Open main menu

Contents

ArchivesEdit

Caspar Isenmann,Edit

Les deux tableaux qui restent sont bons je voterai bien volontiers pour eux si tu peux les placer dans un article. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: Merci pour ta sollicitude, je viens de faire le nécessaire. Salutations, Gzen92 [discuter] 10:06, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

et puis !Edit

C'est dommage que Puits, cloître du Musée Unterlinden - Colmar.jpg ne soit pas employé... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: oui, j'ai oublié de changer l'image suite à Commons:Valued image candidates/Colmar - 29072016 (29538527435).jpg, voilà qui est fait, elle est utilisée, salutations, Gzen92 [discuter] 10:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Candidates - NominationEdit

Plesae use this template if you nominate an image from another user:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

I´ve seen that the real fotographer´s name is missing at your current nominations. --Milseburg (talk) 11:34, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok, I did not know, Gzen92 [discuter] 12:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

bot stop?Edit

File:Sir Isaac Newton. Stipple engraving by J. Whessel, 1812, aft Wellcome V0006567.jpg is NOT correctly categorised. It needs more besides "portraits in the Wellcome Collection"! Why did you bot take off the tag? I've been using it to check over the wellcome collection portraits. I had over 1,000 to do, now it's down to 192 - this means that there are 900 "portraits" with no other category besides "part of the Wellcome collection". -- Deadstar (msg) 09:53, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

OK, it's down to nothing. :( Is there any way to put the tag (Category:Files from Wellcome Images (categorization needed)) back? This really needs checking by hand, not by bot. @Fae: -- Deadstar (msg) 10:00, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello @Deadstar:, I would like to sort in Category:Media needing categories, first automatically, manually after. Category:Files from Wellcome Images (categorization needed) is linked. For your image, there is Category:Portraits in the Wellcome Collection, it is categorized at least, we can find it. In contrary File:Sidrach Wellcome F0002701.jpg I did not touch. Of course the two categories that you put are just, but we can always add categories, it has no end. I understand your problems. I can cancel everything if necessary, but we will never advance then. A track: a hidden category for you with the files you want to check ? Can we wait for the opinion of Fae who uploaded everything ? Gzen92 [discuter] 10:39, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for responding. I'm sure we can organise something. -- Deadstar (msg) 11:28, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
I was thinking about this - there is a hidden category for Wellcome files already: Can you add the cat Category:Files from Wellcome Images (check needed) to files with only "Category:Portraits in the Wellcome Collection"? I can then search for portraits to be checked. Or if you can tell me how I can search for files with only "Portraits in the Wellcome Collection"? -- Deadstar (msg) 23:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
@Deadstar:, I created Category:Portraits in the Wellcome Collection (check needed), is it good (I also put the sub-categories) ? Gzen92 [discuter] 08:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Oh, that's good, thank you :) I was expecting a few more files though, but likely they have 2 categories or more on there (usually also not great, like "Engraving" or "Files from the Wellcome Collection") but it's better than only the Portraits one. I can work with this :) -- Deadstar (msg) 09:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Actually, can your bot put this tag on all files with the word "portrait" in the name that are in the Category:Files from Wellcome Images (check needed)? Because that's my next step? -- Deadstar (msg) 09:24, 11 July 2018 (UTC) NB: It's actually the word "portrait" in the description, rather than the name. Apologies. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
@Deadstar:, I added a few more, for example File:A woman falsely identified as Catherine Fitzgerald, Countess Wellcome V0007058.jpg. There may be some false/positives, there will be some sort of sorting. Gzen92 [discuter] 12:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
@Deadstar: and Category:Portraits in the Wellcome Collection (description) (check needed) ! Gzen92 [discuter] 13:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
It looks good & it'll give me something to do, that's for sure! Thanks & kind regards -- Deadstar (msg) 16:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Taoyuan, Taoyuan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan - panoramio (19).jpgEdit

I looked at your edits. I'm not sure what are you doing, but it appears that you are violating COM:OVERCAT. Please check categories and avoid so-called "over-categorization".--Kai3952 (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

@Kai3952:, thanks, I was wrong, it's Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 7924063 needing categories I want to empty, and not Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 7924063. Sorry, I will correct all this. Gzen92 [discuter] 15:50, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
No, I am not talking about Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 7924063 needing categories. Please check "your edits" again for over-categorization.--Kai3952 (talk) 02:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
@Kai3952:, I do not understand why keep the category Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 7924063 needing categories. It's a category set for the robot when importing from panoramio. File:Taoyuan, Taoyuan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan - panoramio (19).jpg has three categories, it is already enough to remove "needing categories" i think, no ? Gzen92 [discuter] 06:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Because you don't know what you did to cause "over-categorization". The real problem is that you changed from "Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 7924063" to "Category:Taoyuan City". If you don't know how to fix it, I think the best thing to do is to undo your edits(I already did it).--Kai3952 (talk) 06:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
@Kai3952:, yes I was wrong, I canceled my 162 edits, all the files are in the category Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 7924063 again. Gzen92 [discuter] 06:59, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Maybe you need someone who is familiar with "Taiwan" to help you solve this problem?--Kai3952 (talk) 10:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 1295947 needing categories to Category:Images with bordersEdit

Hello.Why did you re-added the images where borders were removed to Category:Images with borders? ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:23, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Sorry, I had already added this category and you did the job. I still see it with the border, I purge the page and it's ok. I delete the category, still sorry. Gzen92 [discuter] 10:29, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Photographs by Spanish Coches with bordersEdit

Hello.You can work on these photos yourself using CropTool.Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Photos from ColmarEdit

Thank you for the nominations to QI of photo taken by me in Colmar :) Have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 16:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

@Tournasol7: Hello, I do not know much about QI, but I think some pictures are quality. Gzen92 [discuter] 07:30, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Yes, some photos have potential for QI, but I'm limited by 5 nominations per day. That's why I'm happy for your nominations. Thank you! Tournasol7 (talk) 08:08, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Yack à... :-)Edit

Bonjour Gzen,

Dans la catégorie "Animals of Parc animalier de Sainte-Croix", je suis tombée sur la photo ci-dessous dont tu es l'auteur, qui est mal nommée et dans la catégorie "Unidentified cattle" qui ne va pas bien. Il ne s'agit pas de yacks mais d'Aurochs de Heck. Je te laisse faire les rectifications.

Cordialement, Musicaline (talk) 17:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour @Musicaline: merci pour cette info et ta connaissance ! Je modifie ça de suite. Gzen92 [discuter] 07:27, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Saint-Benoît (Réunion)Edit

Bonjour Gzen92! J'ai vu que vous aviez redirigé la catégorie Category:Saint-Benoît (Réunion) vers Category:Saint-Pierre (La Réunion) - n'y a-t-il pas une erreur, ces deux villes étant très éloignées l'une de l'autre ? --Dominik (talk) 05:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour @Dominik: effectivement il y a eu un couac, j'ai fait les modifs pour Saint-Pierre/Saint-Benoît sur Commons/Wikipédia/Wikidata. Je pense que c'est bon maintenant. Cordialement, Gzen92 [discuter] 07:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Merci bcp pour la modification, ça marche pour ces deux villes. --Dominik (talk) 18:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Problème en VIEdit

Pour Pending Most valued review candidates il y a un problème la forme de la nomination n'est pas bonne le Bot ne la prendra pas. Je ne suis pas très fort pour ce chapitre il faudrait relire la procédure. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Paysage à Sienne.jpgEdit

 
File:Paysage à Sienne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Adelfrank (talk) 00:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Wrong changesEdit

Dear Gzen92, Please stop changing clock times when several clocks in one picture clearly reflect different time zones in one picture, like in this file. Changing 12:30 to 00:30 in this image is ludicrous, as it conflicts with the other clocks. I know the rules, but they can't apply to this image. Vysotsky (talk) 09:15, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

I understand, Gzen92 [discuter] 09:21, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
But be careful how to decide that File:ClocksPortoAirport7.JPG is 10:51, 11:51 and 14:51 and not 22:51, 23:51 and 02:51 ? Here it is not easy to decide the right categories. Cordially, Gzen92 [discuter] 09:51, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Category:Time 01:30Edit

Hola Gzen92:

En la fotografía "File:Ayuntamiento de Alcalá de Henares (RPS 11-06-2017) torre del reloj.png" el reloj marca 13:30 horas, aunque es un reloj de 12 horas, porque si marcara las 01:30 horas la fotografía estaría tomada necesariamente de noche, y como se puede observar es pleno día. Un cordial saludo:Raimundo Pastor (talk) 20:56, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, yes, okay. But the category is not used to indicate the time of the photography but the time in the photo (see the description of the category), on the dial it is 1:30. For example, this is 14:06. We categorize what we see, not what we extrapolate. Cordially, Gzen92 [discuter] 06:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Efectivamente, categorizamos lo que vemos. Y veo un reloj con esfera de 12 horas, que marca la una y treinta minutos en pleno día, por lo tanto son las 13:30 horas. Si viera ese mismo reloj, con la misma hora pero de noche, serían las 01:30 horas. Un cordial saludo:Raimundo Pastor (talk) 19:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
The notion of full light is vague, for example beyond the polar circle your reasoning does not apply. Good continuation, Gzen92 [discuter] 06:18, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Gzen92".