Open main menu

User talk:G-13114

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, G-13114!

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, you can now share images from Flickr using the UploadWizard, batch-upload up to 500 files with UploadWizard instead of 50, move up to 32 pages per minute instead of 8, and upload freely licensed audio files in the MP3 format. Thank you. INeverCry 20:39, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Birmingham Cross-City Line diagramEdit

Hi - I've increased the size of the font for File:Birmingham Cross-City Line.png, and also increased the resolution, and made a couple of other tweaks, such as including the Lifford Curve at Kings Norton. Are there any other improvements you feel could be included? Optimist on the run (talk) 12:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Well, I think the text for the stations could still be slightly larger or bolder still, and also the dotted line section to Bromsgrove says 'proposed extensions' when the extension is already approved and under construction, so it should say something like 'future extension', but apart from that it's fine. G-13114 (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Resizing of File:Resting Between Duties.jpgEdit

I notice you've uploaded a higher-resolution version of File:Resting Between Duties.jpg. Did you generate that simply by scaling up the original 640 × 422 version? If so, what benefit does that give to compensate for the extra layer of JPEG compression artefacts? --bjh21 (talk) 17:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello again. I see that you've also uploaded a higher-resolution version of File:Nuneaton Marketplace - - 878155.jpg. I have the same questions in this case. --bjh21 (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Can you please stop stalking me, thank you. G-13114 (talk) 18:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry. I shan't post on your talk page again. --bjh21 (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Starboard view of a White Star Line passenger steamship, probably SS CERAMIC, at sea (6897784886) (crop).jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Starboard view of a White Star Line passenger steamship, probably SS CERAMIC, at sea (6897784886) (crop).jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Starboard view of a White Star Line passenger steamship, probably SS CERAMIC, at sea (6897784886) (crop).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 08:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

It wouldn't allow me to use the licence from the original file for some reason. G-13114 (talk) 08:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


I removed the district category because its redundant with Category:Bedworth similar to the fact that Category:Norton Mandeville isn't also in Category:Epping Forest District because Category:High Ongar is there, see COM:OVERCAT. See also User talk:Skinsmoke#Wirral Urban District where it was agreed that it shouldn't be classified as an unparished area in its own right (although both Bedworth and Bulkington will probably become parishes soon). Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:50, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Hmm, I would argue Bulkington has enough of a separate identity to be classified separately, it's physically separate from Bedworth, the fact that it was formerly in an urban district which was abolished 45 years ago doesn't really change that. G-13114 (talk) 20:12, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "G-13114".