Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gumruch!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

Please link imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello Gumruch!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


File:Charlotta_Garrigue_Masarykova_054.jpgEdit

File deletion warning File:Charlotta_Garrigue_Masarykova_054.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Miraceti (talk) 11:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


File:Charlotte_Garrigue_Masarykova_011.jpgEdit

File deletion warning File:Charlotte_Garrigue_Masarykova_011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Miraceti (talk) 11:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


File:Charlotta_Garrigue.jpgEdit

File deletion warning File:Charlotta_Garrigue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Miraceti (talk) 11:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


File:Olgoj.jpgEdit

 
File:Olgoj.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Mormegil (talk) 13:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


File:Blob_jako_politické_téma.jpgEdit

 
File:Blob_jako_politické_téma.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Huib talk 20:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Elviz_195123456789.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Elviz_195123456789.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Elviz_195123456789.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 18:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Street category namesEdit

Ahoj. Mám drobnou připomínku ke kategorii "Husova ulice (Semily)". Podle mého názoru je lépe do názvu kategorie dávat pouze to, co se v mapách používá jako označení ulice (tedy v tomto případě pouze slovo "Husova"). Mimo jiné se tím také vyhneme problému, zda ten dovětek psát česky nebo anglicky (t. j. zda "Husova Street" nebo "Husova ulice"). Jen výjimečně v některých městech používají třeba slovo "třída" jako pevnou součást názvu některé ulice. Jiný případ jsou náměstí, kde slovo "náměstí" je používáno jako neoddělitelná část označení a tedy jej nelze psát samotné, např. "Masarykovo". --ŠJů (talk) 22:41, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Při vytváření kategorie jsem hledal vzor a jednoznačný jsem nenašel. Co teď s tím, mám požádat o přesun kategorie? --Gumruch (talk) 22:46, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Když už je to založené, tak bych na změnu nespěchal. Řešil bych to teprve až těch kategorií bude v Semilech víc. Vzory bych hledal nejspíše v kategoriích velkých českých měst (ale v případě Prahy je to zase komplikované s tím, zda český název ulice kombinovat s anglickým názvem města). Žádat o přejmenování je vždycky riskantní: i proto, že hlavní roli v přejmenovávání kategorií má jistý Vlám, který má na používání českých vlastních jmen v názvech kategorií poněkud extrémní názory. --ŠJů (talk) 11:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

HolečkovaEdit

Ahoj. Mám drobnou připomínku. Pokud zakládáš kategorii pro nějakou ulici, tak si předtím orientačně ověř, jestli neexistují ulice téhož jména i v jiným městech (někdy je to jasné i bez ověřování) a pokud ano, tak kategorii založ rovnou i z rozlišovačem. Ušetříme si tím do budoucna zbytečně stěhování a předejdeme tak tomu, že by se v jedné kategorii smíchaly snímky z různých měst. Taky jsem to dříve nedělal, ale snad už nás vývoj poučil, že je dobré předvídat. --ŠJů (talk) 08:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Byl jsem na vážkách, protože některé ulice v Praze rozlišovač mají, jiné ne. Odvodil jsem, že jde o častost ulic – Plzeňská a Bratislavská budou jistě v každém druhém městě, Holečkových jen pár, takže tam by bez rozlišovače mohla být ta v hlavním městě. Ale od příště to tedy už budu dělat systematicky s rozlišovačem. Ahoj, Gumruch (talk) 08:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Tie betwen Reinhold Ewald and TintinEdit

Hallo Gumruch, where is a connection betwen Reinhold Ewald and Tintin? He's an astronaut. ;-) --Alkab (talk) 12:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Look at it—Ewald wears a necktie presenting a motive with Tintin and Snowy and their rocket. --Gumruch (talk) 12:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Mormegil (talk) 19:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obecní dům - Šalounova deska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sharp enough to be readable, useful. --Cayambe 19:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zdeněk Tůma - 12 června 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 19:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chodovský hřbitov - Emil Hadač.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jiří Všetečka - listopad 2009a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:57, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Václav Riedlbauch nad Prahou 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vincenc Makovský - Nový věk Praha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
tilt/distortion must be corrected --Mbdortmund 20:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)   Info Updated–tried to fix. --Gumruch 19:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC) not so bad, despite of the horrible background, not your fault. I think it's a QI.--Jebulon 22:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bohemia1590 1609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jiří Komorous duben 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good --AleXXw 06:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chodov - Václav Frydecký - Sova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Cayambe 17:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zora Jandová 2009a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good portrait. --Cayambe 14:27, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Bischofjoachimreinelt.jpgEdit

 
File:Bischofjoachimreinelt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 04:39, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lukáš Hurník 2010-11-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok. --kallerna 11:08, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Robert Reichel 2010-10-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok. --kallerna 11:08, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vojtěch Cepl.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Bo CarpelanEdit

Hallo, You nominated this photo:   for VI and after some research I tend to support. But, there is a rule every image to be geotagged. In other words, the camera coordinates should be shown. The description of the photo tells that this is in Helsinki but can you find more specifically where exactly in the city?--MrPanyGoff 07:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

OK, I have asked the author. Let’s hope he will geocode it. --Gumruch (talk) 08:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


Category:StampsEdit

Category discussion notification Category:Stamps has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bo Carpelan (1926–2011).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Altrimenti ci- arrabbiamo Spencer.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Altrimenti ci- arrabbiamo Spencer.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

High Contrast (talk) 20:03, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Please...Edit

Thank you for new download file:Ridec znak.jpg. Please sea of http://obecpaseka.cz Top left is a magnificent coat of arms for cs:Paseka (okres Olomouc). Unfortunately i can not upload it because. I did not address the source file in the source code of the website find. Maybe I'm too stupid. :) Can you help? Sorry --AHZ (talk) 21:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

You are right, the coat is a part of background, it can be only extracted from http://obecpaseka.cz/img/header1.jpg. Better place for finding Czech coats of arms is usually REKOS, see Paseka. Unfortunately over past few years they have inserted files of a poor quality, I guess they re-scan printed artwork sent from municipalities – see Řídeč. Sincerely --Gumruch (talk) 23:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
I thank you very much --AHZ (talk) 22:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

RE: svgcheckEdit

Thanks for your message. I have now looked at the issue again, and pinpointed the error - the use of custom entity references in the Doctype specification. Which is a stupid idea all around.

I shall add it to svgcheck shortly. Regards, Jarry1250 (talk) 12:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavel Vrba.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bořivoj Navrátil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Jan Palach and Jan Zajic RIP.JPGEdit

Hello Gumruch!

Thanks for your edit in in this image: you have added Category:Milada Horáková. My question: is Milada Horáková shown on the image between the Jan Palach and Jan Zajic? Thanks for your support. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 08:37, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes, it is a sticker with one of her famous photos (see here), text is imho readable: † 27. 6. 1950 Dr. Milada Horák–. I think the sticker was placed here for a long time (many months). Best regards, Gumruch (talk) 20:04, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for these interesting facts. I linked the portrait-sticker in the image accordingly. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

File:One_Million_Canadian_Dollar_Coin_-_2007.jpgEdit

 
File:One_Million_Canadian_Dollar_Coin_-_2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 10:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikihvězda za vektorizaciEdit

Jako poděkování za velkou pomoc při nahrávání SVG verzí znaků městských obvodů a místních částí ti uděluji tuto wikihvězdu za vektorizaci. :) --Ragimiri (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Český BrodEdit

Ahoj, k tomuto souboru bych měl pár připomínek: orlice by měla mít červené jazyky a zlaté pařáty, nikoliv černé a stříbrné. I ten lvíček je takový trochu podivný, i když z hlediska blasonování je to OK. Tak či onak, oficiální verze je zde, takže můžeš opravovat. :) --Ragimiri (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Altrimenti ci- arrabbiamo Spencer.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Altrimenti ci- arrabbiamo Spencer.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Altrimenti ci- arrabbiamo Spencer.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 in Czech RepublicEdit

Ahoj! Já jsem hned poprosil Podzemnika o přejmenování, na tuhle šablonu jsem zapomněl. Díky! Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 03:50, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Vlajka KarlínaEdit

Kdosi nechal sloučit tebou nahraný soubor File:Flag of Prague Karlín.svg (archiv) se Zirlandovým souborem File:Flag of Prague 7.svg, což mi nepřipadá jako dobrý nápad - to už by to rovnou mohli sloučit i s polskou vlajkou a s porevoluční českou vlajkou. Bohužel ani jeden z Vás jste neuvedli v infoboxu zdroj, odkud jste přišli na to, že zrovna takto by měla vypadat vlajka Karlína či Prahy 7, a do článků jsou tyto vlajky přidány také bez jakéhokoliv zdroje. Na webu Prahy 7 žádnou vlajku nevidím a vlajku či prapor Karlína se mi Googlem také nepodařilo najít. Admin, který oba obrázky sloučil, navíc zřejmě ani nevěděl, že Praha 7 je zcela jiná část Prahy než Karlín. A ke všemu na parlamentním webu přes léto stávkují a nefunguje jim REKOS. Mohl bys do situace vnést jasno? Dík. --ŠJů (talk) 19:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Ahoj, omlouvám se, jsem na počítači teď málo a hlavně nárazově. V knize o českých znacích jsem to teď nenašel (myslel jsem, jestli to tam nebylo zmíněno např. ve spojitosti s plachtou a praporkem na znaku), takže buď to byla informace odněkud z webu, nebo z nějaké vlastivědné knihy. Nicméně zařídím obnovení souboru, předpokládám, že jsem tam zdroj uvedl. REKOS už funguje na nové adrese (Praha 7), chci na naší Wiki i tady na Commons poprosit botovodiče o aktualizaci externích odkazů. Btw předpokládám, že v sobotu půjdeš na den otevřených dveří nafotit stanici metra Motol? :-) Gumruch (talk) 23:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Bohemia1590 1609.jpgEdit

Zdravím, nevíš o oné odkazované mapě (nahrané již v roce 2008) víc, než jsi uvedl? Je "dost podobná" Orteliově kopii Johanna Crigingera, jenže se poněkud odlišuje a trochu matoucí jsou i ty roky (jestli si dobře všímám, tak započínáš GLAM Mapová sbírka PřF UK, tak by se to v rámci mohlo lépe identifikovat - zvláště pokud se ti teď ta mapa válí v soukromé sbírce, jak "vyplývá" :-) ze současného popisu). S pozdravem --marv1N (talk) 15:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Ahoj, bohužel víc nevím a ta mapa z antikvariátu se teď válí ve sbírce někoho jiného, já ji jen skenoval. Ohledně digitalizace mapové sbírky je nejlepší se obracet na Gampeho, já jsem teď jen pasivní fanoušek GLAMu. Zdravím, Gumruch (talk) 18:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Tak nic. --marv1N (talk) 18:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Čestmír Šimáně.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Rocio Durcal 1.jpgEdit

 
File:Rocio Durcal 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LMLM (talk) 10:28, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

RelikviářeEdit

Ahoj, odstranil jsem Category:Roman Catholic shrines in the Czech Republic z Category:Reliquaries in the Czech Republic. Ne všechny relikviáře musejí být automaticky románské - možná to mělo být kategorizované s opačnou posloupností(?) nebo bude třeba kategorii románských relikviářů přiřadit konkrétním položkám, k nimž časově patří. --Xth-Floor (talk) 14:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

No tak to odstranění byla chyba, protože to znamená římskokatolické, což všechny budou; u protestantských církví nevím o tom, že by svaté uctívali a shromažďovali nějaké relikvie. Kategorizaci jsem udělal podle odbobné francouzské kategorie a logicky by měla být v nějaké „české“ kategorii, ne jen v kategorii „podle země“. Gumruch (talk) 18:59, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Aha, tak to jsem si špatně vyložil. Kategorii tedy vrátím, byť za předpokladu neexistence jiných než řimskokatolických relikviářů v ČR bude asi redundantní. Pěkný zbytek víkendu. --Xth-Floor (talk) 11:00, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Shakespeare Theatre Company's production of Pericles.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Shakespeare Theatre Company's production of Pericles.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 23:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

CopyviosEdit

Hi, when you report copyvios, please give the cause why they should be copyvios. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:57, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

OK, imho these are so obvious, I checked it using Google images tab. They are spread on the web so it is hard to find the original link. I did not find how to report massive copyvios from one user. Gumruch (talk) 15:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wikiEdit

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:08, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Béla Iványi-Grünwald - Kytice.jpgEdit

 
File:Béla Iványi-Grünwald - Kytice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Přejmenování kategorieEdit

Zdravím. Pokud přejmenováváš kategorii (ať už z jakéhokoliv důvodu) tak do původní kategorie vždy uváděj odkaz na novou kategorii, kam jsi obsah přestěhoval (buď jako měkké přesměrování, nebo do odůvodnění žádosti o smazání). Nejen že tím usnadníš mazajícímu správci orientaci v problému, ale zároveň mu pomůžeš, aby se odkaz na novou kategorii mohl objevit v mazacím logu, takže pokud v některých projektech zůstal odkaz na starý název, uživateli se zobrazí odkaz na aktuální kategorii. --ŠJů (talk) 16:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Já nic nepřesouval, to je spíš na Gortynu, já přišel k prázdné kategorii. Je to pár dnů stará kategorie s evidentním překlepem, tak jsem doufal, že zvenku není odnikud linkována. Jinak souhlasím. Gumruch (talk) 17:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Krobotova Krobot.JPGEdit

Ahoj! Zařazení fotky File:Krobotova Krobot.JPG do kategorie Category:Families of the Czech Republic považuji za trošku zavádějící, protože na snímku žádná rodina zobrazena není. Jsou tam dva příbuzní otec a dcera. Správněji by to asi mohlo být category:relatives či category:fathers and daughters, pokud by taková existovala... Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Pardon, existuje! rekategorizováno. --Gampe (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

OK, dík, třeba časem založím podkategorii pro české příbuzné/části rodin. Já osobně tedy takovouto kategorizaci, kdy jsou spolu vyfoceni encyklopedicky významní příbuzní, považuji za užitečnou. Gumruch (talk) 10:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


ŠotekEdit

Ahoj, díky za opravu šotka, i když Kvítková je taky hezké příjmení... :)--Kacir (talk) 02:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Velim CoA CZ.gifEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Velim CoA CZ.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Olga HavlováEdit

Zdravím, k tomuto smazání obrázku, nedošel mezitím do OTRS mail od Výboru dobré vůle - Nadace Olgy Havlové? Byl jsem s nimi v kontaktu, říkali, že to posílali (byť asi trochu později než by bylo vhodné). --Vojtěch Veselý (talk) 17:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Ahoj, nejsem členem OTRS týmu (zkus Podzemnika nebo Harolda), ale zřejmě ne. Nicméně pokud dojde dodatečně, správci jsou schopni soubor obnovit. Gumruch (talk) 20:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Já nevím, OTRS jsem poslední cca 2 týdny nesledoval a zrovna včera odpoledne jsem ukončil svoji tamní činnost, takže už tam přístup nemám. Jinak Podzemnik by členem OTRS měl pořád být, kromě toho je i správce tady na Commons, takže fotku může případně obnovit. --Harold (talk) 14:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:58, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:H Kvitka.gifEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:H Kvitka.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Statue Rocio Durcal.jpgEdit

 
File:Statue Rocio Durcal.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LMLM (talk) 05:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Statue Rocio Durcal.jpgEdit

 
File:Statue Rocio Durcal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LMLM (talk) 07:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Hram Vaskrsenja Hristovog u Karakaju, Zvornik.jpgEdit

 
File:Hram Vaskrsenja Hristovog u Karakaju, Zvornik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Surtsicna (talk) 10:39, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Hram Vaskrsenja Hristovog u Karakaju, Zvornik.jpgEdit

 
File:Hram Vaskrsenja Hristovog u Karakaju, Zvornik.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 18:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Hrob Martina FričeEdit

Pane kolego, pouze se zeptám: proč?--Alena Pokorná (talk) 21:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cristiano Donati - herec.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cristiano Donati - herec.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cristiano Donati - herec.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Hystrix (talk) 19:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Cristiano Donati - herec.jpgEdit

 
File:Cristiano Donati - herec.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hystrix (talk) 19:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Stanislav Kasík - podpis.jpgEdit

 
File:Stanislav Kasík - podpis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mates (talk) 21:36, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

RequestEdit

Hello,

In File:Dubbing films in Europe1.png and File:Dubbing in Europe 1.png, could you translate this new legend into Czech?

   Belgium: The Flemish speaking region occasionally produces its own dialect dubbing versions, otherwise solely subtitles. The French speaking region of Wallonia and the German speaking region of East Belgium use exclusively a full-cast dubbing, both for films and for TV series.

Yours sincerely, A2D2 (talk) 15:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Řazení jmen v kategorii dle příjmeníEdit

Dobrý den. Potřebuji portréty seřadit dle příjmení, kategorie se 400 portréty se stala málo přehledná. Připravuji si případné příští rozdělení do subkategorií. Vymazal jsem asi dvě zařazení People of Czechia..., protože jsem to považoval za umělou a nesmyslnou kategorii. I po zběžné kontrole podobných kategorií mi zcela uniká smysl jejich existence.--NoJin (talk) 20:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Jean Gabin Touchez Pas au Grisbi.jpgEdit

 
File:Jean Gabin Touchez Pas au Grisbi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

— Racconish 07:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Creator:Luděk KovářEdit

 
Creator:Luděk Kovář has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this creator, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

~Moheen (keep talking) 05:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Coat of arms of Bruntál.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coat of arms of Bruntál.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 06:38, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

File DeletionEdit

Hi Gumruch,

regarding this message. Can you please check the history of the deleted file, because I do not remember that I ever upoloaded this file. It's not my "line of work". Regards, Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 20:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

@Wo st 01: Hi, probably you reuploaded a cropped version of a file by another user and the system here informs all uploaders concerned. I am not an admin so I can not check it now. As I remember the source was http://www.kinghussein.gov.jo/images/bio_q-muna.jpg (dated 1999) and the {{PD-old}} tag (70 years after author’s death) was used by the uploader. Regards, Gumruch (talk) 21:19, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Trebsko znak.jpgEdit

 
File:Trebsko znak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Gumruch".