User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive24

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:12, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:03, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:36, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:46, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Długopole Dolne, kościół św. Jerzego 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Długopolu Dolnym.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- DeFacto 09:12, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Brzeźnicy 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Brzeźnicy 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Szkoda, że są te linie, ale i tak dobre zdjęcie. Good quality, Tournasol7 08:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Bystrzyca Dusznicka w Piekielnej Dolinie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pałac w Jugowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pałac w Jugowie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)  Comment I am not convinced because of the disturbing shadow. -- Spurzem 19:46, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pałac w Jugowie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:08, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jugów, park przy pałacu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:08, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:08, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Disabled parking permit, in Poland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Question Possible identification problem? Are we allowed to post such ID cards on Commons? --Peulle (talk) 17:50, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

• @Peulle: The image is question does not identify the card's owner. The card holder's personal details are on the other side of the card and are not displayed in this image. Martinvl (talk) 21:21, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but is it allowed? Some countries have complete bans against copying or scanning any sort of permits ...--Peulle (talk) 23:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Polish law explicitly permits the copying of official documents (subject to other laws such as data protection). In this case there has been no infringement of data protection since the image in question does not identify anybody. Martinvl (talk) 21:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

OK.--Peulle (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I have expanded the English language description accompanying the image.

@Jacek Halicki: You might like to expand the Polish language text. Martinvl (talk) 21:21, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

@Martinvl:  Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment @Peulle: The status discussed only applies if there are "support" and "oppose" votes. The addition of Comments do not cause a "discussed" state. I have corrected the status. Martinvl (talk) 21:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:56, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Długopole Dolne, John of Nepomuk statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:11, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:56, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Czerwieńczyce, crucifixion group.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wzgórza Rogówki, Sośnina, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station Bystrzyca Kłodzka Przedmieście, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Jedlinie-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Jedlinie-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 10:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Jedlinie-Zdroju 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przysiółek Giełczów w Gorzuchowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przysiółek Giełczów w Gorzuchowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy Gorzuchów Kłodzki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Ścinawka w Gorzuchowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 3 w Gorzuchowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kąpielisko w Gorzuchowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kąpielisko w Gorzuchowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kąpielisko w Gorzuchowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Zakład Poliamid Plastics w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Świerki, zabudowania Wrześnika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Floriana w Święcku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful little church. Good quality -- Spurzem 07:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Floriana w Święcku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Floriana w Święcku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Floriana w Święcku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 10:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Floriana w Święcku 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Floriana w Święcku 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy w Głuszycy Górnej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 44 w Głuszycy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 44 w Głuszycy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but would you please add specific categories (doors, windows,...)? --Poco a poco 08:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 44 w Głuszycy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 44 w Głuszycy 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 44 w Głuszycy 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dworki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół NMP Królowej Polski w Głuszycy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 36 w Głuszycy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 36 w Głuszycy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 36 w Głuszycy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 36 w Głuszycy 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 41 w Głuszycy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --SKas 07:57, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 41 w Głuszycy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:06, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 41 w Głuszycy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej 41 w Głuszycy 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:33, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your Ingmar Bergman image

The image of Ingmar Bergman you appear to have downloaded to Wikicommons is currently being challenged at the FAC for Akira Kurosawa. Could you glance at the discussion here [1]. JohnWickTwo (talk) 15:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Staropolanka 2000 butelki.JPG

Yours sincerely, Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy Jedlina Górna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sad but good quality -- Spurzem 07:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy Jedlina Górna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy Jedlina Górna 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krzyż przydrożny w Świerkach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krzyż przydrożny w Świerkach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:21, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Głuszycy Górnej 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Głuszycy Górnej 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Kłodzkiej 41 w Głuszycy Górnej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Kłodzkiej 41 w Głuszycy Górnej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Kłodzkiej 41 w Głuszycy Górnej 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy Jedlina Górna 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 10:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krzyż przydrożny w Świerkach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:04, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Świerkowa Kopa, Góry Sowie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:32, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Tunele kolejowe pod Świerkową Kopą.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful form, near FP quality but might not wow enough people if nominated (I would vote for it without hesitation). -- Ikan Kekek 09:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Świerkach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Świerkach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Świerkach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Świerkach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Świerkach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:00, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Wapniarka, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower house in Żelazno, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, lime kilns.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Zabudowa Świerków.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 3a w Świerkach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Hotel Jedlinka w Jedlinie-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Hotel Jedlinka w Jedlinie-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Hotel Jedlinka w Jedlinie-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
41 Grunwaldzka Street in Głuszyca, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
41 Grunwaldzka Street in Głuszyca, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I could ask you to state why this door is notable, too, but it looks kind of special to me, so I'll support this scope as useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pod Jeleniem inn in Głuszyca, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pod Jeleniem inn in Głuszyca, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Nice door, but what makes it per se notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek: It's cultural heritage monument in Poland. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

• In that case,  Support as useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Jedlinka, hostel and Jedlinka Brevery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Dirt heaps in the foreground are unfortunate, but still a useful image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Kłodzkiej 44 w Głuszycy Górnej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Bartnica, zabudowania Nowej Głuszycy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom gabra na zboczu Przykrzca 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Bydło na pastwisku w Nagodzicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Sowie, quarry of gabbro on hillside of Przykrzec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Blessed Virgin Mary Queen of Poland in Głuszyca, tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Assumption of Mary Church in Głuszyca Górna, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Jedlina-Zdrój, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I agree that this is best in scope, although if you got a picture showing the entire staircase without a person in it, you could make an argument for that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 10 w Smreczynie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:56, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 45 w Smreczynie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 12 w Jodłowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 22 w Jodłowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Florian church in Święcko, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Florian church in Święcko, crucifix at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Świerki, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Świerki, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Can you list cultural heritage number please. Charles (talk) 07:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

This is a photo of a monument in Poland identified in WLM database by the ID

592989.

--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support OK for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Świerki, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 21 w Boboszowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:14, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Zajazd Byczy Róg w Boboszowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 22 w Jodłowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 28 w Gajniku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 4a w Gajniku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom gabra na zboczu Przykrzca 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps there could be a bit more contrast on the trees above the rock area but it's already OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals well done, sharp enough, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Świerkach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schools in Kłodzko, Higher School of Management, Faculty of Tourism in Kłodzko, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Should this be VI based on VI criteria? Charles (talk) 22:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

In my opinion schools are meeting the VI criteria, the same as other buildings of the public utility so as for example town halls or fire stations. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment It appears that there's a Polish Wikipedia article about this school. I don't hold use of a photo in a WP article as proof of being best in scope, but does the fact that there is a WP article about it make it notable enough to be a VI? That's a different question, and I think a good argument. Is this part of a university? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:36, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

• Jacek, please respond. I'd like to support this nomination, but I'd like a response to my question first. My feeling is, if this is part of a university, it's clearly notable, but if it's a high school, its notability would need to be established. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 17 August 2017(UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: This is not part of the university, but it's a college. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

What do you mean by "college"? What kind of degree or certificate do they grant? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Licentiate and master's degree. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:35, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks.  Support as useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:34, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 44 w Lasówce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:35, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Leśniczówka w Lasówce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Leśniczówka w Lasówce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:39, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 4 w Pisarach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 6 w Potoczku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 08:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 7 w Jaworku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 08:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Szopa w Michałowicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 08:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Nowej Wsi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Nowej Wsi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Nowej Wsi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Roztokach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All those cars does not make it the composition very nice. However I cannot deny the photo is sharp, not deformed and the cloudy sky is well done. So I support this photo, but please show me this house without all those disturbing cars --Michielverbeek 08:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Roztokach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Roztokach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Roztokach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jedlina Górna train station, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and IMO best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 10:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jedlina Górna train station, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Głuszyca Górna train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Sowie, Świerkowa Kopa, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support -- Useful and used. Also good shot. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:06, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Roztokach 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Anny w Boboszowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (I would clone out the leaves at the border) --Berthold Werner 08:52, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Anny w Boboszowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Jodłowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Jodłowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:04, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anthony of Padua church in Lasówka, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anthony of Padua church in Lasówka, corner stone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gorzuchów, train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruins of manor house in Nowa Wieś (Kłodzko County), exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Roztoki. exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Jodłowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:19, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Marcina w Roztokach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Marcina w Roztokach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Wacława w Pisarach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Wacława w Pisarach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anthony of Padua church in Lasówka, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

• I prefer Commons:Valued_image_candidates/2017_Kościół_św._Antoniego_w_Lasówce_4.jpg  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:11, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Johannes, if you think another photo is better in scope, you should oppose, not be neutral. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

• Commons:Valued_image_candidates/2017_Kościół_św._Antoniego_w_Lasówce_4.jpg is most valuable in this scope. (see: According to Commons:Valued_image_criteria Point 2)Johannes Kalliauer
•  Comment @JoKalliauer: It's good to have read the rules but you have to read them all. The scopes are different. Find another argument. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - This is correct, and I should have caught this before. Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:43, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment @Archaeodontosaurus and Ikan Kekek: exposure from N is a too narrow scope in my opinion to make any sense  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 17:43, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

• Why? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
• @JoKalliauer: For butterflies it takes two images to describe them completely for the buildings it is usual to present them from several angles giving the orientation of the view. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek:

  It is unlikely that anyone would want to use that phrase as the basis of an image search.

  — Commons:Valued_image_scope#Not_too_narrow...

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

• I don't think that's the point, really. The point is, does this building merit having several (or at least more than one) views from different angles that come up when a VI of the building is searched for? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus: With this argument we would have to nominate every pic that shows any residential building (f.e. File:Wohnhaus_Walterstraße_31_(Langenlois)_03.jpg), if the photo fulfills the quality-criteria (sharpness, lighting).  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

@JoKalliauer: The example is very well chosen. This building does not look remarkable but it is (the Austrian services have classified it in their database) in this case this image is eligible in VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Roztoki, coats of arms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Boboszów, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of John the Baptist in Jodłów, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 10:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of John the Baptist in Jodłów, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 10:22, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Martin church in Roztoki, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 10:25, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Wacława w Pisarach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Wacława w Pisarach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Goworowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Goworowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Goworowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Martin church in Roztoki, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:32, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Wenceslaus church in Pisary, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Wenceslaus church in Pisary, crucifixion group.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Goworów, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Goworów, gatehouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Latarnia uliczna w Pisarach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:16, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Młyn wodny w Goworowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:16, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Młyn wodny w Goworowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:16, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Młyn wodny w Goworowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes. --Peulle 08:25, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Obora w Roztokach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:47, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Watermill in Goworów, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

{subst:vicl

}}

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Watermill in Goworów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 07:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cowshed in Roztoki, expoure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope (also changed "cowhouse" to the more common "cowshed" in the scope). DeFacto (talk). 06:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cowshed in Roztoki, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope (also changed "cowhouse" to the more common "cowshed" in the scope). DeFacto (talk). 06:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Goworów, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Młyn wodny w Goworowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Obora w Roztokach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:23, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Obora w Roztokach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Goworowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Trees on the rigth are unsharp, but the palace (the theme this image) is ok. Enough for QI IMO. Tournasol7 14:42, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Goworowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Roztoki, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Wilkanów, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Goworowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 10:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Goworowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Roztokach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Roztokach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boboszów–Dolní Lipka border crossing, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boboszów–Dolní Lipka border crossing, exposuree from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Międzylesie town hall, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nagodzice, sculpture of Saint Florian.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John of Nepomuk sculpture in Nowa Wieś.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, used and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 14:52, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2017 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Ukraine

Вітаємо!

Запрошуємо взяти участь у міжнародному фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Звертаємо увагу, що завантажені матеріали будуть враховуватися у тій версії файлу, що був на час завершення конкурсу, тож якщо у Вас гарне фото, вантажте його одразу у високій роздільності. З регламентом конкурсу можна ознайомитися тут.

Якщо у Вас дуже багато фото, скористайтеся масовими завантажувачами або зверніться до нас.

Окрім традиційних номінацій за найкращі фото і найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, у конкурсі також є спецномінація для Ваших відеоматеріалів про пам'ятки. Якщо у Вас розмір відеофайлу завеликий для конкурсного завантажувача, спробуйте скористатися стандартним завантажувачем, але не забудьте поставити ідентифікатор пам'ятки. Якщо виникатимуть будь-які труднощі — пишіть нам на wlmwikimediaukraine.org.ua

Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 21:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Goworowie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Roztokach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Roztokach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You could add some door- or portal-related category. --Basotxerri 08:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Wilkanowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Wilkanowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Goworowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anthony of Padua church in Lasówka, World War I memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Best in scope, but please tell us what makes this a notable scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek: The church is listed as a cultural heritage monument and the the sculpture commemorating the victims of World War I is atypical. In these area, there are usually simple plates bearing the list of people killed, and here we have a relief alluding to Bamberg Horseman. All the guidebooks mention this sculpture as a phenomenon. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:30, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks.  Support per this explanation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:33, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Roztoki, portal with chronogram.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:40, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Is this door notable? Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roztoki, John of Nepomuk sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Różanka, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Różanka, outbuilding by the rectory.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House number 103 in Pławnica, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House number 52 in Różanka, expoure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015

		Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal
		Dear Jacek Halicki, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there. Kind regards, The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015

		Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal
		Dear Jacek Halicki, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there. Kind regards, The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015

		Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal
		Dear Jacek Halicki, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there. Kind regards, The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Wilkanowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Wilkanowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przejście graniczne Boboszów–Dolní Lipka 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:49, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przejście graniczne Boboszów–Dolní Lipka 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przejście graniczne Boboszów–Dolní Lipka 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House number 52 in Różanka, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House number 52 in Różanka, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House number 54 in Różanka, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House number 6 in Różanka, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House number 6 in Różanka, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Also a useful view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:55, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Remont ul. Rodzinnej w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 12:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Remont ul. Rodzinnej w Kłodzku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Ulica Rodzinna w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dekanat w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Wolności Square in Międzylesie, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Idzików, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Wojska Polskiego Street in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Florian chapel in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Remont ul. Rodzinnej w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 14:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Remont ul. Rodzinnej w Kłodzku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Remont ul. Rodzinnej w Kłodzku 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Świętego w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 14:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Świętego w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway water tower in Międzylesie, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Mostowice, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exaltation of the Holy Cross church in Rudawa, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Różanka, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--Nikhil B (talk) 08:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John Paul II church in Międzylesie, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, used and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Ratusz w Międzylesiu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Rzeźba św. Floriana w Nagodzicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:53, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Rzeźba św. Jana Nepomucena w Nowej Wsi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Rzeźba św. Jana Nepomucena w Nowej Wsi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:53, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Rzeźba św. Jana Nepomucena w Nowej Wsi 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dekanat w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:40, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Gniewoszów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bystrzyckie, Nad Porębą Pass, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I have my same concerns about this nomination (more than local interest) as I do with the one above. But this road does seem to be important, this is a junction, and this photo is used in 3 wikipedia pages. This makes me support this one but I have a question, does the scope need to include "exposure from S"? Would a different view justify another scope and VI? Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John of Nepomuk sculpture in Szczytna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Rzeźba św. Jana Nepomucena w Roztokach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Zabudowania Nagodzic 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 12:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Zabudowania Nagodzic 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 12:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Baza harcerska w Marianówce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Budynek gospodarczy przy plebanii w Różance 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 12:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Voivodeship road 389 (Poland) between Gniewoszów and Nad Porębą Pass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It appears this road is more than local interest but is this scope more than local interest? Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:40, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

  The road has a great historical significance, as described in an article on Polish Wikipedia. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

   Support I did read the article on Polish Wikipedia and there is some historical significance. So it is notable plus Nad Porębą Pass. I'm not too hard to win over. So I'm onboard unless anyone else objects. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masyw Śnieżnika, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Valuable illustration. Karol Szapsza (talk) 12:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mostowice, John of Nepomuk sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Międzylesie train station, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masyw Śnieżnika, Urwista, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Goworów, gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Świerki, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, rail tunnels.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Budynek gospodarczy przy plebanii w Różance 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 103 w Pławnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 103 w Pławnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 20 w Gniewoszowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 24 w Gniewoszowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 52 w Różance 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 52 w Różance 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 52 w Różance 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 52 w Różance 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 54 w Różance 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mostowice–Orlické Záhoří border crossing, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment At first I thought that this image could do with some annotation so I checked it against Google Maps (see here). The road signs in the VI candidate image appear to be in a different order to those on Google Maps image. Is there an explanation for this? Martinvl (talk) 20:18, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment, @Martinvl: perhaps, in the five or six years between the Google image being taken and this image, the authorities needed to move the direction sign closer to the junction, and to make room for it they moved the speed limit sign to the same post used by the built-up area end sign. Just a possibility. ;-) DeFacto (talk). 20:39, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment @DeFacto: - Rather than speculating, you should let Jacek explain the situation. After all, he was there. Martinvl (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Jacek Halicki: Please answer my question? Martinvl (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image suggested to me that the road-sign in the foreground had been "photo-shopped" onto the image so I invited Jacek to explain himself. No explanation has been forthcoming, so I must oppose this nomination on grounds that the scope fails the test "The scope must be broad enough to be realistically useful to somebody who wishes to search the VI repository" - What is so special about this border crossing that anybody would look specifically for it?

Having said that, if any photo-shopped signs are removed from the image and suitable annotations are added, we have a perfectly good image for the scope "Schengen Area border crossing with traces of pre-Schengen control posts". The following items could be annotated:

• Black building on left - "Former customs office"
• Road markings in centre of road adjacent to parked car - "Site of former control booths"
• "Entry to Poland sign" - (Partially obscured by "Exit from Orlicke Zahori" sign)
• "Entry to Czech Republic sign (reverse)"
• "Polish speed limit signs"

Martinvl (talk) 11:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral It is used and could be useful but you would think he could have answered the question Martinvl asked. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:48, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 54 w Różance 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 54 w Różance 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 6 w Różance 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 6 w Różance 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 7 w Mostowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons Conference project

Hello Jacek,

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 10:53, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 6 w Różance 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 7 w Mostowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy pl. Wolności 17 w Międzylesiu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy pl. Wolności 17 w Międzylesiu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy pl. Wolności 17 w Międzylesiu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom w Pławnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:37, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom w Pławnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Droga wojewódzka nr 389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 10:54, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Idzikowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:37, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Idzikowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is weer begonnen!

Beste Jacek Halicki,

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is vorige week begonnen! Aan deze fotowedstrijd nemen dit jaar 54 landen deel, waaronder bijvoorbeeld Nederland, Groot Brittannië, Thailand, Rusland, Oekraïne, maar ook de eilanden Aruba, Bonaire, Curaçao, Saba, Sint Eustatius en Sint Maarten in de Nederlandse Caribean. Je wordt dus van harte uitgenodigd om te kijken tussen de deelnemende landen of jouw vakantieland er ook bij zit dit jaar en je foto's uit die landen ook te delen!

Net als voorgaande jaren hebben we prijzen voor de mooiste foto en de meeste foto's en een keus gemaakt voor een speciale categorie. Heb jij een foto gemaakt van een monument waarvan voor 1 september 2017 nog geen afbeelding op Wikimedia Commons bestond? Dan doet de afbeelding mee in de speciale categorie! Heeft een monument nog geen foto in de monumentenlijst op Wikipedia, dan is het aannemelijk dat we er nog geen foto van hadden. Om het zoeken naar monumenten zonder afbeelding wat makkelijker te maken, kun je op Wikipedia lijsten en een kaart van Nederland vinden.

Tot slot nodigen we je nog van harte uit om volgende week met ons op pad te gaan. Op zaterdag 16 september wandelen we tijdens een Wiki Takes rond in Hoorn: op zondag 17 september doen we hetzelfde in Leiden. Onder ervaren gidsen wandelen we langs monumenten in de stad en nemen we ruimschoots de tijd om de monumenten goed op de foto te zetten. Aanmelden verplicht en plaatsen gelimiteerd!
Tot en met 30 september heb je de tijd om je foto's up te loaden: de top 10 gaat door naar de internationale wedstrijd, waar de hoofdprijs de nieuwste Canon EOS 5D camera is!

Veel succes gewenst,
het Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments team 17:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Folwark w Pławnicy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Hotel Fryderyk w Dusznikach-Zdroju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica św. Floriana w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kolejowa wieża ciśnień w Międzylesiu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Mostowicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments troche blade kolory, na QI wystarczy --Pudelek 09:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Świętego w Rudawie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Różance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Jana Pawła II w Międzylesiu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Gniewoszowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Gniewoszowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Gniewoszowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Ośrodek Wypoczynkowy Orlica w Rudawie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kolejowa wieża ciśnień w Międzylesiu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:18, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Różance 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Różance 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Różance 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Plebania w Wilkanowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 11:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pomnik ofiar I wojny światowej w Mostowicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Rzeźba św. Jana Nepomucena w Szczytnej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Rzeźba św. Jana Nepomuena w Mostowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Rzeźba św. Jana Nepomuena w Mostowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stacja kolejowa w Międzylesiu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stacja kolejowa w Międzylesiu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pomnik ofiar I wojny światowej w Marianówce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pomnik ofiar I wojny światowej w Marianówce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przejście graniczne Mostowice-Orlické Záhoří.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przełęcz nad Porębą, Góry Bystrzyckie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (but not the street) -- Spurzem 09:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Rzeźba św. Jana Nepomucena w Szczytnej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:36, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Idzikowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically it is correct (except harsh lights). Thus ok --Nino Verde 05:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 13:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Szkoła podstawowa w Pławnicy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Zamek w Międzylesiu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little soft, but given resolution not a problem --Crisco 1492 09:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 09:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 13:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dom nr 21 w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dom nr 21 w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dom nr 21 w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:23, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dom nr 21 w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dom nr 21 w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Matki Boskiej Bolesnej w Nowej Rudzie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, kościół Podwyższenia Świętego Krzyża 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Bożego Ciała w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi imo.--ArildV 19:57, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A bit better contrast between elements would be nice, but they're all the same color. --Crisco 1492 02:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Nowa Ruda, dom w Kolnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Nowa Ruda, dom w Kolnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Słupcu, ogrodzenie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, miasto 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Popków, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Popków, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 09:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 09:32, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:32, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:32, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:30, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)