Open main menu

User talk:Globetrotter19

Andrássy Avenue 110 & 118Edit

I copide Category:Andrássy Avenue 110 and Category:Andrássy Avenue 118 to Category:Cultural heritage monuments on Andrássy Avenue because they were in Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Budapest District VI, but they are not in your list of monuments on the street (which I added to Category:Cultural heritage monuments on Andrássy Avenue). Should they be added to the list, or removed from the category? Thanks. - Themightyquill (talk) 06:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

It is right now. Here is a link (PDF) that (I told you before) it has contents all(?) of the district listed monument (started from page 20), first are stately level monuments next pages with local level protected buildings name and architects. Sadly no ID which pass to the
This is a photo of a monument in Hungary, Identifier:

, but it is ok for checking. Thanks. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Átjáró a vasúti híd alatt, Fő tér, 2018 Nagymaros.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Átjáró a vasúti híd alatt, Fő tér, 2018 Nagymaros.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Átjáró a vasúti híd alatt, Fő tér, 2018 Nagymaros.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

It's my work! I accidentally deleted the license! I corrected. Yours sincerely, - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:02, 5 May 2018 (UTC)


Szia! Megkérhetlek hogy a r.kethelyi templom képeit nevezd át Szentgotthárdról Rábakethelyre? Kértem már, de nem jártam eddig sikkerrel. Rakás (talk) 19:52, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Kész! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Láttad már?Edit

[1] Rakás (talk) 16:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Most már igen! Köszi. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:53, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Dezső BergerEdit

Hello! Are you sure, that Dezső Berger died in Mauthausen? Greetings from Lower Austria: --GT1976 (talk) 16:17, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

No! There are probably more than one Dezső Berger or similar like here Benedek (BERGER) Dezső. I just moved all file from Dezsö Berger category to Dezső Berger. Yours sincerely, - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Hegymagas, Lengyel kápolnaEdit

Szia! A kategóriában lévő képek a feltöltőjük szerin Nemesgulácson készültek, de amikor utánajártam,, kiderült, hogy a kápolna Hegymagason áll. Megtennéd, hogy átnevezed őket? Rakás (talk) 18:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Kodály körönd 1 vs Andrássy Avenue 87Edit

Maybe I'm confused, but aren't Category:Kodály körönd 1 and Category:Andrássy Avenue 87 the same building? Thanks. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:05, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Same address the pics are not same! But Kodály körönd 1 probably Andrássy Avenue 87/Benczúr u. 2?/Felsőerdősor utca GPS 47.509569, 19.070995, I gave Kodály körönd 1.-to the 'building pics with murals',-based [2]!, probably that was mistyped? So if You agree I will create a Category:Andrássy Avenue 88–90 (Kodály körönd 3) for those. Regards, - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:06, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

File:08052-Budapest-1906-Volkstheater-Brück & Sohn Kunstverlag.jpgEdit

Hi Globetrotter. You just wiped a whole lot of categories from this image with the comment "overcategorized". Can you amplify on that statement please. Many thanks, 09:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Eddaido. So I wrote overcategorized, and collect cats so buildings and postcard of theater and and streets all collected to category Postcards of Népszínház (Budapest)). Other cats Horses of Hungary and Horse-drawn carriages also simply overcats and ad column or tram is only 1% of the pic. Sincerely, - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

You understand I need to understand your reasons so I do not make the same mistake again. That's why I ask (again) Eddaido (talk) 10:08, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
It was not a mistake! It is true! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
1. I am sorry I still do not understand you. and 2. what does "and ad column or tram is only 1% of the pic" mean? Eddaido (talk) 10:14, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
It means becose the pics shows something... like window or people or tram but insignificant part of the pics only 1%, means we not categorized like window by city People by year or trams by city. I hope it was clear. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Ah, understood, agreed, content. My fully deployed ESP antennae are retracting as I type. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 10:26, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for categorising...Edit

...all the files that I dumped into Category:Budapest. I categorised some of them, but you are quicker. I also forgot to include Category:August 2017 in Budapest. I will try to be more careful next time! Triplecaña (talk) 13:45, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Most of description (and coords) was really excellent. So it was easy. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 13:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Laurus offices building BEdit

Thanks for taking a shot of the Laurus Offices! I took a look at the image you took, and it seems to be buuilding A.

When you have a chance, do you mind going back there and photographing Building B? I ask because that's where Wizz Air's head office is. There is a side view from the street, but if they allow a better view and/or if you see Wizz Air signage in the complex, that would be wonderful!

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 19:34, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

P.S., pinging @Fauvirt:, who was kind enough to point me to your photo of Building A. ---

Hello! So, it is a bit off to me (almost the other end of the city), but I try to remember your request next time when I visit this area. My idea there was a light problem which means even if I've made pictures,-from the other side,-probably all were overexponated and so I deleted them immediatly... other daytime or season (summer?) maybe will be more effective. Your sincerely, - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 20:06, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

MÁV 5341, Road 6213 level crossing, 2017 Pákozd–Dinnyés.jpgEdit

Szia! Csak megjegyzem, hogy a MÁV Stadler FLIRT-jei 2014 óta már nem az 5341-es, hanem a GYSEV járműveivel megegyezően 415-ös sorozatszámot viselik. Rakás (talk) 13:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Szia! Lehet tudni miért? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 20:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Már látom! A MÁV-os szerelvények teljes hosszának sorozatszáma korábban 5341 volt, 2014 tavasza óta a járműtípus számozása 415, míg a vonatrészek 1415, 2415, 3415 és 4415 számokat kapják. 'Szétszedték'! Értelme? (költői kérdés) - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 20:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Gondolom az egységes vonatszámozás miatt. De igazából nem értek hozzá. Rakás (talk) 21:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Erre mondtam, hogy költői kérdés. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 22:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Globetrotter19".