User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jacek Halicki!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 18:06, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Jacek Halicki!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Caterpillar Club - rewers.jpg was uncategorized on 3 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:M.Halicki - Lwów 1929.jpg was uncategorized on 3 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:M.Halicki - Warszawa 1938 lub 1939.jpg was uncategorized on 3 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Caterpillar Club - awers.jpg was uncategorized on 3 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Jacek Halicki, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Tadeusz Jażdżewski.jpeg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some noise, but quality suffices for QI (imo). - A.Savin 12:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

---

Dziękujemy za Twoje edycje. Twoja grafika (lub inna zawartość), Wikipedysta:Halicki/brudnopis 2, została ostatnio usunięta z uwagi na nasze zalecenia edycyjne, regulamin lub też nie była zgodna z przeznaczeniem tego serwisu. Prosimy zapoznać się z przeznaczeniem tego serwisu (przydałby się jakiś link do strony pomocy tutaj) - w skrócie zadaniem Commons jest przechowywanie mediów zawierających grafiki, diagramy, animacje, muzykę, mowę, filmy, itp. Wikimedia Commons nie zawiera tekstów takich jak artykuły encyklopedyczne, podręczniki i książki, wiadomości, definicje słownikowe, itp. Każdy z tych rodzajów zawartości ma bowiem osobny projekt: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary i Wikiquote. Jeśli Twoja zawartość bardziej pasuje do jednego z tych serwisów prosimy o rozważenie dodania jej właśnie tam. Jeśli uważasz, że usunięcie zostało błędnie wykonane, ponieważ dana zawartość była odpowiednia dla Commons, możesz poprosić o jej odtworzenie poprzez umieszczenie odpowiedniej prośby na Commons:Undeletion requests oraz podanie powodu, dla którego zawartość nie powinna zostać usunięta tak, aby administratorzy mogli to ocenić. Dziękujemy za zrozumienie i współpracę.

 

KTo288 (talk) 01:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

WLZ - Ząbkowice Rynek 6

Poprawiłam numer na liście https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Lubi_Zabytki/Pytania#Brakuje_zabytku_w_spisie . Twoje zdjęcia umieszczone w kategorii "8 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie" przeniosłam do "9 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie". Były przypisane do niewłaściwej kategorii. --InnaIna (talk) 08:42, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Za pięć dwunasta !

Witam Panie Jacku w środku nocy, nie wiem czy Pan śpi, czy jeszcze pracuje. Jeszcze wiele moich zdjęć pójdzie do wiki normalnym trybem już poza WLZ 2013 bo właśnie dobiegamy mety. Moje pliki co prawda jeszcze podróżują gdzieś po świecie by dotrzeć nad ranem na serwer docelowy, ale już właśnie wybija północ i nie dotrą wszystkie do celu. WLZ 2013 właśnie się bowiem zakończyła. Przyznam, że źle nieco zorganizowałam sobie pracę w tym roku, bo mogłoby być ilościowo lepiej. A i jakościowo - no cóż sporo pracy przede mną! Gratuluję Panu, w końcu zajął Pan 3 miejsce w Polsce, choć długo Pan nie dawał mi szans w tej naszej wspólnej rywalizacji. Mam przyjemność pogratulować Panu dobrej roboty. Zrobiliśmy, co do nas należało, a reszta w rękach ... nie, nie ... tylko szanownej komisji konkursowej, a przyznam, że jest z czego wybierać! życzę z całego serca powodzenia i pozdrawiam - dobrej nocy na dzisiaj  :) i dobrego dnia jutro! --Jolanya Dyr (talk) 22:12, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's a QI for me. Pymouss 22:12, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Wojska Polskiego 11, 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Wojska Polskiego 11, 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but in my opinion You should crop this photo - part of dog is needless --SMilejski 20:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC) Corrected. Much better now.--SMilejski 17:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:42, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality image nominations

Hi Halicki, and welcome to COM:QIC. I noticed you nominated about 20 images on October 11 - please don't nominate so many at once - many people see it as spamming, and it's liable to lead to most of your images not being reviewed at all. Stick to 5 or 6 per day, and try to review as many as you nominate. Thanks! -mattbuck (Talk) 10:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 31, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 14, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, Teatr Zdrojowy, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. But I would like to have a better description. -- Spurzem 11:39, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:06, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 22, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Mattbuck 10:06, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --A.Savin 18:02, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Ziemi Kłodzkiej z Zieleńca 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Longjoe 23:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Panorama Ziemi Kłodzkiej z Zieleńca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Paczków, ratusz, 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mild overexposure and unsharpness. Mattbuck 10:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your comments on COM:QIC

Please reassess your votes on COM:QIC. You've tagged files as under 2MP when they are 6MP and 4.6MP. You've declined files for overexposure when they're clearly not overexposed.

At least, make a comment before declining for overexposure or a technical fault, as one can correct it. It's the way we all do. Comment, then decline if it's not changed or commented by an other editor in a few days time.

Pleclown (talk) 21:28, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 22, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:13, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Longjoe 20:48, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec, miejsce odpoczynku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Ziębice, Rynek 42, 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (hint: you can remove the annotations) --Cccefalon 05:38, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Grottgera 5, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:38, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Ziębice, Rynek 11, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:31, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, ratusz, 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI - nice view --Isiwal 21:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 31, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Zieleniec, widok na Duszniki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Longjoe 13:59, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Wojska Polskiego 11, 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Longjoe 13:59, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, twierdza 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, kościół Jerzego i Wojciecha, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI.--Jebulon 09:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, kościół Jerzego i Wojciecha, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:44, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, klasztor klarysek, 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Grottgera 5, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, twierdza 50.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 18:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice, centrum, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, klasztor klarysek, 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 10:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 21:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 7, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What about cutting the left side (just the parking sign) to get the house symmetrical and reduce the dark area which is a strong competitor to the bright colour of the house? Quality of the photo however is QI for me. --Cccefalon 09:35, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Zamenhofa 5, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 07:06, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 22, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, kościół ewangelicki, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gotycki most na Mlynowce - nocny pejzaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pity it’s rather noisy and yet looks overprocessed on the lamp rays. I tried to give it some more NR and a bit contrast and colour improvement on File:Gotycki most na Mlynowce - nocny pejzaz ks01.jpg --Kreuzschnabel 18:26, 15 November 2013 (UTC) I think it's excellent, apart from the heads. Mattbuck 20:28, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Łukasińskiego 30, 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, kościół ewangelicki, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 19:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Ziębice, cukrownia, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo (some small correctable perspective distortion).--ArildV 19:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Jacek Halicki, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The upper side has a low contrast, but QI for me--Lmbuga 22:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, zespół szpitalny, budynek neurologii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Jacek Halicki, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

File:Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Rock-Detail 01.jpg

Hi Halicki-

I appreciate your effort to make a correction in the image, but I have reverted back to the earlier version. My sole reason for doing this is because the original version was voted on by 9 different FP processes and to change the image now would mean that the image being voted on in Polish Wikipedia is not the same as what has been voted on before. Many thanks.-Godot13 (talk) 22:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)