Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Incnis Mrsi

Files uploaded by G – undeletion requestEdit

The request has been closed, I cannot comment there. You used a spelling error by me as an argument against undeletion? And then invoked Godwin's Law? --𝔊 (Gradzeichen DiſkTalk) 23:20, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

@G: I didn’t want the request to be closed early; please, don’t blame me for it. It was you to recklessly misspell a name of the same corporation presumably everyone here should know, as claimed or assumed by yourself (note I didn’t quibble about “wepository” – you haven’t necessarily be proficient in English). I, indeed, only commented about inconsistency of such a position. In fact, I am rather °-positive and even spent no less than a full work hour to solve problems of a guy with asterisk in the nick, but:
  • dislike wobbling between two nicks or more – choose a permanent one at last;
  • dislike litigation over a one-letter nick;
  • dislike nicks which are obviously unsearchable;
and—relevant to this very topic—
  • dislike cryptic headings like “UDEL G”, especially where text doesn’t contain a single link.
The last thing might have something to do with [[Category:]] tags. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:24, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
You are right, here is a single link: https://www.gutzitiert.de/zitat_autor_gustav_heinemann_thema_anklage_zitat_23849.html --𝔊 (Gradzeichen DiſkTalk) 15:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

CP866Edit

Можно поинтересоваться, из какой программы/ОС вы взяли File:Octets_in_CP866_ordered_by_nibbles.png? Меня интересует последняя строка F, которая отличается от собственно CP 866.--Luboslov Yezykin (talk) 23:36, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Revision of File:Octets_in_CP866_ordered_by_nibbles.png
Всё-таки это не ответило на мой вопрос: из какой программы/ОС? Вы же откуда-то это взяли?--Luboslov Yezykin (talk) 21:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Peace and LoveEdit

3 users against 2, does not consensus, that's for sure (especially without admin), and we are not in a war; "faction", "Camulogene77's warring", you believe on a battlefield? Don't you see enough horror?

Now, it will be good to find an intelligent compromise. - In the {{Maps}} template, for non-translatable languages, it returns {{Label}}, so it does not change anything for them. there are hundreds of titles to translate, the work is colossal, good luck but if {{Label}} is used for the forgotten, all is well. In this case, it will be wise to add an argument of type: "p" for plural (the translations) and "s" for singular ({{Label}}) (eg if a city has only one bridge), it will answer everything.

Is the problem fixed? Or should I prepare my aircraft carrier? Camulogene77 (talk) 09:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

@Camulogene77: who is the second in your faction? I saw only you alone edit-warring for six weeks, and in the last case you are doing it against a supermajority, if not even consensus. I do not have a strong opinion about “an argument of type”, my strong opinion is only against indiscriminate {{label}} gibberish in every heading (esp. given how map is rendered in Russian). Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

"the second in your faction?", "edit-warring for six weeks", "supermajority", but what are you talking about? you do not have an opinion on an argument, seriously? And "map is rendered in Russian", but what are you talking about? Are you sure everything is fine? Camulogene77 (talk) 10:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

For third-party inspectors: “edit warring” includes this, this, and this. Other problems are explained in user talk: Camulogene77 #Scotland, category talk: Multilingual tags: Gallery headings, and already mentioned talk:Mediterranean Sea.
@Camulogene77, if you are not happy with the current {{Maps}}, {{Images}} etc, then either edit these templates or appeal to the community asking to stop their deployment. Again, four editors are against inappropriate singular, and only you alone remove custom templates and place the gibberish instead. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

FileEdit

Hi thereEdit

Hi there, Incnis. Answer to your question "isn’t it a sarcasm?" No, it isn't. The sign :) shows it is something to make people smile. (If you would like to see what "I" think could be sarcasm, see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tulsi Bhagat with Satdeep Gill at TTT2018 (B&W) - Fortune JP Palace 2018-01-26.jpg please; they have written it in bold so that no-one would miss... :) If I'm not taking too much of your time, let me tell you something personal: I hate to let people understand my age, gender, social condition etc but I wish to give a clue. I spent a short time of my not so long life as a teacher at an all-male school. (I mean all the kids were male, but there were men and women in the staff.) When I saw those adolescents bored of my lectures (most of the time :) I used to spit a sentence that would include a "magic word", like "sex" or "naked women" that would wake up even the snoring double-decker (class repeating older guy) at the backside, like "What about La Maja Desnuda?" and attract their attention. Please let's not jump to any misunderstandings that neither I'm a teacher (for some reason my teaching adventure went short :) nor anybody a student. Maybe this "personal part" of the talk is totally out of place. If you wish just consider the initial part ending in "no, it isn't". Take care, colleague, and cheers! --E4024 (talk) 07:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Re:Edit

hello Mr. Incnis Mrsi, I am writing to tell you that I am not a copied account, although my actions appear to be completely identical to that blocked account, which you subject me to, but if you notice my actions and contributions, I do not I'm a subject that annoys the community :)--Kaisers1 (talk) 13:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Sommeiller1 più alta.jpgEdit

Hi, if you disagree with a license, please don't remove it, but nominate the file for deletion instead. Same for the 'author' and the 'source' field. If you disagree, don't empty those fields. Replace it by correct content or by {{unknown|author}} / {{unknown|source}} and if you think there is a copyright problem, nominate the file for deletion. Jcb (talk) 11:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jcb: I haven’t much experience with condition where a file is potentially eligible for Commons but correct values for author and source are not evident. Can you point me to guidelines or discussions about manner of action to effect there? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Actually it's not so complex. If you think there is a problem, press the 'nominate for deletion' link from the left menu and tell what the problem is. If you see erroneous 'author' and 'source' information and you can correct it, feel free to do so. But don't empty those fields, because then they will clutter various maintenance categories. Jcb (talk) 11:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
@Jcb evades answer to my question. Of course, “various maintenance categories” are cluttered just because Commons has too much dirt. This dirt will not decompose with edits like Revision of File:La_bandiera.jpg and Revision of File:Sommeiller1_più_alta.jpg. Where are relevant guidelines or discussions, again? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
You are frustrating maintenance with your actions. You are adding workload, these edits are nett negative to the project. Don't do it. I have clearly explaned what to do instead. Jcb (talk) 12:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Again, evasion of my question. I removed evident Annabosazza’s lies based on Commons: Licensing. Jcb reverted my edits based on a personal opinion of a sysop preoccupied with maintenance categories. IMHO enough said for a reasonably minded third-party reviewer. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
A review by another admin of this exact point has been done recently. Jcb (talk) 13:06, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

New British Empire mapEdit

Hello.

I have uploaded a new map with a firmly established title and summary, and is backed up by links, so that it cannot be narrowed down like File:The British Empire.png on which it is based. The new File:The British Empire (including Crown Dependencies, Crown Colonies-Overseas Territories, Protectorates, Military Administrations).png is based on the broad definition of the "British Empire" and includes Crown Dependencies, Crown Colonies, British Protectorates, British Mandates and British Military Administrations. I hope this other user does not contest this map. Please feel free to edit, if there are missing areas and corrections need to be made, with verifiable sources and links, so it is not contested and narrowed down.

Kindest regards, Maphobbyist (talk) 21:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Not interested much in historical imperialism, more in users exiled from the encyclopedia empire. Edit warring is only a misdemeanor unless aggravated with sock puppeteering. @Maphobbyist: I hope you are wise enough to never use alternative accounts for this end here, on Commons. For some of such accounts it is not difficult to discover that they belong to the same person. And also: I am no friend to nationalist/fundamentalist PoV pushers. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
I am not a sock puppet of User:Brythones, just because we happen to agree on the same topic. I am not an imperialist or push an imperialist POV agenda nor am I a fan of colonial empires. I just included sourced information based on the broader definition of the "British Empire" when particularly British Military Administrations are also included. While this new map includes a broader definition, the original maps includes a narrower definition. So they don't need to clash and they provide alternative definitions. In the end, neither map is unsourced fantasy-based original research, as they are both linked and are sourced. Thank you for your reply. Maphobbyist (talk) 22:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Well that's just petty of you to claim sockpuppetry. Compare our contribution histories (I'm sure there are times where it would be physically impossible for us to be the same person), or if you are serious take it up with an administrator. Brythones (talk) 23:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Cross paths the first time with one Brythones and didn’t have this acc in mind at all. What for this person came here, did I invite them to discuss virtual belongings of Maphobbyist? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:22, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
I got a notification when my name was tagged here. Brythones (talk) 13:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Just to add in all my years of wiki this is the first time I've ever come across Maphobbyist... WHAT! Brythones (talk) 23:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Technical questionsEdit

Dear Incnis Mrsi,
I was revered to you for some technical questions i have, so i hope you can help me out.
Currently i am uploading a lot of CC0 immages from the Dutch national Archives. Since there are over 300.000 of them i currently (at top peak) am using 5 laptop computers to do this with my Mr.Nostalgic accounmt. The problem is that every now and then i get a Anti Abuse limit warning and haveto wait for about 5 minutes or so. This is very disruptive for the programs that are uploading these immages. Do you know if there is some way, like say disabeling it for my IP, toswithc it off for say 2 months or so. I still have about 170.000 immages to upload and with max four computers working day and night it will take me at least two more months to upload. I have another 2 available, but then the warnings start to pop-up.
Another problem is catagorization. I have uploaded 20.000 immages of The Dutch Army in Indonesia that need to be catagorized. However, if i do a search, to use the catalog tool, i can only go back 10.000 files with the Wiki search engine. Do you know if this can be resolved or whom to contact for this problem?
Hopefuly you can help me out.
Regards, Alf van Beem alias Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 17:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
@Mr.Nostalgic: you can apply for an extended uploader. Sorry, don’t see how can I help further. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
@Mr.Nostalgic:, actually no. Go to the autopatroller permission and upload that. Artix Kreiger (talk)
@Artix Kreiger: Could you give me some more hinds where to find autopatroller? I am very unfamiliar with this. Regards Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 19:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
@Mr.Nostalgic:, Commons:Requests for rights#Mr.Nostalgic. Artix Kreiger (talk) 19:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
@Artix Kreiger: Thank you very much for the assistance. Regards, Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 15:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
@Mr.Nostalgic:, you can upload now without worry about limits. Artix Kreiger (talk) 23:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

WarningEdit

Hi, stop wasting our time with personal attacks like this one. We have no place for harrassment of fellow users. Jcb (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Yet we have a lot of place for spite. But will gradually improve on it. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

DelreqsEdit

Do you think that a non-admin can move deletion requests made by a certain troll to the user space of that not established editor? --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

If you ask about me, then I acquired the privilege of redirectless move as a supplement to another thing (global rollback) to which I find almost no use since migration of interwiki to Wikidata. Unsure which Commons user group is least sufficient for this ability. And I used move-with-redlink not for combat only, but for purely peaceful ends as well. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

EmailEdit

Incnis Mrsi, I received your email. AFAIK your talk page is not blocked and you may use it to discuss your block or appeal it. I'm not interested in engaging in such discussions off-wiki. You were edit warring. I suggest you sit out your block and consider how to avoid edit conflict. -- Colin (talk) 18:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the big revert. Such tedious attention-seeking. Sad. -- Colin (talk) 09:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

"Права личности" и стиль комментариев к правкамEdit

Дорогой Иннокентий! Я высоко ценю Ваш вклад, однако не могу не отметить, что вот такой или такой способ комментировать правки считаю неприемлемым. Мне-то, в общем, всё равно, но совершенно неясно, какую полезную информацию из этого комментария почерпнут другие участники.

Теперь по сути Вашего изменения, которое я был вынужден отменить. В настоящее время (как и в 2010 году, когда я делал этот перевод) по-прежнему нет русскоязычной статья для термина w:en:Personality rights, и даже нет перевода эссе Commons:Personality rights. Яндекс-переводчик сейчас выдаёт мне единственный вариант перевода для "Personality rights" - а именно "права личности". Вот что нам дают другие онлайновые ресурсы:

  • context.reverso.net - "права личности"
  • linguee.ru - "личные права", "права личности"
  • proz.com - "права индивидуальности", "право на личность"
  • lingvolive.com - "личностные права", "личные неимущественные права"

Предложенного вами словосочетания "права индивидуальности" (равно как и "права имиджа") я нигде не встречал ранее, и сейчас нашёл только в одном источнике. По форме оно мне также кажется неграмотным. --Kaganer (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

@Kaganer: "личные права" видимо писал кто-то, плохо понимающий по-русски. «Имидж» я брал с multitran — убирайте, если не нравится, а против вариантов "личностные права" или "личные неимущественные права" я ничего не имею, но их нигде и не стояло. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Правильно, таких вариантов в то время мне не встретилось. Я продублировал тему на форуме - пусть там тоже народ выскажется. Не хочу оставаться "законодателем мод". --Kaganer (talk) 17:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

User pageEdit

Hi, Incnis Mrsi, on your userpage you mention: This user encourage disputes and critics, do you mean This user encourages disputes and critics... Just being curious. :) Lotje (talk) 14:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello Lotje. An update possibly removed grammar errors. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:23, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Yes, Incnis Mrsi that sometimes happens, indeed. Lotje (talk) 15:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by মোমিনুর রশিদEdit

Hello. I kept File:শহীদ দিবস ২০১৫.jpg because it was in use. The logos are COM:De minimis, so there is no copyright violation. Photoshop processing does not mean it is a copyvio either. However, I could find the picture elsewhere on the web (http://www.smuct.edu.bd/gallery.php), so I think it is actually a copyvio and I have finally deleted it. File:প্রেজেন্টেশন.jpg is out of scope imho, so I did not delete it for a copyright problem. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

About my accountEdit

Hi, I read the investigation and I don't understand why I'm involved in that. It's probably someone who imitates me by opening accounts or something like that, my name should be removed from this investigation. Thank you and respond me soon please. Bill Wong (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

@Bill Wong: please, debunk relation to a known sock farm here. I won’t discuss it on my user_talk. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

TranslationsEdit

Hi, you saw Template talk:I18n/by, and you are good in languages. It would be great if you can correct and add translations to both templates, and then as well to the table. Thank you -- sarang사랑 10:43, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For trying to create well-thought out policies that will keep Wikimedia Commons free of that deletionist troll, keep up the good work. 😉 Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Mona Elyamani, photoshopped?Edit

File:IMG-20180130-WA0019.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:IMG-20180130-WA0019.jpg

Another investigation..

That file was compressed with 77% quality. With a resolution of 768 × 1024 you can plausibly take this with any camera when configured to this resolution. With 77% quality and the contrast between the purple area and area with details, the artifacts do not surprise me. This does not explain why there is no EXIF. I found the filename to be odd, I know of no camera that creates such filenames by default. I suspect these filenames are the result Whatsapp.

The most likely scenario: she got a friend (or the company that makes the product she is holding??) to take her picture. The friend sends the picture to her using Whatsapp. Whatsapp lowers the quality and strips the EXIF. Mona uploads the picture to Commons.

It's also possible she is clumsy and sends the picture from one phone to another using Whatsapp, then uploads to Commons. But that's less likely.

Technically you could re-nominate the image because it would seem likely she got a friend to take the picture. Capturing the way she posed would be hard on a self-timer anyway. I don't think it's worth it, the friend probably "gave" the image to her through Whatsapp. I wouldn't want to bother OTRS with that, but technically you could.

We have 471 files that are or were named like this: Category:Files with IMG-date-WA in filename. Yes, I just created that category. - Alexis Jazz 22:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying although, predictably, I already know about the category—because watch problematic files—and your gallery as well. It has little merit to discuss Whatsapp and similar things with me – I am old-fashioned and don’t understand almost anything in it. And also… please, do not clutter talk pages with large-size graphics without a very convincing pretext. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
I don't know what you watch..
WhatsApp is used to send text messages, kind of like SMS, E-mail or a letter. So these files were sent from one device/person to another and WhatsApp as a company was in between (like the postal services), scaling the image to save bandwidth. That's all you really need to know about these, it might help in some cases to track the origin of a file. But if this is too much, forget what I said. You don't have to do anything with this. Populating that category wasn't trivial as you can't search for these filenames. It's clearly completely thankless work though. You had already seen the category but you have absolutely no idea how it was populated. (yeah, with cat-a-lot.. but how did I find the images) Or maybe you do know and I'm just wasting your time. - Alexis Jazz 23:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: did you tweak Cat-a-lot to work on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AllPages/IMG-20?namespace=6 ? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
No, you made the user-space gallery namely for running Cat-a-lot on it. Not a mystery, really. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
You're wrong on both fronts. Thanks for the link, I didn't know about that special page. May come in handy in the future. It produces slightly different results from what is in the category so I'll check if there is anything in it I need to add. It also shows some files incorrectly though as it does not check if WA is present. (File:IMG-20180218-rehovot-train-station-february-2018.jpg for example is in the list) I think I also have some filenames on my list that are not on your list.
I initially created the user page so I could have an on-wiki list of the files and I wasn't sure about an appropriate name for a category. I also wasn't sure yet these originate from Whatsapp. I never needed the page for cat-a-lot. Cat-a-lot works fine from a preview page. That's actually what I did because 400+ images at once made it choke.
One more thing: File:РосКомСвобода - IMG-20130728-WA0005.jpg. (I'll be adding some more) - Alexis Jazz 07:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

File:MAR-DEL-PLATA ship.jpgEdit

Hi Incnis Mrsi,

This picture was taken in 1955 by my grant father (dead in 1971). How could I mention that I have all the rights on it ?

- Regards, Cymbella (talk) 21:02, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

RedirectsEdit

Please keep redirects when renaming, unless the original name violates policy.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for reminder, I understand merits of redirects in general. Tracking of these .webm files by the uploader? He proposed the current names himself. General accountability? There is an easily searchable page transcluded to deletion logs; specific moves can be traced directly by clicking a red link. Use of the files by anyone else? Unlikely, given short timespan since uploading; moreover, 26 names were blatantly erroneous so their use could be contrary to intentions. But even given this last point, I’d not suppress redirects for files uploaded several weeks ago. Also keep in mind that you proposed these files for deletion. Had it been accepted, there wouldn’t be any remaining indication—except available for sysops—of the fate of each individual upload. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

SockhuntingEdit

I'm asking you because I think you might know more about it. Is there a guide or something for hunting socks? Reason I'm asking is Commons:Deletion requests/File:US Navy 070820-N-0021M-002 Seabees from Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 7 Detail Chinhae, homeported in Gulfport, Miss., clear out logs from last year's mushroom harvest at Aikwangon Residence for the Mentally and Phy.jpg. My gut is telling me possible sock, but a guide with some pointers would be nice to see if it could be confirmed. - Alexis Jazz 14:48, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: not very much, but give several tips for dealing with IPs. The first to look at – whois(1). Which country and city? How wide the range is? Is the IP dynamic or static? Well – Germany, München, a library (German: Bibliothek), /24 (theoretically 232−24, practically ≤ 254 hosts). Browsing Special:Contribs/194.95.59.0/24 shows that there are two active static IPs in the range. New versions of MediaWiki understand CIDR network ranges internally. There is also a JavaScript gadget (can be activated via Special:Preferences#mw-input-wpgadgets-contribsrange) which supports wildcard syntax for both IPs (like «194.95.59.*») and even account names, and can group contribs by individual sources. Next steps, taking the country into account: w:Special:Contribs/194.95.59.0/24, de:Special:Contribs/194.95.59.0/24.
My opinion on the case? This may be a library employee or visitor too lazy to set up an account. But it is only my guess, and there is a non-zero probability for a person banned from Wikipedia, blocked on Commons, etc. Very unlikely a Commons regular with a usable account but socking as an IP deliberately. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Camulogene77’ stuffEdit

I don't understand, can you explain me the difference between {{Satellite images}} => Satellite imagery and {{Q725252}} => Satellite imagery? he must surely have a good reason to present the same "stuff". Camulogene77 (talk) 09:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

I explained it no less than three times: {{label}} can’t be customized for Commons galleries whereas {{Satellite images}} and similar templates can. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Patrick Kennedy (1823–1858).jpgEdit

Hi, Please do not create deletion request (and even more speedy) for files like this one. A picture from 1850 is in the public domain, no matter what. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: would you seek to overturn Commons:Deletion requests/File:Patrick Kennedy in 1850.jpg? I acted accordingly to Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion #G4. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:05, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
That DR is clearly an error. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: if you are about to sort all the mess left after this uploader, then visit Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mou3awiya Rafi3i‎ please. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

WarningEdit

Hi, you must stop playing games on our noticeboards, like here. Jcb (talk) 16:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

@Jcb: it was likely an edit conflict unreported by the engine; I deleted Túrelio’s thing by accident, of course. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:22, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
The pottering in the contribution of Túrelio was not the main problem of course, but I am sure you know. Jcb (talk) 16:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Did you return here without finding “Andrew J.Kurbiko” in user talk:Pipenavis? I will not specify whom should you stop playing on our site; you should realize which problem is referred now. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:34, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Don't involve or mention me in cases where I am not involved. You are wasting my time on purpose. Jcb (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Загорська Людмила Михайлівна.jpgEdit

Нащо було видаляти файл File:Загорська Людмила Михайлівна.jpg, що був призначений для статті про Загорську Людмилу Михайлівну? Замість того, що б я тепер з процедурою відновлення файлу з видаленого (яка зовсім неясно прописана) мучився, то в першу чергу карайте тих, хто тупо бездумно і за своїм бажанням видаляє файли. Вважаю, що за такі бездумні вчинки також повинна бути відповідальність!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Omeland47 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
For bewildered third-party observers: look at user talk:Omeland47 #Warning. The rant (in Ukrainian language) does not address licensing of the deleted file, only states that the file was intended for uk.Wikipedia. Note that the account has currently zero contribs in Wikipedia. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:53, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

RE: 175.158...Edit

I do not know who that IP is and I'm honestly telling you that that is NOT me Rix Morales (talk) 21:22, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

COM:ANEdit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Português | Русский | Svenska | +/−


 
  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#User:Lingveno. It contains and concerns your accusation. Thank you.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:27, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy G3Edit

Hello, Incnis Mrsi! I saw your edit summary for tagging the fake map, and wanted to point out that speedy criterion G3 does include hoaxes. As written it looks like something of an afterthought, but I guess the idea is that deliberate hoaxing is considered a form of vandalism.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 06:21, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

You may try speedy deletion, but I do not see any urgency. Regular deletion will eliminate the images anyway; it is less expensive than arguing whether hoax maps were “intentional” or, say, created due to delusions. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Fair enough; divining the uploader’s intentions is an uncertain business, and where there’s been a discussion the deleting admin is relieved of the sole burden of doing so.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Kim Okura s 1O1 Babe.jpgEdit

Hello. Thank you for your note. I have the permission from the sculptor. Otherwise I would not upload/use it. I see now what is missing (source). Br--Kamillenteefee (talk) 15:15, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Me again. Would you be so kind and take a look at the file, if it's now correct? Br --Kamillenteefee (talk) 15:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello!Edit

Your Facebook. --223.136.64.242 07:50, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 09:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Kai3592Edit

a little note,

probably best to ignore him. He's strange and has a caustic personality that brings a lot more questions than answers. At one point and a few more, he just says "who cares what you say" and tells Fae to stop uploading because a select few are deleted. just don't bother with him. Artix Kreiger (talk) 15:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

ANU caseEdit

The user in question inserted {{project scope}} everywhere (without nowiki, very disruptive), called Fæ "kiddo" and for some reason nominated mostly images related to metal music. (possibly religiously motivated) Also a third user with similar behaviour was found, but no solid proof of socking yet.

I don't know if the user deserved an indefblock, but I can't really say Yann is massively out of line here either. - Alexis Jazz 11:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

First, I did not look on their exchanges with Fæ (except this SPI case). Second, harassment in itself is not vandalism and should be handled differently. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

thanks for adviseEdit

I will Stop YussufHr123 (talk) 23:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

About your questionEdit

I discussed about this issue on fa.wikiquote.org. I have no idea about him, and personally i am totally sure there is no relation between Chyah and this Ghorbanpour-related band of socks, a huge mistake of userchecking happened on EnWiki and affected a 7-years active user with thousands of contributions. Look at chyah's talk page, she seem so angry and denied it. This make no sense a user like chyah changing to this kind of acts. Just bcz of some similar edits, and myabe similar ipis. God's know, maybe the trolls who were messing on fawikiquote (and Chyah was a case for them), became more professional and by making this not-notable article they are trying to make chyah seem really a spammer and anoyoing her, or just some amateur users who know nothing. i have been blocked on FaWiki by the reason that i am sock of chyah, and on fawikiquote bcz chyah is globally banned. Last chyah checkuser was on 06 February 2018 and my user name don't seen there. The List is completing monthly, And as Chyah you can't complaint it. They believe on evidences not what the user says. -Rafic.Mufid (talk) 22:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

I'm Artix - Ask me anything.Edit

70.21.184.216 03:59, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Why didn't you login?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:31, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
I was determined to defend one Artix Kreiger against Wikipedia-style lynching incited by en.Wikipedia functionaries, but the master scuttled this account leaving such text on the user page. Please, settle on one of the remaining accounts and stop socking on Wikimedia Commons. I won’t lend any support to a person changing a couple of accounts a year – it is a very bad flavour of attention-seeking and drains the community resources. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Incnis and Jeff G., let me explain. I was short changed by functionaries over there on enwiki. The account would have been resolved if a certain user didn't decide to follow every fcking edit across all wikis. yes he went through the 5 million edits across me and the alt and notified the person on wikidata, who led the 6 other blocks on other wikis. It would not have been a problem then and thus, I realized that even IF the block was released on enwiki, people will still think that way. I don't plan on changing accounts much anymore since I quit and will be on Wikia. Sorry. 70.21.184.216 00:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

ThanksEdit

Hi greetings Sir, you renamed the file into correct name. Thank you for your help.--Path slopu(Talk) 16:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Sir I have also a problem. I made a mistake I uploaded a existing file in another name. Kindly please delete it.--Path slopu(Talk) 16:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Naomi-Watts-sockmasterEdit

Hi Incnis Mrsi, the Naomi-Watts-sockmaster has now created a sock to mock your username, User:Incnis Mrsii, as he had done earlier with me. I've asked revi on meta to hide it as he had done with "my" socks. --Túrelio (talk) 17:44, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

I don’t see all the waste produced by outlaws (such as this username in Cyrillic) as anything deserving attention, assuming Wikimedia provides some protection for my work space. Wikimedia projects are open to the world. Such people as Ven0m2014 have some presence and hate the system because it reject their shit in almost all wikis. I take no offence and feel no discomfort with their silly attempts to attack established members. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:31, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Please deleteEdit

Hi greetings, Sir I uploaded a file namely Stk template.jpg to commons. But I noticed there is a file identical to it. Kindly please delete Stk template.jpg.--Path slopu(Talk) 02:53, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

RFAEdit

Do you accept my nomination for adminiship? --B dash (talk) 12:52, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

@B dash: do you mean starting an RfA for me, Incnis Mrsi? Thanks for your esteem, but look… my humble development effort in templates isn’t received well by the community. Not better for my proposal to discourage off-topic rampage on certain noticeboard (represented by this recent thread). Why do you expect a sufficient support for my person then? IMHO not until I managed to put some my ideas to production. Moreover, I am not ready currently to have yet another bunch of arguments with Commons users. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Fw. Category:Field theoryEdit

Hi. Sorry. Speedy delette, please. Tanks. --Allforrous (talk) 10:44, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

ANUEdit

Hi, Please be careful, you removed Donald's edit. Can you please revert that? Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, Incnis MrsiEdit

Hello, Incnis Mrsi, I come back. Thank you for your support. --Solomon203 (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Solomon203Edit

Hello Incnis Mrsi, Regarding the pings i got on meta and other wikis, i would like to express my regret that you had to wait for a reply. You can be sure that i am very concerned about the fact that the user has been mixed up with an LTA. When the user has been locked, there was CU evidence on enwiki. Since the ID has been confirmed i see no issues. Please note that the user is still blocked for the same reason on two wikis, i also want to point out the lack of communication from the user itself. Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

First, is “the lack of communication from the user itself” a statement about past development or a joke? Today is June 1, not April 1. Second, a request to unblock Solomon203 in ja.Wikipedia is underway, and has a good chance to succeed. English Wikipedia will likely remain the last stronghold of sock paranoia in this case – IMHO not least due to excessive self-esteem. They traditionally deem themselves an incredibly cool community, but I remember them in 2009–11 and see nowadays, and consequently… I don’t show any special respect to their regime and didn’t press for rehabilitation of Solomon203 seriously. Let them prove their coolness without one Incnis Mrsi. I now consider the case closed for my practical purposes and moved onto other things. By the way @Steinsplitter… thanks for a due reaction to this report! Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:04, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Comment obliterationEdit

Presumably unintentionally, you removed Jdx's comment with Special:Diff/304545908/304546187. Storkk (talk) 11:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks – not the first instance it happens. Possibly something wrong is with my settings, but I will push [Show changes] immediately before saving anything to a busy section next time. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Meh... it happens. No worries. While we should all "preview" or "show changes" more often, as long as it's infrequent and unintentional it's not the end of the world IMO. Storkk (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Opinion for rightsEdit

Opinion for rightsEdit

Hi @Incnis Mrsi:, could you please give your opinion for extended uploader rights request. I don't think that rollback rights will be granted for me but Thanks for your support on rollback request. ZI Jony (talk) 13:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

OpenBikeSharing screenshotsEdit

Hello,

A few months ago, you asked for deletion of files i uploaded on WC => https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Jerome_misc

About OpenBikeSharing screenshots, you wrote "possibly proprietary" OBS is a "free software" : https://f-droid.org/packages/be.brunoparmentier.openbikesharing.app/

Can you tell me what you think is "possibly proprietary" ?

--Jerome misc (talk) 17:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Jerome_misc didn’t care about valid attribution in file descriptions—a thing required by most free and liberal licenses—consequently Incnis_Mrsi doesn’t care which license some Android program has. Six files from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jerome misc were deleted due to errors in attribution; each file that was eventually undeleted got repairs for such an error. If you have ideas how to attribute OpenBikeSharing screenshots correctly, then go to Commons:Undeletion requests and make the case. In any case don’t bother me with it, please. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:12, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Rafic.MufidEdit

Commons:Village pump#To make checkusers work for Commons

Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Chyah

I wasn't sure if I would as several people here severely distrust me (so this doesn't really matter), but I took one more look.

There isn't much to analyze regarding the Mohammad Ghorbanpour socks, they have a couple hundred edits tops it seems. The only things that seem to stand out is that they spam Ghorbanpour and make relatively high numbers of Wikidata edits. So I searched the page titles (and edit summaries) of pages edited by Rafic.Mufid and Chyah.

I searched 105009 edits on Commons from Chyah (2011-2017), 88994 edits on Commons by Rafic.Mufid (2017-2018), 4974 Wikdata edits from Chyah and 6417 Wikidata edits from Rafic.Mufid. At first glance the numbers seem to suggest Rafic.Mufid was more active than Chyah, but I didn't dive into this any further - nobody cares if Chyah and Rafic.Mufid are the same person or not because neither misbehaved.

I searched that total of 205394 edits (page titles and edit summaries) for "ghpr", "ghbn" and "ghorban". Everything I found was unrelated to the artist, edits like these.

I wonder if Chyah ever even mentioned that Ghorbanpour singer. Even a mere mention that predates the spamming socks would comfort me a little they made the right call. Even though a mention would be no proof of a severe obsession, it would be something.. And shouldn't hurt the detectives and their methods. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

If the “obsession” theory has any currency, than certainly not here – I understand who Sonia/Rafic.Mufid is much better than an average Commons member. There may be other reasons for promotional uploads and edits by Sonia herself or a technically indistinguishable person, reasons which I won’t discuss. And why should you search for any incriminating edits by Sonia while check-users still neglect their direct responsibility? Let’s get them back to workplace. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
If someone is a fan (or hater) of the subject they are spamming, they would be unlikely to keep it completely quiet. Other reasons? Perhaps, as a paid-to-spam editor. I don't think so, but couldn't rule it out completely. Or other reasons that "you won't discuss". (maybe paid-to-spam to get money to flee the country, but that would still be paid-to-spam even if the goal is honorable)
Why should I search for it? If I find it, maybe I can confirm the CU did their job correctly.
Here are some accounts/IPs that were not linked on Category:Sockpuppets of Chyah, do with them whatever you want:
  • 80.242.7.35 AS50810 MOBINNET-AS AS47823 belongs to ArvanCloud CDN that is mobinnet peer, IR 80.242.0.0/20
  • 5.52.80.213 AS50810 MOBINNET-AS AS47823 belongs to ArvanCloud CDN that is mobinnet peer, IR 5.52.64.0/18
  • 5.52.144.60 AS50810 MOBINNET-AS AS47823 belongs to ArvanCloud CDN that is mobinnet peer, IR 5.52.128.0/18
  • 5.52.252.24 AS50810 MOBINNET-AS AS47823 belongs to ArvanCloud CDN that is mobinnet peer, IR 5.52.192.0/18 (because)
  • 5.52.67.136 AS50810 MOBINNET-AS AS47823 belongs to ArvanCloud CDN that is mobinnet peer, IR 5.52.64.0/18
  • 162.245.81.94 host.coloup.com AS19084 COLOUP - ColoUp, US 162.245.81.0/24 (certain, removed deletion template, and again, and again)
Rafic.Mufid IP: (no link to Ghorbanpour spam)
  • 109.169.65.151 AS20860 IOMART-AS, GB 109.169.64.0/19
Also interesting: this IP tagged a bunch of articles on fawiki as speedy with comment "Rafic.Mufid" or "Chyah". These articles (or most of them) were created by the account mentioned in the speedy. All those edits were undone. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Incnis Mrsi".