Open main menu

StatusEdit

Category:John BoscoEdit

Category discussion notification Category:John Bosco has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

--AlbeiroR24 09:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Dali imageEdit

You might like to comment here, as you previously commented on this issue. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

DaliEdit

The appropriate place for the discussion is the policy change talk page. Once that is ironed out, the image can be undeleted without any further discussion. But until such point, it is not de minimis per Commons now and is thus out of scope, as explained by MichaelMaggs in the discussion, including his conversation with Mike. The closure was not an indication that this must be salted never to return, but at THIS point, the conversation belongs on the de minimis policy page, not at COM:UND. Thanks! -- Avi (talk) 17:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

The GC does not decide policy or matters of scope, Evrik, we Commonists do. Everyone but yourself believes that the image is NOT de minimis now and will not be until the Commons de minimis policy is changed. Please respect that and work on changing the Commons de minimis policy instead. That is the appropriate venue. -- Avi (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Evrik, if the consensus of the respondents in the discussion is not to restore it until the policy is clarified, the discussion should be closed. Do you realize that you are single-handedly ignoring the consensus opinion of all the other respondents? -- Avi (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
The discussion is over, Evrik. Everyone but yourself wants the image to be deleted until the policy is ironed out. Keeping it open will not return the image faster. -- Avi (talk) 18:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Evrik, this is just an unasked for piece of friendly advice. Your behavior in re-opening the discussion is grounds for a behavioral complaint. Furthermore, you may be alienating people who agree with you that the policy should be adjusted because of your perceived intransigence and possible lack of a desire to work with other people. My advice to you would be to accept the consensus on COM:UNDEL and work to quickly adjust the de minimis policy so thatthe image comes back into scope. Feel free to ignore me :) -- Avi (talk) 18:29, 15 March 2009 (UTC) /

I second that. Your attitude is becoming disruptive. –Tryphon 18:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Evrik. I'm going to reinsert Tryphons second closure of this undeletion request. A new undeletion request may be filed if, and only if, our policy of de minimis is changed. Do not revert this closure again. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

I second the above comments. Your re-opening of closed DRs is disruptive. Let me be frank: you are at risk on being blocked if you do it again. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller !Edit

Hi Evrik !

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As might know already, the patrolling functionality has been enabled for all edits, no longer just for page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edit made by anonymous users on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by checking an Anonymous edits checklist and patrol a day-part. There is a short video tutorial which addresses some things you may not know.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage, my talkpage or on IRC. –Krinkletalk 17:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

CategoriesEdit

Hi. How does this edit make the image more useful? The categories seem completely relevent to me. Wondering, -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Category:Photos_of_topless_females_featuring_armpitsEdit

80.187.97.160 22:02, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 62866d79a6ab8abc3474dcd39d5bb74dEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 8517c958f57d9fde027dcd5fbb622c0bEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:BAL Penn station.pngEdit

 
File:BAL Penn station.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ST 23:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

  • it's a picture of the building. The statue just happens to be in front of it. Evrik (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Please don't renew your copyvio, you might be blocked for this project otherwise. This is actual US-Law. That might be stupid (it is in fact), but it's real. --ST 06:26, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Clinton.jpgEdit

 
File:Clinton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

File:High School For The Creative & Performing Arts.jpgEdit

 
File:High School For The Creative & Performing Arts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

GrapedApe (talk) 04:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Eleanor Roosevelt and Kassal.jpgEdit

 
File:Eleanor Roosevelt and Kassal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Kennedy and Kassal.jpgEdit

 
File:Kennedy and Kassal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Boy Scouts of AmericaEdit

The Categories "Scouting in [state]" does not guarantee the photo also is part of "Boy Scouts of America", that's why photos have both categories. Boy Scouts of America is under Scouting in the United States, not under each individual state.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjrmtg (talk • contribs) 17:37, 4 February 2013‎ (UTC)
  • Yes, but if both Boy Scouts of America and Scouting in [state] are under Scouting in the United States, do they need both? The BSA cat is overpopulated. Evrik (talk)
    • Do we need "Boy Scouts of America in Alabama" - "Boy Scouts of America in West Virginia" then? --Mjrmtg (talk) 15:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
      • I don't know. Probably not. Probably best to have two categories then to start slicing the pie so fine. Evrik (talk) 15:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:Civil_Rights_leaders_of_the_United_States_of_AmericaEdit

Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 01:45, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:Jennifer_NettlesEdit

166.205.68.15 12:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Metallportal St Albert Bergheim (crop).jpgEdit

 
File:Metallportal St Albert Bergheim (crop).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

4pq1injbok (talk) 21:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

RE: Page won't let me post this request, would an admin please post itEdit

Global replaceEdit

  1. User:CommonsDelinker/commands/filemovers is for moved files only
  2. User:CommonsDelinker/commands/filemovers can be only edited by file movers
  3. CommonsDelinker will refuse replacing ‚.anything‘ with ‚.svg‘
  4. If you like to replace a file globally, you can do this using your user account, CORS (requires a modern browser) and User:Sreejithk2000/JustReplace.js. (This requires a minimum knowledge about how to use JavaScripts.

-- Rillke(q?) 16:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 20:45, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Grace Coolidge.gifEdit

 
File:Grace Coolidge.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 21:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

On top of the worldEdit

 
Defy censorship

Too bad i didn't have a good photo of it to upload!

Smallbones (talk) 00:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


File:Rc con cevang ps pospa img korean-martyrs.jpgEdit

 
File:Rc con cevang ps pospa img korean-martyrs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

더위먹은민츠(Mintz) / 토론 (talk) 01:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


Category:HispanicEdit

--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:59, 16 August 2013 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--GrapedApe (talk) 21:19, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Zoetermeer Dorp Adventskerk (13).JPGEdit

Is there a Zoetermeer in Norway? Did not know that ;=)) --Stunteltje (talk) 15:52, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

  • I may have made a mistake. Evrik (talk) 16:30, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Think so. No problem, I make my own mistakes. But this picture was made in a church in The Netherlands. --Stunteltje (talk) 19:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 AnnouncementEdit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:California_communities_with_Hispanic_majority_populationsEdit

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover!Edit

 

Hi Evrik, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | 中文(臺灣) | +/− INeverCry 02:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:National border signsEdit

I think you shouldn't move the domain into its subdomain. Something went wrong. The Category:National border signs by country‎ is placed in a redirected category, so it's hidden. It's not proper, do something with this, please. Wieralee (talk) 09:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

  • I see no redirected category. Please move it to where you think it should go. Evrik (talk) 16:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

January 1 pageEdit

Hello. I have reverted you edit on the January 1 page. It is too specific and it looks like no other pages have that stuff. Also, It would be very hard to find similar files for other countries. Cheers. Alan Liefting (talk) 09:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queuesEdit

Hello Evrik. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Nyc santacon 05 mta.jpgEdit

 
File:Nyc santacon 05 mta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Prosfilaes (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:PersondataEdit

 
Template:Persondata has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Reguyla (talk) 15:14, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

File:William F. Winter.pngEdit

 
File:William F. Winter.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jarekt (talk) 13:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

de:Rudolf HeßEdit

Hi, he is a German and his name is Rudolf Heß, not Rudolf Hess. The category should be the same name as the person. Regards --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  18:25, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

The page was written in English, and there was no German to speak of on the page. Hence the change. Evrik (talk) 18:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, you are a file mover. Com:MOVE#Which files should not be renamed? [Files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English and/or is not correctly capitalized....] for Categories the same is true. More than sixty wikipedia projects you have to change the link to the category. Great. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  05:06, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
I encourage you to put this up for discussion. Category:Rudolf Hess has three entries in wikidata. Of the 45 entires in wikidata in a roman alphabet, 39 use Rudolf Hess and six use Rudolf Heß. Evrik (talk) 20:54, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm nowhere more to this discussion. I do not mean also the categories to change that here or on wikidata itself are, but in the various Wikipedia projects. I'm going to change it in my home wiki. For me is done --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  02:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Scouting in...Edit

In 2012, you created the series of categories of Category:Scouting in Connecticut and its ilk. You then categorized them under Category:Events in Connecticut and so on. Since most images of scouting are not defined one-time events, I believe the scouting categories would be better under Category:Culture of Connecticut and so on. (Individual scouting events like Jamborees would still belong under the Events categories). Since this would affect a large number of categories you created, I wanted to check with you before making the move. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

I have no objection. Evrik (talk) 16:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Done, thanks for your reply. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:04, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


File:Anna Eleanor Roosevelt.pngEdit

 
File:Anna Eleanor Roosevelt.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alanscottwalker (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Barnabas McDonald.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Barnabas McDonald.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:95 thesesEdit

Hi. I was just looking at Category:95 theses, and it appears that you added rather a lot of files that probably don't belong in the category. Could you please review your work? Thanks. - Eureka Lott 01:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

@EurekaLott: I went in and removed 55 files. Evrik (talk) 04:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Looking better. Thank you! - Eureka Lott 04:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Cira Center editEdit

Allow me to explain the reason for the edit I made on the file File:Cira Centre, Philadelphia-east.JPG that you reverted. The reason I removed the category 'Buildings by César Pelli' is a twofold reason. First off, the photo would belong in Category:Buildings by César Pelli which I created today rather than Category:César Pelli, as it is an image of one of his buildings and not of him himself. The second reason is that I placed Category:Cira Center, to which the file belongs, in Category:Buildings by César Pelli, thus the file is already included as a result and does not need to be tagged into this category individually. Have a wonderful day. Best wishes!
SecretName101 (talk) 02:41, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Johnny (45726694).jpgEdit

 
File:Johnny (45726694).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Taivo (talk) 19:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Gregorian calendarEdit

 
Gregorian calendar has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

177.64.81.175 16:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Could you explain pleaseEdit

This edit of yours? I used an edit-summary to explain why I think it is not correct. DMacks (talk) 16:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

  • Whenever possible I refer people to an article or category in the commons rather than across projects. Evrik (talk) 16:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
{{Information}}'s documentation for the |description= field says "Wikilinks to Wikipedia articles." and Commons:Guide to layout#File description pages also recommends "In-line Interwiki links". Is there some other guideline to the contrary? DMacks (talk) 17:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Those are both general guidelines, I wouldn't be surprised if the template language was lifted right from wikipedia. Evrik (talk) 17:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
That may well be, but they are nonetheless currently here on commons. Is there some other commons-specific guideline that makes any different recommendation? DMacks (talk) 17:30, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
They are not law. Reading through what you sent, I'm not sure how enforceable either is. Please leave the image as it is, thanks. Evrik (talk) 17:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
I asked Template talk:Information for input. I don't appreciate your claim to first-mover fiat on this. DMacks (talk) 17:42, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
You may not appreciate it, but you're making a much bigger issue out of this than you need to. There are a lot of other things that need attention on the commons. Evrik (talk) 17:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:Vladimir_Putin_by_dayEdit

Auntof6 (talk) 18:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

{{Geodis}}Edit

Evrik, the only thing your malformed/incomplete (didn't have a closer look) template does is adding the page it is used on to the Category:Pages with script errors like one can see at Silver Peak. Please do some tests using a sandbox or (better) leave it. By now I don't see any need nor advantage of more than one disambiguation template but maybe you can tell me. --Achim (talk) 16:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

It doesn't and in won't do this way. You cannot expect one or two templates simply copied from en:wp to Commons to work properly here. Have a look at the source page of en:Template:Geodis and scroll down for to see its transclusions. And please stop immediately creating new disambig categories without previous discussion otherwise I will treat that as vandalism. Disambig cats have to be fed by templates only. --Achim (talk) 18:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
It's not vandalism. Don't even go there. I created the categories so the template wouldn't exist in a vacuum. I also tied them to the exiting category structure on some of the other wikis. @Achim55: I would appreciate it if you could fix the template so it works properly. Evrik (talk) 18:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Category:All article disambiguation pages will be deleted because there are no articles on Commons. --Achim (talk) 18:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
@Achim55:, agreed. Evrik (talk) 18:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Changing the category name inside {{Disambig}} leads to a change of links on about 8.000 (didn't count exactly) pages. I'm afraid, but that shouldn't be done on the fly. --Achim (talk) 18:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Before you reverted me, the system had made the change rather seemlessly. In any case, it's 'more correct.' Evrik (talk) 18:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
There seems to be some misunderstanding: Although articles on wp projects and galleries on Commons have the same namespace number 0 they are completely different. i) The purpose of galleries is to assist the categories. If a cat like for example Category:Cologne Cathedral contains thousands of images, some typical ones of these can be presented using a gallery (Kölner Dom for example) to get an overview. ii) So galleries without any image (for example Silver Peak by now) are treated as unwanted and can be deleted speedily according to the policy. iii) As Commons is a multilanguage project several galleries using different languages on the same theme can coexist being connected to the same category. iv) There are thousands of things/topics of which no gallery pages exist but cat pages do. Therefore disambiguations are here usually handled on category pages. Hope you understand my actions better now. Best, --Achim (talk) 19:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

yes, but there are hundreds of galleries being used in lieu of categories. What to do with them? Evrik (talk) 19:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't know if "in lieu of" fits or I don't get it (I'm no native speaker). If a cat contains 2 images and a gallery the same 2 images without any additional information the gallery can be deleted. If a gallery contains images of a special aspect of anything that is categorised correctly one can consider to create a new category. But on the other hand 1-image categories as well as galleries are unwanted (except a few special cases like notable persons or cats that might be populated per WLM or similar projects). --Achim (talk) 19:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Evrik, please have a look at some disambiguating pages I created during the past weeks: Category:Washington Park, Category:Ermengarde, Category:Alaincourt. Such pages may contain red links for not yet existing categories, doesn't matter. The advantage of disambiguating cats is that images can get assigned to them via upload so that they can be moved to an appropriate cat from there. That doesn't work using galleries as uploaders normally don't assign galleries during upload. Most of the existing disambiguating gallery pages are some years old and might be converted to disambiguating categories if someone finds the time to do so. Best, --Achim (talk) 21:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
That works. What then do do with all the galleries that currently exist? Evrik (talk) 21:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Observances_by_monthEdit

Auntof6 (talk) 08:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Silver PeakEdit

Yes but since when do we have disambiguation galleries? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Ok, I restored it. Have fun. Should you optimize or empty it let me know, it may be necessary to delete it after you're done. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:December_17_deathsEdit

Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:46, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Template:HndisEdit

 
Template:Hndis has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Achim (talk) 20:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Template:GeodisEdit

 
Template:Geodis has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Achim (talk) 20:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Kate Bush by David Gerrard (12966878834).jpgEdit

 
File:Kate Bush by David Gerrard (12966878834).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Misterpither (talk) 20:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

June 26Edit

Hi, June 26 has currently only one image. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Eagle_Scout_Leadership_Service_ProjectEdit

Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Running_of_the_BullsEdit

E4024 (talk) 13:54, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Kate Bush by David Gerrard (12966878834).jpgEdit

 
File:Kate Bush by David Gerrard (12966878834).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

100cellsman (talk) 06:26, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Disambiguation_galleries_of_place_namesEdit

211.28.133.245 08:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Capital AirportEdit

 
Capital Airport has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 10:55, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

scout hallsEdit

Little point putting images into Scout halls if they're already in Scout halls in the United Kingdom or subcats thereof. I've just moved 147 out of that category but I have other things to do. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2018 (UTC) @Rodhullandemu: You are correct. Sorry about the mistake. Evrik (talk) 15:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Mummers_Play_by_countryEdit

E4024 (talk) 12:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

WarningEdit

Stop polluting the disabiguation category. Jcb (talk) 06:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Please provide a written policy that back you up. Otherwise, please remove this comment. Evrik (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
This is to remind you to not pollute the disambuguation category with gallery pages. Jcb (talk) 12:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
  • @Jcb: Last time I checked, there was no formal policy on this. Is there now a formal policy? Evrik (talk) 13:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
    • The outcome of several recent discussions has always been that disambiguation at Commons only takes place in Category namespace. Jcb (talk) 14:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
  • I just checked Commons:Category disambiguation and Commons talk:Category disambiguation. As far as I can tell, there is no official policy. So, unless you can show links to an official policy, please stop harassing me with your threats. Evrik (talk) 03:26, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

May 21Edit

Hi, Evrik; I noticed your revert, just wanted to inform you that I will undo it because as a matter of fact, linking to the commons categories is not the intention, linking to the Wikipedia articles is! --

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lotje (talk • contribs) 00:31, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Lotje, there are more than 365 day related gallery pages, most are done that way. I link to things in the commons before wikipedia. Evrik (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Time to start linking to other projects then! Never too late to begin... Lotje (talk) 14:22, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Lotje, the purpose of the pages when they were set up was to refer people to resources in the commons. If you look at May 21, you'll see a reference to Lynn Annette Ripley - there is no resource on the commons for her. Evrik (talk) 14:27, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:July 1863 in EuropeEdit

Hello Evrik, I am sorry that I did not give an explanation for my revert on the "July 1863 in Europe" -category. I thought it was just a mistake by you. There are many reasons for using templates on such categories: the template creates a navigation box on the page, sorting is standardized and if there is need for a change it can be implemented by just editing the template. I will now revert your change again, I hope it is ok with you now. --Estormiz (talk) 06:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

File:LVDALogo.JPGEdit

 
File:LVDALogo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Piscataway Powwow 2009 Flickr.jpgEdit

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | hrvatski | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Piscataway Powwow 2009 Flickr.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA) or   (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:50, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Piscataway Indian Nation and The Piscataway Conoy Tribe Officially Recognized Maryland By Governor Martin O'Malley And State Of Maryland In Annapolis On January 9, 2012 Flickr.jpgEdit

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Piscataway Indian Nation and The Piscataway Conoy Tribe Officially Recognized Maryland By Governor Martin O'Malley And State Of Maryland In Annapolis On January 9, 2012 Flickr.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.

Deutsch | English | español | français | മലയാളം | polski | português | svenska | 日本語 | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Charbel.jpgEdit

 
File:Charbel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 02:37, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Female_physicians_by_nationalityEdit

E4024 (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

File:National Scientist Fe Del Mundo.jpgEdit

 
File:National Scientist Fe Del Mundo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not found at URL.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons Newsletter - Fall 2018 editionEdit

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates
Things to do / input and feedback requests

Current:

Since the last newsletter:

Presentations / Press / Events
Partners and allies
  • The info portal on Structured Commons now includes a section on GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums).
  • We are currently planning the first GLAM pilot projects that will use structured data on Wikimedia Commons. One project has already started: the Swedish Heritage Board researches and develops a prototype tool to provide improved metadata (translations, data additions...) from Wikimedia Commons back to the source institution. Read the project brief.
  • The documentation for batch uploads of files to Wikimedia Commons will be improved in 2019, as part of preparing for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. To prepare, the GLAM team at the Wikimedia Foundation wants to understand better which types of documentation you already use, and how you like to learn new GLAM-Wiki skills and knowledge. Fill in a short survey to provide input!
Stay up to date!

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 17:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

File:In God We Trust AFA Poster in New Philadelphia High School.jpgEdit

 
File:In God We Trust AFA Poster in New Philadelphia High School.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ubcule (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2018 (UTC)


You have been blocked for a duration of 1 weekEdit

{{Autotranslate|1=1 week|2=disruptive edits after warnings|base=Blocked}} {{unblock granted|[[User:Jcb|jcb]] has elevated a disagreement on policy and blocked me in retaliation for bringing this disagreement to the [[Commons:Village_pump#Disambiguation|Village Pump]] [[User:Evrik|Evrik]] ([[User talk:Evrik#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 16:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)|by {{noping|Jcb}} one hour after original block. [[User:Taivo|Taivo]] ([[User talk:Taivo|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 08:54, 8 January 2019 (UTC)}}

@Jmabel: like I said, I was being threatened (see this warning). I can no longer post any comments to Commons:Village_pump#Disambiguation. If you read this Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (de-adminship), this Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (de-adminship 2) and this Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (de-adminship 3) - it's the same behavior. Evrik (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

  Oppose - you have been warned several times for this exact behaviour and you knew very well that your last edit at Silver Peak would get you blocked. So well, that you immediately started canvassing the next edition of a discussion that we have had over and over again in the past few years. The clear outcome has been over and over again that Wikimedia Commons only accepts disambiguation pages in category namespace. You are well aware of that. Jcb (talk) 17:11, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
You say this, but you have never once listed an official policy, nor links to any policy discussions. I moved the discussion to the Village Pump and pinged anyone who I had seen had discussed this before, simply to move it off my talk page. Your block, and your subsequent comments here are pure retaliation. Evrik (talk) 17:17, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: If Evrik will agree to refrain from the conduct in question while discussion proceeds, I would strongly urge you to rescind the block. I don't see anything wrong with his canvassing to have a policy clarified or even changed. He should be able to advocate for that openly.
Evrik, would you agree to hold off on such edits while discussion proceeds? - Jmabel ! talk 17:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Yes. Evrik (talk) 17:17, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Ok, but please be aware this is your last chance. You have a history of being disruptive on purpose (e.g. all the repeated null-edits you have done to my talk page in the past) and enough is enough. Jcb (talk) 17:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: Null edit? What's a null edit? Evrik (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
That's an edit that does not add anything, but does cause the system to attract my attention to my talk page, e.g. this edit. Jcb (talk) 17:37, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
I might have done that, sorry if that bothered you. Evrik (talk) 21:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Captions in JanuaryEdit

The previous message from today says captions will be released in November in the text. January is the correct month. My apologies for the potential confusion. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - file captions coming this week (January 2019)Edit

My apologies if this is a duplicate message for you, it is being sent to multiple lists which you may be signed up for.

Hi all, following up on last month's announcement...

Multilingual file captions will be released this week, on either Wednesday, 9 January or Thursday, 10 January 2019. Captions are a feature to add short, translatable descriptions to files. Here's some links you might want to look follow before the release, if you haven't already:

  1. Read over the help page for using captions - I wrote the page on mediawiki.org because captions are available for any MediaWiki user, feel free to host/modify a copy of the page here on Commons.
  2. Test out using captions on Beta Commons.
  3. Leave feedback about the test on the captions test talk page, if you have anything you'd like to say prior to release.

Additionally, there will be an IRC office hour on Thursday, 10 January with the Structured Data team to talk about file captions, as well as anything else the community may be interested in. Date/time conversion, as well as a link to join, are on Meta.

Thanks for your time, I look forward to seeing those who can make it to the IRC office hour on Thursday. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

File:San valentino.pngEdit

 
File:San valentino.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

vlsergey (talk) 19:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

CFDs you closedEdit

Hello, Evrik. You might have noticed that I undid several of your CFD closures. I think they were improper closures because:

  • You participated in the discussions, and CFDs should be closed by uninvolved users.
  • Your closures were contrary to the majority opinions. Sometimes that can be done if there is a good reason, but you gave no reason. In fact, you made no closing comment at all on the CFD page, contrary to standard practice.

By the way, the notices you left about the CFDs were left in the wrong places: They should be on the talk page of the category being discussed, not on the talk page of the discussion. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Actually, until someone voted this month, opinion was against deleting the categories, so again ... so closing forgotten discussions after more than two years should have been no big deal.

I did make a comment in the Edit summaries when I closed the discussion. Finally, oops. I did put the tags on the wrong pages. Evrik (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

You have to count the proposer as supporting, so the counts weren't quite as you listed. I also don't think it matters how much you participated. You not only participated, but you closed in favor of your own viewpoint -- that makes a difference, too. And people won't usually see comments in edit summaries: it's usual to comment on the page. See other closed CFDs if you aren't familiar with that. And the proposals aren't necessarily forgotten just because they're old. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • The counts were close enough, besides it's not a vote. There was no consensus for the idea. Put it up for a neutral and to see if the discussions get closed. Evrik (talk) 20:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Usage of Edit requestEdit

Hey Evrik, unfortunately the maintenance page for this is now unpleasant flooded. Your request are still not valid as the content for the edit is not given and not easily solvable. So this is not a job for an admin. So I suggest you make a single collected request with translated content. Greetings -- Perhelion 14:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Responding to the comment you added and then removed at Village PumpEdit

Not every bit of common sense is going to be spelled out as explicit policy. Obviously it is disruptive to keep asking for administrative attention to something that does not need administrative attention. I appreciate that you did not initially know that is what the template does. Now you do. -User:Jmabel 15:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

@Jmabel: I took out my comment because I decided to rephrase what I wrote. I knew what the template did. What I'd really like is a simple solution to adding that text to the scores of pages where it could go. Evrik (talk) 16:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

File:The cast of The Simpsons attends the unveiling of The Simpsons stamps.jpgEdit

 
File:The cast of The Simpsons attends the unveiling of The Simpsons stamps.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 15:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Evrik".