talk) 02:54, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

crop tool

Hi there, thanks for the tip on crop tool. I didn't know about it. The image I uploaded was not already on the commons; but I can see how it's better to upload the whole image and then crop for use. Best wishes, Devadaru (talk) 21:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Tim Arnold - I Am For You cover art, 2017.jpg

 
File:Tim Arnold - I Am For You cover art, 2017.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Album cover. Flickrwashed.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Majora (talk) 23:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

PDN: Own work doesn't look right

This user seems to be all over the place. Images from Baghdad, Tehran, Berlin, Amsterdam, Toronto, etc and all are marked as Own Work. Thoughts? @sikander (talk) 00:59, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Files from Elvert Barnes Flickr stream

I boldly redirected the category (see my edit summary for reasoning), then realized while I was mass-removing files I should probably notify you before proceeding any further. I'll refrain from transferring any more unless you agree. MB298 (talk) 23:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

@MB298: Thanks for checking with me. I don't really mind what we call these sort of categories, as long as there is one and the flickr account number is listed. --Elisfkc (talk) 00:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

File:TWDC Logo.svg

 
File:TWDC Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 03:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Korea.net images

Flickrreviewer 2 will always fail because the original file @ flickr has some HTML tags in EXIF, which is causing MediaWiki to reject the file. FR2 then thinks there's no such file and fails it. You have to manually do it.

Thanks! — regards, Revi 17:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

@Revi: Couldn't remember if it was one of the override ones or not. Thanks, --Elisfkc (talk) 17:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
I learned that hard way, trying it via Flickr2Commons / UploadWizard, in the end I just removed EXIF manually. One bad thing - korea.net seem to be licensing most of their stuff with NC clause these days. I'll have to contact them to remove them. — regards, Revi 17:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Abaout images

About File:TF-C 2.jpg, File:TF-C 1.jpg, File:Toa tfc 3.jpg, File:Toa tfc 1.jpg I think the license is right i've copied the licence on flickr Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0)--Marinaio56 (talk) 18:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

@Marinaio56: That's not the issue. The issue is that the Flickr uploader's page indicates that the license listed is not valid. --Elisfkc (talk) 19:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Please do you speek italian?--Marinaio56 (talk) 19:56, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 13:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

SIGNY pic

Ok so what do I tell the band members of SIGNY what they have to do to upload the picture? I obviously told them incorrect info the first time. I don't live in the same state as they do so I communicate only through messenger. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

@Fyunck(click): They need to ask whoever originally took the picture to release it under a free to use license.--Elisfkc (talk) 04:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
When I uploaded it, the wikimedia walkthrough said 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) works with wikimedia. This wikimedia page also says that, so I don't understand what to tell them. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
They just messaged me that Casey Holder and Delaney Gibson did the uploading to flickr, putting in all the correct info that your license page says to do. I have to say, getting pics from people is so hard to use here. I had to tell Chris Evert and Margaret Court not to send me any personally taken pics from their own cameras because it's too hard to get approved here. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
@Fyunck(click): Great. Please send that correspondence from Casey Holder and Delaney Gibson through the OTRS procedure. An OTRS volunteer will review it, and if it has enough proof that the license is correct, you should be fine. --Elisfkc (talk) 16:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Pues proceder a borrar

Hola 🙂
Revise y arregle solo 2 imagenes (File:Screenshot Android 7.0.png y File:1er Cuerpo técnico Chivas Álamos F.C.jpg)
Mientras que busque como poder licenciar las demás, y no puede 😢
Ya que el Aviso Legal de Prisa no lo permite, asi que puedes proceder a eliminar las demas imagenes 🤗

--Victor Gibby (talk) 23:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

Hi Elisfkc, thank you for your message. I'm aware of the existance of FLickr2Commons, and I use it quite regularly. I believe that you are refering to the pictures of NASA KSC. The problem is, despite that those pictures are in public domain, for some reason they are released on Flickr under a CC-NC license which is not compatible with Commons. Flickr 2 Commons won't work under those circumstances, so I have no other option but upload them manually. --BugWarp (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

@BugWarp: I understand that, but you can actually still upload them one by one. The bigger issue is that you only put the base url on most of those pictures, rather than the specific image url. I've fixed them already. --Elisfkc (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
@Elisfkc: Yes, that was a mistake, since I upload them in bulk mode, and it was quite annoying to put the specific image url on that mode, I should have corrected that and I'm sorry for it.--BugWarp (talk) 00:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Video frame deletions

Why are you nominating still images from videos as duplicates? Extracted still images are not duplicates of entire videos. --Closeapple (talk) 23:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

@Closeapple: It is a known issue with the Flickr2Commons tool. The tool uploads a still of the video, rather than recognizing that it is a video and either ignoring or uploading the video. The ones I am nominating are because of that issue. The uploader and I have talked about this before. --Elisfkc (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
So Flickr2Commons is uploading just the JPG, not the WEBM, and then someone has to upload the WEBM manually instead? --Closeapple (talk) 06:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
@Closeapple: Pretty much. --Elisfkc (talk) 02:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
@Closeapple:, yes. It doesn't recognize videos. It just cuts the first frame and uploads it. Artix Kreiger 2 (talk) 02:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:American Auto Advertising As well as European Auto advertising

Perhaps should Ben nominated as well. Artix Kreiger (talk) 18:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Artix Kreiger: Probably, but I was finding the images by running through Category:Images by John LLoyd. --Elisfkc (talk) 18:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Barnstar of Diligence
For the work you do. Artix Kreiger (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

File:One Disney Dollar (3792841350).jpg

 
File:One Disney Dollar (3792841350).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kam Solusar (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Disney Dollars – then and now (244190746).jpg

 
File:Disney Dollars – then and now (244190746).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kam Solusar (talk) 00:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

File:One Disney Dollar.jpg

 
File:One Disney Dollar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kam Solusar (talk) 00:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Repeated renaming of files imported from Flickr

Hello User:Elisfkc, please could you help myself and others understand the thought process behind these actions:

These renames were reverted the original names restored by User:Dyolf77, per request on the basis of "Restore previous descriptive, non-generic and searchable name, including camera angle and visible text.". Reviewing Special:Log/Elisfkc?type=move, we can see that the same set of moves has been performed again four days later. —Sladen (talk) 12:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Sladen: I see them as being too long of a file name, when they could have a simple name (like I made them) with their Flickr number at the end to differentiate. They also seemed close to the examples for reason #2 to move files. I honestly forgot I had already moved them, which is why I moved them again. --Elisfkc (talk) 17:07, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Elisfkc. Thank you for the response. These moves appear to have introduced #2 (not solved it … ie. moving a meaningful name to a meaningless name), differentiated only by (an effectively random) numeric Flickr ID. Please kindly move the files back to the originally uploaded filenames. —Sladen (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Elisfkc. *polite cough*. —Sladen (talk) 21:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
@Sladen: You can do it yourself, I won't move it back. --Elisfkc (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Mickey's Fun Wheel (6991796036) (cropped).jpg

 
File:Mickey's Fun Wheel (6991796036) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images by John LLoyd

I think you got the point, but as closing admin, I think its worth saying: please do not do this again.. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images by John LLoyd is the absolute worst way to go about getting files deleted. I actually wish I didn't stumble about it because it was the biggest pain to clean up. ~riley (talk) 03:56, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Downloads

Check these my downloads — File:Baosteel logo.gif, File:Baowu Steel Group logo.png, File:Shagang Group logo.png, File:Shougang Group logo.jpg. Is everything normal in terms of copyright? I'm going to upload some more logos of this kind. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 17:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

@Blast furnace chip worker: Double check with Commons:Village pump/Copyright. These seem close to the threshold of originality to me. --Elisfkc (talk) 18:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Ok. Thank you. I'll check with it. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 19:07, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Request for verification

Hi, could you check photos which i have added recently — File:Peck1918.jpg, File:Peck Bacall Designing Woman 1957.jpg, File:Peck The Valley of Decision.jpg, File:Peck Moby Dick.jpg are they correct in terms of license ? Mike89 (talk) 19:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

@Mike89: They look ok to me, but double check with Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Elisfkc (talk) 23:23, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Ok, Thanks. I'll check with it :) Mike89 (talk) 9:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

commons:deletion policy

Hi. The deletion policy is specific about what can be speedied, and images that are the same image though not the same file type are not seen as exact duplicates. The policy then says that such deletions should be handled by a DR. Our usage on duplication is not to restrict users from choosing the file type of their preference, so generally we should have a purposeful reason for deleting a work.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:08, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons tool

Ref your message:

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first"). Elisfkc (talk) 19:42, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for showing me this, I didn't even know it existed...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ontomeister45 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

This Link

On this link you can view the images and even click on the license which is almost always CC BY 3.0 if it is "Creative Commons erkännande". A few are not and I have filed DR's on them like this case Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Permissions and such

Thanks for pointing me to OTRS process. I'll request the image authors to email Commons directly. Hopefully they'll take the time to do so. Regards. 20:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Siqbal (talk • contribs) 20:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Veja_Meu_Bem_by_Brazilian_artist_Marepe_at_Tate_Modern.jpg

Hello there, I just updated the URL of the source file. I just saw that CC-BY-NC-ND images are not accepted. Please mark it for speedy deletion. I am trying to found some images for one of my articles. :) Thanks!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertgombos (talk • contribs) 04:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

افزودن منبع به عکس محسن رضایی

لطفا اون پیام که نشون میده منبع و مجوز نداره رو از صفحه حذف کنید سپاس گزارم

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mohsen-rezaee-enikazemi.jpg#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Enik (talk • contribs) 06:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Flick tool

Thank you very much for the help ! I didn't know about it. But now some pictures from flick are considered violation copyright

— Preceding unsigned comment added by JSBach16853 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
@JSBach16853: That is something that happens. See COM:Flickr washing for details as to why that may be happening. Elisfkc (talk) 17:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Re: CropTool

ok, I'll keep it in mind, thanks. --Stella (talk) 17:00, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

File:NS2801.jpg

FYI: The image you state as being ARR is a different image source which is not for this image, so I think it's actually a "source not found" image. Ww2censor (talk) 21:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

@Ww2censor: Good call. Elisfkc (talk) 21:39, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Commie

Kiss my ass lmao no copyright here bih -Floral- (talk) 06:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Croping

Sorry i didnt know that tool. How do I fix the images ive already uploaded? Editorofthewiki (talk) 01:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

@Editorofthewiki: I've already fix some. Elisfkc (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 20:36, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Chicago Blackhawks Rally 6-18-2015 (18568989614)-video.webm

 
File:Chicago Blackhawks Rally 6-18-2015 (18568989614)-video.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Majora (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Hey!

I am the owner of the account QuinteroP in Flickr. I have recently uploaded some photographs in Commons and those photographs were already uploaded by me on Commons. Can you help me with this? I may change the rights of some photos

This is my Flickr account https://www.flickr.com/photos/140297617@N07/

Thank you QuinteroP (talk) 08:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

@QuinteroP: Please see Commons:Flickr files for information on Flickr files on Commons. Elisfkc (talk) 16:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Matteo Renzi and Tim Cook, 2016.jpeg

 
File:Matteo Renzi and Tim Cook, 2016.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yeenosaurus (talk) 04:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

The Huntington

Please don't undo my (or FlickreviewR's) edits. I am working on the Huntington category, see also Commons:Deletion requests/undefinedinsource:huntingtontheatreco. The Huntington messed up with licenses in the past and updated licenses for many files.

"CC is irrevocable" has no meaning when The Huntington never had the rights in the first place. The files really do need a new review. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: You already have a deletion request open on them because of that issue. There is no reason to rereview them in that case, especially since they passed the first time. --Elisfkc (talk) 01:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Following that DR, The Huntington updated the license for many files on Flickr that they never had the proper rights for to begin with. Eventually I will ask FlickreviewR to re-review all of them. Steinsplitter, Zhuyifei1999 and others know what I'm doing. If you want to stop me, gather some consensus or report me on ANU or something.
If you want to help you can though! See Commons:Village pump#Help categorizing photos from the Huntington theatre for instructions. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:2015 Flower and Garden Sign.jpg

 
File:2015 Flower and Garden Sign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Guanaco (talk) 06:55, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

The Honourable Rosalie Silberman Abella

Are there any copyright issues for illustrations of living people? Found this today and wondered: Rosalie Abella. Compare with actual photo of person: https://www.scc-csc.ca/judges-juges/bio-eng.aspx?id=rosalie-silberman-abella and probably inspired by photo here: https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/canadian-supreme-court-judge-awarded-honorary-degree-from-yale-1.2914423 // sikander { talk } 21:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

@Sikander: Not 100% sure. Ask on Com:Village Pump/Copyright. --Elisfkc (talk) 22:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

File:JCB working near the Pathfoot building at the University of Stirling.jpg

Good Evening,

Please find a link below to the University of Stirling Archives page, there you can see all the photos I have uploaded and double check that they have CC BY SA 2.0. I asked the archive to change the copyright before I began to upload the images, I also watched as they changed the copyright. What else do you need to stop the images being deleted?

Best Wishes,

Lucy

https://www.flickr.com/photos/unistirarchives/albums/72157621903197479

LMRodger (talk) 19:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

@LMRodger: On each image, you need to provide the source url. For instance, on File:A graduate at the University of Stirling.jpg, you needed to say the source was https://www.flickr.com/photos/unistirarchives/3817608404/in/album-72157621903197479/ instead of "University of Stirling Archives flickr page". That way the reviewer/review bot can easily find and approve the image. In the future, I'd recommend using Flickr2Commons to upload the photos. I'll let you source each of the images now. --Elisfkc (talk) 19:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. I'll go and do that. Should I contact you once I have finished? LMRodger (talk) 19:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
@LMRodger: Sure --Elisfkc (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Done. Thank you for your advice and help. Have a nice nightǃ LMRodger (talk) 21:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
@LMRodger: (talk page stalker) Now that added a source url, I tagged them for review and the flickr review robot has passed them all, though one had a wrong url but I found that one too. Ww2censor (talk) 21:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:37, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Etruscan Terracotta head.jpg

Hi, I checked the Flickr licens directly on Flickr, and it points to this, I thought it was fine for Wikicommons.

  • Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ --Chiorbone da Frittole (talk) 00:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

@Chiorbone da Frittole: Nope, see Commons:Flickr files. --Elisfkc (talk) 00:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Muppet*Vision 3D Movie Poster-It Called From Outer Space (23473258975).jpg

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Muppet*Vision 3D Movie Poster-It Called From Outer Space (23473258975).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 17:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Rock Contra La Dictadura - Nicolás Maduro.jpg and other image

The image was shared by PROVEA, which produced the album. Would this be a copyvio? Also, would Hugo Chávez portrait.jpg be a copyvio as well? If so, you can tag it for deletion and I apologize.--ZiaLater (talk) 16:22, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@ZiaLater: It is unclear who owns the copyright to the album cover, whether it is the band or if someone else created the cover art. Yes, the Hugo Chávez portrait.jpg is a copyright violation. For the whole principle on this, see Commons:De minimis. --Elisfkc (talk) 16:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Ok, thank you! Sorry about uploading those.--ZiaLater (talk) 01:40, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Two images from the same source

Why would this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Atlantic_Wall_in_Norway#/media/File:Festung_Norwegen.jpg be acceptable while this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Festung_Norwegen_155mm_cannon.jpg would be deleted? They are the same gun from two different angles, taken by the same person, same time and from the same flickr slideshow. They should have the same license. Why do I need a Masters Degree in Copyright Law just to post an image? Snowdawg (talk) 16:48, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@Snowdawg: If they had both been uploaded right now, they would both need to be deleted. However, File:Festung Norwegen.jpg was uploaded and passed review in 2009, meaning it was under Creative Commons license at the time. Since Creative Commons licencees are irrevocable, it remains under that license. However, there is no way to prove that the image you uploaded ever was under Creative Commons. I understand that they are from the same person, but sometimes people purposely license images differently. If you want a full explanation from others or need help on other images, feel free to ask on Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Elisfkc (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Geology Files Source

USGS=United States Geological Survey, US Dept. of the Interior

User:pi3.124 (User talk:pi3.124)

@Pi3.124: Huh? Also, please sign your posts. --Elisfkc (talk) 15:15, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


William Capers James photo

Hello, you placed Deletation tag on my photo William Capers James today. I just want to ask you, what I can improve on the source, because I received this photo via google drive from USMC Military History Division.

Let me know please.

Thank you

AntonyZ

@AntonyZ: Send in proof of the license to the OTRS team. --Elisfkc (talk) 16:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Donald & Melania Trump 2018-07-12 02.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Donald & Melania Trump 2018-07-12 02.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 21:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:12, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

File:BJD Super Dollfie doll.jpg

 
File:BJD Super Dollfie doll.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Siawase (talk) 10:26, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:ESPN Wide World of Sports (5503964820).jpg

 
File:ESPN Wide World of Sports (5503964820).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

B (talk) 23:55, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

File:ESPN Wide World of Sports Complex in Orlando, FL.-Race Expo for @rundisney Wine and Dine. -rundisney -winedinehalf -runchat (8172870024).jpg

 
File:ESPN Wide World of Sports Complex in Orlando, FL.-Race Expo for @rundisney Wine and Dine. -rundisney -winedinehalf -runchat (8172870024).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

B (talk) 23:55, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Andrássy út files

Hi there. I see you have deleted a number of files from the same flickr album. I would have like to have been informed in advance of those deletions. Then I could have explained why I thought these files could be uploaded to commons. See the discussion on my discussion page --Judithcomm (talk) 20:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 00:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Disney's Art of Animation Resort (7135504537).jpg

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Disney's Art of Animation Resort (7135504537).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 12:40, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Calgary Police service pipe band Canmore 2016 (29407990911)-video.webm

 
File:Calgary Police service pipe band Canmore 2016 (29407990911)-video.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gone Postal ( ) 13:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Camp fire video (23557624241)-video.webm

 
File:Camp fire video (23557624241)-video.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gone Postal ( ) 13:30, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Cochrane Labour day parade 2017 (37094091995)-video.webm

 
File:Cochrane Labour day parade 2017 (37094091995)-video.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gone Postal ( ) 06:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Valley of Mo'ara in Pandora – The World of Avatar.jpeg

 
File:Valley of Mo'ara in Pandora – The World of Avatar.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Feedback for Commons Android app

Hello,

Thanks for uploading photos to Commons via the Commons Android app! :) We (the developers of the app) have recently submitted a Project Grant proposal for the app, detailing our plans for the app in 2019. As a user of the app, we would love to hear your thoughts on it, if you have the time.

Cheers, Misaochan (talk) 11:11, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy

I misread the license, please tag the derivative File:Bill Kaulitz 2017.jpg as well. Thanks.LM2000 (talk) 16:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:25, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Galatea lakes exploring (36087121320)-video.webm

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | hrvatski | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Galatea lakes exploring (36087121320)-video.webm, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA) or   (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Roy17 (talk) 23:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Question

Hi, Can I upload this photo from Flickr here, under creativecommons licenses by-2.0? Malkawi99 (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Malkawi99: No. The person does not own the poster. They are license laundering. Do not upload it here. -- 1989 (talk) 23:29, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Babel

Hey Elisfkc,

Like Hedwig said, you are somewhat required to add templates about what languages you understand. Refer to here and add e.g. {{User en}} or a babel box {{Babel}} and add any language you're familiar with to your user page. -- 1989 (talk) 15:41, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

@1989: Awesome. Is there a template to say that, if you write in another language, I will use Google Translate to try to understand your question and write back to you? Because that's what I try to do. --Elisfkc (talk) 22:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
No. -- 1989 (talk) 22:31, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
@1989: Didn't think so, but thought I'd ask anyways just to make sure I didn't miss anything. --Elisfkc (talk) 22:33, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

COM:A

Hey Elisfkc,

Have you ever thought about becoming an admin? You seem to have the knowledge to be one. -- 1989 (talk) 03:53, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@1989: I've thought about it. That's it. I am interested in it. --Elisfkc (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Done. Just sign and transclude it and you are good to go. -- 1989 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Elcobbola has accused you of uploading copyvios and carelessness of the Flickr2Commons tool. You may want to respond to that. -- 1989 (talk) 13:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Barbara Kurdej-Szatan (41779185185).jpg

 
File:Barbara Kurdej-Szatan (41779185185).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Geralt Riv (*talk) 09:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Original Barnstar
This is for your contributions to the project. Editing here is more than certain a thankless “job”, but I and others whom supported your RfA appreciate the work you have done here. I really hope when you have the time, you could go over your uploads and nominate which ones you uploaded by mistake. You certainly have the potential to become an administrator. I hope I can come back in a year and nominate you again. Thanks again for your contributions and have a happy new year! 1989 (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

  Close call, darn. Have a cuppa and forget the RfA. Next time you'll get the votes. Best, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Added photo

Hey Elisfkc, Just letting you know that I added A photo you took of A.J. Davis taking free throws to his page, which I recently created. If its ok with you I may try to edit a copy of the picture and then re-upload it so it is more focused on Davis. I'll be sure to attribute you as the photographer if I do it. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:47, 7 February 2019 (UTC) @GPL93: Sounds good. --Elisfkc (talk) 02:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Photos on Wiki and flickr

All the photos of mine you have reported are my own photographs, the link to flickr is to my own profile too so id be grateful if you were to kindly remove the possible removal of images as they are my own content and not stolen.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Moylesy98 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
@Moylesy98: The tag doesn't mean that the images are stolen, it means they aren't licensed for use on Commons. Please change the license on Flickr to an acceptable license. --Elisfkc (talk) 00:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

File:USS Gerald R. Ford pulls alongside USNS William McLean during a replenishment-at-sea.. (36562208786).jpg

 
File:USS Gerald R. Ford pulls alongside USNS William McLean during a replenishment-at-sea.. (36562208786).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Psu256 (talk) 17:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

File:American Airlines logo 2013.svg

 
File:American Airlines logo 2013.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Marcação da imagem File:Outono brasileiro.jpg

Se você quiser vai eliminar umas 500 imagens que eu carreguei entre 2013 e 2014 porque todas as imagens foram carregadas do PICASA. Como o PICASA não existe mais, algumas imagens foram parar no google onde não informa mais os licenciamentos das imagens. Na época todas as imagens foram carregadas corretamente e conferidas pelos administradores. Se vc começar a conferir imagens que foram carregadas em 2013 que estavam no PICASA você não vai encontra licença mesmo. Você vai cometer o erro de eliminar milhares de imagens que foram carregadas corretamente na época. As imagens e os artigos não tem culpa que o PICASA não existe mais. NosLida (talk) 23:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Trump not welcome in France (45828942991).jpg

 
File:Trump not welcome in France (45828942991).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:38, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Good call. I was just trying to get it to go through Flickr review. --Elisfkc (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:00, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 16:18, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

File:160319-N-QF605-022 (25507623424).jpg

 
File:160319-N-QF605-022 (25507623424).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | +/−


 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Elisfkc massive edit. Explained above -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 20:08, 28 April 2019 (UTC). Thank you.

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Safety and medical cars in Japan 2014.jpg

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Safety and medical cars in Japan 2014.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Be more careful

Elisfkc, read this: Commons:500px licensing data next time that you perform a massive edits, at least look the summary, or try to understand were the files came from. Fix your edits will be very time consuming... pay more attention. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 19:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

@Rodrigo.Argenton: I understand your point, but there should still be a {{License review}} or similar template shown. Even Upload Wizard shows a version of it after verifying licenses for files from Flickr. --Elisfkc (talk) 01:54, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
No it don't.
The {{License review}} it's just to manually attest the source.
The 500px tool include the source at the description of the file, including an archived version "Imported from 500px (archived version) by the Archive Team. (detail page)" , because in theory, 500px will delete this files.
So, again, read the page that I suggest, and after revert this massive edits that will only create issues and rework to other volunteers.
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 06:14, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Mickey's Boo-To-You Halloween Parade (29716233561).jpg

 
File:Mickey's Boo-To-You Halloween Parade (29716233561).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: © The Walt Disney Company. This picture mainly focused on Disney-copyrighted animation chracters, and the relevant content is not used de minimis.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

WQL (talk) 05:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Disney Springs.svg

 
File:Disney Springs.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

192.195.66.4 15:50, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Disney's Art of Animation Resort - property map (7135542151).jpg

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Disney's Art of Animation Resort - property map (7135542151).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 21:34, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Inside Luigi's Rollickin' Roadsters (28348343196).jpg

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Inside Luigi's Rollickin' Roadsters (28348343196).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 21:34, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

@BevinKacon: Good call on both of these. Thanks, --Elisfkc (talk) 23:23, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Elisfkc/Archive 5".