Open main menu

User talk:HYanWong

TUSC token 7c245e986dd1aeff7dd22b4486eab330Edit

{{Alethinophidia}}Edit

About {{Alethinophidia}}, I am not sure, you should change the caller.
I think we should suppress the template.
We have 3 serpentes templates that are not much used.
In fact, they are deprecated by the include= parameter of {{Taxonavigation}}.
If you look at {{TaxonavigationIncluded}} you will see that there are includes for:

We could create includes for reptilian orders !?
My bot would make usage of those templates.
Cheers 14:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

I agree, but was trying to make minimal changes. If you'd like to suppress the template, please go ahead: it would make my life easier anyway! HYanWong (talk) 14:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
p.s. I assumed these might be a bit like {{Lepidoptera}}, which I think is your work. I assume there's a different reason for keeping that template? HYanWong (talk) 14:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
p.p.s there are 2 other similar snake templates (but at the family-level): Template:Pythonidae and Template:Atractaspididae. Would it be sensible to change those too? HYanWong (talk) 14:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
OK, I am killing them ;-) So don't bother change the parameters.
ps: That's exactly the same problem than for {{Lepidoptera}} which has been created before the creation of the include= parameter
pps: they are already dead ;-)
Cheers 14:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Fossil taxa with ⇒ rather than named levelsEdit

Hi Liné, I'm coming across a good number of fossil categories that have had changes made like this. Have you any idea why it would be better to remove the classification levels (Classis, Familia, etc.) and replace them with ⇒ signs? HYanWong (talk) 08:37, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Truth is, first time I saw that, I was shocked.
But now, I am used to it.
I even modified {{Taxonavigation}} to accept ⇒ as a valid rank (please don't shoot me ;-))
I even created include={{Fossil reptiles}}, {{Fossil Bivalvia}}, {{Fossil Synapsida}} (now you hate me ;-))
All 'Fossil XXX' categories are like this !
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 17:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Category problemEdit

Hi Yan - I added {{Category:Washingtonia filifera}} to Category:Washingtonia filifera in Joshua Tree National Park, and it is showing up in Category:Washingtonia (which it shouldn't) as well as Category:Washingtonia filifera. Any idea what's gone wrong? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 16:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

You need to make sure that any categories referred to within the page Category:Washingtonia filifera are surrounded by <noinclude> tags. HYanWong (talk) 19:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
p.s. you probably want to put {{subst:NoteTransclusion/subst}} on Category:Washingtonia filifera too, as described in the docs. HYanWong (talk) 19:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Not really sure what you mean; would you mind doing these, so I can see what you did for future reference, please? - MPF (talk) 20:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Done. Have a look. HYanWong (talk) 20:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! I've been very wary of using the <noinclude> tags on the species page, thinking they would kill the categories on that page (taking the commands at their word, "do not apply the categories between these tags on this page"). I guess it doesn't work like that?!? - MPF (talk) 21:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
<noinclude> simply means do not use this section when transcluding this file on other pages. It doesn't affect the original page at all. HYanWong (talk) 09:18, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Xenoturbella churro Rouse.jpgEdit

 
File:Xenoturbella churro Rouse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 00:24, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Dawkinsia tambraparniei-Marcus Knight.tifEdit

 
File:Dawkinsia tambraparniei-Marcus Knight.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 00:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ministeria vibrans catching bacteria.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ministeria vibrans catching bacteria.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ministeria vibrans catching bacteria.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:38, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "HYanWong".