Open main menu

Contents

File:Grube Messel Cross Section (German).pngEdit

Hi, Gretarsson, thank you very much for your German translation. Grüße, --PePeEfe (talk) 08:25, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

¡De nada! Cheers! --6r3tar550n (talk) 20:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 01:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Steigerberg etc.Edit

Hallo Gretarsson, hab gedacht, da es Rhyolith ist, würde es sich um Tuff handeln. PS: Bist Du auch ein deutscher Island-Freund (Dein Name!)? Reykholt (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Dir ist aber schon klar, dass Rhyolith ein Lavagestein ist und dass das dazugehörige Tuffgestein explizit Rhyolith-Tuff heißt? Ja, mein Nick ist isländisch, ist aber eher Zufall. Ich hab eigentlich keine besondere Affinität zu Island oder Nordeuropa allgemein... --Gretarsson (talk) 13:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Blakey 500moll labelled.jpgEdit

 
File:Blakey 500moll labelled.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ketil Trout (<><!) 08:27, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Also File:Blakey 430moll labelled.jpg and File:Blakey 400moll labelled.jpg, as part of the same deletion request.—Ketil Trout (<><!) 08:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Teufelstisch Kreuzschichtung.jpgEdit

Hallo Gretarsson,
ich habe die Kategorie [[::Category:Buntsandstein|Buntsandstein]] aus dem Foto gelöscht weil die Kategorie Teufelstisch (Hinterweidenthal) eine Unterkategorie von Buntsandstein ist.
Meines Wissens sollen Bilder immer der untersten Kategorie zugeordnet werden und nicht gleichzeitig in einer übergeordneten.
Gruß, --F. Riedelio (talk) 19:03, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

OK, das hatte ich so nicht erwartet. Hab meinen Revert revertiert. Cheers! --Gretarsson (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover!Edit

 

Hi Gretarsson, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | 中文(臺灣) | +/−

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:17, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Aptychus Nomenklatur.pngEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 12:32, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Wow, that went fast. License is added now.   Done --Gretarsson (talk) 12:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

MudcracksEdit

I agree with the fact mudcrakcs are related to sedimetology, but in an undirect way, no more than theese. I removed that category because i'm actually trying to organize part of the matter eliminating the recursive sub-categories. (Mudcracks->Dried muds->Muds->Types of soil->Soils->Sedimentology; and also Mudcracks->Dried muds->Soil cracks->Soils->Sedimentology).--Ciaurlec (talk) 22:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

OK, I see the problem: Soils are erroneously categorized under Sedimentology because soils are subject of their own science, soil science, which has only slight overlap with sedimentology... --Gretarsson (talk) 23:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
As you suggest, for the moment "Mudcracks" could stay on category "Sedimentology" as a direct sub; surely the partial overlapping of sedimentology, geomorphology and soil science requires a less linear classifying system and more attention on classifying files. Thanks for your opinion. Good work and see you again. --Ciaurlec (talk) 22:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Kategorie Middle Ugab ValleyEdit

Danke für das Erstellen der neuen Kategorie: "Middle Ugab Valley" und das Verschieben der dazugehörigen Bilder ! Gruß --Olga Ernst (talk) 13:43, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

@Olga Ernst: Keine Ursache. Es scheint wirklich so zu sein, dass dem Namibia-Geotouristen die Gegend mit der Fingerklippe als das „Ugab Valley“ verkauft wird, aber ich hatte ja schon ausgeführt, warum das eine sehr unglückliche Namenswahl ist. Nun ist „Middle Ugab Valley“ auch nicht sehr viel glücklicher, verhindert aber hoffentlich, das keine Bilder vom Ugab River dort landen, die an anderen Stellen des tatsächlichen Ugab-Tals aufgenommen wurden, wie dieses hier, das am „Unterlauf“ aufgenommen wurde, ca. 150 km Luftlinie von der Vingerklip entfernt...
Was ich jetzt aber nicht verstehe ist, warum du jetzt deine Bilder von den Organ Pipes in die Kategorie Namib Desert gesteckt hast. Meines Wissens ist die Namib auf die Küstenebene beschränkt und reicht ausschließlich im Bereich der Sand Sea mehr als ein paar Dutzend Kilometer weit ins Landesinnere... --Gretarsson (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Gretarsson, habe gelesen dass sich die Namib Desert bis ca. 160 km ins Landesinnere erstreckt - deshalb fast überall noch "Namib Desert" dazugetan ! Wenn dies falsch ist nehme ich die Kategorie natürlich wieder raus ! --Olga Ernst (talk) 21:39, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Im Artikel Namib hatte ich diese 160 km gefunden. Stimmt das etwa nicht ? Gruß --Olga Ernst (talk) 08:46, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Naja, da steht „bis 160 Kilometer“, das gilt wohl nicht für den gesamten Küstenstreifen vom Namaqualand bis nach Angola... --Gretarsson (talk) 16:21, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Ich entferne deine Bilder daher erstmal wieder aus dieser Kategorie, und auch die übrigen Bilder in dieser Kategorie, die Basaltsäulen zeigen, für die (überdies) sämtliche geographische Angaben fehlen... --Gretarsson (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Ist in Ordnung so ! Danke für die Mühe ! Gruß und schönes Wochenende --Olga Ernst (talk) 17:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

remove CDATAEdit

In File:Ascendonanus_skull_reconstruction.svg as well as in File:PalZ_logo.svg the files contain useless CDATA-Elements, they should be removed before uploading.

In Template:Cdata/doc you can find some posibilites how to remove CDATA in SVG-files.

If you need any help please ask me.

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 17:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you you decreased the filesize of File:PalZ_logo.svg from 490kB to 2.6kB (0.0052 of original file) .  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Yes, this was truly “code overkill”. Think I should disable “preserve illustrator editing capability” when saving illustrator work as SVG... --Gretarsson (talk) 21:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:AptychiEdit

Hello,
Every taxon category (like Category:Aptychi) must be placed in its parent taxon category (like Category:Cephalopoda).
Category:Ammonoidea fossils is not a taxon category.
For information, Category:Ammonoidea fossils should contains only fossils pictures or Category:XXXX fossils, no taxon categories.
So Category:Aptychi should not be in Category:Ammonoidea fossils (because Category:Aptychi can contain mdeia that are not fossils, like reconstitutions, pdf...)
Regards Liné1 (talk) 17:14, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Aptychi is not a ‘normal’ taxon but a form taxon or parataxon of ammonoid fossils, hence it doesn't make much sense to put it in a ‘normal’ taxon category (the correct one of which btw would be Ammonoidea, not Cephalopoda). So Ammonoidea fossils IMHO is quite a good parent category for Aptychi... --Gretarsson (talk) 17:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Addendum: ... and ‘subclass Aptychi’ is plain nonsense. Where does this come from?! --Gretarsson (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Wildebeest bone bed (1).jpgEdit

The person in the image is the one who uploaded it. It was taken with her camera at her request. Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

I have replied on the deletion request page, which is the best place for this conversation/rationale. --Gretarsson (talk) 12:27, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Gretarsson".