Open main menu

Contents

Authors should decide their own license preferencesEdit

I, Infrogmation, hereby "opt out" of the involuntary "license migration". Notes: The vast majority of my uploads I would happily agree to add cc-by-sa-3.0 to the listed license option (if that license is not one of the listed options already) IF I am ASKED. I do NOT consent to any change license of any of my copyrighted works that I have not personally authorized. I have NOT authorized any party other than myself to change licensing of any of my works without my explicit permission. See here on my talk page for discussion.

This was my stand more than 2 years ago. It has not changed. Months of work and thousands of edits have been required of me for this simple assertion of my basic authorship rights. I consider Wikimedia a noble project, but think Wikimedia should be deeply ashamed of the way they have treated and continue to treat contributors who have been kind enough to share their own media under free licenses. Infrogmation (talk)

I do so agree with you. This license policy of the commons project prevents me from uploading more photos because I do not like my pictures changed by other people and not even knowing about it. --Manuela (talk) 06:38, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

Rebuild image information please..Edit

Appreciated if you could cleanup the information provided here: File:Gerald Ford Edwin Edwards 1976.jpg

The parser checker thingy didn't like it.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:49, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Is it fixed now? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Help to delete the first uploaded fileEdit

Hi Infogramation, I was wondering if you could help me with this --> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Aqiqah_rice_box_(Indonesia).jpg The first one was wrongly uploaded by me. Thanks in advance. Naval Scene (talk) 13:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Done. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Wow, thanks again for your fast response! Bests, Naval Scene (talk) 06:21, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

File:QueenYangIf74.jpgEdit

 
File:QueenYangIf74.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pitpisit (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

File:E Woodward Seated Female Nude 1927.jpgEdit

 
File:E Woodward Seated Female Nude 1927.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Prosfilaes (talk) 01:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Milnebourg Train PictureEdit

Hello, I see that the image Milneburg Train is public domain from your entry and from the LSU library display page. I just want to confirm that it is OK for me to download and use your scan of this image from your Wikipedia page on the Pontchartrain R.R. thanks, Scott Ellis, author of "Madame Vieux Carre, the French Quarter in the Twentieth Century —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.63.60.143 (talk) 18:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure which picture you're referring to, but if it is marked as public domain on the image page, it's fine to reuse as you wish. Check the file page for individual pictures, the license (copyright status) will be listed. Many images are licensed requiring specific attribution to the photographer/author, but may be reused for free as long as the attribution/license terms are credited. See Commons:Reusing_content_outside_Wikimedia for more details. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Clean Populated places in LouisianaEdit

Remove Category:Populated places in Louisiana off all of Populated places in Louisiana. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 104.243.160.142 (talk) 23:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Because why? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons Conference projectEdit

Hello Infrogmation,

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 19:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:51, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Louisiana_SuperdomeEdit

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

International trucksEdit

There is a discussion on this page whether images should be categorised as International trucks or International Harvester trucks.   Not many wikipedia contributors have contributed to the discussion or voted with their preference, but you have contributed to material on International Harvester.   I would be grateful, if you have the time, if you would share your own opinion on the page name.  And thank you. Eddaido (talk) 00:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Wisdom Swimming.jpgEdit

 
File:Wisdom Swimming.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

207.165.194.2 20:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Birthday at Bacco.jpgEdit

 
File:Birthday at Bacco.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

E4024 (talk) 08:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Austin Marathon 2013 Grumpy Cat.jpgEdit

 
File:Austin Marathon 2013 Grumpy Cat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Wisdom Swimming.jpgEdit

 
File:Wisdom Swimming.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

209.129.247.244 20:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:1925_Ford_Model_TEdit

Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 07:08, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Burgundy Poland Union Swoon.JPGEdit

 
File:Burgundy Poland Union Swoon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 20:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:PFCEngland.jpgEdit

 
File:PFCEngland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

fourthords | =Λ= | 01:23, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Don Murray (clarinetist) pageEdit

You appear to have originally created the Don Murray page in 2003. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Murray_(clarinetist)

Where did you get the info that Ted Lewis said Murray was the greatest clarinetist ever to be in Lewis's band? I am writing about Don Murray now for publication and have read every available source I'm aware of. Nowhere have I found that Ted Lewis statement - except here. Can you please provide the source? Many thanks for your help.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Completewarrior (talk • contribs) 07:52, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
I don't recall off hand, but it may well be from a taped interview with Ted Lewis, IIRC by Richard B. Allen, at the Hogan Jazz Archive, Tulane University, since I've done lots of research at the Tulane Jazz Archive. I believe many of those archival interviews have been put online in recent years, so you may find it in a search of the Tulane U website. Cheers! -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:37, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Saints Fan and her boobs say Who Dat.jpgEdit

 
File:Saints Fan and her boobs say Who Dat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:AutomobilesEdit

Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:49, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

About Category:Rural municipalities in LouisianaEdit

hey, you need to added a rural incorporated places in Louisiana with Category:Rural municipalities in Louisiana. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 104.243.164.31 (talk) 22:48, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Bank_checksEdit

Flávio Nuno Neves Rodrigues (talk) 15:17, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Orange Pickup Truck New Orleans 2002.jpgEdit

 
File:Orange Pickup Truck New Orleans 2002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

File:GT BBall Swarm.jpgEdit

Hi Infrogmation, while researching the provenance of some other images, I happen to notice File:GT BBall Swarm.jpg, which is from [1] and has an apparently valid CC-BY-2.0 license. You deleted it in 2009 saying "Copyright violation: Creative Commons attribution license; photographer not credited". (I'm not sure why you didn't just fix the problem with the image rather than deleting it?) But could you please restore the image? Thanks, --B (talk) 18:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

I don't recall the details. Looking I see it was 9 years ago, and the image had false information about both license and author, which certainly qualifies for speedy deletion. If the actual source photo is free licensed and you think it of in scope usefulness, it may be uploaded with proper source, attribution, and license. Commons Upload Wizard: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:34, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gumbo and cheese grits French Press Lafayette Louisiana.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Gumbo and cheese grits French Press Lafayette Louisiana.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gumbo and cheese grits French Press Lafayette Louisiana.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 03:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bacon infused Bloody Mary with Pickled Okra Green beens and of course bacon French Press Lafayette Louisiana.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Bacon infused Bloody Mary with Pickled Okra Green beens and of course bacon French Press Lafayette Louisiana.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bacon infused Bloody Mary with Pickled Okra Green beens and of course bacon French Press Lafayette Louisiana.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 03:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Where's the permission?Edit

I fail to find any evidence of a CC-BY-SA-2.0 license for File:Gumbo and cheese grits French Press Lafayette Louisiana.jpg and File:Bacon infused Bloody Mary with Pickled Okra Green beens and of course bacon French Press Lafayette Louisiana.jpg - could you point me to the web page with this information? Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

(Looks at history...) Hm, it looks like the Flickr upload bot somehow put the 2.0 license on when uploading? I don't know why unless there was a change of license on Flickr, and that was what it was at the time of upload? Flickr user seems to have specified no copyright/public domain. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
No idea. The first edit in the file history shows flickrreview saying "Public Domain Mark" AND a {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} - maybe a bug in the "Flickr upload bot" at the time? I suspect it's always been a PDM. Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:21, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Any recommendation as to procedure? Contact the Flickr uploader? What is needed? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SirlanzEdit

Hello. Help vote. Thanks you. Pv sindhu (talk) 05:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Category:Medical_leechesEdit

E4024 (talk) 19:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:Social_classEdit

E4024 (talk) 02:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:USCG Range SFO Galveston.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:USCG Range SFO Galveston.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:USCG Range SFO Galveston.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Photographer's Barnstar
You're a visual historian, future New Orleansians(?) will be very grateful for all your hard work chronicling the city's contemporary history.   Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Oops! File:Orange Willys 1951 NOLA right side Grits.JPG and othersEdit

I have to apologise, I have made a mistake, I intended to add the pictures to the category 1950 Willys automobiles. 1950 because production ended in 1950. I see no reason why the vehicle might not have been sold new in 1951 but it looks wrong to have 1951 models of a car that was not made near that year.

In my enthusiasm I cannot have been watching what I was doing. I will go back and check my other edits around that time but not for an hour or two. Thanks for picking up my mistake. Eddaido (talk) 20:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. I believe I labeled it "1951" because that is what the person who was driving it told me. If that was a mistake, I have no objection changing to the correct year. However you added it to a category which is specifically for "Automobiles_in_the_Automobile_Driving_Museum", and since this car is not in that museum, it does not belong in that category. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:55, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
I do not understand how the museum category was picked from the drop down cat-a-lot menu. As I say above my attention must have been distracted. I am sure we are both of one mind but it certainly did not look like it. Eddaido (talk) 22:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Two observations: 1)I didn't see a separate categories for Willys_Jeepsters by year, perhaps they should be created if you feel a need. There are categories for "Willys_automobiles_by_model_year". 2)"Model year" may be relevant. US automakers often introduce new models before the end of the calendar year, so possibly "1951 model" Jeepsters were produced in calendar year 1950? Just wondering. Thanks for your work. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Quetzaltenango Iglasia San Nicolas y Mujer de pie.jpgEdit

 
File:Quetzaltenango Iglasia San Nicolas y Mujer de pie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:Xela Parque Central 2015 AzurdiaFoto 05.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Xela Parque Central 2015 AzurdiaFoto 05.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Xela Parque Central 2015 AzurdiaFoto 05.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:02, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Also

Category:FezEdit

Josh (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:Belly_dancersEdit

E4024 (talk) 16:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:Mothers_and_daughtersEdit

E4024 (talk) 01:27, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

heads upEdit

File:RN Image1.jpg was uploaded by User:Nolimetangere777 (It's a copyright violation, being a screenshot from here). That brand new file was then added to en:Rubin Naiman a few hours later by User:Ross kramerov. User:N4izL3etsP44k also seems to be involved. If I wasn't assuming good faith, I would figure that Ross kramerov is an obvious paid editor and the others are his socks. And everything uploaded here by any of them is suspect. (File:Chelsea Bunn.jpg for example, comes from here.) World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:47, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

@Infrogmation: Hello? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:03, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  • OK, if you can show those image are copyviols, any reason you're not listing them for deletion? (Sorry the amount of attention I can devote to Commons may or may not vary for a bit) Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
I didn't nominate them for deletion for the same reason that I didn't link the usernames. I approached you because you are an admin both here and on Wikipedia (and you had contact with Nolimetangere). I thought you might want to look into it over there, maybe even ask a checkuser to look into it, and I didn't want to alert the users in question. If you don't have time to follow up or think it is not worth looking into, that's fine. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:26, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
emailed you yesterday. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:39, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the email. Best wishes. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:11, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
See this and this. Just FYI. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

MissedEdit

Hi Infrogmation, I guess you missed this out but you closed the DR. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

About the deletion of File:Drawing of great horned owl (not by me).jpgEdit

Sorry, I didn’t realize I put "own work". I got the pic from a book called "An Introduction to Nature", which has a ton of beautiful illustrations throughout. The problem is that the first page of the book says "Illustrated by Don Eckelberry, Tabea Hofmann, and Michael H Bevans"; nowhere else does it say specifically who made what, but I was just about to change the description to say that it could be any one of those three people—but that I did believe Don E. was most likely, due to him showing up as a well-known professional illustrator of birds of all sorts when you look him up on Google. I guess they apparently didn’t care that much about them getting credit for their specific artworks. I could not find a copyright license, as it was not mentioned anywhere within the book. Sorry, I’m kind of new to this whole "uploading copyrighted material" thing, but I can assure you that I published this with the only intention of more people seeing the artist's amazing work.

If it did turn out to certainly be the work of Don E., and I had specified who the creator of the work was but still without providing a license, would it somehow be okay because he never ever anywhere specified a license in any of his works, and because I don’t believe I can ask him about it since he’s dead now (but I’m sure he wouldn’t mind)? If he were still alive, I believe he’d be around 97 years old. SaltySemanticSchmuck (talk) 22:10, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Note that Wikimedia Commons is for only free licensed media - mostly either copyright expired or the author authorizes reuse under a free license; see Commons:Licensing for details. Don't claim someone else's work as your own. Unless the artist/author (or if they are dead, the heirs to the artist/author's work) has specifically authorized a free license (see Commons:OTRS for details if they do), there's no reason to assume it's free licensed, sorry. If you have more questions about using Commons you can't find an answer to, ask. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Grudi.jpgEdit

 
File:Grudi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alex Spade (talk) 23:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Infrogmation".