Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dampremy - Chapelle Saint-Ghislain - 2014-10-04 - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Strong vertical distortion - could you fix that? --PtrQs 01:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
  Done--Jmh2o 20:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
OK now. --PtrQs 01:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Petit Bitu - 1983.jpgEdit

 
File:Petit Bitu - 1983.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 15:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dampremy - monument aux morts 1914-1918 - la Semeuse - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:45, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bois du Cazier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - église Saint-Christophe - coupole - saint Marc - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - église Saint-Christophe - coupole - saint Mathieu - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - église Saint-Christophe - coupole - saint Jean - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruxelles - Mont des Arts - Darville - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:32, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - monument Paul Pastur - 2020-02 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - monument Paul Pastur - 2020-02 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 18:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove deletion requestsEdit

Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Nederlands (informeel) |polski | português | русский | svenska | українська | +/−


 
Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

--Sealle (talk) 06:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC) @Sealle: ok. --H2O(talk) 07:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Catégorie streets and squaresEdit

Salut à toi,

Quand tu crées une catégorie du type "Streets and squares in /ville/" est-ce que tu peux mettre également une redirection depuis "Streets in /ville/", nom de catégorie également très utilisée, ça facilite le travail après pour ajouter des rues aux villes.

Amicalement,

Ldgdps (talk) 01:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ldgdps: bonjour. Ma difficulté viens que la commune/ville, c'est Charleroi fusionné = Category:Streets in Charleroi. Quand j'ai créé des catégories pour les rues des sections, j'avais un doublon pour la section Charleroi (ancienne commune) par rapport à Charleroi (commune fusionnée). Et une redirection ne changerais rien quant à ce doublon. Je suis preneur d'une solution qui puisse garder cette cohérence. Si tu as des idées. Bien à toi. --H2O(talk) 11:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Un idée : renommer toutes les catégories "Streets and squares in /ville/" en "Streets in /ville/" et renommé la catégorie Category:Streets in Charleroi actuelles en "Streets and squares in Charleroi". Donc inverser le nom d'une catégorie mère et d'une catégorie fille. Ou un autre nom cohérent pour la catégorie mère. Qu'un penses-tu ? --H2O(talk) 11:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
J'ai regardé comment c'était pour les autres villes, et j'ai procédé à un renommages de "Streets and squares in /ville/" en "Streets in /ville/". --H2O(talk) 18:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Salut,
La différenciation streets and squares n'est pas toujours utile, par streets on regroupe tout en général ruelle rue place avenue boulevard.
Sur les autres commune je fais ainsi : Streets in commune (ex. Charleroi) - avec toutes les rues et places et les sous-catégories Streets in "section de commune".
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Streets_in_Binche
Ldgdps (talk) 19:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Bonjour @Ldgdps: c'est finalement ce que j'ai fait. --H2O(talk) 20:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Ok ça marche.
Ldgdps (talk) 20:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Merci. Comme tu vois, je me suis beaucoup promené dans la ville. En attendant les jours meilleurs pour compléter la photothèque. --H2O(talk) 20:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi Communal Cemetery - Visitor's book - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 03:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Thy-Marcinelle - 2016-09-10 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Don't you think it's too dark? --Podzemnik 02:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I have reduced the foreground shade to bring out a few details. Is it better ? --Jmh2o 11:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
  Support Isn't a different pictures now? Good though --Podzemnik 00:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - rue de Montigny 114 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 03:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - rue de Montigny 114 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 03:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - rue de Montigny 114 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare du Sud de Charleroi - 2016-07-10 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Shame about that wire. --Peulle 12:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare du Sud de Charleroi - 2016-07-10 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - monument Paul Pastur - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - 2019-08-24 - 01 - quai Paul Verlaine et quai Arthur Rimbaud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 00:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - 2019-08-24 - 02 - quai Arthur Rimbaud et Quai 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 00:23, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - 2019-08-24 - 05 - quai Arthur Rimbaud et quai de Sambre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 08:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - 2019-08-24 - 03 - quai Arthur Rimbaud et Quai 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 06:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
  Done --Jmh2o 09:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Fêtes de Wallonie - Messe en wallon - 2015 - Flanqueurs de la garde de Beignée - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 22:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Square Jules Hiernaux - 2020-05-09 - COVID-19 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 08:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi- Grand-Rue 100 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support GQ --Palauenc05 06:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - caserne Trésignies - 2020-06-23 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Hwwo 18:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - caserne Trésignies - 2020-06-23 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Hwwo 18:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - maison Lafleur - 2020 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. A little bit soft, but good light emphasizing all details. --Aristeas 06:57, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Darville - monument à Jules Destrée - 2020-07-06 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:38, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Plan des "tenures d'eau" qui se trouvent à Dampremy, entre la Buchère et Charleroi (1688).jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Plan des "tenures d'eau" qui se trouvent à Dampremy, entre la Buchère et Charleroi (1688).jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Plan des "tenures d'eau" qui se trouvent à Dampremy, entre la Buchère et Charleroi (1688).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - boulevard Jacques Bertrand 58-62 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Beffroi vu de la rue Neuve - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:46, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Rue de Dampremy - été 2020 - couleurs et ombres - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Beffroi vu de la rue Montal - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Beffroi vu de la place du Manège - 2020-08-01 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality IMO, a description and a caption in English will be wellcome on the page of the image.--PJDespa 18:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - Palais provincial - Robert Delnest - L'Industrie - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --PJDespa 19:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - Palais provincial - Robert Delnest - L'Agriculture - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - pont roi Baudouin - 02 - garde corps Art déco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

It would benefit from a perspective correction --Poco a poco 09:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  Done but object is not realy vertical everywere. --Jmh2o 10:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Pont Roi Baudouin - été 2020 - ombres - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - A la tête saint Jean - enseigne - 2020-06-29 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - Beffroi - 2020-07 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - Beffroi - 2020-07 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - David Mesguich - Lucie et les papillons - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - David Mesguich - Lucie et les papillons - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - David Mesguich - Lucie et les papillons - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - David Mesguich - Lucie et les papillons - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 August 2020 (UTC)