Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, IssamBarhoumi!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Contents

Images from WLMEdit

Hi,
Some images are not concerned by the contest (The Ribat of Sousse), for the others, I will fix them. Thanks for participating and sharing your photos. Regards. --— D Y O L F 77 [Talk] 12:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Merci !Edit

Bonjour,

Merci beaucoup d'avoir participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 en Tunisie. Restez en contact pour être informé de nos prochains événements.
À bientôt, Dyolf77 (d · c)

WLAEdit

Il faut sélectionner une seule photo :) --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)


Photos de Kairouan et de sa Grande MosquéeEdit

Bonjour Mr Issam Barhoumi, je suis l'auteur et le contributeur de l'article Wikipédia Grande Mosquée de Kairouan. j'ai remarqué que tu as pris plusieurs photos à l'occasion de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015. J'espère que tu prendras également plusieurs photos de la Grande Mosquée de Kairouan ou mosquée Oqba Ibn Nafi : ses extérieurs, ses intérieurs et notamment les éléments de la cour et de la salle de prière (colonnes, maqsura, minbar, etc), ainsi que des photos d'autres monuments de Kairouan : remparts, mausolées, autres mosquées. Salutations très cordiales, Sutherland (d) 13:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Rethink the way you are working.Edit

You have such wonderful motifs in your country, I´m sure, most picture will be improved, when you use a tripod.

It´s a big misunderstanding, that you can meet the lightning problems, typical for interior pictures, just by raising the ISO rate. the D5200 does not allow more than ISO 400, due to its sensor. Every ISO rate above will just lead to color noise. You have a quite good equipment, use it as a photographer, not a snap-shooter. Take more time for yourself, think about the available light. Use the AV-Mode. And use the spot measure method. And a tripod. --Hubertl 23:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

It´s the second time todayEdit

that you placed your nominations wrong. Please, always put your nominations after the <gallery>-Tag. Otherwise, it won´t work.

Much better would be, if you read the explanations on the start page, it is well descripted (english and french), how to do it with Java-script. Use the QInominator, a gadget, which is constructed just for nominating QI. It is much easier and you dont make mistakes. Thank you!

Now, it was the third time. If you don´t communicate, your nominations will be deleted. Point. You misplaced a nomination again today, it´s deleted now. Don´t tell me, nobody haven´t told you anything about this issue. --Hubertl 11:25, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry and ThanksEdit

Thank you --Hubertl~~ now I saw your messages because I am a newbie in editing and I am so grateful for the piece of advice I fixed the nomination issue and I will improve my shooting skills :)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetières Hou Tabiya Koubbas, tombes et épitaphes 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Óðinn 13:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Taivo (talk) 12:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear IssamBarhoumi,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buste de Capoue de Hannibal au Musée National du Bardo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I propose to apply a 5:7 ratio (see notes) to reduce empty space. --Cccefalon 10:52, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
I did it my friend --IssamBarhoumi 20:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Good quality. Well done. --Cccefalon 20:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galite-Galiton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Tilted, check horizon. And also, it is quite hazy. --C messier 12:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)   Comment dear --C messier I fixed the horizon And make it clearer --IssamBarhoumi 02:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
  Support By making clearer I ment add some more contrast, now it looks slightly oversharpened, but IMHO, still acceptable. --C messier 12:17, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc National de Jabal Zaghouan 177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamants roses sur le Lac de Tunis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:40, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc national de Jebel Zaghouan 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 03:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galite-Galiton 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  SupportThe rocks are not that sharp, but I like the composition and the idea. Light over the see well managed.--Jebulon 09:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galite-Galiton 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok for me! --Hubertl 20:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galite-Galiton 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 03:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Tunis Sud 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good composition and nice DoF --Daniel Case 03:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc National de Jabal Zaghouan 172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galite-Galiton 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galite-Galiton 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 16:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc National de Jabal Zaghouan 176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 22:05, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue du mihrab dans la salle de prière de la Grande Mosquée de Kairouan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok for me. --Hubertl 23:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Fixing up a photoEdit

Hello again! The first thing for a good photo is the quality of the light and what color it has. In your picture you had both yellow and blue light. You should chose only one of those. In almost every photoshop program there is a function called "white balance" or just "WB". It is usually a tool that you can point to something in the picture that you want to be absolutely white, grey or black. This adjusts the picture to what photographers call "light temperature". As you see in the picture, the clock is now white instead of light blue as it was before.

After this I used another tool to adjust the total brightness of the picture. This can be done in several ways and you have to look for something called "light adjustment" or something like that. With that you can make a picture lighter or darker. Finally I used a tool in photoshop called a "light brush" and swept it over the darkest shadows to brighten the picture further. I think it would be a great idea if you tested some of these functions on some of your other photos to see what results you can get. But remember that it usually takes years to learn this properly. Good luck!   cart-Talk 23:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Détails du Mihrab 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --W.carter 19:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Détails du Mihrab 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A little soft on the left side, but overall good quality. --W.carter 19:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grande Mosquée de Kairouan, gros plan sur le mihrab.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
At first I hesitated here if you should break the rule of perspective correction to preserve the whole lovely arc above the pillars, but then I saw the plastic bag... so I would recommend it anyway. If you correct the perspective, the plastic bag will fall outside the new crop of the picture. W.carter 19:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Dear W.carter I removed the plastic bag by correcting the vertical perspective --IssamBarhoumi 19:55, 7 September 2016 (UTC))
Thank you! That looks so much better. :) Good quality. --W.carter 19:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great Mosque of Kairouan (Okba Mosque), the main dome 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --W.carter 21:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Détails du Mihrab 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amphithéâtre d'ElJem 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. If you crop out some of the foreground it might look much better. --Ermell 14:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
  Support Very good picture--Lmbuga 16:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okba Mosque Main Dome 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 14:14, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amphithéâtre d'ElJem 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bab Bhar Mahdia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
tilted and to dark. No QI for me --Milseburg 12:43, 9 September 2016 (UTC) Dear Milseburg I fixed the horizon and enlightened it a bit --IssamBarhoumi 14:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC) The horizon is still tilting ccw, but it doesn´t really matter any more for QI. But IMHO it´s still underexposed or taken in unfortunate conditions. You´re free to send it in CR. --Milseburg 10:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC) dear --Milseburg have a look now i want to learn more if it is not OK for you there is no need to send it to CR cuz I am the owner --IssamBarhoumi 13:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC) It´s ok to send own images to CR to ge a third opinion. You´ve made some unexpected improvements. I think it´s enough for QI now. --Milseburg 19:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skifa ElKahla 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good contre-jour image. Daniel Case 02:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dar Echérif 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ksar Lemsa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 10:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausolée de C. Marius Romanus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The main object is in the shadow, which is a pity, but the quality is OK. --Basotxerri 15:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausolée de C. Marius Romanus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 13:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand chapiteau corinthien 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 07:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausolée de C. Marius Romanus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosquée de Mohammed Bey 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dar Echérif 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:29, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Café Bayn el Qahâwi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality however you must add some categories, at least one for the town/city --Christian Ferrer 11:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC) Dear --Christian Ferrer I added the city in all the four photos of the dome --IssamBarhoumi 13:57, 19 September 2016 (UTC)  Support ok fine --Christian Ferrer 20:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Café Bayn el Qahâwi 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 02:43, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ksar Lemsa 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 02:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ksar Lemsa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 02:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kasr carré d Sidi Amara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice and interesting! Could be a bit sharper and the composition more out of the centre but it's nice. Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC) dear Basotxerri I improved th sharpness have a look please --IssamBarhoumi 20:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Dear IssamBarhoumi, thank you for your good will. However, this is the first time that I have set a picture as promoted and an additional enhancement degrades the quality. Please compare both images, the new one looks overprocessed to me. It seems that you've given the image too much sharpness. Furthermore, now there are visible halos on the right side of the wall. You should revert to the first version or apply the modified controls in a finer way. I don't know if I explain myself well... --Basotxerri 14:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC) dear Basotxerri could you please have a look again I improved sharpness in the photo --IssamBarhoumi 22:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
OK now, thank you! --Basotxerri 18:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Café Bayn el Qahâwi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --W.carter 18:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ksar Lemsa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I'd welcome a second opinion, but the quality looks quite acceptable to me. The photo is a bit subdued in lighting, but it's kind of nice to reflect the effect of the clouds that way. -- Ikan Kekek 10:16, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpture at Ksar Lemsa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
*  Comment Nice and sharp, but there are halos around the stone. Also, may I suggest a more precise file name?--Peulle 09:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)   Comment dear you have to sign your comment but this is my answer I can't change the name of my file because it i the only stone on Ksar Lemsa with a similar sculpture I put that name because it is more useful to know the place in that case for the halos it i due to contrast due to the clouds and light in the background. dear Hubertl could you give us your opinion here --IssamBarhoumi 15:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, forgot to sign last time. I think the file should have a more accurate name, such as sculpture at Ksar Lemsa, so that it's easier to find on commons when searching for it. If I shot an image of the Eiffel Tower and called the image "view of Paris", it would be inaccurate. --Peulle 09:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC) dear Peulle I requested a file rename have a nice day --IssamBarhoumi 10:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC) dear Peulle the name has been chnaged IssamBarhoumi Fair enough.--Peulle 09:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grande Mosquée de Sousse 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple de Saturne de Dougga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple de Caelestis 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 15:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausolée libyco-punique de Dougga 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Note: tower is crooked to me.--Famberhorst 15:21, 5 October 2016 (UTC) dear Famberhorst I fixed it --IssamBarhoumi 19:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citernes situées au nord des thermes 213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imam Mazri 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --W.carter 13:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citernes situées au nord des thermes 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok --Poco a poco 08:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ribat de Monastir 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good and interesting photo and good categories (you are learning ^^) but the horizon is tilted and the description needs to be more than just one word. W.carter 13:52, 8 October 2016 (UTC) dear W.carter I changed the description by editing the file and I fixed the horizon have a look please --IssamBarhoumi 16:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Now that is much better. :) Good quality. --W.carter 10:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausolée libyco-punique de Dougga 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok now, but still, I believe that the result could be better. If you like I can process your RAW files to show you how I'd do it. --Poco a poco 08:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC) dear Poco a poco on that day I took photos in JPG format I do not have RAWs --IssamBarhoumi 14:46, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple aux six colonnes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple de Caelestis 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple aux six colonnes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausolée libyco-punique de Dougga 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 09:51, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amphithéâtre d'El Jem 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice photo but it needs a bit more than a one-word description. --W.carter 13:58, 8 October 2016 (UTC) dear W.carter I improved the description have a look please --IssamBarhoumi 14:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Good quality. W.carter 09:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourbet El Bey 144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Mustapha Khaznadar in Tourbet El Bey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple aux six colonnes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
it is tilted on the left --Christian Ferrer 08:16, 12 October 2016 (UTC) dear Christian Ferrer done have a look please --IssamBarhoumi 22:21, 12 October 2016 (UTC)  Support ok now, a little advice : you should decrease a bit the saturation and increse a bit the contrast, it's a nice image! --Christian Ferrer 12:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosquée El Ksar 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kasba of Ghazi Mostpha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 12:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dar Ben Ayyed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 12:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arc monumental.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --A.Savin 03:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hypogée 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Vengolis 01:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple de Caelestis 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Lean looks to be in the object itself, not the lens. --Crisco 1492 04:33, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Featured picturesEdit

You have been lately active on FP. So I took a look into your images and for me the following ones standed out.

Maybe that could give some idea on what might work there. Even thou I'd have to admit, that many of those images would not get a FP star in nominated. There are some minor issues, that are always picked on, as FP pictures are expected to be nearly flawless. But the locations and the images like that would definitely have a great potential. There is this unexplainable something, what creates wow.

By now I've personally added nearly 5200 images to Commons, but only 5 of my own images have been featured so far. That just how it is. So keep on trying and you'll definitely soon get there. Good luck! Kruusamägi (talk) 16:42, 19 October 2016 (UTC)   Comment dear Kruusamägi thank you my friend I will begin with your selection. By the way I have been in Estonia in 2012 in Tallin ... it is a beautiful country :) --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Byzantin de Younga 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality/ --Rbrechko 14:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Byzantin de Younga 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 11:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grande Mosquée de Sfax 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 11:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Souk Kriaâ 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Synagogue de la Ghriba Djerba 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 19:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Withdraw?Edit

It looks like you tried to withdraw your nomination at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Temple aux six colonnes 01.jpg, but the edit was done by an IP. You can only withdraw this while logged in to your account, so we know for sure it's you doing the withdraw. lNeverCry 20:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Temple aux six colonnes 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Temple aux six colonnes 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple aux six colonnes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
This version is good enough, thanks --Poco a poco 07:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carassius auratus black telescope.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Slight light refraaction but generally good quality. --Peulle 21:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Super moon over Medina of Tunis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The quality is a bit iffy to my eyes, because the photo is pretty noisy at full size, but that's a beautiful composition. -- Ikan Kekek 03:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont aqueduc sur l'oued Cherchira et réservoir voisin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dancing Knight 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Super moon over Medina of Tunis.jpgEdit

I believe that this image has a strong chance if you nominate it at FPC.
Je crois que cette image a un chance fort en FPC. Thanks, merci -- Thennicke (talk) 11:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

dear Thennicke I nominated it for featured pictures but it was declined. Thank you i will improve my skills dear Thennicke --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
@IssamBarhoumi: Oh, I should have looked more carefully at the file page. Anyway, it's a great image, despite having too much noise reduction. The colours and the composition are really nice, you just need a better way of handling noise in your processing software. Regards -- Thennicke (talk) 01:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
@Thennicke: thank you :) I ll do my best --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quadria of Nefta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dancing Kgnit 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tunisian Drummers and a Dancing Kgnit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice perspective and composition, if perhaps a little too aggressively lightened --Daniel Case 05:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dancing Kgnit 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice end-of-day atmosphere --Daniel Case 05:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drummers 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 17:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weld Jallaba Show 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Very interesting. --Yann 20:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

FPCEdit

Hi! Please remember that you have to complete the creation of the nomination page before adding the new nomination to the FPC list, otherwise it can be reverted as it was done here. I have fixed it now, but keep it in mind. Good luck with the nomination! --cart-Talk 11:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

dear cart-Talk yes I will --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medina old Town of Tunis.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc national de Jebel Orbata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Village Snad inside Mountain Orbata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --W.carter 10:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Village Snad inside Mountain Orbata.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Village Snad inside Mountain Orbata.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capparis spinosa Ichkeul National Parc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Capparis spinosa Ichkeul National Parc.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Capparis spinosa Ichkeul National Parc.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aqueduct of Chemtou 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 18:35, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marius Romanus still standing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality--Capricorn4049 14:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citernes de La Malga 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality--Capricorn4049 14:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kasbah of Bizerte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Not perfect but better, good enough for QI IMHO --Poco a poco 11:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Mosque Zitouna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saheb Ettabaâ Mosque by night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Jupiter 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dyeing Chechia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beignet maker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. JiriMatejicek 10:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Beignet maker.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beignet maker.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves AfricaEdit

The Wiki Loves Africa 2017 photographic contest is officially closed. Thank you all for your participation !

This year, the photographic competition has resulted in an amazing 18,294 image uploads to Commons around the theme People at Work.
International winners have been announced !!! Check it out on Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2017/Winners. Congratulations to winners and all those who participated and organised events. More national winners are yet to be announced.
Please follow us on Facebook to know more and stay informed next year.

There are several fun ways you can help us to make the impact of Wiki Loves Africa stronger:

  • Add more categories to your images so that people will find them to use them in articles ... you can see how to do this here: Quick Guide to Categories on Commons
  • Improve the images description to make them easier to understand and reuse.
  • Add your image to a relevant Wikipedia article, i.e. if your image shows a tailor sewing, then add the image to an article on Sewing or Tailors - this allows readers to see different global perspectives of a universal subject. You can see how to do this here: How to insert images into Wikipedia using WikiText
  • If there is no article that reflects the subject of your images, then start an article about that subject. If you are a new editor, you can see how to do that here: Creating your first article
  • Add more images - you can add more images or media that reflect interesting and encyclopedic subjects in your immediate community.
  • Use the images produced during the contest. Here is a short link to the best ones : c:Category:Best images from Wiki Loves Africa 2017

We look forward to seeing your contributions!!

Warmest,

Anthere for the Wiki Loves Africa Team


Le concours Wiki Loves Africa 2017 est officiellement fermé. Merci d'avoir participé !
Cette année, le concours photo Wiki Loves Africa 2017 a permis l'ajout de 18,294 photos à Wikimedia Commons sur le thème Les gens au travail, une participation en très forte augmentation par rapport aux années précédentes.
Les gagnants ont été annoncés !!! Voir tous les résultats sur Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2017/Winners. Félicitations aux gagnants mais aussi à tous les participants ainsi qu'aux organisateurs d'évènements. Des gagnants nationaux doivent encore être annoncés.
Suivez nos actualités sur Facebook pour en savoir plus et être informés du prochain concours.

Le projet se veut une célébration de la diversité visuelle de l'Afrique sur Wikipédia et ses projets frères. Vous pouvez augmenter l'impact de Wiki Loves Africa des façons suivantes:

  • Fournir d'avantage de photos !
  • Ajouter des catégories à vos images afin que les utilisateurs les trouvent plus facilement. Voici comment faire: Commons:Catégories.
  • Vous pouvez également améliorer les descriptions de vos images pour faciliter leur compréhension et leur réutilisation.
  • Ajouter vos images dans un article existant sur Wikipédia.
  • S'il n'existe aucun article correspondant à ce qu'illustre votre photo, pourquoi ne pas envisager de créer un nouvel article sur Wikipedia ?
  • Vous pouvez même rejoindre un groupe d'utilisateurs locaux. Vous pouvez trouver les groupes déjà existant ici: groupes Wikimedia en Afrique
  • Utilisez les meilleures images produites pendant le concours. Voici un lien vers les meilleures : c:Category:Best images from Wiki Loves Africa 2017

Merci encore pour vos contributions.

Anthere pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa.

مسابقة التصوير الفوتوغرافي ويكي تهوى إفريقيا 2017 رسميًا مغلقة . شكرا لكم على مشاركتكم !

في هذا العام ، أسفرت مسابقة التصوير الفوتوغرافي عن تحميلات مذهلة للصور بلغ عددها 18،294 إلى كومنز حول موضوع الناس في العمل.

تم الإعلان عن الفائزين الدوليين !!! شاهد ذلك على كومنز: ويكي تهوى إفريقيا 2017 / الفائزين. تهانينا للفائزين وجميع من شاركوا في الفعاليات التي نظمت. المزيد من الفائزين الوطنيين لم يعلن بعد. يرجى متابعتنا على فيسبوك لمعرفة المزيد من االأخبار والبقاء على اطلاع للسنة المقبلة .

هناك العديد من الطرق الممتعة التي يمكنك مساعدتنا في جعل ويكي تهوى إفريقيا أقوى تأثيرا:

  • أضف المزيد من التصانيف إلى صورك حتى يعثر عليها المستخدمون لإستعمالها في المقالات... يمكنك أن ترى كيفية القيام بذلك هنا: الدليل السريع التصانيف في كومنز
  • قم بتحسين وصف الصور لتسهيل فهمها وإعادة استخدامها.
  • أضف صورتك إلى مقالة في ويكيبيديا ذات صلة، أي إذا كانت صورتك تعرض خياطة مخصصة ، أضف الصورة إلى مقالة عن الخياطة أو الخياطة - وهذا يتيح للقراء رؤية مشاهد عالمية مختلفة لموضوع عالمي. يمكنك أن ترى كيفية القيام بذلك هنا: كيفية إدراج الصور في ويكيبيديا باستخدام ويكي نص
  • إذا لم تكن هناك مقالة تعكس موضوع صورك ، فقم ببدء مقال حول هذا الموضوع. إذا كنت محررًا جديدًا ، يمكنك مشاهدة كيفية القيام بذلك هنا: إنشاء مقالتك الأولى.
  • إضافة المزيد من الصور - يمكنك إضافة المزيد من الصور أو الوسائط التي تعكس مواضيع مثيرة للاهتمام وموسوعية في مجتمعك المباشر.
  • استخدم الصور المنتجة خلال المسابقة. هنا رابط قصير لأفضلها أفضل الصور من ويكي تهوى إفريقيا

نحن شغوفون إلى رؤية مساهماتك !!

تحياتنا ،

أنتير من فريق ويكي تهوى إفريقيا

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dome and Minaret of Jamaa Zitouna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment the white balance is slightly too yellowish and the image needs some more contrast. --Carschten 09:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC) dear --Carschten have a look please I fixed it --IssamBarhoumi 20:56, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
  Support thanks! --Carschten 12:26, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausolée quadrangulaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petit arc triomphal 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salle couverte de grandes dalles situées au Sud u monastère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tophet de Carthage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand arc triomphal dédié à Septime Sévère 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausolée hexagonal de Haidra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arc triomphal d'Antonin et de Marc Aurèle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trois temples de Sbeitla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Africa 2019Edit

Dear IssamBarhoumi,

You have contributed in the past to the Wiki Loves Africa competition. Your images have helped people learn more about Africa and see Africa more clearly from an African perspective. Overall, nearly 5000 people like you have contributed to this photo contest, and contributed nearly 40000 images about Africa. Pictures from Wiki Loves Africa illustrate more than 7000 Wikipedia articles and they received... 278.859.973 views between 2015 through the end of 2018. WOW ! How does it feel to be part of this and really make a difference when it come to Africa representation on Wikipedia ?

This February, you have another opportunity to create beautiful photographs on the theme of "play" that could change how the world understands people and culture in your part of Africa.

Wiki Loves Africa is a annual public contest where people across Africa can contribute media (photographs, video and audio) about their environment to Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia and other project websites of the Wikimedia Foundation.

When does it take place?
The 2019 competition will start on 1st February 2019 and close on 1st March 2019.

What should we contribute?
Pictures ! audios ! videos ! The theme for the 2019 contest is... Play.
This theme encompasses a host of approaches and is intentionally open to interpretation. The theme Play! encourages the submission of visual representations of joyful and serious games, sport, and recreation in the form of board or mental games, physical fun or contests, playful interactions, theatrical and musical performances, etc.

In addition to the value your photos contribute to human understanding and african visibility on the Internet, there are several prizes on offer – including two separate prize categories for photos and media that encompass

  • (a) capture Women in sport or
  • (b) culturally specific and traditional formal forms of play, recreation or events.

For rules and information about how to participate, or to join the contest, click on: Contribute to the Wiki Loves Africa photo contest.

Warmest,

Anthere, for the Wiki Loves Africa Team

++++++++++

Cher ou chère IssamBarhoumi,

Par le passé, vous avez participé au concours photographique Wiki Loves Africa. Vos photos ont aidé de nombreuses personnes à mieux comprendre l'Afrique et à la voir sous un autre angle, l'angle des africains eux-même. Depuis sa création en 2014, près de 5000 personnes ont contribué au concours photo, en ajoutant près de 40000 photos relatives à l'Afrique. 5000 personnes, dont vous, qui ont fait une vraie différence sur la représentation de l'Afrique sur Wikipédia et en ligne. Mieux encore... ces photos illustrent aujourd'hui près de 7000 articles Wikipédia et totalisent 278.859.973 vues entre 2015 et fin 2018 !

Ce mois de février vous avez à nouveau l'opportunité de proposer de fabuleuses illustrations sur le thème du "Jeu", qui participeront à changer la façon dont les êtres humains à travers le monde comprennent les habitants et la culture de votre région..

Wiki Loves Africa, c’est un concours public annuel où chacun est invité à partager des illustrations via Wikimedia Commons, en rapport avec le thème de l’année, illustrations qui pourront être utilisées sur Wikipédia ou les autres sites de la Wikimedia Foundation.

Quand le concours se déroule t-il?
Le concours 2019 démarre le 1er février 2019 et cloture le 1er mars 2019.

Quelles sont les contenus attendus?
Des photos ! Des enregistrements audio ! Des vidéos ! Le thème du concours 2019 est ... Jouer.
Ce thème englobe de nombreuses approches, il est aussi intentionnellement ouvert à l’interprétation. Le thème Jouer ! encourage à proposer des représentations de jeux de détente et sérieux, du sport et des divertissements sous la forme de jeux de société ou de jeux intellectuels, d'activités physiques de divertissement ou de compétitions, d'interactions ludiques, de performances théâtrales ou musicales, etc..

En plus de la valeur intrinsèque que vos photos apporteront à la compréhension et à la visibilité du monde africain sur Internet, il y a de nombreux prix à gagner. Dont deux prix spéciaux pour les photos qui représentent

  • a) femmes et sport ou
  • b) formes de jeux, de divertissements ou d’évènements culturellement spécifiques ou traditionnels.

Pour plus d'informations, règles de participation et pour participer au concours, cliquez sur Contribuer au concours photo Wiki Loves Africa.

Bien à vous,

Anthere, pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa

Return to the user page of "IssamBarhoumi".