Open main menu

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jdx.

This is the user talk page of Jdx, where you can send messages and comments to Jdx.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.
Puzzle x template.gif
If you leave a message here, I will answer it here. So check back later.
If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there. I will watch your page and reply as soon as I can.

Contents

New and correct version of File:Coat of arms of Bolivia.svg

Ciao JDX,

As results of further research, I came to believe that the current Bolivian Coat of arms >>   is wrong.

The evidence is the official Bolivian coat of arms >>   from web site Ministerio de la presidencia de la Republica de Bolivia. See also (for better particulars): Gaceta Oficial.

According to this new and correct coat of arms, I made the new related svg version (for flags and coat of arms), listed below:

It is possible (please) overwrite the files abovementioned over the following:

My new versions, as shown by evidences, are more right than current versions.

Ciao and thank you!

P.S.: warning, my versions are different compared to user-vandal Tio Dari's old versions and should not be confused with the old versions! My svg design for "condor" (for example) is more elegant, the script "Bolivia" uses font Dejavu supported by commons >> png image=svg image (old version: Bitstream, not supported). Finally, my svg image details are more accurate than old versions.

User talk:FDRMRZUSA (18 April 2019; 15,45 UTC+1).

Breaking news: restored yesterday old version of Bolivian coat of arms. But this old version presents a bit of a problem:
  • 1: the script "BOLIVIA" in the shield uses font "Bitstream" not supported, as a result the png image not = svg image (verify please);
  • 2: the condor size is disproportionate (too big) to the shield (see official Bolivian coat of arms above);
  • 3: the coat of arms design, in particular the condor design is not excellent;


>> My new versions, as shown by evidences, are more right than current versions and have an design improved.

Ciao Jan and HAPPY EASTER!!!!

User talk:FDRMRZUSA (21 April 2019; 16,30 UTC+1).

Requested updates to protected images

Hello. I have posted some requests related to flags on the request. However, there has been no recent response, and some of these have been pushed for more than a month. Please carefully review and upload the files you requested. For reference, I have once again asked for something that someone else has already posted about the flag of Bolivia. --Tcfc2349 (talk) 11:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Deira Clock Tower.jpg

 
File:Deira Clock Tower.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ras67 (talk) 15:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Commons:History_merging_and_splitting/Requests#Workaround_→_FlowRoot-SVG

  1. Thanks for merging
  2. can you please check if I merged correctly, or if I forgot something (I'm a new admin)
  3. If I want to merge files, can I just do it, or should I announce it on Commons:History_merging_and_splitting/Requests or ask a second one (one person can easily be wrong)

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 19:43, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

2. @JoKalliauer: File:Bayesian Calculus Summary.svg doesn't seem to be fully fixed – overlapping texts. Do File:2016 Angola and DR Congo yellow fever outbreak.svg and File:Mt Etna system cross section.svg still contain errors? W3C validator doesn't complain about them.
3. I haven't seen any recommendation that assistance of a second person or announcement on COM:HMS is needed. So just do it.
--jdx Re: 08:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
2a) File:Bayesian Calculus Summary.svg I originally just fixed the rendering-bug, but I did not change the content, but now I changed the overlapping text.
2b) File:2016 Angola and DR Congo yellow fever outbreak.svg and File:Mt Etna system cross section.svg are both marked as valid? Therfore I do not understand your question. Maybe you mean {{Rsvg bug}}, but validation is independent on bugs. And the option is overwritten (?o=) with a workaround.
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Jdx".