TUSC token 70dfd90b6e52c9080a8e30c0dd592336Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! 70dfd90b6e52c9080a8e30c0dd592336 Geo Swan (talk) 01:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:The foredeck of the Joseph Gerczak mounts its main armament, a remotely controlled, gyrostabilized, 25mm autocannon -b.jpgEdit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Caroline-mulroney-1.pngEdit

 
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Caroline-mulroney-1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Soulspinr (talk) 20:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

  • Odd. @Soulspinr:, I didn't upload this image. I nominated it for deletion, over a concern it required OTRS... Geo Swan (talk) 23:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chris Troutman (talk) 00:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:IED timers that use Casio F-91WEdit

It isn't clear to me who authored the document that contains these photos. You state that it is a US Department of Defense employee, but I see no indication of that on the document. Can you provide any more information about the source? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:09, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Al Qaida watch timer 05706 -a.jpgEdit

 
File:Al Qaida watch timer 05706 -a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Aerial view of the Pentagon shortly after the attack on 2001-9-11.pngEdit

 
File:Aerial view of the Pentagon shortly after the attack on 2001-9-11.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

World's Lamest Critic (talk) 19:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:US Boy Scouts at an event hosted by the DoD.pngEdit

 
File:US Boy Scouts at an event hosted by the DoD.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

World's Lamest Critic (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

A requestEdit

Perhaps you might consider not uploading any more images extracted from those Guardian PDFs unless they are clearly marked as the work of military or government personnel? Thanks. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 19:26, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Generally, I don't find it praiseworthy to spend one's time uploading a bunch of content from gov't sources just because you might believe it to be PD. Helping article editors get images to support their text is useful. Downloading from gov't websites and uploading to Commons is wasteful, in my opinion, if not foolish. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Image from page 67 of "Coast watch" (1979) (20473798929).jpgEdit

 
File:Image from page 67 of "Coast watch" (1979) (20473798929).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

File:U. S. Coast Guard- Small Cutters and Patrol Boats 1915 - 2012.pdfEdit

 
File:U. S. Coast Guard- Small Cutters and Patrol Boats 1915 - 2012.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Another requestEdit

Perhaps you could be more careful that what you upload is really not protected by copyright. That would save some work for other editors. And it would mean fewer deletion requests for you to deal with. Thanks! World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:U. S. Coast Guard- Small Cutters and Patrol Boats 1915 - 2012.pdfEdit

Copyright status: File:U. S. Coast Guard- Small Cutters and Patrol Boats 1915 - 2012.pdf

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:U. S. Coast Guard- Small Cutters and Patrol Boats 1915 - 2012.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Please watch what you sayEdit

If you are going to accuse me of being a "sockpuppetmaster" or "dedicated to violating our policies" you should do it privately. And it was the New York Times that "outed" your friend Joshua Boyle. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Despite my request, you seem intent on misrepresenting my words where I am currently unable to respond. Because of our communications difficulties, I wondered if you had a spectrum disorder, in which case I would change how I attempted to communicate with you. To call this "a mental illness" is insulting to people with those conditions. I suggest you revise your statement. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
  • A bullshit claim. Your faux helpful suggestion that I had a mental disorder was very clearly obviously a personal attack, and nothing more. I am under no obligation to take your very very late faux apology at face value. Geo Swan (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Sexy Librarian (4406073036).jpgEdit

 
File:Sexy Librarian (4406073036).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:05, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Palau Maritime Police vessel.jpgEdit

What part of "U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Byron C. Linder/Released" made you think this was a Coast Guard image? If you continue to make such errors, expect me to continue checking your contributions. Please correct the license. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:38, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Guantanamo_captivesEdit

 

Guantanamo captives has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 16:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Sexy Librarian (4406073036).jpgEdit

 
File:Sexy Librarian (4406073036).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Please watch what you say (a friendly reminder)Edit

Geo Swan, based on your remarks here, perhaps it will helpful for you to see this sockpuppetry investigation. If I had any other accounts, they would have been discovered at that time. Nor am I the person harassing you via Toronto-based IPs. Nor am I harassing J.C. Maçek III (or anyone else) via IPs.

Allow me to repeat my earlier advice - stick to boats. You are likely to end up blocked yourself if you continue to use poor judgment on articles pertaining to living people. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Note to third parties... World's Lamest Critic was wikistalking me on enwiki, until they were indefinitely blocked for outing wikipedia contributors real world identities. Their wikistalking of me included multiple instances of what they characterized as "friendly advice" -- including the "friendly advice" that they thought I should check out a mental illness they thought I had. Geo Swan (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Geo Swan, I did not suggest you had a mental illness or that anyone should "check out" anything (whatever you mean by that). I have previously clarified this. Equating autism spectrum disorders with mental illness is insulting. You really should stop doing that. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Four uninvolved third parties told WLC that their comments were an insult at Wikipedia talk:No personal attacks [1]. WLC's exact comment was "I don't mean this in an insulting way, but do you happen to have a spectrum disorder? It may explain some of our communication difficulties." 23:56, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Allow me to apologize for linking spectrum disorder when I should have instead linked Autism spectrum. My mistake. It was a genuine attempt to understand our communications difficulties at the time. I was willing to change how I was communicating with you if it would help. I have apologized for this, although it was not intended to be insulting and I continue to believe it is not an insulting question. I will not apologize again. You seem to be fixated on this. That's fine, but you insist on referring to people on the Autism spectrum as having a mental illness. They do not. Please stop making that inference. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 01:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  • WLC's apology is not accepted.
WLC made these cracks about mental health as a shameful rhetorical ploy to avoid addressing civil policy-based attempts to have a meaningful dialogue.
To any third party readers, in the message above WLC asserts "I have apologized for this" -- implying they had offered an apology on an earlier occasion. That is just not true, not even close. Up until the insincere apology immediately above WLC was totally unrepentant, as the discussion at at Wikipedia talk:No personal attacks [2] makes clear. Geo Swan (talk) 09:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Geo Swan, I have absolutely nothing to gain from lying about my motivation for asking the question. I give up. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 14:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  • To Geo Swan and all interested third parties, World's Lamest Critic is Wikistalking me again as you can see here. And falsely accusing me of being someone I am not. Isn't there something that can be done about someone who obsessively follows others around Wikipedia? This person just needs to learn to leave others on Wikipedia alone. Neptune's Trident —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2606:6000:E7C2:E500:E402:F6E1:1805:1926 (talk) 00:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
If you are User:Neptune's Trident, why aren't you using your account? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

An easy questionEdit

In the past, I have encouraged you to stick to articles about boats because of your lack of judgment when it comes to articles about living people. Perhaps that was not good advice. You have added two images to en:Fireboat Tiburon, an article you created about a specific boat: File:20071017 Tiburon fire boat.jpg and File:Tiburon Fire Department fireboat fights a fire on Angel Island, near San Francisco, 2008-10-13.jpg. Do these look like the same boat to you? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

For the record, the IP that undid your edit wasn't me. I don't know which boat is the right one. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Senior Navy SEAL Joseph John Schmidt.jpgEdit

 
File:Senior Navy SEAL Joseph John Schmidt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:A_Heritage_fire_engine_in_Toronto_helps_inform_and_entertain_the_public_on_2015_08_06Edit

 

Category:A_Heritage_fire_engine_in_Toronto_helps_inform_and_entertain_the_public_on_2015_08_06 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


grendel|khan 16:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Joseph_John_Schmidt_IIIEdit

 

Joseph John Schmidt III has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sanandros (talk) 04:13, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Linda Jarmer, the granddaughter of John McCormick and the sponsor of the USCGC John McCormick .jpgEdit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

"Chicago, murder capital of the USA"Edit

Geo Swan, Chicago is not the "murder capital of the USA". In fact, it isn't even close, either by number or by rate. I understand why you might think that, though, since it is often misrepresented as such for political reasons. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 14:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Muhammad Kazim Allahyar, Ghazni.jpgEdit

 
File:Muhammad Kazim Allahyar, Ghazni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shxahxh (talk) 18:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Muhammad Kazim Allahyar, Ghazni.jpgEdit

 
File:Muhammad Kazim Allahyar, Ghazni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:21, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Intellectual property in AfghanistanEdit

Hello. Following your inquiry about the current status of intellectual property in Afghanistan, I would like to inform you that the Parliament of Afghanistan passed a modern copyright law in 2008 [3]. Furthermore, Afghanistan has copyright relations with the United States since at least December 2017 [4] [5], and the country became a member of the Bern Union since 2 June 2018 [6].

Regarding your writings at the Village Pump about progress, I would like to say that I think joining international conventions has nothing to do with progress. I am an Iranian national. Iran is not a member of any international copyright conventions. While I very much like that my country joins the Berne Union and I actively campaign for it, I can understand why many people (including elites and intellectuals) oppose joining such agreements. They argue that we would be basically a copyright-importing country. Thus, we should pay high royalties to British, American and other Western publishers to obtain their permission, while we have virtually no products of our own to export. They argue that Westerners have colonized Eastern nations and have progressed through "plundering our riches." Now it is our turn to translate their valuable books and publications without paying a penny, and make progress at their expense. The debate is, of course, much more complicated, but it comes down to what I just said. Regards 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

File:The Point Purakanui Inlet Blueskin Bay Otago New Zeand.jpgEdit

 
File:The Point Purakanui Inlet Blueskin Bay Otago New Zeand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:26, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:USS Sea Fox crew visit the USCGC Sea Fox - 170830-N-EH218-139.jpgEdit

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:36, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

holaEdit

My user talk page, my rules...

  1. I don't excise vandalism, I disarm it, so it ends up in my archives.
  2. My user talk page, my rules. Most recent comments go at the end.
  3. The image added here is a closeup of a pair of pierced privates, apparently about to engage in coitus. Geo Swan (talk) 02:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Comment from 2605:8D80:462:DEB7:5DFF:E6DF:4605:A16F
File:JJ and TJ about to have sex.jpg this picture is dirty. please remove. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2605:8D80:462:DEB7:5DFF:E6DF:4605:A16F (talk) 21:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Air New Zealand - Boeing 767-200 (50445555591).jpgEdit

 
File:Air New Zealand - Boeing 767-200 (50445555591).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Migebert (talk) 11:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Continental Airlines - Boeing 747 (50516542341).jpgEdit

 
File:Continental Airlines - Boeing 747 (50516542341).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Migebert (talk) 12:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Ghana Airways - McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30 (50423291212).jpgEdit

 
File:Ghana Airways - McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30 (50423291212).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Migebert (talk) 17:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:McComb_MansionEdit

 

McComb Mansion has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 13:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Norman Robinson (right) and three other soldiers - N-2002-005-0001 141.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Norman Robinson (right) and three other soldiers - N-2002-005-0001 141.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Norman Robinson (right) and three other soldiers - N-2002-005-0001 141.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:06, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Dominion Governement steamer Kestrel as regatta flagship in English Bay.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Dominion Governement steamer Kestrel as regatta flagship in English Bay.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dominion Governement steamer Kestrel as regatta flagship in English Bay.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Captain Marvel First Set Photos Leak Out! (39187315394).jpgEdit

 
File:Captain Marvel First Set Photos Leak Out! (39187315394).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Brie Larson - Captain Marvel (48707649951).jpgEdit

 
File:Brie Larson - Captain Marvel (48707649951).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Karyn Edwards at a CFC event in L.A. 2018 (40065287315).jpgEdit

 
File:Karyn Edwards at a CFC event in L.A. 2018 (40065287315).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:54, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Rouen,_FranceEdit

 

Rouen, France has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 09:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Portland,_JamaicaEdit

 

Portland, Jamaica has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 09:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 14:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Military_Imams_at_the_Guantanamo_Bay_Naval_BaseEdit

 

Military Imams at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Saif_Ul_IslamEdit

 

Saif Ul Islam has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 18:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Dan Trotta at the Gale Anne Hurd Masterclass (6829984489).jpgEdit

 
File:Dan Trotta at the Gale Anne Hurd Masterclass (6829984489).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Imissdisco (talk) 16:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Jeremy Boxen at the Gale Anne Hurd Masterclass (6829984489).jpgEdit

 
File:Jeremy Boxen at the Gale Anne Hurd Masterclass (6829984489).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liz (talk) 20:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Bryan Atkinson at the CFC 25th Anniversary Celebration in LA.jpgEdit

 
File:Bryan Atkinson at the CFC 25th Anniversary Celebration in LA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 18:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:Saint_Boniface,_ManitobaEdit

 

Saint Boniface, Manitoba has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 21:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!Edit

  Thanks for the help! the speedy deletion was bullshit so i didnt bother contesting.

as for the cat and the images, i have to say sorry. i thought i had seen a photo of this anita lee on commons so i changed it, but then i realised there is currently no free image available. the two photos i moved were another anita lee who's a producer for NFB Canada. i cant pinpoint her in wikidata so i have not created another cat for her. RZuo (talk) 21:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Can you please explain your blockEdit

You need to explain yourself to the commons and greater Wiki community. Since you have been blocked at english Wikipedia we can apply your logic regarding blocks: any BLP image posted to commons should be deleted as clearly you can't be trusted! —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2607:FEA8:2D20:10CE:4D9C:D340:C7B5:6393 (talk) 12:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:87j317 supplement 3 K&I Bridge diagram from Corps of Engineers, 1935 (8178969309).jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:87j317 supplement 3 K&I Bridge diagram from Corps of Engineers, 1935 (8178969309).jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:87j317 supplement 3 K&I Bridge diagram from Corps of Engineers, 1935 (8178969309).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

File:HABs Maumee River 2017 (37078163120).jpgEdit

 
File:HABs Maumee River 2017 (37078163120).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Canada - Nunavut - Jeopardy.jpgEdit

 
File:Canada - Nunavut - Jeopardy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Akeosnhaoe (talk) 12:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Lake Erie HABs Aug 2017 (36320334350).jpgEdit

 
File:Lake Erie HABs Aug 2017 (36320334350).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Screenshot from Google Earth, not NOAA works
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Caledon Township, Peel County, Ontario, 1880.jpgEdit

 
File:Caledon Township, Peel County, Ontario, 1880.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Region of Peel Archives (talk) 17:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Albion Township, Peel County, Ontario, 1880.jpgEdit

 
File:Albion Township, Peel County, Ontario, 1880.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Region of Peel Archives (talk) 17:32, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:USCG and Tunisian patrol vessels - 210421-G-HO001-751.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:USCG and Tunisian patrol vessels - 210421-G-HO001-751.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:USCG and Tunisian patrol vessels - 210421-G-HO001-751.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burning container ship Hyundai Fortune yemin-ship-76682.jpgEdit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Burning container ship Hyundai Fortune yemin-ship-76682.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own or work which is your own but has been previously published.

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Burning container ship Hyundai Fortune yemin-ship-76682.jpgEdit

 
File:Burning container ship Hyundai Fortune yemin-ship-76682.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Tuválkin 22:46, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Metro (4304391541).jpgEdit

 
File:Metro (4304391541).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutlass (talk) 14:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Culos (3508711332).jpgEdit

 
File:Culos (3508711332).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 19:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Depois de 5 Km de caminhada (4245801293).jpgEdit

 
File:Depois de 5 Km de caminhada (4245801293).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 20:00, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Graders? Road graders?Edit

May I ask, what is the difference between Category:Graders and Category:Road graders?--Kai3952 (talk) 13:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

  • I am not really an expert in earth moving machinery, although Category:Road graders is far from the first category I started. Having said that, it is my impression that only some graders are used to prepare roads, and that they may be used in other context, including open-pit mining.
  • Did you see I started that category eight years ago?
  • If you start a broader discussion please give me a heads-up. Geo Swan (talk) 23:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Well, I'm not an expert either, but at least I have the right to know what is the difference between grader and road grader. As far as I know I assume all road graders look no different in appearance from an ordinary grader. By contrast, if there is no difference in appearance between them, how do we know if the picture we see is "ordinary grader" or "road grader"?--Kai3952 (talk) 10:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:Photographs_from_John_Schaunlaub_in_August_2014Edit

 

Photographs from John Schaunlaub in August 2014 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Senator2029 13:55, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Karyn Edwards at a CFC event in L.A. 2018 (40065287315).jpgEdit

 
File:Karyn Edwards at a CFC event in L.A. 2018 (40065287315).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RootsCad (talk) 16:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:35, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Meu Super no Louvre (4655869621).jpgEdit

 
File:Meu Super no Louvre (4655869621).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Patrol vessels of VanuataEdit

Hi Geo Swan, is Category:Patrol vessels of Vanuata a mistake or is or is there a good reason it isn't Category:Patrol vessels of Vanuatu? Calistemon (talk) 12:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


File:Photo (2) (6313667889Zombie cosplay).jpgEdit

 
File:Photo (2) (6313667889Zombie cosplay).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Blur, unusable photo)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Smooth O.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Patrons can gamble in the Hooters in Las Vegas (854612848).jpgEdit

 
File:Patrons can gamble in the Hooters in Las Vegas (854612848).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Missvain (talk) 16:14, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Missvain (talk) 02:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Abu Hamza al-Masri.jpgEdit

 
File:Abu Hamza al-Masri.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiro Bassem (talk) 10:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Afghan billboard advertising voting, women voting, and soldiers.jpgEdit

 
File:Afghan billboard advertising voting, women voting, and soldiers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)