Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


Einladung für den Jahreskalender 2016Edit

Hallo, ich lade dich hiermit herzlich dazu ein Fotos (von dir) für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2016 von Wikimedia Österreich zu nominieren, die 2015 hochgeladen und mit {{Supported by Wikimedia Österreich}} gekennzeichnet wurden. Gruß --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:08, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Gratulation!Edit

 
... fürs Mitmachen!

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich - und herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Foto File:Linz Holzstraße 3 Fleischmarkthalle frontal.jpg hat im Hauptwettbewerb Platz 10 gewonnen. Deine Fotos File:Spital aP Oberweng 106 Greßtenberg.jpg, File:Steinbach ad Steyr Messerermuseum Steg.jpg und File:Waldneukirchen Steyrtalbahn Brücke Widerlager Pieslwang 2015.jpg gehören zu den 40 Fotos, die im Hauptwettbewerb ex aequo Platz 11 belegen. Deine Fotos File:Waldneukirchen_Steyrtalbahn_Brücke_Widerlager_Pieslwang_09_2015.jpg, File:Sierning_Letten_Steyrtalbahn.jpg und File:Waldneukirchen_Steyrtalbahn_Haltestelle_09_2015.jpg liegen in der Sonderkategorie zu Bahninfrastruktur auf Platz 2. Insgesamt wurden dieses Jahr 7757 Fotos eingereicht. Die Liste der Preisträger findest du hier: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/category/news/.

Wir würden uns sehr freuen, wenn du persönlich an der Preisverleihung teilnehmen kannst, die am 9. Dezember 2015 um 17 Uhr in der Wiener Hofburg stattfindet. Wir werden dich diesbezüglich noch per E-Mail kontaktieren.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:55, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


possible FPCEdit

Hi,

I came across this picture of yours while voting for last month's photo contest. I was thinking about nominating it at FPC but wanted to check with you first (because you may have plans to edit it and/or nominate it yourself). I don't know if others will agree, but it seems like a great action shot IMO. — Rhododendrites talk |  05:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello Rhododentrites, I am pleased about your proposal and ask you to nominate this picture as is. It shows the moment of "yeah, I got it" when the girl has successfully completed her exercise in trickski --Isiwal (talk) 10:53, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
  DoneRhododendrites talk |  00:51, 11 July 2018 (UTC)


This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fischlham Mevisto Cup 2017 Trickski Theresa Schmidberger1-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fischlham Mevisto Cup 2017 Trickski Theresa Schmidberger1-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Leichtathletik Gala Linz 2018 pole vault Preiner Katrin-5628.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leichtathletik Gala Linz 2018 pole vault Preiner Katrin-5628.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)


Commons:Photo challenge/2018 - June - On the move/WinnersEdit

  Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Fischlham Mevisto Cup 2017 Trickski Theresa Schmidberger1-1.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge On the move, in June 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Images by HaeferlEdit

Hi Isiwal!

Hier ein schneller Petscan zu Haeferls Bildern, wie gestern besprochen ;-) LG, Braveheart (talk) 07:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Danke, schau ich mir an. Derzeit hole ich mir die Bilder über das Galery-tool. --Isiwal (talk) 07:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
BTW du kannst in commons den QInominator aktivieren (Einstellungen -->Unterprojekte), dann musst du nix schreiben. Das tool zieht Text + Autor hinein und fügt deine Signatur dazu. Das Häferl hat sich leider den englischen Text erspart. Den sollte man hinzufügen sonst gibts gleich ein Gemecker. --Isiwal (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Ah, vielen Dank für den Hinweis, erspart natürlich viel Zeit :-) Braveheart (talk) 20:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Sorry wegen den fehlenden englischen Beschreibungstexten, aber das ist ja Teil des Problems, warum ich mit den QIs aufgehört habe - ich kann einfach nicht so gut Englisch. Was den petscan betrifft, stimmt da irgendwas nicht: 1. sind da auch Bilder dabei, die in not-for-prejury sind (wobei Ihr die Gräber ruhig mitnehmen könnt), 2. sind auch Bilder aus 2017 dabei (letzteres stört zwar nicht, trotzdem liefert der petscan offensichtlich nicht das, was eingegeben wurde). Und danke jedenfalls für Eure Bemühungen! Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 21:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Stimmt, hier der neue Petscan - die "|1" hinter der 2018er-Kategorie hat bewirkt, dass auch die prejury-Kategorie selektiert wurde, da hat die Negativ-Kategorie dann nix mehr gebracht. Ist beim neuen nun korrigiert, 262 klingt auch deutlich einleuchtender. Braveheart (talk) 21:35, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Passt scho so wies is :-) Und das mit dem Englisch richt ma schon, gibt eh den leo. LG --Isiwal (talk) 22:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Ja, jetzt passt der petscan. :-) Wie gesagt, die Grabbilder gehen auch, wollte nur die Vorjury nicht mit endlosen Gräberserien langweilen und sowieso nicht mit einem Grabbild einen Preis gewinnen - aber als QI gerne. Und der Duke erlaubt es bei seinen Bildern jetzt doch auch, vorausgesetzt Ihr nehmt nur die wirklich schönen (z.B. das, was ich grad für den Kalender vorgeschlagen hab). Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 23:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Also wenns wirklich nur an den Übersetzungen scheitert, können wir auch gern eine Liste abarbeiten, die ihr zusammenstellt :-) Gern auch in Zukunft, das ist bei 5 Bildern pro Tag immer nur 2-3 Minuten Arbeit täglich. LG, Braveheart (talk) 07:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Aber immer nur 5 Bilder pro Tag und Autor. Sonst haben wir vermutlich bald Diskussionen wenn wir das pushen. Bei den Texten beschränke ich mich sowieso auf das Notwendigste - ein paar Minuten wie du sagst. Morgen nominiere ich wieder ein paar Bilder von mir. --Isiwal (talk) 08:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Hab heut (UTC-Zeit) noch ein paar Bilder der Top10 für WLM 2018 nominiert, inklusive deiner Kirchenorgel. Hoffe das ist ok so. LG, Braveheart (talk) 23:46, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Danke - bin positiv überrascht :-) --Isiwal (talk) 08:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Ich auch, viel Glück im internationalen Wettbewerb! Braveheart (talk) 09:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Das Bild von der Orgel ist bereits ein QI - das solltest du mit Withdraw zurückziehen, d.h. es wird dann aus der QI-Galerie automatisch entfernt. Ich habe aber vergessen wie das genau geht und im Moment gibts dort auch kein kopierbares Beispiel. schon erledigt --Isiwal (talk) 08:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Thnx, da haben sich die Nominierungen etwas überschnitten ;-) Braveheart (talk) 09:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Jetzt auch minus den bereits ausgezeichneten Bildern. Braveheart (talk) 07:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


WikiDaheim 2018 – Gratulation!Edit

Hallo Isiwal!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war.

Aus rund 500 von der Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger dieses Jahres gewählt und so haben wir die Freude, Dir zum 1. Platz in der Kategorie Gemeingüter zu gratulieren!

Du erhältst von mir ein E-Mail mit Details zur Preisvergabe.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 16:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)


FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:40. Schwimmzonen- und Mastersmeeting Enns 2017 100m Brust Damen-9834.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:40. Schwimmzonen- und Mastersmeeting Enns 2017 100m Brust Damen-9834.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Leichtathletik Gala Linz 2018 men´s 110m hurdles Okafor-6401.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leichtathletik Gala Linz 2018 men´s 110m hurdles Okafor-6401.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Gratulation, die Zweite!Edit

Hallo Isiwal!
nachdem auch die Jury des Bundesdenkmalamtes ihre Preisträger für mehrere Themenkategorien gewählt hat haben wir die Freude, Dir noch einmal zu gratulieren, zum 5. Platz in der Kategorie Denkmale für File:Dürnstein Klostergassl-7365.jpg. Deinen Preis, eine kleine Anerkennung, würden wir Dir gerne bei der WikiDaheim-Preisvergabe überreichen.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, --Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 11:36, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Garsten Pfarrkirche Langhaus Joch 2 Kartusche Fresko.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garsten Pfarrkirche Langhaus Joch 2 Kartusche Fresko.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2018 STM Austria Skibob Hochficht DERFLINGER Clemens-2143.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2018 STM Austria Skibob Hochficht DERFLINGER Clemens-2143.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Alpensteinbock Capra ibex-0801.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpensteinbock Capra ibex-0801.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Vanessa cardui on Lavandula angustifolia-2459.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vanessa cardui on Lavandula angustifolia-2459.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Haliaeetus pelagicus Riesenseeadler-3381.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haliaeetus pelagicus Riesenseeadler-3381.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2019: Gratulation zum Sonderpreis!Edit

Hallo Isiwal! Danke für deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb WikiDaheim 2019. Die erste der beiden Jurys hat schon getagt und ich freue mich dir mitteilen können, dass dein Foto Gmunden Seeschloss Orth-9513.jpg in der Kategorie für denkmalgeschützte Objekte Platz 2 erreicht hat. Das bedeutet auch, dass dieses Bild nun der internationalen Jury von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 vorgelegt wird und damit die Chance auf eine weitere Auszeichnung hat. Alle ausgezeichneten Fotos findest du auf Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Österreich. Die Preisverleihung von WikiDaheim findet 30. Jänner 2020 im Bundesdenkmalamt in der Wiener Hofburg statt. Dazu bekommst du zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch eine eigene Einladung. Für Fragen bis dahin erreichst du das WikiDaheim-Team unter wikidaheim[at]wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 10:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2019: Gratulation zum Sonderpreis!Edit

Hallo Isiwal!
Danke für deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb WikiDaheim 2019. Die erste der beiden Jurys hat schon getagt und ich freue mich dir mitteilen können, dass Du mit Museum Geyerhammer Scharnstein Schmiedefeuer-2772.jpg (2. Platz), Gmunden Gisela Tag des Denkmals 2019-2743.jpg (6. Platz) und Scharnstein Schloß Neuscharnstein großer Saal-2688-2.jpg (10. Platz) gleich mehrfach in den Top-Ten des Sonderpreises zum Tag des Denkmals vertreten bist.
Alle ausgezeichneten Fotos findest du auf Tag des Denkmals 2019 in Österreich. Die Preisverleihung findet 30. Jänner 2020 im Bundesdenkmalamt in der Wiener Hofburg statt. Dazu bekommst du zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch eine eigene Einladung. Für Fragen bis dahin erreichst du das WikiDaheim-Team unter wikidaheim[at]wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 11:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file moversEdit

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Salzburg Michaelskirche Deckenfresko-4118.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salzburg Michaelskirche Deckenfresko-4118.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

CongratulationsEdit

Congratulations and thanks for your Quality-Images and Featured pictures, you contributed to the photo competitions WLM and WikiDaheim!

Gratulation und danke für deine wunderbaren Quality-Images und featured Pictures, die du zu jedem Fotowettbewerb wie WLM und WikiDaheim beisteuerst!--Regiomontanus (talk) 11:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Die WikiDaheim-Jury hat noch nicht getagt. Daher sind auf Commons derzeit nur die 10 Hauptpreisträgerinnen und -preisträger von WLM 2019 zu sehen: Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 winners. MfG --Regiomontanus (talk) 16:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Danke für die Info - ich war der Meinung das wäre schon gelaufen --Isiwal (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Graureiher Ardea cinerea-4883.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Graureiher Ardea cinerea-4883.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2019 – Gratulation!Edit

Hallo Isiwal!
Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2019! In diesem Jahr freuen wir uns über mehr als 8000 Bilder, mit denen viele Orte oder Sehenswertes in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen oder besseren Bildern versehen werden können.

Aus den von der Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat die Hauptjury nun die Preisträger dieses Jahres gewählt und so haben wir die Freude, Dir zum 2. Platz zu gratulieren!

Eine Einladung mit den Details zur Preisvergabe erhältst Du demnächst noch via E-Mail.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 15:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cala Rajada Punta de Capdepera Faro-1623.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cala Rajada Punta de Capdepera Faro-1623.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremsmünster Stift Konventgarten-3040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremsmünster Stift Sternwartegarten Orangerie Zwerge-3038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremsmünster Stift Gartenhaus Moschee-3020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremsmünster Stift Gattersäge-3007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremsmünster Stift Ginkgo Maierhof-3057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremsmünster Stift Gymnasium-3044-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:58, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremsmünster Stift Sternwarte Portal-3039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:58, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremsmünster Stift Sternwarte-3004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:58, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremsmünster Stiftspark Dendlleiten-3018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:58, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melk Kolomanibrunnen Rathausplatz-3546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:58, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melk Stift Portal Stiftspark-3547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melk Altes Posthaus-3566.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 17:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donautal von der Ruine Aggstein-3490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schönbühel-Aggsbach Ruine Aggstein Tor zum inneren Hof-3542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 17:56, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schönbühel-Aggsbach Ruine Aggstein-3495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 16:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Schlossberg Chinesischer Pavillon Deckenverkleidung-4493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 16:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Barmherzigenkirche interior-4443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 16:39, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Dom Mittelschiff-5156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Dom Gewölbe Seitenschiff mitte rechts-5146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schönbühel-Aggsbach Ruine Aggstein-3492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  Comment I love the clouds! Possible FP, though someone will probably object to the bright light and shadow. -- Ikan Kekek 06:18, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Dom Kanzel-5164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Dom Orgelempore-5132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Dom Seitenaltar rechts-5151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Franziskanerkirche 20191204-5187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Katharinenkirche Mausoleum Interior-4501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Nirmal Dulal 08:49, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Stadtpfarrkirche Advent 2019-5179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz St. Andrä Andreaskapelle-4461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Stiegenkirche Portal 2019 2-5169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:12, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micheldorf Altpernstein-5596-5599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulrichsberg Bärenstein Aussichtspunkt-3692 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:29, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems Stein Frauenbergkirche-3424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Nice shot! --Scotch Mist 06:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems Stein Stadtmauer Plumpertor-3431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:08, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stein Nepomuk-3404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Schlossberg Stollen-4474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:17, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz St. Andrä interior-4455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:17, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Katharinenkirche Mausoleum Interior-4497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 03:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz St. Andrä Taufkapelle-4460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. -- Ikan Kekek 03:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Barmherzigenkirche interior Schiffsglocke Tegetthoff-4448.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 12:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Stadtpfarrkirche Johannes-Nepomuk-Kapelle 2019-5174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Donau Voest Brücke-5536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Europaschutzgebiet Traun-Donau-Auen Krems-7785 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems Stein Linzer Tor-3417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großer und Kleiner Pyhrgas-4401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Schönbühel-Aggsbach Ruine Aggstein-3492.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schönbühel-Aggsbach Ruine Aggstein-3492.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr Enns Steyrmündung-5485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selzthal ÖBB 2070 043-4201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Altstadt 10 und 12-5537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Pöstlingbergbahn Haltestelle Einschnitt-7640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Ars Electronica center-5529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Some more categories would be fine. --Ermell 20:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
  Done thanks for review--Isiwal 20:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Schlossmuseum Linzer Krippe-5548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jauerling Jahnwiese Denkmal-9195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:08, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jauerling Nähe Stauferhütte-9198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:09, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jauerling Sender Aussichtswarte Jahnwiese-9209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:09, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr Ennssteg-5479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selzthal ÖBB 2070 043-4211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:10, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz vom Roten Tor-3303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz Burgbergturm-3161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz Hofarnsdorf Donau downstream-3191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 10:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz Donau upstream-3214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 10:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Nationalbibliothek Glockendons luxuriöses Gebetbuch-4767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Bwag 12:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Stimoroll 04:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz Weinberg Singerriedl-3319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz Weinberg Singerriedl-3279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz Dreifaltigkeitsbrunnen-9192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz Weinberg Singerriedl-3306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz Weinberg Singerriedl-3283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pichl bei Wels Pfarrkirche St. Martin-9319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:26, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchkirchen Pfarrhof-9341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchkirchen Pfarrkirche St. Jakob-9332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micheldorf Altpernstein Hungerturm-9296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micheldorf Hirschwaldstein Eustachiuskreuz-9246-9246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißenkirchen in der Wachau-9234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pichl bei Wels Pfarrkirche St. MArtin-9314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz Wachauer Bahn-3240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The most exiting element of this picture is the CW tilt ;-). Maybe it's perspective distortion, but without verticals on the left it can't be distinguished. Could you please fix this? --PtrQs 00:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  Done thanks for review --Isiwal 14:56, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Good Quality. --PtrQs 16:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pichl bei Wels Friedhofslinde-9306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wartberg ob der Aist Kalvarienberg Mahnmal Menschenjagd 1945-4693.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, I like the artistic composition --Michielverbeek 19:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wartberg ob der Aist Kalvarienbergkapelle-4679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wartberg ob der Aist Kalvarienbergkapelle-4696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pregarten Landschaftsschutzgebiet Feldaist Wollsackverwitterung-4628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pregarten Landschaftsschutzgebiet Feldaist Jahnsteg-4563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pregarten Landschaftsschutzgebiet Feldaist Oberwasser Kriehmühle-4652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pregarten Landschaftsschutzgebiet Feldaist Felsnase-4586.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wartberg ob der Aist Kalvarienbergkapelle-4683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Pöstlingbergbahn Haltestelle Schlössl-7635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:49, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enns Georgenberg Burgstall-5922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:49, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scharnstein Ruine-9356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wartberg ob der Aist Kalvarienbergkapelle-4694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aggsbach Kartause Kirche-3450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aggsbach Kartause Kirche Orgel-3463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aggsbach Kartause Kreuzgang-3470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aggsbach Kartause Meditationsgarten-3477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scharnstein Ruine Bräumauer Maisenkögerl-9359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Kajetanerkirche Kuppel Troger-4232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 20:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Kajetanerkirche linker Seitenaltar-4292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 20:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Kajetanerkirche rechter Seitenaltar-4279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and beautiful-- Spurzem 20:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Katakomben Gertraudenkapelle1-4309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Katakomben Gertraudenkapelle-4333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tobelbad Festsaal Fresco-stitched.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche St.Peter-4363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Katakomben Maximuskapelle Bogengrab-4344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 06:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Katakomben Maximuskapelle Treppe-4355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Katakomben Maximuskapelle-4342.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 06:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz Schloss Niederhaus-3168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ottensheim Pfarrkirche Chor-3793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good -- Spurzem 07:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melk Stift Prälatenhof Brunnen-3561.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wels Pfarrkirche Chor-5938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Moahim 09:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aggsbach Kartause Kirche-3460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wartberg ob der Aist Kalvarienberg-4703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schönbühel-Aggsbach Ruine Aggstein-3483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grünburg Rinnerberger Wasserfall-9568.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I really like this - really good exposure time for the water, pretty much optimal to me. -- Ikan Kekek 23:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grünburg Rinnerbergerbach Steg-9529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Katakomben Gertraudenkapelle-4320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scharnstein Tisch beim Turm-9364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 10:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scharnstein Wagnerkapelle Talsperrmauer-9367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulrichsberg Bärenstein Aussichtspunkt-3692 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems Stein Felsenbrunnen-3427.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 18:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pettenbach Ruine Schloss Seisenburg-9625- 9630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pregarten Landschaftsschutzgebiet Feldaist-4600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Vincent60030 07:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waidhofen rechtes Ybbsufer ab Zeller Brücke nach südost -9433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Ulrich bei Steyr Dambergwarte Treppe-9659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micheldorf Altpernstein-5600-5605.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:09, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waidhofen Ybbsaufwärts vom Schlosssteg-9455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Very nice composition --Augustgeyler 15:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waidhofen linkes Ybbsufer ab Zeller Brücke nach nordwest-9441.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aggsbach Kartause Hof-3448.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 15:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grünburg Rinnerbergerbach-9554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waidhofen Alte Post Arkadenhof-9395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Ulrich bei Steyr Dambergwarte-41-212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Slightly noisey sky but good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Ulrich bei Steyr Hönigmayr-Wiese-9678-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support perfect composition --Augustgeyler 13:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waidhofen an der Ybbs Rothschildschloss-9371.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cvmontuy 20:37, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Ulrich bei Steyr Dambergwarte Stütze mit Verstrebung-9667.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 23:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spitz Pichlhof-3184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuhofen ad Krems Volkersdorferkreuz-0284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Burg Doppelwendeltreppe-2620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremsmünster Kirchberg Sankt Stephan Orgelempore-0198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremsmünster Kirchberg Sankt Stephan Hauptaltar-0205-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuhofen ad Krems Kremsfluss-5958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Very nice one. Amazing colors. --Augustgeyler 11:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuhofen ad Krems Obere Wehranlage-0230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuhofen ad Krems Piberbach Bogenbrücke über die Krems-0235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pichl bei Wels Pfarrkirche St. Martin-9307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuhofen ad Krems Figurenbildstock hl. Johannes Nepomuk-0277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 05:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traunkirchen Pfarrkirche Mariä Krönung Friedhof-0443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fischlham Pfarrkirche Fischerkanzel-0348-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fischlham Pfarrkirche hl Petrus-0385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fischlham Pfarrkirche Chor Fischerkanzel-0359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and beautiful lighting -- Spurzem 16:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuhofen ad Krems Pestsäule Hainbergstraße-0224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)~

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traunkirchen Pfarrkirche Mariä Krönung Fischerkanzel-0409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traunkirchen Pfarrhof Friedhof mit Seeblick-0422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fischlham Pfarrkirche Chor Gewölbe-0357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gmunden Rathaus-0397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Verticals at the right side should be checked. --Ermell 19:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  Done thanks for review --Isiwal 19:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gmunden Rathaus Portal-0398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gmunden ehemaliges Gasthaus Traungasse 1-0396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 04:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gmunden Franz-Josefs-Platz Der Gnom mit dem Bergkristall Heinrich Natterer-0390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waidhofen Unterer Stadtplatz 3-9409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traunkirchen Pfarrhof ehemaliges Jesuitenkloster Tor zum Innenhof-0459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sipbachzell Pfarrkirche hl Margareta Fenster rechts-0518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traunkirchen Pfarrhof Friedhof Gedenktafel-0423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traunkirchen Johannesberg Danksagung-0457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sipbachzell Pfarrkirche hl Margareta Orgelempore-0526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waidhofen an der Ybbs vom Burgfried Rothschildschloss-9491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuhofen an der Krems St.Marien Nöstlbach Wehranlage Weißenberg-5947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Very soft along the top and right edges at 100%, but looks just about acceptable at full screen. (Possibly a narrower aperture would have helped, as f/8 is a bit wide for such a range of distances.) Exposure is balanced, and composition is clean. --Bobulous 16:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fischlham Erinnerungsstätte Kriegerdenkmal-0375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

‚‘== Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Supermarket in recife, pernambuco, Brazil.jpg ==

Dear Isiwal,

I have uploaded a new improved version in this nomination, please, take another look and tell me what you think. Thank you very much --Wilfredor (talk) 11:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, maybe it's me, I don't know, but it's just a shelf of fish tins, I miss the wow factor. In addition, some time ago I was accused of misconduct because I supported a nomination upon request . Therefore there will be no further comment on the matter on my part.--Isiwal (talk) 13:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Any feedback ever negative is welcome, I understand and thank you, sincerely--Wilfredor (talk) 02:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retz Kalvarienberg-6576-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinbach an der Steyr Ortsbrunnen-0623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:54, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinbach an der Steyr von oberhalb des Friedhofs-0581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Liridon 12:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinbach an der Steyr Friedhof Priestergrab-0587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grünburg Bahnhof Dampflokomotive Klaus-0681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinbach an der Steyr von oberhalb des Friedhofs-0581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinbach an der Steyr Pfarrkirche Grabkreuz Häuserer-0620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retz Kalvarienberg-6573-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grünburg Rinnerbergerbach-9535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araneus diadematus female-1230-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 03:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr Werndldenkmal-0992.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Tilted CW. --Halavar 09:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  Done Thanks for review--Isiwal 10:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality now. --Halavar 14:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr Werndldenkmal Schmied-0999-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr Werndldenkmal Tischler-1005-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --2simple 07:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinbach an der Steyr Friedhofsportal-0599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Nice photo but dust spot near middle top! --Scotch Mist 15:40, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  Done thanks for review --Isiwal 17:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

WLM2020 in Slovenia - invitationEdit

Dear Isiwal, I noticed that you occasionally publish photos from Slovenia, so I would like to invite you to participate in this year's Wiki Loves Monuments competition, if you have any unpublished pictures of listed monuments in your collection or if you are planning to visit this month. The competition runs until the end of October. Best, — Yerpo Eh? 07:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello Yerpo, thanks for the hint. I had planned a trip to Piran again in July this year. Unfortunately, this was not possible due to Corona. But I will check my files to see if there is anything else that can be used. regards --Isiwal (talk) 07:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Just a minor note: not all object listed in the official registry are monuments. Those can be distinguished by stating "spomenik lokalnega pomena" or "spomenik državnega pomena" under the heading "Spomenik" in the description. So for example, the picture of Valetta tunnel is unfortunately not eligible for the competition (see EŠD 28483, compare with EŠD 7259). Your other contributions are ok, as far as I saw, and, of course, all are welcome. — Yerpo Eh? 11:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Many thanks for information, that protects me from some unnecessary work. --Isiwal (talk) 11:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello Yerpo, I am very happy with the register kulturne dediščine. I learned so much about the objects I photographed and / or have seen. Thank you for linking with WLM Slovenia. The Wikipedians of Slovenia User Group and the creators of the database did a great job! --Isiwal (talk) 16:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

I'm happy to hear that :) Yeah, the database is an uncharacteristically great product of our government, and its capabilities and openness (it is actually possible to download the entire database) enabled us to organize WLM in the first place. — Yerpo Eh? 17:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran chapel on cemetery-1788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Portorož Tunnel Valetta-8031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Interesting shot. Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 10:54, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 14:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Portorož sv Bernadin belfry-7885.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran office building Droga Portorož-4504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Hall Kurpark Brunnen-1434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Cerkev sv. Peter interior-4142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Gabrielli Palace Sergej Mašera Maritime Museum-4703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Portorož sv Bernadin belfry-7886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Hiša Pusterla 11-4362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Barbojo Trevisini Palace-4690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran baroque residential building- Hiša Savudrijska 9-4290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:50, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran neogothic resdential house - Hiša Benvenutti-7785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  SupportDifficult light conditions, good quality result. --Tsui 22:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Courthouse and Tartini monument-7960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Stimoroll 08:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran palace Benečanka 2015 lateral-4475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Tartini Monument most common view-4115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran residential building Prvomajski trg 2-4345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, interesting image --PantheraLeo1359531 13:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Bartole Palaces-4702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran city walls battlement parapet-1805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Tartini monument-7964-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 08:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran right column for flagpole-4477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 08:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran cemetery-1791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Prvomajski trg and residential house -4323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Krajinski park Sečoveljske soline-7676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piran Seča shipyard-1562.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)