Open main menu

Contents

TUSC token 2244d4952bad5f9ab1d4ca15f4afe5b0Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category:Orders and DecorationsEdit

Category discussion notification Category:Orders and Decorations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

-- One or more related categories that you created have been listed for a name change as part of the above discussion. Cheers, AusTerrapin (talk) 15:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Autopatroll und Move-RechteEdit

Hallo Jahobr!

Da ich gesehen habe, dass du hier nur gute Edits machst habe ich dich auf Autopatroll geschalten und dir auch noch Move-Rechte gegeben. LG, Amada44  

User:Tryphon/Top 200 images which should use TeXEdit

Hallo Jahobr. Es gibt jetzt neu diese Übersichtsseite der Anzahl Einbindungen in Artikel. So erkennt man schnell, wo noch (getaggte) Bilder durch TeX-Code ersetzt werden müssen. Auf nicht mehr eingebundene Dateien kann ein Schnelllöschantrag gestellt werden. --Leyo 13:36, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Nice! Danke für den Hinweis. Grüße Jahobr (talk) 14:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

SizeEnglishWikipediaEdit

Oops, thanks for the correction!! --Slashme (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

You are welcome. Thanks for the fast reaction. Jahobr (talk) 15:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Vielen Dank!Edit

für das Hinterherräumen bei den Bildern! Wir hatten nicht nur damit zu tun, die Bilder zu machen und hochzuladen, die anwesende Presse hat uns gebeten, möglichst "sofort" auch noch Artikel zu bebildern. Wenn man so fleißige Helfer wie dich im Hintergrund hat, macht es gleich nochmal soviel Spaß. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 20:20, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Kein Problem. Hier gibts die Liste aber ich finde keine Bilder und bei diesem Herren fehlt mir der Name. Sonst bin ich im Großen und Ganzen durch (glaube ich). MFG Jahobr (talk) 20:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Wenns weiter nichts ist, das bekommen wir raus, ich habe auch erst die Hälfte meiner Bilder oben. In dem Getümmel haben wir manchmal auch in falscher Reihenfolge fotografiert, einer von uns hat dazu Notizen gemacht, die wir noch nicht ausgewertet haben. So macht es Laune! Hast was gut bei mir. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 20:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Congrats!Edit

It seems that you understand the difference between video and gif! Good for you! Hooray! A worthy enough leap in understanding that should most certainly be rewarded with a jump to the main page.

I commend you for your accomplishments. -- Queeg (talk) 18:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Like I said on your discussion page I disagree with "animation=gif / video=ogg", but I try to get us forward. There is not much point in working against each other. I think a wrong classification is still better as an inconsistent one. Arguments that support your point and change my mind are still welcome. Greetings Jahobr (talk) 18:23, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Xenton Cover copy.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Xenton Cover copy.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Xenton Cover copy.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ww2censor (talk) 05:09, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Help?Edit

I have three insect videos -- I have seen too many of a single type of video lately.... Back to my problem.

I have three insect videos and I was wondering if you could put them in MOTD -- scatter them with enough days of distance between (too many insects are too many insects, even if they are good or great videos).

I don't trust myself to put them there right now -- I have seen too many recently.

These are the videos and they can appear in any order:

Should I apologize to anyone that they are not of copulating insects? (There is more to life than this and some of it is good too....) -- Queeg (talk) 04:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

And another one (not an insect and I thought you might like this -- it is a sound file):

DuplicatesEdit

Need a file type match for a speedy delete through Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates, otherwise it is a normal deletion process.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:42, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Pyranoscope shoot.gifEdit

I removed the categories because, frankly, when I see the image, in the file description page, it seems not to move and it seems static. Greetings. Angelus (talk) 15:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

File:LaTeX example sqrt.pngEdit

Hi Jahobr, I the general case I agree that TeX markup is to be preferred over static images, the point of this image is to give an example of an output which cannot be rendered here - it is contrasting the standard output with the output of a package not available when using LaTeX on wikibooks. As the replacement you suggest makes no sense in the context for whihc the image was uploaded I'll remove the template from the image page, and note it on the talk page. Best wishes. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 07:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

And when I went in to edit the page I saw you'd tagged it keep - so that's OK - I'll leave the template on even though the template wording is a little misleading when used with a keep reason. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 07:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I was not sure if this template quite fits in this case ether. I ended up adding it, to give a hint how to display a root using TeX. Greetings Jahobr (talk) 13:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your helpEdit

Hi!

I just deleted most of the images you had specified for deletion around the picture of Aaron Palushaj. I kept the smaller version because the other versions were tests that I uploaded to show the organisation. I had to change all the resolutions on all the pictures because of this. Thank you for pointing out the problem and I am sorry that we had to keep only the small resolution version. Have a nice day, Letartean (talk) 18:19, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Piotr GrochowskiEdit

Hi Jahobr, ich habe gerade gesehen, daß Du den oben genannten Nutzer ebenfalls schon darauf hingewiesen hast, daß er nicht einfach existierende Grafiken wie "File:Seven segment display-animated.gif" verändern soll. Da ich, anders als Du, nur sehr selten bei Commons bin, kannst Du vielleicht mit ein Auge darauf werfen, daß dieser Nutzer nicht zu viel Schaden anrichtet? Der Versuch, den Editor in der englischen WP halbwegs im Zaum zu halten, ist schon aufwendig genug. Niemand macht am Anfang alles richtig, deshalb sollte man natürlich Milde walten lassen, aber Piotr scheint leider selten "merkbefreit" und obendrein noch ziemlich stur zu sein - wobei ich ihm keine böse Absicht unterstellen möchte, sondern nur Unwissenheit/Unvermögen. Viele Grüße, Matthias --Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Hallo, wenn mir etwas auffält kümere ich mich darum. Aber ich bin auch nicht immer da... Grüße Jahobr (talk) 19:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Wasserkraftwerk Dreisam (Freiburg) jmEdit

Danke für deine Ergänzungen der Kategorien, Freiburger Bächle macht aber hier bei der Dreisam keinen Sinn. Die Bächle werden zwar aus der Dreisam gespeist, allerdings wird dazu erst ca. 2 km flusabwärts das Wasser aus dem Fluß ausgeleitet. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 19:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Jo, die Kategotie war Quatsch. Grüße Jahobr (talk) 17:29, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller!Edit

Hi Jahobr,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.


English | മലയാളം | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

--Steinsplitter (talk) 10:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Verloren in den Tiefen der Film-ErstellungEdit

Hi, Jahobr, magst Du mir helfen, nachdem ich schon viele Tage lang ohne Erfolg versuche, ein Filmchen über eine schwingende Saite in den Artikel "Saitenschwingung" einzubauen?
Ich habe deinen Film über eine schwingende Spiralfeder in [[1]] gefunden. So etwas will ich auch mit einer schwingenden Saite machen. Den Film habe ich mit dem Grapher, Version 2.5 (46), und mit QuickTime 10.4 (891) (Mac OS 10.12.1, Sierra) in ein .mov konvertiert, dann mit "Wondershare Video Converter Ultimate" in ein .ogv gewandelt und in die Commons hinaufgeladen. Wie Du hier [[2]] siehst, hat QuickTime einen Film erstellt, der von einer riesigen schwarzen Fläche begleitet ist, die ich nicht weg bekomme. Jetzt meine Frage: mit welchem Programm hast Du den Film über die Schwingung der Spiralfeder gemacht, gibt's das auch für den Apple? Anjolo (talk) 19:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Entschuldige, bitte, Jahobar, ich glaube ich bin völlig falsch bei Dir gelandet. Der Film, den ich oben meinte, stammt von Debenben--Anjolo (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Epicyclic Gearing.svgEdit

Hallo Jahobr,

Danke für deinen Input bei File:Epicyclic Gearing.svg. Ich habe so eben eine korrigierte Version hochgeladen.

-- MichaelFrey (talk) 03:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Top. --Jahobr (talk) 07:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Why tell me why?Edit

Ciao m(r)s Jahobr, Please give me one good reason to rollback a wee edit of mine regarding the fistBump. Only little thing I performed has been addig a category. Is not allowed and if so where it's written? Remember Assume Good Faith! You seem to be one of those people (let's call the deletionists who seem not to understand this part of our constitution. I'm thinking of an amendment ;-D
 Klaas `Z4␟` V:  10:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

You added "Handshake" to a image without a visible handshake. The image shows a "Fist bump", and it already has the category "Fist bumps". It is very simple: you added a wrong category, and I correcte your mistake. Greetings --Jahobr (talk) 11:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Ok, thank you. Sorry for having been so extremely stupid to add a superfluous cat as the Brits and A,ericans do on Wikipedia. I thought I can do this here too. Apparently not according to ppl like you. I am very sorry to do very wrong things that need correction. I should have known better. Befehl ist Befehl vero?  Klaas `Z4␟` V:  15:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC) please forgive for I am a sinner.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Tusi coupleEdit

Ich habe Deine schöne Animation hier eingefügt. Wäre es möglich eine Version zu erstellen, bei der die Ellipsen "quer" liegen ? Das würde besser zum ganzen Artikel passen. --Ag2gaeh (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Ich hab mich an File:Trammel of Archimedes.gif orientiert. Ich kann aber ohne Probleme eine Version machen. Passiert später heute Abend. --Jahobr (talk) 16:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Erledigt. --Jahobr (talk) 21:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Danke !--Ag2gaeh (talk) 06:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Prima, danke für die Farben!--Ag2gaeh (talk) 09:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 
Ellipsenkonstruktion: abgeknickter Papierstreifen

Du kannst so wunderbare Animationen machen. Ginge das vielleicht auch für die in dem Bild beschriebene Methode ? --Ag2gaeh (talk) 13:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Danke. Jo, dass sollte sich relativ einfach aus den besteheden Elementen zusammenstöpseln lassen. Ich guck mir das heute Abend mal an. --Jahobr
Ich hab mal was gebastelt. Farben und Design lassen sich ändern. Neben den "inneren Ellipsen" (Papierstreifen-Stil) kann man natürlich auch "äußere Ellipsen" erstellen (Trammel-of-Archimedes-Stil). Keine Ahnung ob das für dich relevant ist. --Jahobr (talk) 22:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Klasse ! Ich habe die erste und dritte Animation in "Ellipsen zeichnen" eingefügt. Ich hatte leider erst heute bemerkt, dass Du prompt geliefert hattest. Danke ! Vielleicht könntest Du für die ruckelige Animation der 2. Papierstreifenmethode auch eine bessere Animation erstellen. --Ag2gaeh (talk) 07:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Dafür gäbe es unter Category:Trammel of Archimedes bzw Ellipsograph des Archimedes schon einiges. Wenn da nichts dabei ist, musst du etwas genauer sagen was du suchst. Jahobr (talk) 10:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Asymmetric Epicyclic GearingEdit

Hallo Jahobr, Du hast ein Bild eines Planetenradsatzes angefertig mit Planetenrädern unterschiedlicher Zähnezahl. Ich hab so etwas noch nie gesehen, hat das irgendeine praktische Anwendung? FlyMetalBird (talk) 12:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Nein, nicht, dass ich wüsste. Allerdings habe ich aber auch nicht sehr lange recherchiert. Ich habe Skizzen gesehen, und die Animationen gemacht, weil mich das Konzept interessiert hat.--Jahobr (talk) 17:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
@FlyMetalBird: Ich hab das hier gefunden: https://data.epo.org/publication-server/rest/v1.0/publication-dates/20091202/patents/EP2128490NWA2/document.html Grüße Jahobr (talk) 12:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für die Info. Das werde ich mir bei Gelegenheit näher anschauen. FlyMetalBird (talk) 05:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dragon Curve unfolding zoom numbered.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Unnecessarily complicated gears a.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ManualTransmissionAnimation.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Zdjęcia, szablony?Edit

1. File:8 Dywizja Piechoty 2 Armii Wojska Polskiego.jpg

Ten plik powyżej jest własnością publiczną w kraju pochodzenia oraz w państwach i na obszarach, gdzie prawo autorskie wygasa 70 lat po śmierci autora. Jego źródło to Muzeum Archeologiczno-Historyczne w Stargardzie, autor jest nieznany. W czym jest problem, jeżeli prawa wygasły 70 lat po śmierci autora?

GOOGLE TRANSLATE: This file above is publicly owned in the country of origin and in countries and areas where copyright expires 70 years after the author's death. Its source is the Archaeological and Historical Museum in Stargard, the author is unknown. What is the problem if the rights expired 70 years after the author's death?
There is no proof that the author is dead since 70 years. Please provide some proof of that. Otherwise I recommend the "150-year-rule": I assume the author was 15 years old when the image was made. He died at age 95. (80Years + 70Years = 150Years). The image was taken in 1944, so we can be sure it is PD in 2094. --Jahobr
    tłumacz Google: Nie ma dowodu, że autor nie żyje od 70 lat. Proszę o dostarczenie dowodu na to. W przeciwnym razie zalecam "regułę 150 lat": zakładam, że autor miał 15 lat, kiedy powstał obraz. Zmarł w wieku 95 lat (80 lat + 70 lat = 150 lat). Obraz został zrobiony w 1944 roku, więc możemy być pewni, że to PD w 2094 roku. --Jahobr


2. File:Schemat działania 12 Ruchomego Szpitala Chirurgicznego.jpg

Jest to schemat, który osobiście był opracowany, rozrysowany i wykonane zostało zdjęcie moim aparatem. O co więc chodzi. To jest praca mojego autorstwa i ja jestem wyłącznym jego autorem praw autorskich!!!

GOOGLE TRANSLATE: It is a scheme that was personally developed, drawn and made a photo with my camera. So what's going on? This is my work and I am the sole author of copyright !!!
You did not draw the map (see COM:DW). You can: 1. provide proof that the map is free. 2: use a free map as base (see Category:Maps of Poland). 3: draw a own map. --Jahobr
   tłumacz Google :Nie narysowałeś mapy (patrz COM: DW). Możesz: 1. udowodnić, że mapa jest darmowa. 2: użyj darmowej mapy jako bazy (patrz Kategoria: Mapy Polski). 3: narysuj własną mapę. --Jahobr


3. File:Operacja Łużycka 16-17.04. 1945.jpg

Jest to schemat, który osobiście był opracowany, rozrysowany i wykonane zostało zdjęcie moim aparatem. O co więc chodzi. To jest praca mojego autorstwa i ja jestem wyłącznym jego autorem praw autorskich!!!

GOOGLE TRANSLATE: It is a scheme that was personally developed, drawn and made a photo with my camera. So what's going on? This is my work and I am the sole author of copyright !!!
see 2. --Jahobr

4. File:Szkic przełamania obrony nad Nysą Łużycką przez związki 2 Armii WP.jpg

Jest to schemat, który osobiście był opracowany w latach 80-tych, rozrysowany i wykonane zostało zdjęcie moim aparatem. O co więc chodzi??? To jest praca mojego autorstwa i ja jestem wyłącznym jego autorem praw autorskich!!!

GOOGLE TRANSLATE: This is a scheme that was personally developed in the 80s, drawn and made with my camera. So what's going on? This is my work and I am the sole author of copyright !!!
see 2. --Jahobr

5. File:Szkic działania wojsk 1 i 2 Armii WP oraz 1 Korpusu Pancernego.jpg

Jest to schemat, który osobiście był opracowany w latach 80-tych, rozrysowany i wykonane zostało zdjęcie moim aparatem. O co więc chodzi??? To jest praca mojego autorstwa i ja jestem wyłącznym jego autorem praw autorskich!!! Co mam jeszcze dodać, jeżeli praca jest mojego autorstwa?!

GOOGLE TRANSLATE: This is a scheme that was personally developed in the 80s, drawn and made with my camera. So what's going on? This is my work and I am the sole author of copyright !!! What else should I add if the work is my authorship ?!
see 2. --Jahobr

6. File:Budowo, 1972r. Skot dowódczy 8br, w tle jednostka.jpg

Jest to zdjęcie mojego autorstwa, wykonane w 1972 z Budowa, gdy wykonywałem służbę wojskową w tej jednostce, zdjęcie wykonane zostało moim aparatem, wtedy miałem ponad 20 lat, teraz ponad 70!!! O co więc chodzi??? To jest praca mojego autorstwa i ja jestem wyłącznym jego autorem praw autorskich!!! Co mam jeszcze dodać do opisu fotografii?, by nie było wątpliwości???!!!,żę praca jest mojego autorstwa?!

GOOGLE TRANSLATE: This is a photo of me, made in 1972 with Construction, when I was doing military service in this unit, the photo was taken with my camera, then I was over 20 years old, now over 70 !!! So what's going on? This is my work and I am the sole author of copyright !!! What else should I add to the description of photography? There would be no doubt ??? !!!, that the work is my authorship ?!
I retracted this one --Jahobr
    tłumacz Google: Wciągnąłem ten --Jahobr


7. File:Certyfikat.jpg

Certyfikat został mi przedstawiony przez dyrekcję szpitala i osobiście swoim aparatem wykonałem zdjęcie! W czym rzecz? Praca jest mojego autorstwa i mam do niego prawa autorskie, wyłącznie dla mnie!!!

GOOGLE TRANSLATE: The certificate was presented to me by the director of the hospital and I personally took my photo with my camera! What's the matter? The work is my authorship and I have copyrights for it, exclusively for me !!!
The authors are people who work for TÜV-Nord. Not you. Photographing other peoples work does not make you the author. You must provide permission by TÜV-Nord --Jahobr
    tłumacz Google: Autorami są ludzie, którzy pracują dla TÜV-Nord. Nie ty. Fotografowanie pracy innych ludzi nie czyni z ciebie autora. Musisz wyrazić zgodę TÜV-Nord --Jahobr


8. File:Dziennik Stargardzki, 5-8.01.2018 fot. W.Keres.jpg

W opisie do zdjęć jest w szablonie:cyt.: 'że brakuje zezwolenia do tej grafiki. Podano autora i źródło, ale nie ma żadnego dowodu, że autor udzielił zezwolenia na daną licencję. Proszę dostarczyć link do strony z wyraźnym pozwoleniem. W przypadku braku takiej strony poproś właściciela praw autorskich, aby wysłał maila z pozwoleniem na adres permissions-commons-pl@wikimedia.org.'

GOOGLE TRANSLATE: In the description of the pictures is in the template: quot: 'that there is no permission for this graphic. Author and source are given, but there is no proof that the author has granted permission for the license. Please provide a link to the site with express permission. In the absence of such a page, ask the copyright owner to send an email with the permission to the address permissions-commons-en@wikimedia.org. '
The authors are the journalists who made the Newspaper. Not you. Photographing other peoples work does not make you the author. --Jahobr
    Autorzy są dziennikarzami, którzy stworzyli gazetę. Nie ty. Fotografowanie pracy innych ludzi nie czyni z ciebie autora. --Jahobr

Nie mam potrzeby nikogo prosić, bo Praca jest mojego autorstwa!!! Jestem właścicielem praw autorskich tego zdjęcia, które zostało wykonane moim aparatem samsung SM-G935F w dniu 19 stycznia 2018, 12:51:01. Piszę w języku polskim bo takim operuję na wikipedii.

GOOGLE TRANSLATE: I have no need to ask anyone, because the work is my own !!! I am the copyright owner of this photo that was taken with my Samsung SM-G935F on January 19, 2018, 12:51:01. I write in Polish because I use it in wikipedia.

Proszę o pilne sprostowanie sprawy i usunięcie szablonów, gdyż jestem właścicielem praw autorskich do oszablonowanych plików! Pozdrawiam.--Keres40 (dyskusja) 17:14, 25 sty 2018 (CET)

GOOGLE TRANSLATE: I am asking for urgent rectification and deletion of templates, as I am the copyright owner of the duplicated files! Regards

Use TeX?Edit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | +/−


 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons talk:WikiProject Chemistry#“Use TeX” by Jahobr. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:15, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Gearbox_4gears_sequential.gifEdit

Hi Jahobr, I admire the simplicity and clarity of your gearbox animations. As you saw, I went ahead and made a crude animation of a sequential gearbox based on your 4-speed animation. Thank you for your kind words regarding my efforts.
I do regret not taking the time to show some kind of ratchet mechanism to rotate the cam. If I ever decide to fix it, I will gladly accept your offer of original source data.
XyKyWyKy (talk) 01:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Archimedean spiralEdit

Hi Jahobr,

I love the spirals withe the cogs. Specifically with the Archimedean Spiral animation with Gears positive and negative.gif do you know if it is possible to see these spirals in 3 dimension both moving 'up' or in the same 3rd dimensional direction?

thank you

best, Abigail —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.71.98.178 (talk) 20:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. You mean like this? Greetings. --Jahobr (talk) 21:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wikipedia logo puzzle globe spins horizontally, revealing the contents of all of its puzzle pieces.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wikipedia logo puzzle globe spins vertically, revealing the contents of all of its puzzle pieces.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bicycle pedal animation.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Jahobr".