If you wish, you can talk to me here. All the best, Fracqua 07:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Euclids1_def2.png

edit

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 09:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Siebrand, hope I did what you expected. Thanks for your advice --Fracqua 14:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:EuclidesB1T9.png

edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:EuclidesB1T9.png. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Jusjih 22:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jusjih, the drawing was made by a pupil of mine to be put here [1]. No web site will defend our position, therefore delete it if you must or tell me what you think I could do. (by the way my pupil is proud of his work and I would actually like his name to be appear but I wouldn't know where). Thanks for your work --82.58.158.21 17:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Ooops I forgot to log in --Fracqua 17:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
First, is Nicolò Tartaglia the pupil of yours who drew it? Is so, why is the date 1546? Unless your pupil has died for more than 70 years, it cannot be PD-old. This is why the claimed license is questionable while I cannot find it on your claimed source site. I prefer not to delete the image, but if your pupil can use email, please have him/her email to permissions-commons at wikimedia dot org to confirm the authorship.--Jusjih 01:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
First, is Nicolò Tartaglia the pupil of yours who drew it? Of course not: Tartaglia is the italian mathematician who translated Euclid Elements from greek into italian in those days and whose instruction my pupil (Mattia Berto) has followed to draw the graph. it cannot be PD-old, but it cannot be PD-self either. I will, as you suggest, try to make him activate an e-mail addresse in spite of the fact that he has no PC at home and we don't use e-mails at school. I'll keep you informed. In the meanwhile ciao!--Fracqua 11:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
is it better now?--Fracqua 17:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Nicolò Tartaglia died in 1557. If your submitted work was his, then it is PD-old.--Jusjih 03:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

The instructions are Tartaglia's but the drawing is Mattia's. Do as you wish, Jusjih, it'll be fine for us.--Fracqua 13:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Based on your statement, I consider faithful modern redrawing of a very ancient work not making new copyright, hence making a better image description and withdrawing my no-permission tagging, but who is bebo1991 anyway?--Jusjih 01:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your corrections on the drawing: I was getting confused by now. Bebo1991 is my pupil's nick name who just registered in Commons. Do you think it would it be fair to write a note in the talk page of the drawing saying that he is the one who redrew the picture? --Fracqua 16:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it would be fair to write a note in the talk page.--Jusjih 01:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed

edit

20:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

edit

03:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)