Open main menu
English: Welcome to the Commons, J3D3!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−


Contents

File:Mimosa monancistra2.jpgEdit

 
File:Mimosa monancistra2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

InverseHypercube 22:59, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 openEdit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Levy-Jennings SampleChart.pngEdit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Português | svenska | 中文 | +/−


Hello! Thank you for uploading File:Levy-Jennings SampleChart.png to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

TranslationEdit

Hola, may I ask you for some help? The template {{PD-Unicode}} lacks the Spanish version. My knowledge of languages doesn't allow that I add it by myself. Of course it is not at all urgent. Thank you sarang사랑 08:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Seems to have been a lot of work (yes, it is a bit complicated with all the parameter possibilities...) but I can see that you fought and won. Thank you for your good solution! sarang사랑 17:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (tJosve05a (c) 22:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Translation checkEdit

Hola, may I ask you again? You are not asked to do any complicated edit, just look for better expression. I tried to translate everything into Spanish language, but I am not at all sure whether it's correct. When you look at the bottom of the {{Created with Other tool}} documentation (you need to expand the collapsed table!) you can see variations in the chosen language, with different genders in Spain. While I have rather good feelings with "con un otro editor" the expression "con un ignoto editor" might better be replaced by "con un editor ignoto"?

This oversized W3C-invalid seal was created with an unknown tool.

Please don't try to repair something, just tell me where it can be made better. You can answer there at your talk page. Gracias sarang사랑 08:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

_____________________________________________________

Hi Sarang! Look, in Spanish "un" and "otro" (un + otro) don't get along among them; or is one (un) or is other (otro). And, although "ignoto" is a correct Spanish word, it is of little use, and sounds a little weird :D . It is more frequent to say "desconocido" (the Spanish particle "des" fullfils the same function than the English particle "un", in the same way kown = conocido; so un-known = des-conocido). You could instead consider the following expressions:
  • {{Tl|Created with Other tool }}: Este gráfico vectorial fue creado con otro editor SVG.
  • {{Tl|Created with Other tool | v }}: El código fuente de este SVG es válido. Este gráfico vectorial fue creado con otro editor SVG.
  • {{Tl|Created with Other tool | v | vs = fl }}: El código fuente de este SVG es válido. Este gráfico vectorial fue creado con otro editor SVG.
  • {{Tl|Image generation | O }}: Este gráfico fue creado con otra herramienta o editor.
  • {{Tl|Igen | O | s = c }}: Este escudo de armas fue creado con otra herramienta o editor SVG.
  • {{ Igen | O | s = d }}: Este diagrama fue creado con otro herramienta o editor SVG.
  • {{ Igen | O | s = e }}: Este emblema fue creado con otra herramienta o editor SVG.
  • {{ Igen | O | n | s = f }}: Esta bandera fue creada con otra herramienta o editor SVG.
  • {{ Igen | O | n | s = i }}: Este ícono fue creado con otra herramienta o editor.
  • {{ Igen | O | > | s = m }}: Este mapa de gran tamaño fue creado con otra herramienta o editor SVG.
  • {{ Igen | O | 1 | s = v }}: Este signo, inválido según el W3C, fue creado con otra herramienta o editor SVG.
  • {{ Igen | O | 2 | > | s = y }}: Este signo de gran tamaño, inválido según el W3C, fue creado con otra herramienta o editor SVG.

And finally

  • {{Igen|u|s|>|e=2|s=s}}: Este sello de gran tamaño, inválido según el W3C, fue crado con una herramienta o editor SVG desconocido.

And yes, I know, Spanish is a pain in the a55 for non native speakers (and for natives too :D). If you have to do it, do not hesitate to ask. In what I can help you, you can count on me. A big hug.

J3D3 (talk) 19:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help, now I can repair the boxes that they will not be longer a pain for native speakers! (There is a typo at s=d, "herramienta" needs of course "otra".) "Bandera" had been female in my text, so I wonder why you bolded it. I had not been sure whether it is legal to shorten "otra herramienta o otro editor" to "otra herramienta o editor" - but I believe you. You know it is for all the Spanish world, and not only for Southern America or Argentina (which has its own idiom).
I think Spanish is a beautiful language, and it's a pity that it is strange to me. sarang사랑 07:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
I tried to repair it; would you give it another look, please?
I added the signature as an example for "not verifyable" and I am sure that my "non W3C-verificable" is very unSpain... sarang사랑 08:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

_____________________________________________________

Hi again Sarang! well about the "a" from "otra bandera", it was just my OCD talkin' :D. Spanish language is pretty messy about gender of words and not allways a word finished with a is female nor finished in e nor o is a male, so once on the work It would have been easier to write a "male" code, and confusions just slips in :D . For example:
  • {{ Igen | O | 1 | s = v }}:
I translated "This W3C-invalid sign..." into "Este signo, inválido...". The English word "sign" can be a lot of things in Spanish from "symbols" (símbolos) to "simptoms" (síntomas); you translated correctly "sign..." into "señal..." like in "señal de tránsito" (traffic sign); but "señal" it's a female word so the correct sentence in Spanish would be:
  • {{ Igen | O | 1 | s = v }}: Esta señal, inválida según el W3C, fue creada con otra herramienta o editor.
You wrote correctly "creada", but in the "male" code slips in the word "inválido".
It's legal to shorten some sentences in order to not repeat some adverbes nor pronouns. And in some sentences in order to avoid some aliterations and repetition of sounds (that are heard as if it were a stutter), It's almost obligated. For example in the sentence: "otra herramienta o otro editor" the aliteration "o-otro" sounds like you're stuttering. So you can avoid alliteration by changing the logical connector "o" (or) by "u" that fullfills the same function, or bypassing the pronoun "otro". In the daily practice (:D) you tend to shorten the sentences, so It's more natural bypassing some repeated pronouns.
  • Otra herramienta o otro editor   sounds like stutter.
  • Otra herramienta u otro editor  
  • Otra herramienta o editor  
Finally, the sentence "Esta firma de gran tamaño, non W3C-verificable, fue creada con otra herramienta o editor" It's a quite good translation although "non W3C-verificable" It's very, very unSpanish :D :D :D, You could be write "no verificable según el W3C", or better "inverificable según el W3C", or even betterer "imposible de verificar según el W3C". My personal preference would be:
  • {{ Igen | O | -1 | > | s = sig }}: Esta firma de gran tamaño, imposible de verificar según el W3C, fue creada con otra herramienta o editor.
Thank you for your confidence, and ask what you want when you need to :D, I will do the same when I need some advices about my Deutsche (sincerely my Deutsche Is far, far worse than your Spanish). Big hug. J3D3 (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
The female "invalida" had been o.k. but with the changes today I copied it wrong. Now I made the last changes as you advised so friendly, also the imposibles and whether everything is now fine or not I am leaving Wikipedia for vacations. When I am back in 4 weeks my Spanish will be not yet good but much better - but to know all about its complicated grammar and how to create well formed sentences is something for well educated native people. When I am back I will look for the pt translations, they might be also in a wrong state... Always to your service when you have problems with German! sarang사랑 18:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Hola, I remember your help, and I need your skill again. Now exist categories SVG files without W3C-specification where the W3C-unspecified files are collected - files that are neither valid nor invalid; using the SVG created with ... templates without specifying the W3C-validity causes that categorization.
I expanded the Template:Created with/es to display the fact - pero mi españiol... would you please tell me how to express what now is like "Este gráfico vectorial, inespecificado según el W3C, fue creado con ...". ¿May be "desespecificado" is more Spanish ?? When you look at the bottom of the documentation examples you can see far below how it is displayed. I did it similar with Created with/pt and will have to ask somebody else. -- sarang사랑 16:13, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Hola, now I took "sin especificar", because I had been told that it's good. Thank you, the problem is solved -- sarang사랑 16:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Barkleyanthus salicifolius.jpgEdit

 
File:Barkleyanthus salicifolius.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Source is clearly marked {{cc-by-nc-sa-3.0}} (which is non-free), not {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 14:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Mimosa monacistra Benth.jpgEdit

 
File:Mimosa monacistra Benth.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Source is clearly marked {{cc-by-nc-sa-3.0}} (which is non-free), not {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 14:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Opisthoncus parcedentatus FB.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Opisthoncus parcedentatus FB.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Opisthoncus parcedentatus FB.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Template:CC-AR-GPCbaEdit

Vos creaste Template:CC-AR-GPCba diciendo que los contenidos de http://www.cba.gov.ar/ tienen una licencia CC-BY 2.5 AR. En que parte de la pagina dice eso? --Yilku1 (talk) 03:31, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "J3D3".