Open main menu

Deutsch | English | español | français | magyar | +/−

Contents

WatermarksEdit

Please don't upload images with website watermarks. Thanks. Film Fan (talk) 11:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Film Fan: I don't use to upload images with websites watermarks; in this case in particular, I hadn't noticed the watermark at bottom, otherwise, I would have edited the poster with Photoshop (what I usually do) or search for a another version without marks. Beyond that, I don't think it deserves a "warning" from you. Thanks. - Fma12 (talk) 13:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
It wasn't a "warning" or a warning. Film Fan (talk) 13:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Ok. I hope I have made it clear. Fma12 (talk) 14:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Chavela vargas young.jpgEdit

 
File:Chavela vargas young.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:56, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Weird tales jan1934.jpgEdit

 
File:Weird tales jan1934.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 14:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Weird tales oct1933.jpgEdit

 
File:Weird tales oct1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 14:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Weird tales dec1932.jpgEdit

 
File:Weird tales dec1932.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 14:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Weird tales jan1933.jpgEdit

 
File:Weird tales jan1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 14:07, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Weird tales sep1933.jpgEdit

 
File:Weird tales sep1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 14:07, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Weird tales jun1933.jpgEdit

 
File:Weird tales jun1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 14:08, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Weird tales mar1933.jpgEdit

 
File:Weird tales mar1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 14:08, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Boomerang tv logo.pngEdit

 
File:Boomerang tv logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nigo0909 (talk) 07:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Boca Juniors 2012.svgEdit

 
File:Boca Juniors 2012.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Brgesto (talk) 21:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps?Edit

Hello Fma12, I saw your upload Martha Argerich (fabulous) and that you managed OTRS and so on (GREAT!). Perhaps one day there is a pic of Ingrid Fliter that we can use? My efforts had no success so far. Kind regards, ....HMS (talk) 06:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, @PaulasBunt: are you referring to this image I uploaded time ago? If so, I have to comment you that it has not an OTRS ticket but a Presidency of Argentina license. I should search for an Ingrid Fliter pic with a similar license to verify it can be uploaded here. If you need further assistance, please contact me again. Thanks - Fma12 (talk) 15:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much for taking the time for searching.   ....HMS (talk) 16:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vikings uniforms16.pngEdit

Hi mate, I've just noticed a small error in this image: the facemasks on the helmets are currently green, but I believe they should be black. Any chance you could make that minor change for us? PeeJay2K3 (talk) 16:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi @PeeJay2K3: pal, the facemasks were colored on dark grey, not green (as I remember). I should revise the vector file to verify that. There is no problem to make a correction if necessary. - Fma12 (talk) 11:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
That's weird, they look green to me. Maybe it's just because they're next to a purple block. Regardless, I think they should be black, if that's okay. PeeJay2K3 (talk) 12:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Re: File:Escudo de la Asociación Catalana de Socorros Mutuos Montepío de Montserrat.jpgEdit

Recibí autorización de las autoridades de la asociación en la Editatón Casal de Catalunya, lo dice el summary del archivo. Mahadeva (talk) 02:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

@Mahadeva: Te comento, en la descripción del archivo pueden citarse muchos permisos, pero lo que hace Wikipedia en estos casos es solicitar un ticket OTRS, que es un trámite simple que comprueba que efectivamente el permiso te fue concedido, a manera de verificar esta inforamación. Caso contrario, el archivo te será borrado por ser una imagen no libre. - Fma12 (talk) 15:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Sin problema, borren el archivo si así lo quieren. Mahadeva (talk) 00:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC) 

File:Fernando12.svgEdit

 
File:Fernando12.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

IagoQnsi (talk) 21:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Images Needing Removal From CommonsEdit

I'm sorry, but a recent Supreme Court Decision has caused changes in the way we look at uniform images. The Commons images need to be deleted.


File:Yankees unifnb cropped.pngEdit

Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 07:43, 18 April 2018 (UTC)


File:Jets uniforms12.pngEdit

Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 07:43, 18 April 2018 (UTC)


File:Giants uniforms12 nobrands.pngEdit

Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 07:43, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Redskins uniforms12.pngEdit

 
File:Redskins uniforms12.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ionutzmovie (talk) 14:36, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Guanaco (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

USA BasketballEdit

Hello! I've seen your U.S. Soccer kit, pretty impressive! Could you make a similar one for USA Basketball? It's really saddening that basketball national team uniforms are so generic compared to unique styles of football kits. Here are the images: men's home - [1], [2], [3], men's away - [4], [5]; women's home - [6] , women's away - [7]. Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Uiscfd (talk • contribs) 09:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, @Uiscfd:, thanks for your comments about my football (soccer) jerseys!. Of course I could you similar ones for USA Basketball, I'll try and will upload them as soon as possible. I agree with you that basketball jerseys are in general "boring" compared to football shirts. Keep in touch! Best, Fma12 (talk) 01:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! Can't wait!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Uiscfd (talk • contribs) 23:39, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Football uniforms: Thanks for your contributions, humble request for Penn StateEdit

Hi Fernando,

I love the American football jersey graphics you've created! They're all amazingly high-quality.

Would you by any chance be willing to do an illustration of the football jerseys for the Penn State Nittany Lions football article? (The uniforms are nicknamed "the tuxedo of [American] college football!) Your illustration of them would be fantastic.

Fwiw: The two official main color hexes of the team are Pantone 282 (#041e42) and white.

Pics of color uniforms (home) & white uniforms (away)

Thanks for all your great contributions! Cheers, --Hoyadonis (talk) 23:43, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, @Hoyadonis:, thanks a lot for your words to my work !!! I appreciate your recognition and I can assure you that I have a lot of fun designing the uniforms. I have been trying to add the highest level of detail to each uniform to make them both, recognisable and enjoyable for the fans.
I promise you that I'll be working on the Penn State uniforms, uploading them to the infobox as soon as possible. Thanks a lot again for your kind words, greetings from Argentina ! Fma12 (talk) 12:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks again for doing this! Our uniforms are a huge point of athletic pride and an illustration would be awesome.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoyadonis (talk • contribs) 21:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

==Edit

Hi, I'm a huge RAVENS fan. Can I request that you do one for the Baltimore RAVENS? Please! I would appreciate it greatly. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.76.113.13 (talk) 22:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Can you help me tagging these files?Edit

Hi, Fma12. I was wondering if you don't mind nominating these files for deletion. Derivative works of trophies awarded by FIFA and therefore copyrighted (FIFA Confederations Cup, U-17, U-20, World Cup).

File:Messi trofeo infantil 1992.jpgEdit

 
File:Messi trofeo infantil 1992.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BevinKacon (talk) 07:22, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Football trophies depictionsEdit

Why didn't you warn the uploaders of the deleted files when you opened the deletion request? --Horcrux (talk) 08:33, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Some of the files had been uploaded by you? By the way, I don't remember having warned you about it, but I'll take into account for future DR. - Fma12 (talk) 22:58, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Yes they have. Also, you also shoud use template {{Reply to}} if you write in your talk page, otherwise your interlocutor is not informed about your answer. --Horcrux (talk) 09:56, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
It doesn't matter whether they were uploaded by Horcrux or not. You are required to inform the uploaders of files you list on a DR. Storkk (talk) 10:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Well, @Horcrux:, if we are talking about what we "should know", please take a look at Commons:Derivative works to know why I nominated the files, instead of complaining to administrators. The article cited serves as a good guide to avoid uploading renditions of copyrighted trophies that will be invariable nominated here.
Moreover, you mentioned me in the re-opened DR without using the {{Reply to}} template and you should have done that so I was the person who nominated those files. Anyway, I left my feedback there supporting my original position. - Fma12 (talk) 12:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

No such thingEdit

The Australia national rugby union team do not have any aircraft as implied by Category:Airbus of Australia national rugby union team. Also the sponsor (Qantas) that feature the Wallabies "livery" are on Boeing aircraft but even then "Boeing of Australia national rugby union team" would also be totally wrong as per above. Bidgee (talk) 05:34, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@Bidgee: According to what you explained above, any suggestion for a name? I consider those images should be categorized, maybe "Sponsorship of Australia national...." or something more accurate. – Fma12 (talk) 10:50, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

File:El grafico 3084.jpgEdit

 
File:El grafico 3084.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Sports uniforms with non-free logosEdit

I've noticed you have uploaded quite a few. Enwiki has gone bonkers with their 0.1 megapixel rule that clearly makes no sense whatsoever for sports uniforms, having no respect for the spirit of the rule and rather enforcing the letter.

I opposed it for a uniform I had transferred from Commons, tagging it as do-not-resize resulting in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 August 26#File:Washington Redskins uniforms.png. Despite there being no consensus or even any really valid argument Jo-Jo Eumerus deleted it anyway. Apparently, the only outcome of ffd is "keep" or "delete", it's somehow impossible to just scale it down again.

I've worked a bit on a solution for this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Washington_Redskins&oldid=857417660. When you click most of the image, the media viewer will open with the higher resolution Commons image without logos. When you click the top part, it will show the low resolution fair use image from enwiki. If copyrightable elements would appear in the center of the image, this can still be done but the media viewer will be disabled and instead it will link to the file page of the higher resolution image.

Some uniforms that are still on Commons may be deleted in the future. So what do you think? Good idea, or would it be better to just stick to the low resolution fair use images on enwiki? Or censor the logos on Commons and forget about fair use? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Alexis, I really appreciate your efforts to make my Redskins uniforms suitable for Commons, but in fact, the patch "copyrighted logo" is awful (certainly, nothing aesthetically). Therefore, the best solucion I can find is to keep the small version in the article, with no links to the "patched" Commons version. Unfortunately, we have to obey the rules in this case.
Regarding your question, I think that the best solucion is to replace the current Redskins uniform (Commons) with a new version, without logos or patches. I'll take over on this, editing the image with Photoshop. Thanks again. - Fma12 (talk) 22:13, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
My concern with that was that some might consider a uniform without logos to be inaccurate (I've been called Stalin before..). Blurring would also be ugly without indicating why something was blurred. I could also recolor the patches to better match the uniform so they don't stand out as much. But I'm no expert when it comes to uniforms, so if you think it's better (and historically acceptable) to simply remove them I'm okay with that too. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:40, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Yalmakan.jpgEdit

Hola, veo que nominó la imagen para su eliminación, pero si se fija no es la misma de la página de Facebook. No es el mismo color ni tampoco la misma forma del balón. Espero su respuesta, saludos.Diegodiez03 (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Hola, @Diegodiez03:, yo no nominé esa imagen para eliminación, sino el usuario @ShakespeareFan00: (de acuerdo a lo que figura en el deletion request correspondiente). Puede dirigirse a él para hacerle llegar sus inquietudes. Saludos. - Fma12 (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Saccardi ferro.jpgEdit

 
File:Saccardi ferro.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not in the public domain in the United States.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Saccardi playing.jpgEdit

 
File:Saccardi playing.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not in the public domain in the United States.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Marcico arg 1983.jpgEdit

 
File:Marcico arg 1983.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not in the public domain in the United States.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Marcico ferro.jpgEdit

 
File:Marcico ferro.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not in the public domain in the United States.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Central cordoba campeon.jpgEdit

 
File:Central cordoba campeon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Cacho saccardi.jpgEdit

 
File:Cacho saccardi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:26, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Latest filesEdit

Following your remark perhaps you should reply to my mass deletion request... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

When I have enough time, be sure I will reply to your mass deletion request... Meanwhile, I was replying your most recent DR. - Fma12 (talk) 15:55, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Rowdies Two Stars.pngEdit

 
File:Rowdies Two Stars.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

IagoQnsi (talk) 16:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Farmdrop logo.pngEdit

 
File:Farmdrop logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:40, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Tottenham hotspur 1901.jpgEdit

 
File:Tottenham hotspur 1901.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Author of photograph identified, copyright does not lapse in the UK until 2024
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hzh (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Animal card fox godfrey.jpgEdit

 
File:Animal card fox godfrey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Celtics champions 1959.jpgEdit

 
File:Celtics champions 1959.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Celtics team 1961-62.jpgEdit

 
File:Celtics team 1961-62.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Celtics 1961 champs.jpgEdit

 
File:Celtics 1961 champs.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:54, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Escudo IndependienteEdit

Hola,

Como estas? Te escribia por el escudo de Independiente que subiste. Soy el Director de Arte del club y estoy tratando de ordenar un poco todo el contenido incorrecto que vengo encontrando. Por favor si podes borrar esos escudos que subiste ya que no son los oficiales te lo agradeceria.

Muchas gracias, saludos,

Martín Laksman

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlaksman (talk • contribs) 21:10, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Hola, @Mlaksman:, te comento, no soy administrador en Commons y por lo tanto no puedo borrar el escudo. De todos modos, los escudos viejos o históricos no se borran (a menos que sean infracciones de copyright) sino que quedan archivados porque son parte de la historia del/los club/es y se los utiliza (por ej) para reseñas históricas en las respectivos artículos de wikipedia, por ej mostrar la evolución de un emblema a través de los años.
Además, dejé mi punto de vista en la página de discusión donde solicitás el borrado.
Cualquier consulta, a tu disposición, saludos!, Fernando - Fma12 (talk) 03:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Hola, es que el escudo que subiste no es histórico. Simplemente está mal, no es el correcto por lo tanto infringe el copyright. Saludos.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlaksman (talk • contribs) 16:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
@Mlaksman: Hola, te soy sincero, no recuerdo de dónde saqué ese escudo, lo subí hace muchos años; pero por lo que veo, no difiere mucho del que subiste vos recientemente. Aclaración: "infringir el copyright" es otro concepto. Saludos, - Fma12 (talk) 00:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

@Fma12: Hola, que se entienda, no es nada en contra tuya, pero si le hace mal al club que haya escudos truchos dando vueltas por páginas de referencia como esta. Sacado de wiki: "Una infracción de derechos de autor, infracción de copyright o violación de copyright es un uso no autorizado o prohibido de obras cubiertas por las leyes de derechos de autor, como el derecho de copia, de reproducción o el de hacer obras derivadas."

"no difiere mucho" Con que difiera minimamente, es un montón y está incorrecto. Subiste un logo/escudo anómalo de una marca registrada sin permiso de la institución.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlaksman (talk • contribs) 11:18, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
@Mlaksman: Hola, te lo comento claramente para ir cerrando el tema, porque ya siento que aunque vos no lo digas explícitamente, me hacés responsable a mí de algo que claramente no me concierne y por momentos parece un ataque personal:
1) Cuando subí este escudo en 2012, mi referencia fue el sitio web de Independiente, ese mismo que vos decís representar en su concepto de marca e imagen. Jamás hice ni hago algo de mala fe, pero no todos los colaboradores de Commons trabajan en deptos. de marketing / imagen ni todos los clubes tienen una sección en su web como Independiente, detallando tan precisamente la marca de identidad, como para saber el color de Pantone exacto de un escudo por ej, o si debe ir sobre fondo negro, verde o amarillo.
2) Cita tuya: "Subiste un logo/escudo anómalo de una marca registrada sin permiso de la institución.". ERROR. Subí el escudo que estaba vigente en ese momento (tomando como referencia visual el sitio web oficial en aquel momento). Éste y gran cantidad de escudos de fútbol están permitidos en Commons a partir del llamado "Umbral de originalidad o threshold of originality, donde se detalla que los logos que no superen cierto patrón mínimo de originalidad, pueden subirse libremente y no requieren permiso alguno de la institución o parte creadora.
3) Te comento porque seguramente no lo sabés, que a partir de lo enunciado en el punto 2, he hecho montones de deletion requests para borrar escudos de Independiente subidos aquí que SI infringían el copyright por tener la originalidad suficiente para no ser una "imagen libre". Por ej, éste.
A manera ilustrativa, te comento que también subí el escudo oficial de Boca Juniors en 2012 y cuando éste se modificó levemente en 2016, no recibí ningún mensaje del Depto. de Imagen del club intimándome a que lo quitara o reemplazara. De haber sido así, le hubiera respondido lo mismo. (de hecho, subí también esa versión posteriormente).
3) En Category:Independiente logos podrás encontrar la cantidad y variedad de logos sobre el club. Todos están subidos (entiendo) de buena fe por los usuarios, son logos históricos y seguramente habrá diferencias con respecto a la versión oficial de la web actual. ¿Eso amerita borrarlos? No.
De aquí en más, podés proceder como quieras, pero lo que no voy a aceptar es que me hagas partícipe y/o responsable de un delito (distribución ilegal de la marca) que no existe como tal, por las razones que te expliqué arriba. Ah, y para finalizar y siendo desconfiado como soy: este es un sitio web donde muchos dicen ser representantes o dueños de tal o cual marca para justificar sus intervenciones. A pesar de no saber si realmente trabajás en Independiente o sos un simple usuario indignado, me tomo tiempo para responderte y explicarte cómo funciona Commons y sus políticas. Si seguís con los ataques personales, no seré tan "amable" de aquí en más. - Fma12 (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

@Fma12: ok, dale. Para nada son ataques. Lo siento que lo hayas sentido de así, una pena que no lo hayas entendido de la manera en la que fue intencionado. Mlaksman (talk) 13:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Mlaksman

File:Escudo del Club Atlético Independiente.svgEdit

 
File:Escudo del Club Atlético Independiente.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mlaksman (talk) 23:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Bilardo pasculli mexico.jpgEdit

 
File:Bilardo pasculli mexico.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:31, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:La anonima logo.svgEdit

 
File:La anonima logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Rogers drums logo.pngEdit

 
File:Rogers drums logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Acajenka (talk) 22:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Warrnambool fnc logo.pngEdit

 
File:Warrnambool fnc logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

大诺史 (talk) 03:44, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Fma12".