Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Horst J. Meuter!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:03, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Musée de Tram, Brussels.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Musée de Tram, Brussels.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Musée de Tram, Brussels.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Takeaway (talk) 01:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Paul Delvaux Musée 001.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Paul Delvaux Musée 001.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Paul Delvaux Musée 001.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Takeaway (talk) 01:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Musèe de Tram. jpg | Paul Delvaux jpg.Edit

Takeaway, danke für die Information, in beiden Fällen handelt es sich um Eintrittskarten, die von mir zur Info von eventuell interessierten Mitnutzern gescannt und hochgeladen wurden. Das auch diese einer ausdrücklichen Lizensierung bedurften, war mir - als "Neu-User" - nicht klar. Mit einer Löschung bin ich aufgrund dessen natürlich vollkommen einverstanden. Gruß Horst J. Meuter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horst J. Meuter (talk • contribs) 16:33, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Deine RevertsEdit

Hallo Horst, deine Revertierungen auf File:Bad Laasphe Feudingen, Kreis Siegen-Wittgenstein - 02 -.jpg und File:Bad Laasphe Feudingen, Kreis Siegen-Wittgenstein - 01 -.jpg sind nicht sinnvoll, da du die Fotos überkategorisiert hast. Die "feinstmögliche" Kategorisierung auf Feudingen ist vollkommen ausreichend, die anderen Kategorien ergeben sich aus dieser vergebenen Kategorie. Bitte lies dir mal die Regeln zur Kategorisierung durch. Beste Grüße, --Joschi71 (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


Hallo Joschi, vielen Dank für deine nochmalige Überarbeitung und Korrektur, ich bin damit vollkommen einverstanden. Ich hatte angenommen, die Dateien seien durch die Änderung nicht mehr auffindbar, verlasse mich aber auf den Rat eines erfahrenen Users, wenn du meinst, ich habe die Fotos damit überkategorisiert. Beste Grüße --Horst70, 14:17, 10 January (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horst J. Meuter (talk • contribs) 13:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.


Please do not recreate deleted contentEdit

বাংলা | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
Your image or other content, Gallery: Horst J. Meuter, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

As I noted in the deletion comment both times, "User galleries must be in the user's own space. User galleries are not permitted in main space." You may create User:Horst J. Meuter/Gallery, but you may not have Gallery: Horst J. Meuter or Horst J. Meuter. See Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


I have taken the survey some weeks ago. Horst70 (talk) 16:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC) Regards horst70

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Do not overcategorizeEdit

I reverted your categorizations "Animals of Belgium" for the shrimping horses and "Forests in Belgium" for the Forêt de Soignes, because they are already in subcategories of those. Please read COM:OVERCAT. Henxter (talk) 09:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windmill (details) - Woluwe Saint Lambert - Brussels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tangla Hotel Brussels - Woluwe-Saint-Lambert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woluwe stream - Vellemolenweg - Woluwe Saint Lambert - Brussels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The photo seems a bit overworked. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:57, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

[[File:|75px|center]]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

* File:Strasbourg, Fachwerkhäuser, Gassen, EU 01.jpgEdit

Hallo ShakespeareFan00, zunächst herzlichen Dank für den Hinweis auf die beantragte Löschung dieses Files. Mir war bislang absolut nicht bekannt, dass der EuGeH nicht abgelichtet werden darf und hier Beschränkungen bestehen. Wenn dem tatsächlich so ist, werde ich mich natürlich an die bestehenden Regeln halten und habe keinen Einwand gegen die Löschung dieses Files.

Nochmals danke für den Hinweis --Horst70 (talk) 13:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, for your message, The issue of the lack of FoP in some parts of the EU is something, you might want to take up with your local Wikimedia Chapter, especially on a prominent European building like the one in the photo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!Edit

Dear Horst J. Meuter,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die Info!Horst70 (talk) 10:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)